Transportation systems shape the built environment of cities and the lived experiences of their residents, but equitable public participation in municipal transportation decision-making is limited. Furthermore, municipal transportation decision-making—and thus public participation within it—exists in a complicated field of transportation provision, while intersecting with a myriad of policy issues. This research article draws on Chicago as a case study and existing research in transportation and planning to argue for equity-oriented capacity building by transportation agencies. Such capacity building should more explicitly clarify official and informal decision-making processes and their politicized nature to enhance equitable, meaningful impact on transportation decisions.
BeardV. A.SarmientoC. S. (2014). Planning, public participation, and money politics in Santa Ana (CA). Journal of the American Planning Association, 80(2), 168–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2014.953002
3.
BullardR. D.JohnsonG. S.TorresA. O. (2004). Highway robbery: Transportation racism and new routes to equity. South End Press.
Federal Highway AdministrationFederal Transit Administration. (2007). The transportation planning process key issues: A briefing book for transportation decisionmakers, officials, and staff. Federal Highway Administration.
GarcíaI.Garfinkel-CastroA.PfeifferD. (2019). Planning with diverse communities. American Planning Association.
10.
GrossardtT.BaileyK. (2018). Transportation planning and public participation: Theory, process, and practice. Elsevier.
11.
HopkinsD.SchwanenT. (2022). Recruiting research participants for transport research: Reflections from studies on autonomous vehicles in the UK. Journal of Transport Geography, 102, 103377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2022.103377
12.
KarnerA.LondonJ.RowangouldD.ManaughK. (2020). From transportation equity to transportation justice: Within, through, and beyond the state. Journal of Planning Literature, 35(4), 440–459. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885412220927691
13.
KarnerA.MarcantonioR. A. (2018). Achieving transportation equity: Meaningful public involvement to meet the needs of underserved communities. Public Works Management and Policy, 23(2), 105–126. https://doi.org/10.1177/1087724X17738792
14.
KontokostaC. E.HongB. (2021). Bias in smart city governance: How socio-spatial disparities in 311 complaint behavior impact the fairness of data-driven decisions. Sustainable Cities and Society, 64, 102503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102503
15.
LoflandJ.LoflandL. H. (2009). Analyzing social settings: A guide to qualitative observation and analysis. Wadsworth.
16.
LoweK (2014). Bypassing equity? Transit investment and regional transportation planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 34(1), 30–44.
17.
McAndrewsC.MarcusJ. (2015). The politics of collective public participation in transportation decision-making. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 78, 537–550. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2015.06.014
18.
McArthurJ. (2019). The production and politics of urban knowledge: Contesting transport in Auckland, New Zealand. Urban Policy and Research, 37(1), 45–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/08111146.2018.1476229
ShellerM. (2018). Mobility justice: The politics of movement in an age of extremes. Verso Books.
25.
WagnerJ. (2013). Measuring performance of public engagement in transportation planning: Three best principles. Transportation Research Record, 2397(1), 38–44. https://doi.org/10.3141/2397-05
