This paper reviews an embodied or experientialist view of conceptual understanding. It focuses on George Lakoff and Mark Johnson’s theory of embodied cognition and its framing of human conceptualization and reasoning in terms of embodied imagination. These ideas are summarized as ten basic claims: (a) objectivist assumptions are problematic; (b) many human categories have non-classical structure; (c) conceptual systems consist of cognitive models; (d) thinking utilizes frames, metonymies, and prototypes; (e) metaphor is prevalent and primarily conceptual; (f) image schemas structure our experiences; (g) the mind is embodied; (h) abstract thought is largely metaphorical; (i) truth is relative to embodied understanding; and (j) philosophy should be empirically responsible. Lakoff and Johnson’s theory of embodied cognition offers a view of conceptual understanding that is cognitively realistic (or empirically responsible), biologically plausible, and self-critical, while providing adequate theories of meaning and truth grounded in embodied experience.
BarsalouL. W. (2020). Challenges and opportunities for grounding cognition. Journal of Cognition, 3(1), 31. https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.116
3.
BorghiA. M. (2020). A future of words: Language and the challenge of abstract concepts. Journal of Cognition, 3(1), 42. https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.134
4.
BrunerJ. (1990). Acts of meaning, Harvard University Press.
5.
ChemeroA. (2013). Radical embodied cognitive science. Review of General Psychology, 17(2), 145–150. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032923
6.
ClarkA. (2011). Supersizing the mind: Embodiment, action, and cognitive extension, Oxford University Press.
7.
DamasioA. (1994). Descartes’ error: Emotion, reason, and the human brain, Grosset/Putnam.
8.
DanzigerK. (1997). Naming the mind: How psychology found its language, Sage.
9.
DeweyJ. (1925). Experience and nature, Open Court.
10.
DeweyJ. (1938). Logic: The theory of inquiry, Henry Holt.
GalleseV.LakoffG. (2005). The brain’s concepts: The role of the sensory-motor system in conceptual knowledge. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 22(3), 455–479. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643290442000310
16.
GardnerH. (1985). The mind’s new science: A history of the cognitive revolution, Basic Books.
17.
GibbsR. W.Jr. (2005). Embodiment and cognitive science, Cambridge University Press.
GibbsJr.R. W. (Ed.), (2008). The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought, Cambridge University Press.
20.
GibsonJ. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception, Houghton Mifflin.
21.
GlenbergA. M. (2015). Few believe the world is flat: How embodiment is changing the scientific understanding of cognition. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69(2), 165–171. https://doi.org/10.1037/cep0000056
22.
GlenbergA. M.KaschakM. P. (2002). Grounding language in action. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9(3), 558–565. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196313
JamesW. (1890). The principles of psychology, Henry Holt.
27.
JirakD.MenzM. M.BuccinoG.BorghiA. M.BinkofskiF. (2010). Grasping language – a short story on embodiment. Consciousness and Cognition, 19(3), 711–720. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2010.06.020
28.
JohnsonM. (1987). The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason, University of Chicago Press.
29.
JohnsonM. (1993). Moral imagination: Implications of cognitive science for ethics, University of Chicago Press.
30.
JohnsonM. (2007). The meaning of the body: Aesthetics of human understanding, University of Chicago Press.
31.
JohnsonM. (2017). Embodied mind, meaning, and reason: How our bodies give rise to understanding, University of Chicago Press.
Johnson-LairdP. A. (1988). The computer and the mind: An introduction to cognitive science, Harvard University Press.
34.
LakoffG. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things: What our categories reveal about the mind, University of Chicago Press.
35.
LakoffG.The Rockridge Institute. (2006). Thinking points: Communicating our American values and vision, Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
36.
LakoffG. (2008a). The neural theory of metaphor. In GibbsR. W. (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 17–38), Cambridge University Press.
37.
LakoffG. (2008b). The political mind: Why you can’t understand 21st-century politics with an 18th-century brain, Viking.
38.
LakoffG. (2016). Moral politics: How liberals and conservatives think (3rd ed.), University of Chicago Press.
39.
LakoffG.JohnsonM. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought, Basic Books.
40.
LakoffG.JohnsonM. (2003). Metaphors we live by (updated ed.), University of Chicago Press.
41.
LakoffG.NúñezR. E. (2000). Where mathematics comes from: How the embodied mind brings mathematics into being, Basic Books.
42.
LakoffG.TurnerM. (1989). More than cool reason: A field-guide to poetic metaphor, University of Chicago Press.
43.
LeungA. K.-Y.QiuL.OngL.TamK. (2011). Embodied cultural cognition: Situating the study of embodied cognition in socio-cultural contexts. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 5(9), 591–608. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2011.00373.x
44.
MahonB. Z. (2015a). The burden of embodied cognition. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69(2), 172–178. https://doi.org/10.1037/cep000060
McGloneM. S. (2011). Hyperbole, homunculi, and hindsight bias: An alternative evaluation of conceptual metaphor theory. Discourse Processes, 48(8), 563–574. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853x.2011.606104
NiedenthalP. M.BarsalouL. W.WinkielmanP.Krauth-GruberS.RicF. (2005). Embodiment in attitudes, social perception, and emotion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9(3), 184–211. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0903_1
ThelenE.SchönerG.ScheierC.SmithL. B. (2001). The dynamics of embodiment: A field theory of infant perseverative reaching. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x01003910
TverskyA.KahnemanD. (1986). Rational choice and the framing of decisions. Journal of Business, 59(S4), S251–S278. https://doi.org/10.1086/296365
57.
VarelaF. J.ThompsonE.RoschE. (1991). The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience, MIT Press.
58.
VervaekeJ.GreenC. D. (1997). Women, fire, and dangerous theories: A critique of Lakoff’s theory of categorization. Metaphor and Symbol, 12(1), 59–80. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327868ms1201_5
VygotskyL. S. (1978). In ColeM.John-SteinerV.ScribnerS.SoubermanE. (eds), Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes, Harvard University Press.
61.
VygotskyL. S. (1986). In KozulinA. (Ed.), Thought and language. Harvard University Press.
62.
WatsonJ. B. (1913). Psychology as the behaviorist views it. Psychological Review, 20(2), 158–177. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0074428
ZwaanR. A. (2021). Two challenges to “embodied cognition” research and how to overcome them. Journal of Cognition, 4(1), 14. https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.151
