This study investigated the effects of a modified system of least prompts and an electronic story-mapping intervention for elementary students with autism spectrum disorder. Participants were first taught to identify story element definitions using constant time delay. Participants then listened to age-appropriate narrative texts with a problem–solution structure, completed an electronic story map, and orally answered questions related to the story elements. If unable to complete the map or answer questions, a system of least prompts was used that redirected the students to use provided supports and provided rereads of portions of the text. A multiple probe across participants design was used to examine the effects of the intervention. Outcomes indicated the intervention was effective for teaching story element definitions, labeling of the story element map on an iPad, and comprehension of story element questions. The limitations of the study as well as implications for future research and practice are discussed.
AspergJ.KoppS.Berg-KellyK.GillberC. (2010). Reading comprehension, word decoding, and spelling in girls with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) or attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (AD/HD): Performance and predictors. Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 45, 61–71.
2.
BillingsleyF.WhiteO. R.MunsonR. (1980). Procedural reliability: A rationale and example. Behavioral Assessment, 2, 229–241.
3.
BoulineauT.ForeC.Hagan-BurkeS.BurkeM. D. (2004). Use of story-mapping to increase the story-grammar text comprehension of elementary students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 27, 105–121.
4.
BrowderD. M.Ahlgrim-DelzellL.SpoonerF.MimsP. J.BakerJ. N. (2009). Using time delay to teach literacy to students with severe developmental disabilities. Exceptional Children, 75, 343–364.
5.
BrowderD. M.HudsonM. E.WoodL. (2013). Teaching students with moderate intellectual disability who are emergent readers to comprehend passages of text. Exceptionality, 21, 191–206.
6.
BrowderD. M.TrelaK.JimenezB. (2007). Training teachers to follow a task analysis to engage middle school students with moderate and severe developmental disabilities in grade-appropriate literature. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 22, 206–219.
7.
BrowderD. M.WakemanS.SpoonerF.Ahlgrim-DelzellL.AlgozzineB. (2006). Research on reading instruction for individuals with significant cognitive disabilities. Exceptional Children, 72, 392–408.
8.
BurtonC. E.AndersonD. H.PraterM.DychesT. T. (2013). Video self-modeling on an iPad to teach functional math skills to adolescents with autism and intellectual disability. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 28, 67–77.
9.
CarnineD. W.SilbertJ.Kame’enuiE. J. (1997). Direct instruction reading (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
10.
ChiangH. M.LinY. H. (2007). Reading comprehension instruction for students with autism spectrum disorders: A review of the literature. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 22, 259–267.
11.
CihakD. F.AyresK. (2011). Comparing pictorial and video modeling activity schedules during transitions for students with autism spectrum disorders. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 5, 433–441.
12.
DiminoJ.GerstenR.CarnineD.BlakeG. (1990). Story grammar: An approach for promoting at-risk secondary students’ comprehension of literature. The Elementary School Journal, 91, 19–32.
13.
GardillC. M.JitendraA. K. (1999). Advanced story map instruction: Effects on the reading comprehension of students with learning disabilities. The Journal of Special Education, 33, 2–17.
14.
GastD. L.LedfordJ. (2010). Multiple baseline and multiple probe designs. In GastD. L. (Ed.), Single subject research methodology in behavioral sciences (pp. 276–328). New York, NY: Routledge.
15.
HudsonM. E.BrowderD. M.JimenezB. (2014). Effects of a peer-delivered system of least prompts intervention and adapted science read-alouds on listening comprehension for participants with moderate intellectual disability. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 49, 60–77.
16.
KazdinA. E. (1982). Single-case research designs: Methods for clinical and applied settings. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
17.
KnightV.McKissickB. R.SaundersA. (2013). A review of technology-based interventions to teach academic skills to students with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 4, 2628–2648.
18.
KnightV. F.SpoonerF.BrowderD. M.SmithB. R.WoodC. L. (2013). Using systematic instruction and graphic organizers to teach science concepts to students with autism spectrum disorders and intellectual disability. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 28, 115–126.
19.
MetaMetrics. (2011). Lexile Analyzer [Internet Software]. Available from http://lexile.com
20.
MimsP. J.HudsonM. E.BrowderD. M. (2012). Using read-alouds of grade-level biographies and systematic prompting to promote comprehension for students with moderate and severe developmental disabilities. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 27, 67–80.
21.
NationK.ClarkeP.WrightB.WilliamsC. (2006). Patterns of reading ability in children with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 36, 911–919.
22.
National Reading Panel. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel: Reports of the subgroups. Washington, DC: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Clearinghouse.
23.
OdomS. L. (2013). Technology-aided instruction and intervention (TAII) fact sheet. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina, Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute, The National Professional Development Center on Autism Spectrum Disorders.
24.
OzmenR. (2011). Comparison of two different presentations of graphic organizers in recalling information in expository texts with intellectually disabled students. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 11, 785–793.
25.
PenningtonR. C. (2010). Computer-assisted instruction for teaching academic skills to students with autism spectrum disorders: A review of literature. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 25, 239–248.
26.
PraterM.CarterN.HitchcockC.DowrickP. (2012). Video self-modeling to improve academic performance: A literature review. Psychology in the Schools, 49, 71–81.
27.
SchenningH.KnightV.SpoonerF. (2013). Effects of structured inquiry and graphic organizers on social studies comprehension by students with autism spectrum disorders. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 7, 526–540.
28.
StringfieldS.LuscreD.GastD. L. (2011). Effects of a story map on accelerated reader postreading test scores in students with high-functioning autism. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 26, 218–229.
29.
TawneyJ. W.GastD. L. (1984). Single subject research in special education. Columbus, OH: Merrill.
WhalonK. J.Al OtaibaS.DelanoM. E. (2009). Evidence-based reading instruction for individuals with autism spectrum disorders. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 24, 3–16.
32.
WilliamsonP.CarnahanC. R.JacobsJ. A. (2012). Reading comprehension profiles of high-functioning students on the autism spectrum: A grounded theory. Exceptional children, 78, 449–469.
33.
ZakasT. L.BrowderD. M.Ahlgrim-DelzellL.HeafnerT. (2013). Teaching social studies content to students with autism using a graphic organizer intervention. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 7, 1075–1086.
