More children with special needs are educated in general education classrooms than ever before. Ideally, special education and general education teachers work together in these settings as instructional teams, but a “one teaching, one assisting” model is often in place with the special education teacher assuming a subordinate role. As such, the authors conducted research to determine whether changes can be made in teacher instruction so that both teachers in a collaborative team are highly engaged in the instructional process during the lesson. The authors used a multiple-baseline, across-participants design to assess the effects of peer coaches’ giving immediate corrective feedback via bug-in-ear technology on a specific teaching behavior during instruction. Three dyads of co-teachers participated (five women, one man). Each teacher met criterion (three consecutive sessions at 90% or higher) in just three sessions, maintained the behavior at high levels postintervention, and generalized the behavior to a different setting without the peer coach present. Teachers rated the treatment as a beneficial technique that they would recommend to others. Implications for classroom use are discussed.
Alber, S.R., & Heward, W.L. ( 2000). Teaching students to recruit positive attention: A review and recommendations. Journal of Behavioral Education, 10, 177-204.
2.
Albers, A.E., & Greer, R.D. ( 1991). Is the three-term contingency trial a predictor of effective instruction? Journal of Behavioral Education, 1, 337-354.
3.
Alberto, A., & Troutman, P. ( 2003). Applied behavior analysis for teachers (5th ed.). New York: Merrill.
4.
Arthaud, T.J., Aram, R.J., Breck, S.E., Doelling, J.E., & Bushrow, K.M. ( 2007). Developing collaboration skills in pre-service teachers: A partnership between general and special education. Teacher Education and Special Education, 30, 1-12.
5.
Austin, V.L. ( 2001). Teachers’ beliefs about co-teaching. Remedial and Special Education, 22, 245-255.
6.
Boudah, D.J., Logan, K.R., & Greenwood, C.R. , (2001). The research to practice projects: Lessons learned about changing teacher practice. Teacher Education and Special Education, 24, 290-303.
7.
Boudah, D.J., Schumacher, J.B., & Deshler, D.D. ( 1997). Collaborative instruction: Is it an effective option for inclusion in secondary classrooms? Learning Disability Quarterly, 20, 293-316.
8.
Cook, L., & Friend, M. ( 1995). Co-teaching: Guidelines for creating effective practices . Focus on Exceptional Children, 28(3), 1-16.
Coulter, G.A., & Grossen, B. ( 1997). The effectiveness of in-class instructive feedback versus after-class instructive feedback for teachers learning direct instruction teaching behaviors. Effective School Practices, 16, 21-35.
11.
Hall, R.V., Delquadri, J., Greenwood, C.R., & Thurston, L. ( 1982). The importance of opportunity to respond in children’s academic success. In E. B. Edgar, N. G. Haring, J. R. Jenkins , & E. E. Pious (Eds.), Mentally handicapped children: Education and training (pp. 58-88). Baltimore : University Park Press.
12.
Harbort, G., Gunter, P.L., Hull, K., Brown, Q., Venn, M.L., Wiley, L.P., et al. (2007). Behaviors of teachers in co-taught classes in a secondary school. Teacher Education and Special Education , 30, 13-23.
13.
Heward, W. ( 1997). Four validated instructional strategies. Behavior and Social Issues, 7, 43-48.
14.
Horner, R.H., Carr, E.G., Halle, J., McGee, G., Odom, S., & Wolery, M. ( 2005). The use of single-subject research to identify evidence-based practice in special education. Exceptional Children, 71, 165-179.
15.
Joyce, B., & Showers, B. ( 1988). Power in staff development through research in training . Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Mallette, B., Maheady, L., & Harper, G. ( 1999). The effects of reciprocal peer coaching on preservice general educators’ instruction of students with special learning needs . Teacher Education and Special Education, 15, 249-258.
18.
Magiera, K., & Zigmond, N. ( 2005). Co-teaching in middle school classrooms under routine conditions: Does the instructional experience differ for students with disabilities in co-taught and solo-taught classes? Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 20, 79-85.
19.
Miller, S.P., Harris, C., & Watanabe, A. ( 1991). Professional coaching: A method for increasing effective and decreasing ineffective teacher behaviors. Teacher Education and Special Education, 14, 183-191.
20.
Murawski, W.W., & Swanson, H.L. ( 2001). A meta-analysis of co-teaching research. Where are the data? Remedial and Special Education, 22, 258-267.
21.
O’Reilly, M.F., Renzaglia, A., Hutchins, M., Koterba-Bass, L., Clayton, M., Halle, J.W., et al. (1992). Teaching systematic instruction competencies to special education student teachers: An applied behavioral supervision model . Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps , 17, 104-111.
22.
O’Reilly, M.F., Renzaglia, A., & Lee, S. ( 1994). An analysis of acquisition, generalization and maintenance of systematic instruction competencies by preservice teachers using behavioral supervision techniques. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 29, 22-33.
23.
Polloway, E.A. ( 2002). The profession of learning disabilities: Progress and promises. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 25, 103-112.
24.
Rice, D., & Zigmond, N. ( 2000). Co-teaching in secondary schools: Teacher reports of development inAustralian and American classrooms. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 15, 190-197.
25.
Scheeler, M.C., & Lee, D.L. ( 2002). Using technology to deliver immediate corrective feedback to preservice teachers. Journal of Behavioral Education, 11, 231-241.
26.
Scheeler, M.C., Macluckie, M., & Albright, K.E. (in press). Effects of immediate feedback delivered by peer tutors on oral presentation skills of adolescents with learning disabilities . Remedial and Special Education.
27.
Scheeler, M.C., McAfee, J.K., Ruhl, K.L., & Lee, D.L. ( 2006). Effects of corrective feedback delivered via wireless technology on preserice teacher performance and student behavior. Teacher Education and Special Education, 29, 12-25.
28.
Scheeler, M.C., Ruhl, K.L., & McAfee, J.K. (2004). Providing performance feedback to teachers: A review. Teacher Education and Special Education , 27, 396-407.
29.
Scruggs, T.E., Mastropieri, M.A., & McDuffie, K.A. (2007). Co-teaching in inclusive classrooms: A metasynthesis of qualitative research. Exceptional Children, 73, 392-416.
Skinner, B.F. ( 1968). The technology of teaching. New York : Appleton-Century Crofts.
32.
Van Houten, R. ( 1980). Learning through feedback. New York : Human Sciences Press.
33.
Weiss, M.P., & Lloyd, J.W. ( 2002). Congruence between roles and actions of secondary special educators in co-taught and special education settings. The Journal of Special Education, 36, 58-68.
34.
Zigmond, N., & Matta, D.W. ( 2004). Value added of the special education teacher in secondary school co-taught classes. In T. E. Scruggs & M. A. Mastropieri (Ed.), Research in secondary schools (pp. 55-76). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.
