Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The equitable distribution of docked bikeshare is an important issue for transportation decision-makers. Gini coefficients and Lorenz curves can be used to study transportation inequality. This study used these methods to achieve three outcomes. First, this study identified a gap in bikeshare equity literature and provided a more nuanced measure of bikeshare supply to better evaluate how well bikeshare meets demand. Second, the updated measure of distributional equity was used to evaluate bikeshare equity in Washington, DC. Third, using historical trip data, the Gini coefficient calculations indicated which trip types are better served. Comparison of the results highlighted a potential conflict in program goals: equity versus supporting existing bikeshare members. Policy feedback may bias this trade-off in favor of members, reinforcing spatial inequalities. Overall, this paper further demonstrated how Gini coefficients and Lorenz curves can be useful tools for evaluating inequality in transportation systems.

Keywords

bikeshare gini lorenz equity Washington DC

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Babagoli

M. A.

Kaufman

T. K.

Noyes

Sheffield

P. E.

(2019). Exploring the health and spatial equity implications of the New York City Bike share system. Journal of Transport & Health, 13, 200–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2019.04.003

Bertolaccini

Lownes

N. E.

(2013). Effects of scale and boundary selection in assessing equity of transit supply distribution. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2350(1), 58–64. https://doi.org/10.3141/2350-07

Bhuyan

Chavis

Nickkar

Barnes

(2019). GIS-based equity gap analysis: Case study of Baltimore bike share program. Urban Science, 3(2), 42. https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci3020042

Campbell

A. L.

(2012). Policy makes mass politics. Annual Review of Political Science, 15(1), 333–351. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-012610-135202

Chester

(2013). Are you getting the most for your money from capital bikeshare? WAMU. Retrieved April 26, 2021, from: https://wamu.org/story/13/10/21/are_you_getting_the_most_for_your_money_from_capital_bikeshare/

Cohen

(2016). Equity in motion: Bikeshare in low-income communities. University of California.

Couch

Smalley

H. K.

(2019). Encouraging equitable bikeshare: Implications of docked and dockless models for spatial equity. arXiv.

DC Health Matters . (2021). 2021 demographics. Retrieved January 4, 2021, from: https://www.dchealthmatters.org/demographicdata?id=130951&sectionId=936

Delbosc

Currie

(2011). Using Lorenz curves to assess public transport equity. Journal of Transport Geography, 19(6), 1252–1259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2011.02.008

10.

Duran

A. C.

Anaya-Boig

Shake

J. D.

Garcia

L. M. T.

Rezende

L. F. M. de

Hérick de Sá

(2018). Bicycle-sharing system socio-spatial inequalities in Brazil. Journal of Transport & Health, 8, 262–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2017.12.011

11.

Fishman

Allan

(2019). Bike share. In Fishman

(Ed), The sharing economy and the relevance for transport (pp. 121–152). Academic Press.

12.

Fishman

Washington

Haworth

(2013). Bike share: A synthesis of the literature. Transport Reviews, 33(2), 148–165. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2013.775612

13.

Fishman

Washington

Haworth

Mazzei

(2014). Barriers to bikesharing: An analysis from Melbourne and Brisbane. Journal of Transport Geography, 41, 325–337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2014.08.005

14.

Goodman

Cheshire

(2014). Inequalities in the London bicycle sharing system revisited: Impacts of extending the scheme to poorer areas but then doubling prices. Journal of Transport Geography, 41, 272–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2014.04.004

15.

Government of the District of Columbia . (2022). Capital bike share locations. Retrieved February 19, 2021, from.https://opendata.dc.gov/datasets/capital-bike-share-locations?geometry=101.953%2C-82.985%2C-101.953%2C89.652

16.

Grasso

S. H.

Barnes

Chavis

(2020). Bike share equity for underrepresented groups: Analyzing barriers to system usage in Baltimore, Maryland. Sustainability, 12(18), 7600. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12187600

17.

Hörcher

Graham

D. J.

(2020). The Gini index of demand imbalances in public transport. Transportation, (0123456789). Springer US.

18.

Hosford

Winters

(2018). Who are public bicycle share programs serving? An evaluation of the equity of spatial access to bicycle share service areas in Canadian cities. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2672(36), 42–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198118783107

19.

Howland

Mcneil

Broach

Rankins

Macarthur

(2017). Breaking barriers to bike share: Insights on equity from a survey of bike share system owners and operators. Portland State University.

20.

Kittelson & Associates . (2020). Draft capital bikeshare development plan update. Kittelson & Associates.

21.

LDA Consulting . (2017). 2016 capital bikeshare member survey report. LDA Consulting.

22.

Litman

(2016). Evaluating transportation equity: Guidance for incorporating distributional impacts in transportation planning. Victoria Transport Policy Institute.

23.

Lope

D. J.

Dolgun

(2020). Measuring the inequality of accessible trams in Melbourne. Journal of Transport Geography, 83, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2020.102657

24.

Lovelace

Beecham

Heinen

Vidal Tortosa

Yang

Slade

Roberts

(2020). Is the London Cycle Hire Scheme becoming more inclusive? An evaluation of the shifting spatial distribution of uptake based on 70 million trips. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 140, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2020.07.017

25.

Lyft . (2021a). About capital bikeshare. Retrieved March 18, 2021, from: https://www.capitalbikeshare.com/about

26.

Lyft . (2021b). System data. Retrieved March 18, 2021, from: https://www.capitalbikeshare.com/system-data

27.

Mckenzie

(2015). What ways are D.C.-Area neighborhoods with rail transit different from other neighborhoods? Retrieved January 5, 2021, from: https://www.census.gov/newsroom/blogs/research-matters/2015/12/in-what-ways-are-d-c-area-neighborhoods-with-rail-transit-different-from-other-neighborhoods.html

28.

Mooney

S. J.

Hosford

Howe

Yan

Winters

Bassok

Hirsch

J. A.

(2019). Freedom from the station: Spatial equity in access to dockless bike share. Journal of Transport Geography, 74, 91–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2018.11.009

29.

OECD . (2011). An overview of growing income inequalities in OECD countries: Main findings. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1787/888932315602

30.

Ogilvie

Goodman

(2012). Inequalities in usage of a public bicycle sharing scheme: Socio-demographic predictors of uptake and usage of the London (UK) cycle hire scheme. Preventive Medicine, 55(1), 40–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2012.05.002

31.

Qian

Jaller

(2020). Bikesharing, equity, and disadvantaged communities: A case study in Chicago. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 140(3), 354–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2020.07.004

32.

Qian

Jaller

Niemeier

(2020). Enhancing equitable service level: Which can address better, dockless or dock-based Bikeshare systems? Journal of Transport Geography, 86, 102784. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2020.102784

33.

Wang

(2019). Three ways bikeshare can counteract, not reinforce, DC’s disparities. Retrieved March 26, 2021, from: https://www.urban.org/urban-wire/three-ways-bikeshare-can-counteract-not-reinforce-dcs-disparities

34.

Ursaki

Aultman-Hall

(2015). Quantifying the equity of bikeshare access in US cities. University of Vermont Transportation Research Center.

35.

Virginia Tech . (2012). Capital bikeshare study: A closer look at casual users and operations. Virginia Tech.

36.

Wang

Lindsey

(2017). Equity of bikeway distribution in Minneapolis, Minnesota. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2605(1), 18–31. https://doi.org/10.3141/2605-02

37.

Wang

Lindsey

(2018). Measuring equity in bike share programs: A case study of the twin cities. Transportation Research Board 97th Annual Meeting.

38.

Willberg

Salonen

Toivonen

(2021). What do trip data reveal about bike-sharing system users? Journal of Transport Geography, 91, 102971. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2021.102971

Docked Bikeshare Equity and Goal Conflict: An Evaluation Using Gini Coefficients and Lorenz Curves

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References