Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Thibodeau (2022) offers a thoughtful critique of my article (Keefer, 2022), attempting to bridge literatures on conceptual metaphor theory (CMT) and Lacan’s theory of metaphor. In this response, I specifically address issues about the extent to which cognitivist alternatives are able to effectively address concerns about the reductiveness of metaphors in CMT. My view is that these approaches either make untenable assumptions about semantic value or are better articulated in a Lacanian structuralism about language. Contra Thibodeau, I believe that a psychoanalytic approach to studying metaphor can be scientific, but that its methods must better capture the complexity of metaphoric thought. I close by addressing the Lacanian unconscious and pose the need for cognitive models of metaphor to better grapple with the intersubjective transmission of metaphor and motive.

Keywords

conceptual metaphor Lacan language metaphor psychoanalysis

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Corneille

Hütter

(2020). Implicit? What do you mean? A comprehensive review of the delusive implicitness construct in attitude research. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 24(3), 212–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868320911325

Fink

(2004). Lacan to the letter. University of Minnesota Press.

Gillett

(2010). Signification and the unconscious. Philosophical Psychology, 14(4), 477–498. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515080120088120

Heck

D. W.

Boehm

Böing-Messing

Bürkner

P.-C.

Derks

Dienes

Karimova

Kiers

H. A. L.

Klugkist

Kuiper

R. M.

Lee

M. D.

Leenders

Leplaa

H. J.

Linde

Meijerink-Bosman

Moerbeek

, . . . Hoijtink

(2022). A review of applications of the Bayes factor in psychological research. Psychological Methods. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000454

Holyoak

K. J.

Thagard

(1994). Mental leaps: Analogy in creative thought. MIT Press.

Kallestrup

(2011). Semantic externalism. Routledge.

Keefer

L. A.

(2022). Whose metaphor? Rethinking conceptual metaphor in Lacanian terms. Theory & Psychology, 32(5), 789–807. https://doi.org/10.1177/09593543221095471

McNamara

T. P.

Altarriba

(1988). Depth of spreading activation revisited: Semantic mediated priming occurs in lexical decisions. Journal of Memory and Language, 27(5), 545–559. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(88)90025-3

Parker

Pavón-Cuéllar

(2014). Lacan, discourse, event: New psychoanalytic approaches to textual indeterminacy. Routledge.

10.

Putnam

(1975). The meaning of “meaning”. In Gunderson

(Ed.), Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science: Vol. 7. Language, mind, and knowledge (pp. 131–193). University of Minnesota Press.

11.

Raskin

J. D.

(2002). Constructivism in psychology: Personal construct psychology, radical constructivism, and social constructionism. In Raskin

J. D.

Bridges

S. K.

(Eds.), Studies in meaning: Exploring constructivist psychology (pp. 1–25). Pace University Press.

12.

Schimmack

Heene

Kesavan

(2017, February 2). Reconstruction of a train wreck: How priming research went off the rails. Replicability-Index. https://replicationindex.com/2017/02/02/reconstruction-of-a-train-wreck-how-priming-research-went-of-the-rails/

13.

Thibodeau

P. H.

(2022). Metaphor and the scientific method: Why Lacan’s perspective isn’t helpful yet. Theory & Psychology, 32(5), 808–813. https://doi.org/10.1177/09593543221107581

Chasing complexity in metaphor research: A response to Thibodeau (2022)

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References