This article presents a history of the study of motivation from approximately 1900-1975, focusing on achievement strivings and containing little-known and often surprising facts about the main contributors to this field. Four theorists are highlighted: David McClelland, Kurt Lewin, John Atkinson, and Fritz Heider, each associated with a different theoretical approach (respectively and in order of historical emergence: trait, Gestalt, expectancy/value, and attribution theory). A fifth conception, drive theory, is also represented. In addition, a number of individuals who influenced these theorists and others who followed them are discussed. The article emphasizes the interrelations between the theorists and the interaction between personal and scientific life.
AllportG. W. (1948). The genius of Kurt Lewin. Journal of Social Issues, 16, 14-21. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1948.tb01792.x
2.
AtkinsonJ. W. (1957). Motivational determinants of risk-taking behavior. Psychological Review, 64, 359-372. doi:10.1037/h0043445
3.
AtkinsonJ. W. (1964). An introduction to motivation. Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand.
4.
BuckleyK. W. (1989). Mechanical man: John Broadus Watson and the beginnings of behaviorism. New York, NY: Guilford.
5.
CohenD. (1979). J.B. Watson, the founder of behaviourism: A biography. London, England: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
6.
CronbachL. J. (1957). The two disciplines of scientific psychology. American Psychologist, 12, 671-684. doi:10.1037/h0043943
7.
DeAngelisT. (2012). Was “Little Albert” ill during the famed conditioning study?Monitor on Psychology, 43(3), 12-13.
8.
DouglasC. (1993). Translate this darkness: The life of Christiana Morgan. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
9.
FinlayS. W. (2000). Influence of Carl Jung and William James on the origin of Alcoholics Anonymous. Review of General Psychology, 4(1), 3-12. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.4.1.3
10.
GoinesD. (1993). The Free Speech Movement: Coming of age in the 1960s. Berkeley, CA: Ten-Speed Press.
11.
Harrower-EricksonM. R. (1942). Kurt Koffka:1886-1941. American Journal of Psychology, 55, 278-281.
12.
HeckhausenH. (1967). The anatomy of achievement motivation. New York, NY: Academic Press.
13.
HeiderF. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York, NY: John Wiley.
14.
HeiderF. (1959a). On Lewin’s methods and theory. Journal of Social Issues, 15, 3-13. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1959.tb02189.x
HeiderF. (1983). The life of a psychologist. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.
17.
HeiderF.SimmelM. (1944). An experimental study of apparent behavior. American Journal of Psychology, 57, 243-259. doi:10.2307/1416950
18.
HenleM. (1978). One man against the Nazis—Wolfgang Köhler. American Psychologist, 33, 939-944. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.33.10.939
19.
HofstadterR.MetzgerW. P. (1955). The development of academic freedom in the United States. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
20.
HoltE. B. (1931). Animal drive and the learning process: An essay toward radical empiricism. Vol. I. New York, NY: Holt.
21.
HovlandC. I. (1952). Clark Leonard Hull:1884-1952. Psychological Review, 59, 347-350. doi:10.1037/h0056239
22.
HovlandC. I.LumsdaineA. A.SheffieldF. D. (1949). Experiments in mass communication. Studies in social psychology in World War II. Vol. 3. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
23.
HullC. L. (1943). Principles of behavior. New York, NY: Appleton-Century.
24.
HullC. L. (1951). Essentials of behavior. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
25.
HullC. L. (1952). HullC.L. In BoringE. G.LangfeldH. S.YerkesR. M. (Eds.), A history of psychology in autobiography (Vol. IV, pp. 143-162). Worster, MA: Clark University Press.
26.
HullC. L.HovlandC. I.RossR. T.HallM.PerkinsD. T.FitchF. B. (1940). Mathematico-deductive theory of rote learning. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
27.
JonesE. (2012). Shell shocked. Monitor on Psychology, 43(6), 18-20.
28.
JonesE. E.KanouseD. E.KelleyH. H.NisbettR. E.ValinsS.WeinerB. (1972). Attribution: Perceiving the causes of behavior. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.
29.
JonesR. A. (1987). The case of William McDougall and the New York Times. American Psychologist, 42, 931-940. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.42.10.931
30.
JungC. G. (1923). Psychological types. London, England: Kegan Paul.
31.
JungC. G. (1973). The reaction time ratio in the association experiment. The Collected Works of C.G. Jung (Vol. 2). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. (Original work published 1905)
32.
KingD. B. (2006). Max Wertheimer and Gestalt theory. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
33.
KoffkaK. (1922). Perception: An introduction to Gestalt-theory. Psychological Bulletin, 19, 531-585.
34.
KoffkaK. (1924). The growth of the mind. London, England: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
35.
KöhlerW. (1925). The mentality of apes. New York, NY: Harcourt and Brace.
36.
KöhlerW. (1944). Max Wertheimer:1880-1943. Psychological Review, 51, 143-146. doi:10.1037/h0056042
37.
LewinK. (1917). The landscape of war. Art in Translation, 1, 199-209.
38.
LewinK. (1938). The conceptual representation and measurement of psychological forces. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
39.
LipsetS. M.WolinS. S. (1965). The Berkeley student revolt: Facts and interpretations. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
40.
MandlerG. (2007). A history of modern experimental psychology: From James and Wundt to cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.
41.
MarrowA. J. (1969). The practical theorist. New York, NY: Basic Books.
42.
McClellandD. C. (1951). Personality. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
43.
McClellandD. C. (1961). The achieving society. Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand.
44.
McClellandD. C.AtkinsonJ. W.ClarkR. A.LowellE. L. (1953). The achievement motive. New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
45.
McDougallW. (1908). An introduction to social psychology. London, England: Methuen.
46.
McDougallW. (1921). Is America safe for democracy?New York, NY: Scribner.
47.
McDougallW. (1927). An experiment for the testing of the hypothesis of Lamarck. British Journal of Psychology, 17, 267-304. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8295.1927.tb00432.x
48.
McDougallW. (1930). Autobiography: A history of psychology in autobiography (pp. 191-223). Worcester, MA: Clark University Press.
49.
MillerA. I. (1975). Albert Einstein and Max Wertheimer: A Gestalt psychologist’s view on the genesis of special relativity theory. History of Science: An Annual Review of Literature, Research, and Teaching, 13, 75-103.
50.
MurrayH. A. (1938). Explorations in personality. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
51.
PachellaR. (2011). Creating the modern Michigan psychology department: The chairmanship of Donald Marquis (1945-1957). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
52.
RaphelsonA. (1968). Psychology at the University of Michigan. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
53.
RitchieB. F. (1964). Edward Chace Tolman. National Academy of Sciences, Biographical Memoirs (pp. 293-324). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
54.
RobinsonF. C. (1992). Love’s story told: The life of Henry A. Murray. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
55.
RutkoffP. M.ScottW. H. (1986). New school. A history of the New School for Social Research. New York, NY: Free Press.
56.
SchultzD. P.SchultzS. E. (2004). A history of modern psychology. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
57.
ShepardR. N. (1961). Carl Hovland. National academy of sciences, bibliographic memoirs. National Academy Press.
58.
TolmanE. C. (1932). Purposive behavior in animals and men. New York, NY: Appleton-Century.
59.
TolmanE. C. (1938). The determiners of behavior at a choice point. Psychological Review, 45, 1-41. doi:10.1037/h0062733
60.
TolmanE. C.HonzigC. H. (1930). Introduction and renewal of reward, and maze performance in rats. Berkeley: University of California Publication in Psychology.
61.
WatsonJ. B.McDougallW. (1928). The battle of behaviorism. London, England: Kegan Paul.
62.
WeinbergerJ. (2012). Puzzles, grand ideas, and science. Observer, 25, 38-39.
63.
WertheimerM.KingD. B.PecklerM. A.RaneyS.SchaefR. W. (1992). Carl Jung and Max Wertheimer on a priority issue. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 28, 45-56.
64.
WinterD. G. (1998). Toward a science of personality psychology: David McClelland’s development of empirically derived TAT measures. History of Psychology, 1, 130-153. doi:10.1037/1093-4510.1.2.130
