Supervision and coaching strategies that provide immediate feedback can help improve instruction for novice teachers. In this study, feedback was provided to teachers using “bug-in-ear” technology to coach them to deliver effective instructional interactions: “learn units.” Three novice teachers in K—8 classrooms with students with disabilities including emotional disorders, autism, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, and developmental delays participated in the study. Results from the multiple-baseline design showed that the rate and accuracy of effective teaching behaviors increased when in-class feedback was delivered via the electronic “bugs.” For two of the three teachers, these increases maintained when the instructional feedback was faded. This study extends previous research and suggests an effective coaching supervision strategy for novice teachers.
Albers, A., & Greer, R.D. (1991). Is the three term contingency trial a predictor of effective instruction? Journal of Behavioral Education , 1, 337-354.
2.
Baum, D. (1976). An application of the "bug-in-the ear" communication system for training psychometrists. Counselor Education and Supervision, 15, 309-310.
3.
Brady, M.P., Taylor, R.D., & Hamilton, R. (1989). Differential measures of teachers' questioning in mainstreamed classes: Individual and classwide patterns. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 22(4), 10-17.
4.
Brophy, J., & Good, T. (1970). Teachers' communication of differential expectations for children's classroom performance: Some behavioral data. Journal of Educational Psychology, 61, 365-374.
5.
Coulter, G.A., & Grossen, B. (1997). The effectiveness of in-class instructive feedback versus after-class instructive feedback for teachers learning direct instruction teaching behaviors. Effective School Practices, 16(4), 21-35.
6.
Englert, C.S., Tarrant, K.L., & Mariage, T.V. (1992). Defining and redefining instructional practice in special education: Perspectives on good teaching. Teacher Education and Special Education, 15, 62-86.
7.
Feiman-Nemser, S. (2001). From preparation to practice: Designing a continuum to strengthen and sustain teaching. Teachers College Record , 103, 1013-1055.
8.
Gersten, R., Vaughn, S., Deshler, D., & Schiller, E. (1997). What we know about using research findings: Implications for improving special education practice. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30, 446-476.
9.
Giebelhaus, C.R. (1994). The mechanical third ear device: A student teaching supervision alternative. Journal of Teacher Education, 45, 365-373.
10.
Greenwood, C.R., Hart, B., Walker, D.I., & Risley, T. (1994). The opportunity to respond and academic performance revisited: A behavioral theory of developmental retardation and its prevention . In R. Gardner III, P. M., Sainato, J. O.Cooper, W. L., Heward, J. Eshelman, & T. A. Grossi (Eds.), Behavior analysis in education: Focus on measurably superior instruction (pp. 213-223). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
11.
Greenwood, C.R., & Maheady, L. (1997). Measurable change in student performance: Forgotten standard in teacher preparation? Teacher Education and Special Education, 20, 265-275.
12.
Greer, R.D. (2002). Designing teaching strategies: An applied behavior analysis systems approach. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
13.
Greer, R.D., & McDonough, S.H. (1999). Is the learn unit a fundamental measure of pedagogy? The Behavior Analyst, 22, 5-16.
14.
Hamilton, R., & Brady, M.P. (1991). Individual and classwide patterns of teachers' questioning in mainstreamed social studies and science classes. Teaching and Teacher Education, 7, 253-262.
15.
Heward, W.L. (1994). Three "low tech" strategies for increasing the frequency of active student responding during group instruction. In R. Gardner III, P. M., Sainato, J. O. Cooper, W. L., Heward, J. Eshelman , & T. A. Grossi (Eds.), Behavior analysis in education: Focus on measurably superior instruction (pp. 283-320). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole .
16.
Hunt, D.D. (1980). "Bug-in-the-ear" technique for teaching interviewing skills. Journal of Medical Education, 11, 964-966.
17.
Ingham P., & Greer, R.D. (1992). Changes in student and teacher responses in observed and generalized settings as a function of supervisor observations. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25, 153-164.
18.
Korner, I., & Brown, W. (1952). The mechanical third ear. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 16(1), 81-84.
19.
Lindell, M.A. (2001). Audiocuing teacher clarity skills: The effects on preservice teachers during student teaching experiences (Doctoral dissertation, University of Wyoming, 2001). Dissertation Abstracts International, 62(05), 1801.
20.
Madsen, C.H., Jr., Becker, W.C., & Thomas, D.R. (1968). Rules, praise, and ignoring: Elements of elementary classroom control. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1, 139-150.
21.
Malott, R.W., & Suarez, E.T. (2004). Principles of behavior. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
Ross, D.E., Singer-Dudek, J., & Greer, R.D. (2005). The Teacher Performance Rate and Accuracy Scale: Training as evaluation. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 40, 411-423.
24.
Scheeler, M.C., & Lee, D.L. (2002). Using technology to deliver immediate corrective feedback to preservice teachers. Journal of Behavioral Education , 1, 231-241.
25.
Scheeler, M.C., Ruhl, K.L., & McAfee, J.K. (2004). Providing performance feedback to teachers: A review. Teacher Education and Special Education , 27, 396-407.
Stallings, J. (1984). Effective use of classroom time (Appalachia Educational Lab Occasional Paper 013). (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED252515)
28.
Sutherland, K.S., & Wehby, J.H. (2001). Exploring the relationship between increased opportunities to respond to academic requests and the academic and behavioral outcomes of students with EBD: A review. Remedial and Special Education , 22, 113-121.
