Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) assessments are designed to reflect a patient's perspective of how a disease has affected their overall health status. Patient-centered outcomes are of value both for risk assessment and as an outcome measure. Strategies for analyzing HRQOL data are inconsistent primarily because the data frequently do not meet underlying assumptions of traditional methods for statistical analyses and require a careful analytic approach.
Spertus JA, Jones P., McDonell M., Fan V., Fihn SDHealth status predicts long-term outcome in outpatients with coronary disease . Circulation. 2002;106:43-49.
2.
Pocock SJ, Henderson RA, Seed P., Treasure T., Hampton JRQuality of life, employment status, and anginal symptoms after coronary angioplasty or bypass surgery: 3-year follow-up in the Randomized Intervention Treatment of Angina (RITA) trial. Circulation. 1996;94:135-142.
3.
Rumsfeld JSHealth status and clinical practice: when will they meet? Circulation. 2002;106:5-7.
4.
Rumsfeld JSValve surgery in the elderly: question of quality (of life)? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;42:1215-1217.
5.
Institute of Medicine.Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2001 .
6.
Curtis LH, Phelps CE, McDermott MP, Rubin HRThe value of patient-reported health status in predicting short-term outcomes after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Med Care . 2002;40:1090-1100.
7.
Rumsfeld JS, MaWhinney S., McCarthy M. Jr, et al. Health-related quality of life as a predictor of mortality following coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Participants of the Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group on Processes, Structures, and Outcomes of Care in Cardiac Surgery. JAMA. 1999;281:1298-1303.
8.
Koch CG, Li L., Lauer M., Sabik J., Starr NJ, Blackstone EHEffect of functional health-related quality of life on long-term survival after cardiac surgery. Circulation. 2007;115:692-699.
9.
Fayers PM, Machin D.Quality of Life Assessment, Analysis, and Interpretation. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley; 2000.
10.
Staquet MJ, Hayes R., Fayers PMQuality of Life Assessment in Clinical Trials: Methods and Practice . Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 1998.
11.
Blackstone EHNeurologic injury from cardiac surgery: an important but enormously complex phenomenon. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2000;120:629-631.
12.
Maliwa MA, van der Heijden GJ, Bots ML, et al. Quality of life and NYHA class 30 years after mechanical aortic valve replacement. Cardiovasc Surg. 2003;11:381-387.
13.
Jarvinen O. , Saarinen T., Julkunen J., Huhtala H., Tarkka MRChanges in health-related quality of life and functional capacity following coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2003;24:750-756.
14.
Welke KF, Stevens JP, Schults WC, Nelson EC, Beggs VL, Nugent WCPatient characteristics can predict improvement in functional health after elective coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg . 2003;75:1849-1855.
15.
Rumsfeld JS , Magid DJ, O'Brien M., et al. Changes in health-related quality of life following coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Ann Thorac Surg.2001;72: 2026-2032.
16.
Sjoland H., Wiklund I., Caidahl K., Hartford M., Karlsson T., Herlitz J.Improvement in quality of life differs between women and men after coronary artery bypass surgery. J Intern Med. 1999;245:445-454.
17.
Colak Z., Segotic I., Uzun S., Mazar M., Ivancan V., Majeric-Kogler V.Health related quality of life following cardiac surgery: correlation with EuroSCORE. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg.2008 ;33:72-76.
18.
Rumsfeld JS , Ho PM, Magid DJ, et al. Predictors of health-related quality of life after coronary artery bypass surgery. Ann Thorac Surg . 2004;77:1508-1513.
19.
Elliott D., Lazarus R., Leeder SRHealth outcomes of patients undergoing cardiac surgery: repeated measures using Short Form-36 and 15 Dimensions of Quality of Life questionnaire. Heart Lung. 2006;35:245-251.
20.
Ho PM, Masoudi FA, Peterson PN, et al. Health-related quality of life predicts mortality in older but not younger patients following cardiac surgery. Am J Geriatr Cardiol. 2005;14:176-182.
21.
Myles PS, Hunt JO, Fletcher H., Solly R., Woodward D., Kelly S.Relation between quality of recovery in hospital and quality of life at 3 months after cardiac surgery. Anesthesiology. 2001;95:862-867.
22.
Khan JH, McElhinney DB, Hall TS, Merrick SHCardiac valve surgery in octogenarians: improving quality of life and functional status. Arch Surg. 1998;133:887-893.
23.
Mayer C., Ergina P., Morin JF, Gold S.Self-reported functional status as a predictor of coronary artery bypass graft surgery outcome in elderly patients. Can J Cardiol. 2003;19:140-144.
24.
Inouye SK, Peduzzi PN, Robison JT, Hughes JS, Horwitz RI, Concato J.Importance of functional measures in predicting mortality among older hospitalized patients. JAMA. 1998;279:1187-1193.
25.
Rodriguez-Artalejo F., Guallar-Castillon P., Pascual CR, et al. Health-related quality of life as a predictor of hospital readmission and death among patients with heart failure. Arch Intern Med. 2005;165:1274-1279.
26.
Sedrakyan A. , Vaccarino V., Paltiel AD, et al. Age does not limit quality of life improvement in cardiac valve surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;42:1208-1214.
27.
Perchinsky M., Henderson C., Jamieson WR, et al. Quality of life in patients with bioprostheses and mechanical prostheses: evaluation of cohorts of patients aged 51 to 65 years at implantation. Circulation . 1998;98 (19 suppl):1181-1186,discussion II86-II87.
28.
Pupello DF, Bessone LN, Lopez E., et al. Long-term results of the bioprosthesis in elderly patients: impact on quality of life. Ann Thorac Surg.2001;71(5 suppl): S244-S248.
29.
Chocron S., Etievent JP, Viel JF, et al. Prospective study of quality of life before and after open heart operations. Ann Thorac Surg. 1996;61:153-157.
30.
Koch CG, Khandwala F., Estafanous FG, Loop FD, Blackstone EHImpact of prosthesis-patient size on functional recovery after aortic valve replacement. Circulation. 2005;111:3221-3229.
31.
Goldsmith IR , Lip GY, Patel RLA prospective study of changes in patients' quality of life after aortic valve replacement. J Heart Valve Dis. 2001;10:346-353.
32.
Notzold A., Huppe M., Schmidtke C., Blomer P., Uhlig T., Sievers HHQuality of life in aortic valve replacement: pulmonary autografts versus mechanical prostheses. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;37:1963-1966.
33.
Sundt TM, Bailey MS, Moon MR, et al. Quality of life after aortic valve replacement at the age of >80 years. Circulation. 2000;102(19 suppl 3):11170-11174.
34.
Fruitman DS, MacDougall CE, Ross DBCardiac surgery in octogenarians: can elderly patients benefit? Quality of life after cardiac surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 1999;68: 2129-2135.
35.
Olsson M., Janfjall H., Orth-Gomer K., Unden A., Rosenqvist M.Quality of life in octogenarians after valve replacement due to aortic stenosis: a prospective comparison with younger patients. Eur Heart J. 1996; 17:583-589.
36.
Herlitz J., Wiklund I., Caidahl K., et al. Determinants of an impaired quality of life five years after coronary artery bypass surgery. Heart. 1999 ;81:342-346.
37.
Shapira OM, Kelleher RM, Zelingher J., et al. Prognosis and quality of life after valve surgery in patients older than 75 years. Chest. 1997;112:885-894.
38.
Yamaguchi H. , Yamauchi H., Yamada T., Ariyoshi T., Takebayashi S.Quality of life in patients over 70 years of age after heart valve replacement. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2000;6:167-172.
39.
Chocron S., Rude N., Dussaucy A., et al. Quality of life after open-heart surgery in patients over 75 years old. Age Ageing. 1996;25:8-11.
40.
Levin IL, Olivecrona GK, Thulin LI, Olsson SBAortic valve replacement in patients older than 85 years: outcomes and the effect on their quality of life. Coron Artery Dis . 1998;9:373-380.
41.
Carey JS, Cukingnan RA, Singer LKHealth status after myocardial revascularization: inferior results in women . Ann Thorac Surg. 1995;59:112-117.
42.
Vaccarino V. , Lin ZQ, Kasl SV, et al. Gender differences in recovery after coronary artery bypass surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;41:307-314.
43.
Artinian NT , Duggan CHSex differences in patient recovery patterns after coronary artery bypass surgery. Heart Lung . 1995;24:483-494.
44.
Kirsch M., Guesnier L., LeBesnerais P., et al. Cardiac operations in octogenarians: perioperative risk factors for death and impaired autonomy. Ann Thorac Surg. 1998;66:60-67.
45.
Koch CG, Khandwala F., Cywinski JB, Ishwaran H., Estafanous FG, Loop FDHealth-related quality of life after coronary artery bypass grafting: a gender analysis using the Duke Activity Status Index. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2004;128:284-295.
46.
Ayanian JZ, Guadagnoli E., Cleary PDPhysical and psychosocial functioning of women and men after coronary artery bypass surgery. JAMA. 1995;274:1767-1770.
47.
Stewart RD, Blair JL, Emond CE, Lahey SJ, Levitsky S., Campos CTGender and functional outcome after coronary artery bypass. Surgery. 1999;126:184-190.
48.
Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CDThe MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30:473-483.
49.
Ware JE Jr.SF-36 health survey update. Spine. 2000; 25:3130-3139.
50.
Bergner M.Development, testing, and use of the Sickness Impact Profile. In: Walker SR, Rosser RM, eds. Quality of Life: Assessment and Application. Lancaster, UK: MTP Press; 1987:79-94.
Thurstone LLThe Measurement of Values. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1959.
53.
Hlatky MA, Boineau RE, Higginbotham MB, et al. A brief self-administered questionnaire to determine functional capacity (the Duke Activity Status Index). Am J Cardiol. 1989;64:651-654.
54.
Tukey JWExploratory Data Analysis. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley; 1977.
55.
Austin PC, Escobar M., Kopec JAThe use of the Tobit model for analyzing measures of health status . Qual Life Res. 2000;9:901-910.
56.
Vickers AJ, Altman DGStatistics notes: analysing controlled trials with baseline and follow up measurements. BMJ. 2001;323:1123-1124.
57.
Bland JM, Altman DGRegression towards the mean. BMJ. 1994;308:1499.
58.
Browne SM, Halligan PW, Wade DT, Taggart DPCognitive performance after cardiac operation: implications of regression toward the mean. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1999;117:481-485.
59.
Vickers AJThe use of percentage change from baseline as an outcome in a controlled trial is statistically inefficient: a simulation study. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2001;1:6.
Frison L., Pocock SJRepeated measures in clinical trials: analysis using mean summary statistics and its implications for design. Stat Med. 1992;11:1685-1704.
62.
Covinsky KE , Fortinsky RH, Palmer RM, Kresevic DM, Landefeld CSRelation between symptoms of depression and health status outcomes in acutely ill hospitalized older persons. Ann Intern Med. 1997;126:417-425.
63.
Ruo B., Rumsfeld JS, Hlatky MA, Liu H., Browner WS, Whooley MADepressive symptoms and health-related quality of life: the Heart and Soul Study. JAMA. 2003; 290:215-221.
64.
Stambler BS , Ellenbogen KA, Orav EJ, et al. Predictors and clinical impact of atrial fibrillation after pacemaker implantation in elderly patients treated with dual chamber versus ventricular pacing. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol . 2003;26:2000-2007.
65.
Sutcliffe N. , Clarke AE, Gordon C., Farewell V., Isenberg DAThe association of socio-economic status, race, psychosocial factors and outcome in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus . Rheumatology (Oxford). 1999;38: 1130-1137.
66.
Cox DR, Snell EJAnalysis of Binary Data. 2nd ed. London, UK: Chapman and Hall; 1990 .
Lall R., Campbell MJ, Walters SJ, Morgan K.A review of ordinal regression models applied on health-related quality of life assessments. Stat Methods Med Res. 2002 ;11:49-67.
69.
AJCC Cancer Staging Handbook/American Joint Committee on Cancer . 5th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott-Raven; 1998.
70.
Lachenbruch PAAnalysis of data with excess zeros. Stat Methods Med Res. 2002;11:303-316.
71.
Berk KN, Lachenbruch PARepeated measures with zeros. Stat Methods Med Res . 2002;11:303-316.
72.
Cox DR, Oakes D.Analysis of Survival Data. London, UK: Chapman and Hall;1984.
73.
Blackstone EH, Naftel DC, Turner ME Jr.The decomposition of time-varying hazard into phases, each incorporating a separate stream of concomitant information . J Am Stat Assoc. 1986;81:615-624.
74.
Diggle PJ, Heagerty PJ, Liang KY, Zeger SLAnalysis of Longitudinal Data. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press ; 2002.
75.
Heagerty PJ , Zeger SLMarginal regression models for clustered ordinal measurements. J Am Stat Assoc. 1996;93:150-162.
76.
Huang GH, Palta M., Allen C., LeCaire T., D'Alessio D.Self-rated health among young people with type 1 diabetes in relation to risk factors in a longitudinal study. Am J Epidemiol. 2004;159:364-372.
77.
Fairclough DLDesign and Analysis of Quality of Life Studies in Clinical Trials. New York, NY: Chapman & Hall; 2002.
78.
Verbeke G., Molenberghs G.Linear Mixed Models for Longitudinal Data. New York, NY : Springer-Verlag; 2000 .
79.
Little RJ, Rubin DBStatistical Analysis With Missing Data. New York, NY: John Wiley; 2002.
