Cultivating Literacies of Love: A Portrait of Trauma and Healing in an English Classroom

Abstract

In recent years, scholars have argued that there is a need to grow trauma-informed and healing-centered practices in the teaching of literacy. To answer this call, I draw on interdisciplinary scholarship that names loving relationships as integral to the healing process. In this article, I center love as a trauma-informed and healing-centered practice and explore how English language arts/literacy curriculum might facilitate loving relationships. Specifically, this study utilizes a single portrait to understand how one student reflected on her high school journey to loving self, peers, community, and the world, as well as the role that literacy curriculum played in illuminating and fostering those loving relationships. Ultimately, I offer literacies of love as a framework that allows us to both center and foster the type of love that we know is necessary for well-being.

Keywords

trauma healing critical literacy portraiture love pláticas

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alvarez

(2020). Seeing race in the research on youth trauma and education: A critical review. Review of Educational Research, 90(5), 583–626. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654320938131

Anzaldúa

(2012). Borderlands / la frontera: The new mestiza (4th ed.). Spinsters/Aunt Lute.

Baker-Bell

Stanbrough

R. J.

Everett

(2017). The stories they tell: Mainstream media, pedagogies of healing, and critical media literacy. English Education, 49(2), 130–152. https://doi.org/10.58680/ee201728918

Black Girls Literacy Collective (2018). The Black girls’ literacy collective statement. Research in the Teaching of English, 53(2), 173–175. https://doi.org/10.58680/rte201829866

Borrero

Camangian

Ayers

Hannegan-Martinez

Flores

(2019). Half an inch from the edge: Teacher education, teaching, and student learning for social transformation. Rowman & Littlefield.

Braden

Myers

Thronton

Rodriguez

Wynter-Hoyte

(2025). Revolutionary love: Centering the full humanity of children in the literacy curriculum. Reading Research Quarterly, 60(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.592

Brooks

D. N.

(2017). (Re)conceptualizing love: Moving towards a critical theory of love in education for social justice. Journal of Critical Thought and Praxis, 6(3), 102–114. https://doi.org/10.31274/jctp-180810-87

Camangian

(2010). Starting with self: Teaching autoethnography to foster critically caring literacies. Research in the Teaching of English, 45(2), 179–204. https://doi.org/10.58680/rte201012745

Camangian

Cariaga

(2021). Social and emotional learning is hegemonic miseducation: Students deserve humanization instead. Race Ethnicity and Education, 25(7), 901–921. https://doi.org/10.1080/13613324.2020.1798374

10.

Cariaga

(2019). Towards self-recovery: Cultivating love with young women of color through pedagogies of bodymindspirit. The Urban Review, 51(1), 101–122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-018-0482-9

11.

Combahee River Collective. (1977). The Combahee River Collective Statement. The Library of Congress. https://www.loc.gov/item/lcwaN0028151 .

12.

Delgado Bernal

(1998). Using a Chicana feminist epistemology in educational research. Harvard Educational Review, 68(4), 555–579. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.68.4.5wv1034973g22q48

13.

de los Ríos

C. V.

Seltzer

(2017). Translanguaging, coloniality, and English classrooms: An exploration of two bicoastal urban classrooms. Research in the Teaching of English, 52(1), 55–76. https://www.jstor.org/stable/44821287. https://doi.org/10.58680/rte201729200

14.

Dutro

(2009). Children writing “hard times”: Lived experiences of poverty and the class-privileged assumptions of a mandated curriculum. Language Arts, 87(2), 89–98. https://doi.org/10.58680/la20098999

15.

Dutro

(2010). What “hard times” means: Mandated curricula, class-privileged assumptions, and the lives of poor children. Research in the Teaching of English, 44(3), 255–291. https://doi.org/10.58680/rte20109836

16.

Dutro

(2017). Let’s start with heartbreak: The perilous potential of trauma in literacy. Language Arts, 94(5), 326–337. https://doi.org/10.58680/la201729057

17.

Dutro

(2019). The vulnerable heart of literacy: Centering trauma as powerful pedagogy. Teachers College Press.

18.

Dutro

Caasi

(2022). The complexities of trauma in responsive teaching. Language Arts, 99(5), 358–362. https://doi.org/10.58680/la202231796

19.

Dutro

Pacheco

(Eds) (2022). Trauma-informed teaching: Towards responsive, humanizing classrooms (Special Issues Vol. 2). National Conference of Teachers of English.

20.

Enriquez

Kontovourki

Johnson

(2024). Literate identities and/in the body: Tracing embodiments of literacy across grade levels. In Wagner

C. J.

Frankel

K. K.

Leighton

C. M.

(Eds.), Becoming readers and writers: Literate identities across childhood and adolescence (pp. 218–232). Routledge.

21.

Everett

(Ed) (2021). Trauma-informed teaching: Cultivating healing-centered ELA classrooms (Special Issues Vol. 1). National Conference of Teachers of English.

22.

Fierros

C. O.

Delgado Bernal

(2016). Vamos a platicár: The contours of pláticas as Chicana/Latina feminist methodology. Chicana/Latina Studies, 15(2), 98–121. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43941617 .

23.

Flores

A. I.

(2017). The Muxerista portraitist: Engaging portraiture and Chicana feminist theory. Chicana/Latina Studies, 17(1), 60–93. https://www.jstor.org/stable/45186470 .

24.

Freire

(1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Bloomsbury.

25.

Freire

Macedo

(1987). Literacy: Reading the word and the world. Bergin & Garvey.

26.

García

Wei

(2014). Translanguaging: Language, bilingualism and education. Palgrave Pivot.

27.

Gee

J. P.

(2010). A situated-sociocultural approach to literacy and technology. AERA Open, 1(2), 1–18.

28.

Ginwright

(2015). Hope and healing in urban education: How urban activists and teachers are reclaiming matters of the heart. Routledge / Taylor & Francis Group.

29.

González Ybarra

Saavedra

C. M.

(2021). Excavating embodied literacies through a Chicana/Latina feminist framework. Journal of Literacy Research, 53(1), 100–121. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086296X20986594

30.

Greenfield-Sanders

(2019). Toni Morrison: The Pieces I Am [Film]. Perfect Day Films; American Masters Pictures.

31.

Griffin

A. A.

(2021). Black parade: Conceptualizing Black adolescent girls’ multimodal renderings as parades. Urban Education, 57(10), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/004208592110033944

32.

Griffin

A. A.

Sealey-Ruiz

(Eds) (2024). All about Black girl love in education: bell hooks and pedagogies of love. Routledge.

33.

Gutiérrez

K. D.

(2008). Developing a sociocritical literacy in the third space. Reading Research Quarterly, 43(2), 148–164. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.43.2.3

34.

Gyles

Hannegan-Martinez

(2025). Trauma-informed praxis as a building block of justice-centered science. Teachers College Record. https:// https://doi.org/10.1177/01614681251408915

35.

Haines

(2019). The politics of trauma: Somatics, healing, and social justice. North Atlantic Books.

36.

Hannegan-Martinez

(2019). From punk love to compa love: A pedagogical paradigm to intervene on trauma. The Urban Review, 514, 659–675. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-019-00540-3

37.

Hannegan-Martinez

(2020). Literacies of love: Trauma, healing, and pedagogical shifts in an English classroom [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of California, Los Angeles. https://www.proquest.com/dissertations-theses/literacies-love-trauma-healing-pedagogical-shifts/docview/2444400708/se-2.

38.

Hannegan-Martinez

(2023a). If we aren’t grieving, we aren’t healing: A testimonio on grief as a trauma-informed practice. Journal of Trauma Studies in Education, 2(3), 38–54. https://doi.org/10.32674/jtse.v2i3.6024

39.

Hannegan-Martinez

(2023b). Platicas as a methodological praxis of love. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 36(9), 1702–1713. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2023.2181437

40.

Hannegan-Martinez

(2025). Legislating trauma: Book bans, educational gag orders, and microaggressions. Reading Research Quarterly, 60(4), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.70046

41.

Hannegan-Martinez

Cariaga

(2023). Grief as an invitation to heal: Extending trauma-informed pedagogies, research, and praxis. Journal of Trauma Studies in Education, 2(3), i–vii. https://doi.org/10.32674/jis.v2i3.6584

42.

Hannegan-Martinez

Griffin

(2024). Pláticando about love at the kitchen table. Journal of Education Sciences, 14(8), Article 879. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14080879

43.

Herman

J. L.

(1992). Trauma and recovery: The aftermath of violence—from domestic abuse to political terror. Basic Books.

44.

hooks

(2001). All about love. HarperCollins.

45.

Howard

T. C.

(2002). Hearing footsteps in the dark: African American students’ descriptions of effective teachers. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 7(4), 425–444. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327671ESPR0704_4

46.

Ife

(2017). Perhaps a Black girl rolls her eyes to shift calcified pain throughout her body (Occasional Paper Series No. 38). Bank Street College of Education. https://www.bankstreet.edu/occasional-paper-series/38 .

47.

Jackson

Sealey-Ruiz

Watson

(2014). Reciprocal love: Mentoring Black and Latino males through an ethos of care. Urban Education, 49(4), 394–417. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085913519336

48.

Johnson

Vasudevan

(2012). Seeing and hearing students’ lived and embodied critical literacy practices. Theory Into Practice, 51(1), 34–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2012.636333

49.

Jordan

(2002). Some of us did not die. Basic Books.

50.

Kelly

(2020). Exploring Black girls subversive literacies as acts of freedom. Journal of Literacy Research, 52(4), 456-481. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086296X20966367

51.

Kinloch

San Pedro

(2014). The space between listening and storying: Foundations for projects in humanization. In Paris

Winn

(Eds.), Humanizing research: Decolonizing qualitative inquiry with youth and communities (pp. 21–42). Sage.

52.

Ladson-Billings

(1992). Reading between the lines and beyond the pages: A culturally relevant approach to literacy teaching. Theory Into Practice, 31(4), 312–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405849209543558

53.

Lane

(2018). For real love: How Black girls benefit from a politicized ethic of care. International Journal of Educational Reform, 27(3), 269–290. https://doi.org/10.1177/105678791802700303

54.

Lara

(2014). Nepantla spirituality: My path to the source(s) of healing. In Facio

Lara

(Eds.), Fleshing the spirit: Spirituality and activism in Chicana, Latina, and Indigenous women’s lives (pp. 167–186). The University of Arizona Press.

55.

Lawrence Lightfoot

(1983). The good high school: Portraits of character and culture. Basic Books.

56.

Lawrence-Lightfoot

(2005). Reflections on portraiture: A dialogue between art and science. Qualitiative Inquiry, 111, 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800404270955

57.

Lawrence-Lightfoot

Davis

J. H.

(1997). The art and science of portraiture. Jossey-Bass.

58.

Lee

C. D.

(2007). The role of culture in academic literacies: Conducting our blooming in the midst of the whirlwind. Teachers College Press.

59.

Levine

(1998). Slam [Film]. Off Line Entertainment Group; TriMark Pictures.

60.

Lyiscott

(2019). The quest to be love(d) in urban schools: Issue introduction. The Urban Review, 51(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-018-00494-y

61.

Menakem

(2017). My grandmother’s hands: Racialized trauma and the pathway to mending our hearts and bodies. Central Recovery Press.

62.

Morrell

(2015). Critical literacy and urban youth: Pedagogies of access, dissent, and liberation. Routledge.

63.

Muhammad

(2019). Cultivating genius: A four-layered framework for culturally and historically responsive literacy. Scholastic.

64.

Muhammad

G. E.

(2024). Love, Islam, and how literacy is conceptualized. Journal of Literacy Research, 56(4), 349–360. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086296X241300545

65.

Nadal

(2018). Microaggressions and traumatic stress: Theory, research, and clinical. American Psychological Association.

66.

Nasir

N. S.

Givens

C. P. C.

(Eds) (2019). We dare say love: Supporting achievement in the educational life of Black boys. Teachers College Press.

67.

New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 60–93. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.66.1.17370n67v22j160u

68.

Noddings

(1984). Caring: A feminine approach to ethics and moral education. University of California Press.

69.

Noddings

(1992). The challenge to care in schools. Teachers College Press.

70.

Ohito

(2019). I just love Black people!: Love, pleasure, and critical pedagogy in urban teacher education. The Urban Review, 511, 123–145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-018-0492-7

71.

Perry

B. D.

(2007). The boy who was raised as a dog: And other stories from a child psychiatrist’s notebook—What traumatized children can teach us about loss, loving, and healing. Basic Books.

72.

Player

G. D.

(2022). Girls of color embodied and experiential dreams for education. Journal of Literacy Research, 54(4), 379–401. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086296X221140852

73.

Player

G. D.

Animashaun

Thornton

(2023). Getting lost in stars and glitter: Black girls’ multimodal literacies as portals to new suns. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 36(3), 411–429. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2022.2025490

74.

Player

G. D.

Gonález Ybarra

(2021). Re-imagining Literacy and language education for girls of color. Urban Education, 57(10). 1663–1672. https://doi.org/10.1177/00420859211003924

75.

Razfar

Smith

(2022). Algorithm of love: Insights from immigrant literacies and narratives. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 35(6), 565–568. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2022.2025497

76.

Simmons

(2019). Why we can’t afford whitewashed social-emotional learning. ASCD Education Update, 61(4), 2–3.

77.

Simmons

(2021). Why SEL alone isn’t enough. Educational Leadership, 78(6), 30–34.

78.

Street

B. V.

(1985). Literacy in theory and practice. Cambridge University Press.

79.

Toliver

S. R.

(2020). Can I get a witness? Speculative fiction as testimony and counterstory. Journal of Literacy Research, 52(4), 507–529. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086296X20966362

80.

Tuck

(2009). Suspending damage: A letter to communities. Harvard Educational Review, 79(3), 409–427. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.79.3.n0016675661t3n15

81.

Valenzuela

(1999). Subtractive schooling: U.S.-Mexican youth and the politics of caring. SUNY Press.

82.

Van der Kolk

B. A.

(2014). The body keeps the score: Brain, mind, and body in the healing of trauma. Viking.

83.

Watson

V. W. M.

Marciano

J. E.

(2023). These tellings: Explosive love as literacy research. Journal of Literacy Research, 55(2), 130–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086296X231178515

84.

Weller

(2015). The wild edge of sorrow: Rituals of renewal and the sacred work of grief. North Atlantic Books.

85.

Winn

M. T.

(2013). Toward a restorative English education. Research in the Teaching of English, 54(1), 126–136. https://doi.org/10.58680/rte201324162

86.

Winn

M. T.

Ubiles

J. R.

(2011). Worthy witnessing: Collaborative research in urban classrooms. In Ball

A. F.

Tyson

C. A.

(Eds.), Studying diversity in teacher education (pp. 295–308). Rowman & Littlefield.

87.

Ybarra

M. G.

(2020). “We have a strong way of thinking … and it shows through our words”: Exploring mujerista literacies with Chicana/Latina youth in a community ethnic studies course. Research in the Teaching of English, 54(3), 231–253. https://doi.org/10.58680/rte202030520

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.01 MB

0.00 MB

2.27 MB

3.38 MB

0.01 MB