Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Active transportation has become an increasingly important policy area over the past 40 years as communities around the country have sought to provide transportation options that improve community quality of life and minimize negative environmental impacts. Federal infrastructure investments supporting walking and bicycling have, however, been contentious. This article explores the underlying tensions created as active transportation has been included in the federal transportation planning process over the past 40 years. Specifically, the article tracks the succession of transportation bill funding levels and changes in policy actors during this period. Structural changes that provided dedicated funding and expanded public participation have been vital to helping to foster the burgeoning active transportation coalition and to increasing usage rates for active transportation around the country.

Keywords

citizen participation public works transportation highways

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Cradock

A. L.

Troped

P. J.

Fields

Melly

S. J.

Simms

S. V.

Gimmler

Fowler

(2009). Factors associated with federal transportation funding for local pedestrian and bicycle programming and facilities. Journal of Public Health Policy, 30, S38-S72.

Downey

M. L.

III . (2007). Legislative considerations for long term policy change. In National roundtable on surface transportation. New York: Regional Plan Association and Lincoln Institute for Land Policy, 29-33.

Fields

Renne

Kevin Mills

(2013). From potential to practice: Building a national policy framework for oil reduction. In Renne

Fields

(Eds.), Transport Beyond Oil: Policy Choices for a Multimodal Future. Washington, DC: Island Press. 291-302.

Fiorino

D. J.

(2010). Sustainability as a conceptual focus for public administration. Public Administration Review, 70(s1), s78-s88.

Handy

S. L.

McCann

Bailey

Ernst

McRee

Meharg

. . . Wright

(2009). The regional response to federal funding for bicycle and pedestrian projects. Davis: Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Davis.

Mapes

(2009). Pedaling revolution: How cyclists are changing American cities. Corvalis: Oregon State University Press.

Mohl

Rose

M. K.

(2012). The post-interstate era: Planning, politics, and policy since the 1970s. Journal of Planning History, 11, 3-7.

National Transportation Alternatives Clearinghouse. (2012). Memorandum: MAP-21 and transportation alternatives apportionments. Washington, DC: Rails-to-Trails Conservancy.

Pucher

Buehler

Merom

Bauman

(2011). Walking and cycling in the United States, 2001-2009: Evidence from the National Household Travel Surveys. Journal Information, 101(S1), s310-s317.

10.

Snyder

(2013, August 16). 500+ complete streets policies in place, but not the most important one. Streetsblog USA. Last accessed August 5, 2014 from http://usa.streetsblog.org/2013/08/16/500-complete-streets-policies-in-place-but-not-the-most-important-one.

11.

Transportation Research Board. (2006). Technical memorandum task 1: The interstate and national highway system—A brief history and lessons learned. In Future options for the national system of interstate and defense highways (National Cooperative Highway Research Program Project 20-24[52]), Washington, DC: Transportattion Research Board.16-42.

12.

Weingroff

R. F.

(2001). Creating a landmark: The Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991. Public Roads, 65(3), np.

Federal Active Transportation Policy in Transition

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References