This article explores the use of the Indigenous Filipino concept of Kapwa in interpreting a young adult literature written by a Filipino American author for Filipino Americans. Through a qualitative content analysis of Randy Ribay's Patron Saints of Nothing, the findings suggest that Kapwa illuminates themes of belonging, collective ways of being and knowing, and a critical call to action. Furthermore, Kapwa as a framework captures the characters’ movement along the spectrum from ibang-tao (outsider) to hindi ibang-tao (insider), revealing the relational negotiations that shape hybrid Filipino American identities. The concept of the fulcrum of cultural identity illustrates this dynamic balancing between Filipino heritage and American influence. By centering Kapwa, the study disrupts the dominance of Western interpretive lenses and positions Filipino American youth to read, interpret, and reclaim literature through culturally sustaining and decolonial perspectives, affirming the visibility and vitality of Filipino worldviews in literary analysis.
AbdillahM. F.SuwargonoE.AstutiningsihI. (2017). Young Ju’s hybrid identity in An Na’s A step from heaven. Publika Budaya, 5(2), 109–116.
2.
AlbertiJ. (1995). The Nigger Huck: Race, identity, and the teaching of Huckleberry Finn. College English, 57(8), 919–937. https://doi.org/10.58680/ce19959084
3.
Al-MahfediM. H. K. (2020). Cultural hegemonic discourse: From imperialist eurocentrism to homogenizing Americentrism. International Journal of Linguistics and Translation Studies, 1(3), 20–34. https://doi.org/10.36892/ijlts.v1i3.94
4.
BakhtinM. (1981). Discourse in the novel (M. Holquist & C. Emerson, Trans.). In HolquistM. (Ed.), The dialogic imagination (pp. 259–422). University of Texas Press.
5.
BenosaB.RamosC. D. (2021, December). Contextualizing types of Filipino collective support during the #COVID19 lockdown. TENCON 2021–2021 IEEE Region 10 Conference (TENCON) (pp. 556–561). IEEE.
6.
BhabhaH. (1994). The location of culture. Routledge.
7.
BishopR. S. (2007). Free within ourselves: The development of African American children‘s literature. Heinemann.
8.
BradfordC. (2010). Reading indigeneity: The ethics of interpretation and representation. In WolfeS.CoatesK.EncisoP. A.JenkinsC. (Eds.), Handbook of research on children’s and young adult literature (pp. 331–344). Taylor & Francis Group.
9.
BrooksW. M. (2017). “Having something of their own”: Passing on a counter-story about family bonds, racism, and land ownership. In JohnsonH.MathisJ.ShortK. G. (Eds.), Critical content analysis of children’s and young adult literature: Reframing perspective (pp. 77–91). Routledge.
10.
BulosanC. (1973). America is in the heart. University of Washington Press.
11.
CastelliA. (2015). On Western and Chinese conception of time: A comparative study. Philosophical Papers and Review, 6(4), 23–30. https://doi.org/10.5897/PPR2015.0119
12.
CaxajC. S.BermanH. (2010). Belonging among newcomer youths: Intersecting experiences of inclusion and exclusion. Advances in Nursing Science, 33(4), E17–E30. https://doi.org/10.1097/ANS.0b013e3181fb2f0f
13.
ClaravallE. B. (2025). The shaping of Filipino-American communities in California: A historical narrative. In ClaravallE. B.Ferreras-StoneJ. (Eds.), Dismantling spaces of silence in social science education (pp. 71–84). Information Age Publishing.
14.
ClaravallE. B.ProtacioM. C. (2023). American English language acquisition among Filipino learners: Language, literacy, and identity. In YoonB.PrattK. L. (Eds.), Primary language impact on second language and literacy learning: Linguistically responsive strategies for classroom teachers (pp. 179–194). Lexington Books.
15.
ClementeJ. A.BellezaD.YuA.CatibogE. V. D.SolisG.LaguertaJ. (2008). Revisiting the Kapwa theory: Applying alternative methodologies and gaining new insights. Philippine Journal of Psychology, 41(2), 1–32.
DavidE. J. R.OkazakiS. (2006). Colonial mentality: A review and recommendation for Filipino American psychology. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 12(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1037/1099-9809.12.1.1
20.
De VeraM. G. A. (1995). Pakikipagkwentuhan: Paano kaya pag-aaralan ang pakikiapid? In Pe-PuaR. (Ed.), Sikolohiyang Pilipino: Teorya, metodo at gamit (3rd ed., pp. 187–193). University of the Philippines Press.
21.
DoughtyJ. (2010). More than meets the “I”: Chinese transnationality in Gene Luen Yang’s American born Chinese. Asian American Literature: Discourses and Pedagogies, 1, 54–60. https://doi.org/10.55917/2154-2171.1007
22.
DurandE. S. (2013). Forging global perspectives through post-colonial young adult literature. The ALAN Review, 40, 2. https://doi.org/10.21061/alan.v40i2.a.3
23.
DurandE. S. (2020). Revisiting homelands. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 64(1), 111–113. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.1069
24.
EnriquezV. (1994). From colonial to liberation psychology: The Philippine experience. De La Salle University Press.
25.
EppleyK.WoodJ.Stagg-PetersonS. (2024). Resistance literature: Representations of land and indigeneity in Indigenous-authored, Canadian award-winning rural young adult and middle-grade fiction. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 67(4), 206–216. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.1318
26.
FanonF. (1963). The wretched of the earth(R. Philcox, Trans.). Grove Press.
27.
FreireP. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Penguin Classics.
28.
GiltonD. L. (2020). Multicultural and ethnic children’s literature in the United States. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
29.
GoJ. (2016). Postcolonial thought and social theory. Oxford University Press.
30.
HuckC. S. (1992). Literacy and literature. Language Arts, 69(7), 520–526.
31.
HunfeldK. (2022). The coloniality of time in the global justice debate: De-centering Western linear temporality. Journal of Global Ethics, 18(1), 100–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449626.2022.2052151
JohnsonH.MathisJ.ShortK. G. (2017). Connecting critical content analysis to critical reading in classrooms. In JohnsonH.MathisJ.ShortK. G. (Eds.), Critical content analysis of children’s and young adult literature: Reframing perspective (pp. 185–199). Routledge.
34.
KaurA.NomanM. (2015). Exploring classroom practices in collectivist cultures through the lens of Hofstede’s model. The Qualitative Report, 20(11), 1794–1811.
35.
KovachM. (2021). Indigenous methodologies (2nd ed.). University of Toronto Press.
36.
LaborP. D.Gastardo-ConacoM. C. C. (2021). Viewing your Kapwa: Elaboration of a social-relational construct through language. Philippine Social Science Journal, 4(4), 10–19. https://doi.org/10.52006/main.v4i4.418
37.
LangerJ. A. (1997). Literacy acquisition through literature (Report series 7.11). National Research Center on English Learning and Achievement.
38.
LeeC. D. (1995). A culturally based cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching African American high school students’ skills in literary interpretation. Reading Research Quarterly, 30(4), 608–631. https://doi.org/10.2307/748192
39.
LeuS. (2010). Exploring bicultural experiences: Responding to a Chinese American young adult novel. Language and Literacy, 12(1), 57–75. https://doi.org/10.20360/G2MW2S
40.
LewisC.EncisoP.MojeE. B. (2007). Reframing sociocultural research on literacy: Identity, agency, and power. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
MacedoD. (1994). Literacies of power: What Americans are not allowed to know. Westview Press.
43.
MarambaD. C.BonusR. (2013). The “other” students: Filipino Americans, education, and power. Information Age Publishing.
44.
MarambaD. C.CurammengE. R.HernandexX. J. (2022). Critiquing empire through desirability: A review of 40 years of Filipinx Americans in Education Research, 1980 to 2020. Review of Educational Research, 92(4), 583–613. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543211060876
45.
MayringP. (2022). Qualitative content analysis: A step-by-step guide. Sage.
46.
NikolajevaM. (2003). Beyond the grammar of story, or how can children’s literature criticism benefit from narrative theory?Children’s Literature Association Quarterly, 28(1), 5–16. https://dx.https://doi.org/10.1353/chq.0.1702
47.
Nolte-OdhiamboC. (2018). “I be home”: Childhood belonging and un/becoming in Hawai’i. Children’s Literature Association Quarterly, 43(4), 377–394. https://dx.https://doi.org/10.1353/chq.2018.0045
48.
OmogunL.SkerrettA. (2021). From Haiti to Detroit through Black immigrant languages and literacies. Journal of Literacy Research, 53(3), 406–429. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086296X211031279
49.
OrtezaG. O. (1997). Pakikipagkwentuhan: Isang pamamaraan sa sama-samang pananaliksik, pagpapatotoo, at pagtulong sa sikolohiyang Pilipino. Philippine Psychology Research and Training House.
50.
ParisD. (2012). Culturally sustaining pedagogy: A needed change in stance, terminology, and practice. Educational Researcher, 41(3), 93–97. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X12441244
51.
RemoquilloA. T. (2023). The problem with Kapwa: Challenging assumptions of community, sameness, and unity in Filipina American feminist fieldwork. Alon: Journal for Filipinx American and Diasporic Studies, 3(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.5070/LN43161818
52.
ResurreccionR. R. (2007). Malasakit, pakkipagkapwa, at kalinisang loob: Mga pundasyon ng kagandahang loob. Malaya, 19(3), 67–78.
RibayR. (2019). Patron saints of nothing. Penguin Books.
55.
RodriguesN. N.SwalwellK. (2022). Social studies for a better world: An anti-oppressive approach for elementary educators. W. W. Norton & Company.
56.
RodriguezN.KimE. (2018). In search of mirrors: An Asian critical race theory content analysis of Asian American picturebooks from 2007 to 2017. Journal of Children’s Literature, 44(2), 17–30.
57.
RosenblattL. M. (1978). The reader, the text, the poem: The transactional theory of the literacy work. Southern Illinois University Press.
58.
San JuanE. (1989). Making Filipino history in a “damaged culture”. Philippines Sociological Review, 37(1), 1–11.
59.
SchreierM. (2012). Qualitative content analysis in practice. Sage Publications.
60.
SeldenR.WiddowsonP.BrookerP. (2016). A reader’s guide to contemporary literary theory. Routledge.
61.
ShortK. (2016). A curriculum that is intercultural. In ShortK.DayD.SchroederJ. (Eds.), Teaching globally: Reading the world through literature (pp. 3–24). Routledge.
62.
ShortK. G. (2019). The dangers of reading globally. Bookbird: A Journal of International Children’s Literature, 57(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1353/bkb.2019.0025
63.
StreetB. V. (1984). Literacy in theory and practice. Cambridge University Press.
64.
SungY. K.FahrenbruckM. L.López-RobertsonJ. (2017). Using intertextuality to unpack representations of immigration in children’s literature. In JohnsonH.MathisJ.ShortK. G. (Eds.), Critical content analysis of children’s and young adult literature (pp. 44–60). Routledge.
65.
TabunanM. L. (2023). Juxtaposition and asynchronicity as postcolonial poetics in Elaine Castillo’s America is not the heart. Critique: Studies in Contemporary Fiction, 64(4), 672–684. https://doi.org/10.1080/00111619.2022.2077091
Tuhiwai-SmithL. (2023). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and Indigenous peoples. Bloomsbury.
68.
UrbachJ. (2012). Beyond story grammar: Looking at stories through cultural lenses. Education and Urban Society, 44(4), 392–411. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013124510392
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
