The authors’ goal was to examine the structural relationships among vocabulary knowledge, morphological awareness, syntactic awareness, and reading comprehension in English-speaking adults. Structural equation analysis of data collected from 151 participants revealed that morphological awareness affected reading comprehension directly. Syntactic awareness predicted reading comprehension not only directly but also indirectly via vocabulary knowledge. Vocabulary knowledge made an independent contribution to reading comprehension above and beyond those of morphologic awareness and syntactic awareness.
AndersonR. C.FreebodyP. (1981). Vocabulary knowledge. In GuthrieJ. T. (Ed.), Comprehension and teaching: Research reviews (pp. 77-117). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
2.
AnglinJ. M. (1993). Vocabulary development: A morphological analysis. Monographs of the Society of Research in Child Development, 58(10, Serial No. 238).
3.
BerkoJ. (1958). The child’s learning of English morphology. Word, 14, 150-177.
4.
BerningerV.NagyW.CarlisleJ.ThomsonJ.HofferD.AbbottS.. . . AylwardE. (2003). Effective treatment for dyslexics in Grades 4 to 6. In FoormanB. (Ed.), Preventing and remediating reading difficulties: Bringing science to scale (pp. 382-417). Timonium, MD: New York Press.
5.
BotzumW. A. (1951). A factorial study of the reasoning and closure factors. Psychometrika, 16(4), 361-386.
6.
BoweyJ. A. (1986). Syntactic awareness in relation to reading skill and ongoing reading comprehension monitoring. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 41(2), 282-299.
7.
BrazeD.TaborW.ShankweilerD. P.MenclW. E. (2007). Speaking up for vocabulary: Reading skill differences in young adults. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 40(3), 227-243.
8.
BrittainM. M. (1970). Inflectional performance and early reading achievement. Reading Research Quarterly, 6(1), 34-48.
BrownW.CudeckR. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In BollenK. A.LongJ. S. (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 247-261). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
11.
CarlisleJ. F. (1995). Morphological awareness and early reading achievement. In FeldmanL. (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing (pp. 189-209). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
12.
CarlisleJ. F. (2000). Awareness of the structure and meaning of morphologically complex words: Impact on reading. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12, 169-190.
13.
CarlisleJ. F. (2003). Morphology matters in learning to read: A commentary. Reading Psychology, 24(3), 291-322.
14.
CarlisleJ. F. (2007). Fostering morphological processing, vocabulary development, and reading comprehension. In WagnerR. K.MuseA.TannenbaumK. (Eds.), Vocabulary development and its implications for reading comprehension (pp. 78-103). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
15.
CarlisleJ. F.FlemingJ. (2003). Lexical processing of morphologically complex words in the elementary years. Scientific Studies of Reading, 7(3), 239-253.
CarlisleJ. F.StoneC. A. (2003). The effects of morphological structure on children’s reading of derived words. In AssinkE.SantaD. (Eds.), Reading complex words: Cross-language studies. New York, NY: Kluwer.
18.
Carrow-WoolfolkE. (1995). OWLS Listening Comprehension and Oral Expression Scale. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
19.
ChampionA. (1997). Knowledge of suffixed words: A comparison of reading disable and nondisabled readers. Annals of Dyslexia, 47, 29-55.
20.
ClarkE. V. (1995). The lexicon and syntax. In MillerJ. L.EismasP. D. (Eds.), Speech, language and communication (pp. 303-337). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
21.
ClarkN. L. (1972). Hierarchical structure of comprehension skills (2 vols.) Hawthorn, Victoria, Australia: A.C.E.R.
22.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.) Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
23.
CrossonA. C.LesauxN. K. (2009). Revisiting assumptions about the relationship of fluent reading to comprehension: Spanish-speakers’ text-reading fluency in English. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 23, 475-494.
24.
DavisF. B. (1944). Fundamental factors of comprehension in reading. Psychometrika, 9(3), 185-197.
25.
DavisF. B. (1968). Research in comprehension in reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 3(4), 499-545.
26.
DeaconS. H.KirbyJ. R. (2004). Morphological awareness: Just “more phonological”? The roles of morphological and phonological awareness in reading development. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25(2), 223-238.
27.
DixonP.LeFevreJ.TwilleyL. (1988). Word knowledge and working memory as predictors of reading skill. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(4), 465-472.
28.
DreherM. J.ZengeS. D. (1990). Using metalinguistic awareness in first grade to predict reading achievement in third and fifth grades. Journal of Educational Research, 84(1), 13-21.
29.
DunnL. M.DunnL. M. (1997). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test (3rd ed.). Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
30.
FeldtR. C. (1988). Predicting academic performance: Nelson-Denny Reading Test and measures of college students’ study of expository prose. Psychological Reports, 63, 579-582.
31.
FlaxJ.RealpeT.HirschL. S.NawynJ. (2000, November). Relationship of language subtypes and literacy skills in families with a history of SLI. Poster presented at the conference of the American Speech, Language and Hearing Association, Washington, DC.
32.
FreydP.BaronJ. (1982). Individual differences in acquisition of derivational morphology. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 21, 282-295.
33.
FrostR. (1998). Toward a strong phonological theory of visual word recognition: True issues and false trails. Psychological Bulletin, 123(1), 71-99.
GelderenA. V.SchoonenR.GlooperK. D.HulstijinJ.SimisA.SnellingsP.StevensonM. (2004). Linguistic knowledge, processing speed, and metacognitive knowledge in first- and second-language reading comprehension: A componential analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(1), 19-30.
36.
GombertJ. E. (1992). Metalinguistic development. London, UK: Harvest Wheatsheaf.
37.
GottardoA.SiegelS. L.StanovichK. E. (1997). The assessment of adults with reading disabilities: What can we learn from experimental tasks. Journal of Research in Reading, 20, 42-54.
38.
GoughP. B.HooverW. A.PetersonC. L. (1996). Some observations on a simple view of reading. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
39.
GoughP. B.TunmerW. (1986). Decoding, reading and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7(1), 6-10.
40.
HerrimanM. (1991). Metalinguistic development. Australian Journal of Reading, 14(4), 326-338.
41.
HillM. M. (1996). What’s in a word? Enhancing English vocabulary development by increasing learner awareness. In StoreyP.BerryV.BuntonD.HoareP. (Eds.), Issues in language in education (pp. 179-190). Hong Kong: Hong Kong Institute of Education.
42.
HooverW. A.GoughP. B. (1990). The simple view of reading. Reading and Writing, 2(2), 127-160.
43.
HuL.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structural analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1-55.
44.
JohnstonA. M.BarnesM. A.DesrochersA. (2008). Reading comprehension: Developmental processes, individual differences, and interventions. Canadian Psychology, 49(2), 125-132.
45.
KempN.NillsonJ.ArciuliJ. (2009). Noun or verb? Adult readers’ sensitivity to spelling cues to grammatical category in word endings. Reading and Writing, 22(6), 661-685.
46.
KennedyD. K.WeenerP. (1973). Visual and auditory training with the cloze procedure to improve reading and listening comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 8(4), 524-541.
47.
KuY.AndersonR. C. (2003). Development of morphological awareness in Chinese and English. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 16(5), 399-422.
48.
LandauerT. K.DumaisS. T. (1997). A solution to Plato’s problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 104(2), 211-240.
49.
LandiN. (2009). An examination of the relationship between higher-order and lower-order reading subskills in adults. Reading and Writing, 23(6), 701-717.
50.
LaveryL.TownsendM. (1998). Computer-assisted instruction in teaching literacy skills to adults not in paid employment. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 33(2), 181-192.
51.
LaytonA.RobinsonJ.LawsonM. (1998). The relationship between syntactic awareness and reading performance. Journal of Research in Reading, 21(1), 5-23.
52.
LeonardL. B.MillerC.GerberE. (1990). Grammatical morphology and the lexicon in children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 42, 678-689.
53.
LeongC. K. (1989). Effects of morphological structure on reading proficiency: A developmental study. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 1, 357-379.
54.
MacKinnonD. P.LockwoodC. M.HoffmanJ. M.WestS. G.SheetsV. (2002). A comparison of methods to test the significance of mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychological Methods, 7(1), 83-104.
55.
MahonyD. L. (1994). Using sensitivity to word structure to explain variance in high school and college level reading ability. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 19-44.
56.
MahonyD. L.SingsonM.MannV. (2000). Reading ability and sensitivity to morphological relations. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12(3), 191-218.
57.
MarshH. M. (1994). Using the National Longitudinal Study of 1988 to evaluate theoretical models of self-concept: The Self-Description Questionnaire. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(3), 439-456.
58.
MattinglyI. (1972). Reading, the linguistic process, and linguistic awareness. In KavanaghJ.MattinglyI. (Eds.), Language by ear and by eye (pp. 133-147). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
59.
McBride-ChangC.ShuH.ZhouA.WatC.-P.WagnerR. K. (2003). Morphological awareness uniquely predicts young children’s Chinese character recognition. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 743-751.
60.
NagyW. (2007). Metalinguistic awareness and the vocabulary-comprehension connection. In WagnerR. K.MuseA.TannenbaumK. (Eds.), Vocabulary development and its implication for reading comprehension (pp. 52-77). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
61.
NagyW.AndersonR. (1984). The number of words in printed school English. Reading Research Quarterly, 19, 304-330.
62.
NagyW.AndersonR.SchommerM.ScottJ.StallmanA. (1989). Morphological families in the internal lexicon. Reading Research Quarterly, 24, 262-282.
63.
NagyW.BerningerV. W.AbbottR. D. (2006). Contributions of morphology beyond phonology to literacy outcomes of upper elementary and middle-school students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(1), 134-147.
64.
NagyW.BerningerV.AbbottR.VaughanK.VermeulenK. (2003). Relationship of morphology and other language skills to literacy skills in at-risk second-grade readers and at-risk fourth-grade writers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(4), 730-742.
65.
NagyW.DiakidoyI.AndersonR. (1993). The acquisition of morphology: learning the contribution of suffixes to the meaning of derivatives. Journal of Reading Behavior, 25(2), 155-170.
66.
NagyW. E.ScottJ. A. (2000). Vocabulary processes. In KamilM. L.MosenthalP. B.PearsonP. D.BarrR. (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 269-284). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
67.
National Institute of Childe Health and Human Development Early Child Care Research Network. (2005). Pathways to reading: The role of oral language in the transition to reading. Developmental Psychology, 41(2), 428-442.
68.
NunesT.BryantP.OlssonJ. (2003). Learning morphological and phonological spelling rules: An intervention study. Scientific Studies of Reading, 7(3), 289-307.
69.
PalmerJ.MacLeodC. M.HuntE.DavidsonJ. E. (1985). Information processing correlates of reading. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 59-88.
70.
PerfettiC. A.HartL. (2002). The lexical quality hypothesis (LQH). In VerhoevenL. (Ed.), Precursors of functional literacy (pp. 189-213). Philadelphia, PA: Benjamins.
71.
PreacherK. J.LeonardelliG. J. (2001). Calculation for the Sobel test: An interactive calculation tool for mediation tests[Computer software]. Retrieved from http://www.quantpsy.org
72.
ProctorC.CarloM.AugustD.SnowC. (2005). Native Spanish-speaking children in English: Toward a model of comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 9, 246-256.
73.
SemelE.WiigE.SecordW.SabersD. (1987). Clinical Evaluation of Language Functions–Revised: Technical manual. New York, NY: Psychological Corp.
74.
ShaywitzS.E. (2003). Overcoming dyslexia: A new and complete science-based program for reading problems at any level. New York, NY: Knopf.
75.
SingsonM.MahonyD.MannV. (2000). The relation between reading ability and morphological skills: Evidence from derivational suffixes. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12, 219-252.
76.
StanovichK. E.CunninghamA. E. (1992). Studying the consequences of literacy within a literate society: the cognitive correlates of print exposure. Memory & Cognition, 20(1), 51-68.
77.
StoltzJ. A.FeldmanL. B. (1995). The role of orthographic and semantic transparency of the base morpheme in morphological processing. In FeldmanL. B. (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing (pp. 109-129). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
78.
TannenbaumK. R.TorgesenJ. K.WagnerR. K. (2006). Word knowledge and reading comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 10(4), 381-398.
79.
TunmerW. E.HerrimanM. L.NesdaleA. R. (1988). Metalinguistic abilities and beginning reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 23(2), 134-158.
80.
TunmerW. E.NesdaleA. R.WrightA. D. (1987). Syntactic awareness and reading acquisition. British Journal of Development Psychology, 5, 25-34.
81.
TylerA.NagyW. (1990). Use of derivational morphology during reading. Cognition, 36(1), 17-34.
82.
VellutinoF. R. (1979). Dyslexia: Theory and research. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
83.
VellutinoF. R.FletcherJ. M.SnowlingM. J.ScanlonD. M. (2004). Specific reading disability (dyslexia): What have we learned in the past four decades?Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45(1), 2-40.
84.
VerhoevenL.PerfettiC. (2003). Introduction to this special issue: The role of morphology in learning to read. Scientific Studies of Reading, 7(3), 209-217.
85.
WallaceG.HammillD. D. (2002). Comprehensive Receptive and Expressive Vocabulary Test (2nd ed.). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
86.
WeaverP. A. (1979). Improving reading comprehension: Effects of sentence organization instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 15(1), 129-146.
WilliamsR. S.AriO.SantamariaC. (in press). Measuring post-secondary students’ reading comprehension ability using cloze tests. Journal of Research in Reading.
89.
WoodP. H. (1982). The Nelson-Denny Reading Test as a predictor of college of freshman grades. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 42(2), 575-583.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
