We believe that reading prosody assessment is culturally situated. In this conceptual article, we problematize some of the phrasing used for prosody indicators and explore how three of the most spoken languages in the United States (other than English) enact aspects of prosody when reading. We probe potential linguistic and sociocultural implications and contribute to the discussion of equitable assessment practices in reading education. Using a multilingual and sociocultural lens, we identify elements of prosody in other languages that could impact how prosody in English is produced. We discuss extratextual features that impact prosody and implications for the rubrics used by assessors. We end by providing recommendations for the field related to increasing our understanding of multilingual fluency and promoting multilingual mindsets in fluency classroom assessment.
Abu-RabiaS. (2019). The role of short vowels in reading Arabic: A critical literature review. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 48(4), 785–795. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-019-09631-4
2.
Álvarez-CañizoM.Suárez-CoallaP.CuetosF. (2018). Reading prosody development in Spanish children. Reading and Writing, 31(1), 35–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-017-9768-7
BaconC. K. (2017). Dichotomies, dialects, and deficits: Confronting the “Standard English” myth in literacy and teacher education. Literacy Research: Theory, Method, and Practice, 66(1), 341–357. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224871187831
5.
BriceñoA.KleinA. F. (2018). Running records and first grade English learners: An analysis of language related errors. Reading Psychology, 39(4), 335–361. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2018.143514
6.
CrossonA. C.LesauxN. K. (2010). Revisiting assumptions about the relationship of fluent reading to comprehension: Spanish-speakers’ text-reading fluency in English. Reading and Writing, 23(5), 475–494. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9168-8
7.
DaaneM. C.CampbellJ. R.GriggW. S.GoodmanM. J.OranjeA. (2005). Fourth-grade students reading aloud: NAEP 2002 special study of oral reading (NCES 2006-469). U.S. Department of Education. Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics. https://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/pubs/studies/2006469.asp
8.
DermanS.BardakçiM.ÖztürkM. S. (2017). An investigation of read speech of Arabic students learning Turkish as a second language in terms of stress and pause. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 13(1), 215–231. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/jlls/issue/36109/405459
9.
Escandell-VidalV.PrietoP. (2020). Pragmatics and prosody in research on Spanish. In KoikeD. A.Félix-BrasdeferJ. C. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of Spanish pragmatics (pp. 149–166). Routledge.
10.
FaltisC. J.ValdésG. (2016). Preparing teachers for teaching in and advocating for linguistically diverse classrooms: A vade mecum for teacher educators. In GitomerD.BellC. (Eds.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 549–592). American Educational Research Association.
11.
FloresN. (2013). The unexamined relationship between neoliberalism and plurilingualism: A cautionary tale. TESOL Quarterly, 47(3), 500–520. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.114
12.
GarcíaO.LiW. (2014). Translanguaging: Language, bilingualism and education. Palgrave Macmillan.
13.
GevaE.FarniaF. (2012). Developmental changes in the nature of language proficiency and reading fluency paint a more complex view of reading comprehension in ELL and EL1. Reading and Writing, 25(8), 1819–1845. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-011-9333-8
14.
GoddeE.BosseM.-L.BaillyG. (2020). A review of reading prosody acquisition and development. Reading and Writing, 33(2), 399–426. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-019-09968-1
15.
HoD. (2003). The characteristics of Mandarin dialects. In ThurgoodG.LaPollaR. (Eds.), The Sino-Tibetan languages (pp. 126–130). Routledge.
16.
KuhnM. (2004). Helping students become accurate, expressive readers: Fluency instruction for small groups. The Reading Teacher, 58(4), 338–344. https://doi.org/10.1598/RT.58.4.3
17.
KuhnM. R.SchwanenflugelP. J. (2017). Reconsidering fluency’s role in reading comprehension. In IsraelS. E. (Ed.), Handbook of research on reading comprehension (2nd ed., pp. 316–334). Guilford Press.
18.
KuhnM. R.SchwanenflugelP. J.MeisingerE. B.LevyB. A.RasinskiT. V. (2010). Aligning theory and assessment of reading fluency: Automaticity, prosody, and definitions of fluency. Reading Research Quarterly, 45(2), 230–251. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.45.2.4
19.
LiA.PostB. (2014). L2 acquisition of prosodic properties of speech rhythm: Evidence from L1 Mandarin and German learners of English. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 36(2), 223–255. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263113000752
20.
MahfoudhiA.EverattJ.ElbeheriG. (2011). Introduction to the special issue on literacy in Arabic. Reading and Writing, 24(9), 1011–1018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-011-9306-y
NewellK. W.CoddingR. S.FortuneT. W. (2020). Oral reading fluency as a screening tool with English learners: A systematic review. Psychology in the Schools, 57(8), 1208–1239. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22406
23.
Noguerón-LiuS. (2020). Expanding the knowledge base in literacy instruction and assessment: Biliteracy and translanguaging perspectives from families, communities, and classrooms. Reading Research Quarterly, 55(S1), S307–S318. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.354
24.
ParisS. G.CarpenterR. D.ParisA. H.HamiltonE. E. (2005). Spurious and genuine correlates of children’s reading comprehension. In ParisS. G.StahlS. A. (Eds.), Children’s reading comprehension and assessment (pp. 131–160). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
25.
RasinskiT.RikliA.JohnstonS. (2009). Reading fluency: More than automaticity? More than a concern for the primary grades?Literacy Research and Instruction, 48(4), 350–361. https://doi.org/10.1080/19388070802468715
RasinskiT. V.ReutzelD. R.ChardD.Linan-ThompsonS. (2011). Reading fluency. In KamilM. L.PearsonP. D.MojeE. B.AfflerbachP. (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 4, pp. 286–319). Routledge.
28.
SchwanenflugelP. J.BenjaminR. G. (2016). Development of reading prosody and its assessment. In ThomsonJ.JarmulowiczL. (Eds.), Linguistic rhythm and literacy (pp. 187–211). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
29.
ShiW.JiangY. (2015). Comparison and contrast between English and Chinese idioms from cultural connotation perspective. Studies in Literature and Language, 10(1), 102–113. https://doi.org/10.3968/6338
30.
WetzelM. M.VlachS. K.SvrcekN. S.SteinitzE.OmogunL.SalmerónC.Batista-MoralesN.TaylorL. A.VillarrealD. (2019). Preparing teachers with sociocultural knowledge in literacy: A literature review. Journal of Literacy Research, 51(2), 138–157. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086296X19833575
31.
WuY. (2019). Review of Chinese English learners’ prosodic acquisition. English Language Teaching, 12(8), 89–94. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v12n8p89
YasinA. (2014). Liaison in Jordanian Arabic and Standard Arabic: Syntax-prosody interface. International Journal of Linguistics, 6(5), 22–36. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijl.v6i5.6469
34.
YuanJ. (2011). Perception of intonation in Mandarin Chinese. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 130(6), 4063–4069. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3651818
35.
ZutellJ.RasinskiT. V. (1991). Training teachers to attend to their students’ oral reading fluency. Theory into Practice, 30(3), 211–217. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405849109543502
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
