Using a Concept Map With RECALL to Increase the Comprehension of Science Texts for Children With Autism

Abstract

Learning science is important for students with autism spectrum disorder (ASD), as knowledge of science allows students to understand their natural world, and science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education is increasingly emphasized in schools. Reading to learn science is, therefore, a vital skill in today’s schools for all students. Using a single-case reversal design, this study evaluated the effectiveness of Reading to Engage Children with Autism in Language and Literacy (RECALL; a shared reading intervention) combined with a concept map on the ability of young children with ASD to answer comprehension questions from science text. Two 5-year-old boys with ASD participated in this study. Results indicated that RECALL combined with a concept map was effective in increasing participants’ correct responding to comprehension questions from science text. Implications for intervention and research are discussed.

Keywords

autism spectrum disorder elementary science storybook reading literacy educational evidence-based practices prompts

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alexander

P. A.

Jetton

T. L.

(2000). Learning from text: A multidimensional and developmental perspective. In Kamil

M. L.

Mosenthal

P. B.

Pearson

Barr

R. E.

(Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 163–180). Lawrence Erlbaum.

American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). American Psychiatric Publishing.

American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2006). Roles and responsibilities of speech-language pathologists in diagnosis, assessment, and treatment of autism spectrum disorders across the lifespan [Position statement]. https://www.asha.org/policy/PS2006-00105/

Anderson-Inman

Ditson

M. T.

(1998). Computer-based concept mapping: Promoting meaningful learning in science for students with disabilities. Information Technology and Disabilities, 5, 1–13.

Barron

R. F.

(1969). The use of vocabulary as an advance organizer. In Herber

H. L.

Sanders

P. L.

(Eds.), Research on reading in the content areas: First-year report (pp. 29–39). Reading and Language Arts Center.

Barton

Meadan-Kaplansky

Ledford

(2018). Independent variables, fidelity, and social validity. In Ledford

J. R.

Gast

D. L.

, Single case research methodology: Applications in special education and behavioral sciences. Routledge (pp. 133–156).

Brown

Reardon

Merrill

(2011). Understanding STEM: Current perceptions. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 70(6), 5–9.

Carnahan

C. R.

Williamson

P. S.

(2013). Does compare-contrast text structure help students with autism spectrum disorder comprehend science text? Exceptional Children, 79, 347–363.

Carnahan

C. R.

Williamson

P. S.

Birri

Swoboda

Snyder

K. K.

(2016). Increasing comprehension of expository science text for students with autism spectrum disorder. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 31, 208–220.

10.

Ezell

H. K.

Justice

L. M.

(2005). Shared storybook reading. Paul H. Brookes.

11.

Fleury

V. P.

(2015). Engaging children with autism in shared book reading: Strategies for parents. Young Exceptional Children, 18(1), 3–16.

12.

Frith

(1989). Autism: Explaining the enigma. Blackwell.

13.

Gately

S. E.

(2008). Facilitating reading comprehension for students on the autism spectrum. Exceptional Children, 40, 40–45.

14.

Grynszpan

Weiss

P. L.

Perez-Diaz

Gal

(2014). Innovative technology-based interventions for autism spectrum disorders: A meta-analysis. Autism, 18, 346–361. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361313476767

15.

Happé

Frith

(2006). The weak coherence account: Detail-focused cognitive style in autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 36, 5–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-005-0039-0

16.

Hundert

van Delft

(2009). Teaching children with autism spectrum disorders to answer inferential “why” questions. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 24, 67–76.

17.

Jimenez

B. A.

Y. Y.

Saunders

A. F.

(2014). The additive effects of scripted lessons plus guided notes on science quiz scores of students with intellectual disability and autism. The Journal of Special Education, 47, 231–244.

18.

Kamps

D. M.

Barbetta

P. M.

Leonard

B. R.

Delquadri

(1994). Classwide peer tutoring: An integration strategy to improve reading skills and promote peer interactions among students with autism and general education peers. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 49–61. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1994.27-49

19.

Kamps

D. M.

Leonard

Potucek

Garrison-Harrell

(1995). Cooperative learning groups in reading: An integration strategy for students with autism and general classroom peers. Behavioral Disorders, 21, 89–109. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23888333

20.

Kamps

D. M.

Locke

Delquadri

Hall

R. V.

(1989). Increasing academic skills of students with autism using fifth grade peers as tutors. Education and Treatment of Children, 12, 38–51. http://www.jstor.org/stable/42899092

21.

Knight

V. F.

Sartini

(2015). A comprehensive literature review of comprehension strategies in core content areas for students with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 45, 1213–1229.

22.

Knight

V. F.

Smith

B. R.

Spooner

Browder

(2012). Using explicit instruction to teach science descriptors to students with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 42, 378–389.

23.

Knight

V. F.

Spooner

Browder

D. M.

Smith

B. R.

Wood

C. L.

(2013). Using systematic instruction and graphic organizers to teach science concepts to students with autism spectrum disorders and intellectual disability. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 28, 115–126.

24.

Knight

V. F.

Wood

C. L.

Spooner

Browder

D. M.

O’Brien

C. P.

(2015). An exploratory study using science etexts with students with autism spectrum disorder. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 30, 86–99.

25.

Krantz

P. J.

Zalenski

Hall

L. J.

Fenske

E. C.

McClannahan

L. E.

(1981). Teaching complex language to autistic children. Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities, 1, 259–297.

26.

Ledford

J. R.

Gast

D. L.

(2018). Single case research methodology: Applications in special education and behavioral sciences. Routledge.

27.

Lord

Rutter

DiLavore

P. C.

Risi

Gotham

Bishop

(2012). Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule: ADOS-2. Western Psychological Services.

28.

Mayer

R. E.

(1984). Aids to text comprehension. Educational Psychologist, 19, 30–42.

29.

McIntyre

N. S.

Solari

E. J.

Gonzales

J. E.

Solomon

Lerro

L. E.

Novotny

Oswald

Mundy

P. C.

(2017). The scope and nature of reading comprehension impairments in school-aged children with higher-functioning autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 47, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-017-3209-y

30.

Mol

S. E.

Bus

A. G.

De Jong

M. T.

(2009). Interactive book reading in early education: A tool to stimulate print knowledge as well as oral language. Review of Educational Research, 79(2), 979–1007.

31.

Novak

J. D.

Gowin

D. B.

(1984). Learning how to learn. Cambridge University Press.

32.

O’Connor

I. M.

Klein

P. D.

(2004). Exploration of strategies for facilitating the reading comprehension of high-functioning students with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 34, 115–127. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:jadd.0000022603.44077.6b

33.

Patten

Watson

L. R.

(2011). Interventions targeting attention in young children with autism. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 20, 60–69.

34.

Randi

Newman

Grigorenko

E. L.

(2010). Teaching children with autism to read for meaning: Challenges and possibilities. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 40, 890–902.

35.

Ricketts

(2011). Research review: Reading comprehension in developmental disorders of language and communication. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 52, 1111–1123.

36.

Roberts

Joiner

(2007). Investigating the efficacy of concept mapping with pupils with autistic spectrum disorder. British Journal of Special Education, 34, 127–135. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8578.2007.00468.x

37.

Schenning

Knight

Spooner

(2013). Effects of structured inquiry and graphic organizers on social studies comprehension by students with autism spectrum disorders. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 7(4), 526–540.

38.

Secan

K. E.

Egel

A. L.

Tilley

C. S.

(1989). Acquisition, generalization, and maintenance of question-answering skills in autistic children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 22, 181–196.

39.

Smith

B. R.

Spooner

Wood

C. L.

(2013). Using embedded computer-assisted explicit instruction to teach science to students with autism spectrum disorder. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 7, 433–443.

40.

Spooner

Knight

Browder

Jimenez

DiBiase

(2011). Evaluating evidence-based practice in teaching science content to students with severe developmental disabilities. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 36, 62–75.

41.

Tager-Flusberg

Paul

Lord

(2005). Language and communication in autism. In Volkmar

F. R.

Paul

Klin

Cohen

(Eds.), Handbook of autism and Pervasive developmental disorders (pp. 335–364). John Wiley.

42.

Tipton

L. A.

Blacher

J. B.

Eisenhower

A. S.

(2017). Young children with ASD: Parent strategies for interaction during adapted book reading activity. Remedial and Special Education, 38, 171–180.

43.

Wei

J. W.

Shattuck

McCracken

Blackorby

(2013). Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) participation among college students with an autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 43, 1539–1546. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-012-1700-z

44.

Whalon

Delano

Hanline

M. F.

(2013). A rationale and strategy for adapting dialogic reading for children with autism spectrum disorder: RECALL. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 57(2), 93–101.

45.

Whalon

Hanline

M. F.

(2008). Effects of a reciprocal questioning intervention on the question generation and responding of children with autism spectrum disorder. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 43, 367–387. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23879798

46.

Whalon

Hanline

M. F.

Davis

(2016). Parent implementation of RECALL: A systematic case study. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 51(2), 211–220.

47.

Whalon

Martinez

J. R.

Shannon

Butcher

Hanline

M. F.

(2015). The impact of reading to engage children with autism in language and learning (RECALL). Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 35(2), 102–115.

48.

Whitehurst

G. J.

Arnold

D. S.

Epstein

J. N.

Angell

A. L.

Smith

Fischel

J. E.

(1994). A picture book reading intervention in day care and home for children from low-income families. Developmental Psychology, 30, 679–689.

49.

Williams

Wright

Callaghan

Coughlan

(2002). Do children with autism learn to read more readily by computer assisted instruction or traditional book methods? A pilot study. Autism, 6, 71–91. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361302006001006

50.

Williamson

Carnahan

C. R.

Jacobs

J. A.

(2012). Reading comprehension profiles of high-functioning students on the autism spectrum: A grounded theory. Exceptional Children, 78, 449–469.

51.

Wong

Odom

S. L.

Hume

K. A.

Cox

A. W.

Fettig

Kucharczyk

Brock

M. E.

Plavnick

J. B.

Fleury

V. P.

Schultz

T. R.

(2015). Evidence-based practices for children, youth, and young adults with autism spectrum disorder: A comprehensive review. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 45, 1951–1966. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-014-2351-z