In coastal communities, green infrastructure can be part of the infrastructure investment strategy to revitalize existing infrastructure and provide protection from flooding, erosion, and other coastal hazards. This article asks the question: What are key equity considerations related to green infrastructure planning for coastal resilience? We answer this question using the voices of research experts, practitioners, and community members who participated in a virtual workshop designed to identify key questions and concerns about coastal resilience and social equity. These research and practice perspectives are synthesized using an integrative planning framework for green infrastructure implementation that was developed to answer the research question. Our findings identify equity touchpoints as they relate to four cross-cutting themes: (1) stakeholder engagement and public participation, (2) trade-offs and multiple benefits, (3) resources and capacity, and (4) data, metrics, and analysis.
AbunnasrY.HaminE. M.BrabecE. (2015). Windows of opportunity: Addressing climate uncertainty through adaptation plan implementation. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 58(1), 135–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2013.849233
2.
ApparicioP.SéguinA.-M.LandryS.GagnonM. (2012). Spatial distribution of vegetation in Montreal: an uneven distribution or environmental inequity?Landscape and Urban Planning, 107(3), 214–224.
3.
ArkemaK. K.GriffinR.MaldonadoS.SilverJ.SuckaleJ.GuerryA. D. (2017). Linking social, ecological, and physical science to advance natural and nature-based protection for coastal communities. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1399(1), 5–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.13322
4.
ArkemaK. K.GuannelG.VerutesG.WoodS. A.GuerryA.RuckelshausM.KareivaP.LacayoM.SilverJ. M. (2013). Coastal habitats shield people and property from sea-level rise and storms. Nature Climate Change, 3(10), 913–918. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1944
5.
BarbierE. B. (2014). Disaster Management. A global strategy for protecting vulnerable coastal populations. Science, 345(6202), 1250–1251. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1254629
CollierM. J.FrantzeskakiN.ConnopS.DickG.DumitruA.DziubałaA.FletcherI.GeorgiouP.HölscherK.KooijmanE.LodderM.MadajczykN.McQuaidS.NashC.OsipiukA.QuartierM.ReilA.RhodesM. L.RizziD.XidousD. (2023). An integrated process for planning, delivery, and stewardship of urban nature-based solutions: The Connecting Nature Framework. Nature-Based Solutions, 3, Article 100060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbsj.2023.100060
8.
ConnopS.VandergertP.EisenbergB.CollierM. J.NashC.CloughJ.NewportD. (2016). Renaturing cities using a regionally-focused biodiversity-led multifunctional benefits approach to urban green infrastructure. Environmental Science & Policy, 62, 99–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2016.01.013
9.
den HeijerC.CoppensT. (2023). Paying for green: A scoping review of alternative financing models for nature-based solutions. Journal of Environmental Management, 337, Article 117754. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117754
10.
DushkovaD.HaaseD. (2020). Not simply green: Nature-based solutions as a concept and practical approach for sustainability studies and planning agendas in cities. Land, 9(1), 19. https://doi.org/10.3390/land9010019
11.
EdwardsP.Sutton-GrierA.CoyleG. (2013). Investing in nature: Restoring coastal habitat blue infrastructure and green job creation. Marine Policy, 38, 65–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2012.05.020
GillespieN.UnthankA.CampbellL.AndersonP.GubernickR.WeinholdM.CenderelliD.AustinB.McKinleyD.WellsS.RowanJ.OrvisC.HudyM.BowdenA.SinglerA.FretzE.LevineJ.KirnR. (2014). Flood effects on road–stream crossing infrastructure: Economic and ecological benefits of stream simulation designs. Fisheries, 39(2), 62–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/03632415.2013.874527
14.
HaaseD.KabischS.HaaseA.AnderssonE.BanzhafE.BaróF.BrenckM.FischerL. K.FrantzeskakiN.KabischN.KrellenbergK.KremerP.KronenbergJ.LarondelleN.MatheyJ.PauleitS.RingI.RinkD.SchwarzN.WolffM. (2017). Greening cities – to be socially inclusive? About the alleged paradox of society and ecology in cities. Habitat International, 64, 41–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2017.04.005
15.
JesdaleB. M.Morello-FroschR.CushingL. (2013). The racial/ethnic distribution of heat risk–related land cover in relation to residential segregation. Environmental Health Perspectives, 121(7), 811–817. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1205919
16.
KabischN.FrantzeskakiN.PauleitS.NaumannS.DavisM.ArtmannM.HaaseD.KnappS.KornH.StadlerJ.ZaunbergerK.BonnA. (2016). Nature-based solutions to climate change mitigation and adaptation in urban areas: Perspectives on indicators, knowledge gaps, barriers, and opportunities for action. Ecology and Society, 21(2), art39. https://doi.org/10.5751/es-08373-210239
17.
KimH. W.TranT. (2018). An evaluation of local comprehensive plans toward sustainable green infrastructure in US. Sustainability, 10(11), 4143. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10114143
18.
LennonM.ScottM. (2014). Delivering ecosystems services via spatial planning: Reviewing the possibilities and implications of a green infrastructure approach. Town Planning Review, 85(5), 563–587. https://doi.org/10.3828/tpr.2014.35
19.
McDonaldL.AllenW.BenedictM. (2005). Green infrastructure plan evaluation frameworks. Journal of Conservation Planning, 1(1), 12–43.
20.
MeerowS.NewellJ. P. (2017). Spatial planning for multifunctional green infrastructure: Growing resilience in Detroit. Landscape and Urban Planning, 159, 62–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.10.005
21.
NarayanS.BeckM. W.WilsonP.ThomasC. J.GuerreroA.ShepardC. C.RegueroB. G.FrancoG.IngramJ. C.TrespalaciosD. (2017). The value of coastal wetlands for flood damage reduction in the northeastern USA. Scientific Reports, 7(1), 9463. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-09269-z
22.
PalmerM. A.LiuJ.MatthewsJ. H.MumbaM.D’OdoricoP. (2015). WATER. Manage water in a green way. Science, 349(6248), 584–585. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac7778
23.
RaymondC. M.FrantzeskakiN.KabischN.BerryP.BreilM.NitaM. R.GenelettiD.CalfapietraC. (2017). A framework for assessing and implementing the co-benefits of nature-based solutions in urban areas. Environmental Science & Policy, 77, 15–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2017.07.008
24.
RouseD. C.Bunster-OssaI. (2018). Green infrastructure: A landscape approach. In InfieldE. M. H.AbunnasrY.RyanR. L. (Eds.), Planning for climate change (pp. 273–281). Routledge.
25.
RyuJ. E. (2007). Federal highway assistance funds in the state infrastructure bank programs: Mechanisms, merits, and modifications. Public Budgeting & Finance, 27(4), 43–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5850.2007.00893.x
26.
SekulovaF.AnguelovskiI.KissB.KotsilaP.BaróF.PalganY. V.ConnollyJ. (2021). The governance of nature-based solutions in the city at the intersection of justice and equity. Cities, 112, Article 103136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2021.103136
27.
SinghviA.LuijendijkA. P.van OudenhovenA. P. E. (2022). The grey – green spectrum: A review of coastal protection interventions. Journal of Environmental Management, 311, Article 114824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.114824
28.
SpaldingM. D.RuffoS.LacambraC.MelianeI.HaleL. Z.ShepardC. C.BeckM. W. (2014). The role of ecosystems in coastal protection: Adapting to climate change and coastal hazards. Ocean & Coastal Management, 90, 50–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2013.09.007
29.
SrithongrungA.YusufJ.-E. W.KrizK. A. (2019). A systematic public capital management and budgeting process. In SrithongrungA.ErmasovaN. B.YusufJ.-E. W. (Eds.), Capital management and budgeting in the public sector (pp. 1–22): IGI Global.
30.
Sutton-GrierA. E.GittmanR. K.ArkemaK. K.BennettR. O.BenoitJ.BlitchS.Burks-CopesK.ColdenA.DausmanA.DeAngelisB.HughesA.ScyphersS.GrabowskiJ. (2018). Investing in natural and nature-based infrastructure: Building better along our coasts. Sustainability, 10(2), 523. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10020523
31.
Sutton-GrierA. E.WowkK.BamfordH. (2015). Future of our coasts: The potential for natural and hybrid infrastructure to enhance the resilience of our coastal communities, economies and ecosystems. Environmental Science & Policy, 51, 137–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2015.04.006
32.
UzsokiD.CasierL.WuennenbergL. (2021). Financial instruments to create and maintain NBS. In CrociE.LucchittaB. (Eds.), Nature-based solutions for more sustainable cities – a framework approach for planning and evaluation (pp. 255–266). Emerald Publishing Limited.
33.
van der JagtA. P. N.SmithM.Ambrose-OjiB.KonijnendijkC. C.GiannicoV.HaaseD.LafortezzaR.NastranM.PintarM.ŽeleznikarŠ.CvejićR. (2019). Co-Creating urban green infrastructure connecting people and nature: A guiding framework and approach. Journal of Environmental Management, 233, 757–767. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.09.083
34.
WickenbergB.McCormickK.OlssonJ. A. (2021). Advancing the implementation of nature-based solutions in cities: A review of frameworks. Environmental Science & Policy, 125, 44–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2021.08.016
35.
WoodruffS.TranT.LeeJ.WilkinsC.NewmanG.NdubisiF.Van ZandtS. (2021). Green infrastructure in comprehensive plans in coastal Texas. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 64(9), 1578–1598. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2020.1835618
36.
YusufJ.-E. W.Denckla CobbT.AndrewsE.GladfelterS.MontroseG. (2022). The resilience adaptation feasibility tool (RAFT) as an approach for incorporating equity into coastal resilience planning and project implementation. Shore and Beach, 90(4), 53–63. https://doi.org/10.34237/1009046
37.
YusufJ.-E.LiuG. (2008). State infrastructure banks and intergovernmental subsidies for local transportation investment. Public Budgeting & Finance, 28(4), 71–89. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5850.2008.00917.x
38.
ZimmermanR.BrennerR.Llopis AbellaJ. (2019). Green infrastructure financing as an imperative to achieve green goals. Climate, 7(3), 39. https://doi.org/10.3390/cli7030039
39.
Zuniga-TeranA. A.StaddonC.de VitoL.GerlakA. K.WardS.SchoemanY.HartA.BoothG. (2020). Challenges of mainstreaming green infrastructure in built environment professions. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 63(4), 710–732. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2019.1605890
