The author examined the transfer of stimulus control from instructor assistance to verbal cues and pictorial cues. The intent was to determine whether it is easier to transfer stimulus control to one form of cue or the other. No studies have conducted such comparisons to date; however, literature exists to suggest that visual cues may be preferred. An adapted alternating treatment design within a multiple baseline design across subjects was used in this investigation to compare effects when teaching two functional skills to four young students with autism. Results indicate that it is more efficient to achieve transfer of stimulus control from instructor assistance to pictorial cues for three of the participants.
Agran, M., King-Sears, M.E., Wehmeyer, M.L., & Copeland, S.R. (2003). Student-directed learning . Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
2.
Alberto, P.A., Cihak, D.F., & Gama, R.I. (2005). Use of static picture prompts versus video modeling during simulation instruction. Research in Developmental Disabilities , 26, 327-339.
3.
American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author .
4.
Baine, D. (1981). Using prompting and fading techniques to instruct handicapped learners. B. C. Journal of Special Education, 5, 1-12.
5.
Bates, P.E., Cuvo, T., Miner, C.A., & Korbeck, C.A. (2001). Simulated and community-based instruction involving persons with mild and moderate mental retardation. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 22, 95-115.
6.
Billingsley, F.F. (1998). Behaving independently: Considerations in fading instructor assistance. In A. Hilton & R. Ringlaben (Eds.), Best and promising practices in developmental disabilities (pp. 157-167). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
7.
Billingsley, F.F., White, O.R., & Munson, R. (1980). Procedural reliability: A rationale and an example . Behavioral Assessment, 2, 229-241.
8.
Bondy, A.S., & Frost, L.A. (1994). The picture exchange communication system. Focus on Autistic Behavior, 9, 1-18.
9.
Bryant, L.C., & Gast, D.L. (2000). Teaching on-task and on-schedule behaviors to high-functioning children with autism via picture activity schedules. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 30, 553-567.
10.
Cihak, D., Alberto, P.A., Taber-Doughty, T., & Gama, R.I. (2006). A comparison of static picture prompting and video prompting simulation strategies using group instructional procedures. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 21, 89-99.
11.
Demchak, M. (1990). Response prompting and fading methods: A review . American Journal on Mental Retardation, 94, 603-615.
12.
Dettmer, S., Simpson, R.L., Myles, B.S., & Ganz, J.B. (2000). The use of visual supports to facilitate transitions of students with autism. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 15, 163-169.
13.
Grandin, T. (1995). How people with autism think. In E. Schopler & G. Mesibov (Eds.), Learning and cognition in autism: Current issues in autism (pp. 137-156). New York: Plenum .
14.
Green, G. (2001). Behavior analytic instruction for learners with autism: Advances in stimulus control technology. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 16, 72-85.
15.
Hall, L.J., McClannahan, L.E., & Krantz, P.J. (1995). Promoting independence in integrated classrooms by teaching aides to use activity schedules and decreased prompts. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities , 30, 208-217.
16.
Haring, T.G., Kennedy, C.H., Adams, M.J., & Pitts-Conway, V. (1987). Teaching generalization of purchasing skills across community settings to autistic youth using videotape modeling. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 20, 89-96.
17.
Hodgdon, L. (1995). Visual strategies for improving communication . Troy, MI: Quirk-Roberts.
18.
Holcombe, A., Wolery, M., & Gast, D.L. (1994). Comparative single-subject research: Descriptions of designs and discussion of problems. Topics in Early Childhood Education, 14, 119-145.
19.
Kazdin, A.E. (1977). Assessing the clinical or applied importance of behavior change through social validation. Behavior Modification , 1, 427-452.
20.
Kazdin, A.E. (1982). Single-case research designs. New York: Oxford University Press.
21.
Koegel, R.L., Koegel, L.K., Frea, W.D., & Smith, A.E. (1995). Emerging interventions for children with autism: Longitudinal and lifestyle implications. In R. L. Koegel & L. K. Koegel (Eds.), Teaching children with autism (pp. 1-15). Baltimore : Paul H. Brookes.
22.
Koul, R.K., Schlosser, R.W., & Sancibrian, S. (2001). Effects of symbol, referent, and instructional variables on the acquisition of aided and unaided symbols by individuals with autism spectrum disorders. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 16, 162-169.
23.
Lancioni, G.E., Klaase, M., & Goossens, A. (1995). Brief report: Pictorial vs. auditory prompt systems for promoting independent task performance in adolescents with multiple handicaps . Behavioral Interventions, 10, 237-244.
24.
Lee, H.S., Simpson, R.L., & Shogren, K.A. (2007). Effects and implications of self-management for students with autism: A meta-analysis. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 22, 2-13.
25.
MacDuff, G.S., Krantz, P.J., & McClannahan, L.E. (1993). Teaching children with autism to use photographic activity schedules: Maintenance and generalization of complex response chains. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis , 26, 89-97.
26.
Massey, N.G., & Wheeler, J.J. (2000). Acquisition and generalization of activity schedules and their effects on task engagement in a young child with autism in an inclusive pre-school classroom. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 35, 326-335.
27.
Mesibov, G.B. (1998). Learning styles of students with autism. Retrieved January 16, 1998, from http://www.autism-society.org/packages/edkids_learning-styles.html
28.
Odom, S.L., Brown, W.H., Frey, T., Karasu, N., Smith-Canter, L.L., & Strain, P. (2003). Evidence-based practices for young children with autism: Contributions for single-subject design research. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 18, 166-175.
29.
Quill, K.A. (1995). Visually cued instruction for children with autism and pervasive developmental disorders. Focus on Autistic Behavior , 10, 10-20.
30.
Quill, K.A. (1997). Instructional considerations for young children with autism: The rationale for visually cued instruction. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 27, 697-714.
31.
Roane, H.S., Vollmer, T.R., Ringdahl, J.E., & Marcus, B. (1998). Evaluation of a brief stimulus preference assessment . Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 31, 605-620.
32.
Schmit, J., Alper, S., Raschke, D., & Ryndak, D. (2000). Effects of using a photographic cueing package during routine school transitions with a child who has autism. Mental Retardation, 38, 131-137.
33.
Schreibman, L., Whalen, C., & Stahmer, A. (2000). The use of video priming to reduce disruptive transition behavior in children with autism. Journal of Positive Behavior Intervention, 2, 3-11.
34.
Schuster, J.W., Gast, D.L., Wolery, M., & Guiltinan, S. (1988). The effectiveness of a constant time-delay procedure to teach chained responses to adolescents with mental retardation. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 21, 169-178.
35.
Shipley-Benamou, R., Lutzker, J.R., & Taubman, M. (2002). Teaching daily living skills to children with autism through instructional video modeling. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 4, 165-175.
36.
Stevens, K., & Shuster, J.W. (1987). Effects of a constant time delay procedure on the written spelling performance of a learning disabled student. Learning Disability Quarterly, 10, 9-16.
37.
Striefel, S., Bryan, K.S., & Aikins, D.A. (1974). Transfer of stimulus control from motor to verbal stimuli. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 7, 123-135.
38.
Stromer, R., Kimball, J.W., Kinney, E.M., & Taylor, B. (2006). Activity schedules, computer technology, and teaching children with autism spectrum disorders. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 21, 14-24.
39.
Taber, T.A., Seltzer, A., Heflin, L.J., & Alberto, P.A. (1999). Use of self-operated auditory prompts to decrease off-task behavior for a student with autism and moderate mental retardation . Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 14, 159-166, 190.
40.
Taber-Doughty, T. (2005). Considering student choice when selecting instructional strategies: A comparison of three prompting systems. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 26, 411-432.
41.
Taylor, B.A., & Levin, L. (1998). Teaching a student with autism to make verbal initiations: Effects of a tactile prompt. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 31, 651-654.
42.
Vaughn, B., & Horner, R.H. (1995). Effects of concrete versus verbal choice systems on problem behavior. AAC: Augmentative and Alternative Communication , 11, 89-92.
43.
Wheeler, J.J., & Carter, S.L. (1998). Using visual cues in the classroom for learners with autism as a method for promoting positive behavior. B. C. Journal of Special Education, 21, 64-73.
44.
Wolery, M., Ault, M.J., Gast, D.L., Doyle, P.M., & Griffen, A.K. (1990). Comparison of constant time delay and the system of least prompts in teaching chained tasks. Education and Training in Mental Retardation, 25, 243-257.
