This article presents findings from an intervention across sixth and seventh grades to teach academic words to middle school students. The goals included investigating a progression of outcomes from word knowledge to comprehension and investigating the processes students use in establishing word meaning. Participants in Year 1 were two sixth-grade reading teachers and 105 students (treatment n = 62; control n = 43) and in Year 2, one seventh-grade reading teacher and 87 students (treatment n = 44; control n = 43) from the same public school. In both years, results favored instructed students in word knowledge, lexical access, and morphological awareness on researcher-designed measures. In Year 2, small advances were also found for comprehension. Transcripts of lessons shed light on processes of developing representations of unfamiliar words.
AdlofS.CattsH.LittleT. (2006). Should the simple view of reading include a fluency component?Reading and Writing, 19(9), 933–958.
2.
American Institutes for Research. (2006). Lessons and recommendations from the Alabama Reading Initiative: Sustaining focus on secondary reading. Washington, DC: Author.
3.
AnglinJ. M. (1993). Vocabulary development: A morphological analysis. Monographs of the Society of Research in Child Development, 58(10), 1–186.
4.
ApplebeeA. N.LangerJ. A.NystrandM.GamoranA. (2003). Discussion-based approaches to developing understanding: Classroom instruction and student performance in middle and high school English. American Educational Research Journal, 40(3), 685–730.
5.
ApthorpH. S.RandelB.CherasaroT.ClarkT.McKeownM. G.BeckI. L. (2012). Effects of a supplemental vocabulary program on word knowledge and passage comprehension. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 5(2), 160–188.
6.
AugustD.Branum-MartinL.Cardenas-HaganE.FrancisD. J. (2009). The impact of an instructional intervention on the science and language learning of middle grade English Language Learners. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 2(4), 345–376.
7.
BaconD. L. (2005). Word master: Seeing and using words (Level 7). Oakdale, NY: EDCON Publishing Group.
8.
BaughA. C.CableT. (1978). A history of the English language (6th ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
9.
BaumannJ. F.Kame’enuiE. J.AshG. E. (2003). Research on vocabulary instruction: Voltaire redux. In FloodJ.LappD.SquireJ. R.JensenJ. M. (Eds.), Handbook of research on teaching the English language arts (pp. 752–785). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum & Associates.
10.
BeckI. L.FarrR. C.StricklandD. S.AdaA. F.HudsonR. F.McKeownM. G.… WashingtonJ. A. (2009). Storytown: A Harcourt reading/language arts program. Orlando, FL: Harcourt, Inc.
11.
BeckI. L.McKeownM. G. (1985). Teaching vocabulary: Making the instruction fit the goal. Educational Perspectives, 23(1), 11–15.
12.
BeckI. L.McKeownM. G. (1991). Conditions of vocabulary acquisition. In BarrR.KamilM. L.MosenthalP.PearsonP. D. (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 2, pp. 789–814). New York, NY: Longman.
13.
BeckI. L.McKeownM. G.KucanL. (2002). Bringing words to life: Robust vocabulary instruction. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
14.
BeckI. L.McKeownM. G.KucanL. (2013). Bringing words to life: Robust vocabulary instruction (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
15.
BeckI. L.PerfettiC. A.McKeownM. G. (1982). The effects of long-term vocabulary instruction on lexical access and reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74(4), 506–521.
16.
BlantonW.MoormanG. (1990). The presentation of reading lessons. Reading Research and Instruction, 29(3), 35–55.
17.
BosC. S.AndersP. L. (1990). Effects of interactive vocabulary instruction on the vocabulary learning and reading comprehension of junior-high learning disabled students. Learning Disability Quarterly, 13(1), 31–42.
18.
BosC. S.AndersP. L. (1992). Using interactive teaching and learning strategies to promote text comprehension and content learning for students with learning disabilities. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 39(3), 225–238.
19.
BowersP. N.KirbyJ. R.DeaconS. H. (2010). The effects of morphological instruction on literacy skills: A systematic review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 80(2), 144–179. doi:10.3102/0034654309359353
20.
BurtonV. J.WatkinsR. V. (2007). Measuring word learning: Dynamic versus static assessment of kindergarten vocabulary. Journal of Communication Disorders, 40(5), 335–356.
21.
CarlisleJ. F. (1995). Morphological awareness and early reading achievement. In FeldmanL. (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing (pp. 189–209). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
22.
CarlisleJ. F. (2000). Awareness of the structure and meaning of morphologically complex words: Impact on reading. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12(3–4), 169–190.
23.
CarloM. S.AugustD.McLaughlinB.SnowC. E.DresslerC.LippmanD. N.WhiteC. E. (2004). Closing the gap: Addressing the vocabulary needs of English-language learners in bilingual and mainstream classrooms. Reading Research Quarterly, 39(2), 188–215.
24.
CarrollJ. B. (1971). Development of native language skills beyond the early years. In ReedC. (Ed.), The learning of language (pp. 97–156). New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
25.
ConnorC. M.SpencerM.DayS. L.GiulianiS.IngebrandS. W.McLeanL.MorrisonF. J. (2014). Capturing the complexity: Content, type, and amount of instruction and quality of the classroom learning environment synergistically predict third graders’ vocabulary and reading comprehension outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(3), 762–778.
26.
CoxheadA. (2000). A new academic word list. TESOL Quarterly, 34(2), 213–238.
27.
CoyneM. D.McCoachD. B.LoftusS.ZipoliR.RubyM.CrevecoeurY.KappS. (2010). Direct and extended vocabulary instruction in kindergarten: Investigating transfer effects. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 3(2), 93–120.
28.
CromleyJ. G.AzevedoR. (2007). Testing and refining the direct and inferential mediation model of reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(2), 311–325.
29.
CrossonA. C.McKeownM. G. (2016). Middle school learners’ use of Latin roots to infer the meaning of unfamiliar words. Cognition and Instruction, 34(2), 1–24.
30.
CurtisM. E. (2006). The role of vocabulary instruction in adult basic education. In ComingsJ.GarnerB.SmithC. (Eds.), Review of adult learning and literacy (Vol. 6, pp. 43–69). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
31.
CurtisM. E.LongoA. M. (2001). Teaching vocabulary to adolescents to improve comprehension. Reading Online, 5(4).
32.
DaviesM. (2008). The corpus of contemporary American English (COCA): 385 million words, 1990–present. Retrieved from http://www.americancorpus.org
33.
DavisF. B. (1944). Fundamental factors in reading comprehension. Psychometrika, 9(3), 185–197.
34.
DurkinD. (1978). What classroom observations reveal about reading comprehension instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 14(4), 481–533.
35.
E-Prime [Software]. (2002). Pittsburgh, PA: Psychology Software Tools Inc.
36.
EllemanA. M.LindoE. J.MorphyP.ComptonD. L. (2009). The impact of vocabulary instruction on passage-level comprehension of school-age children: A Meta-analysis. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 2(1), 1–44.
37.
FellbaumC. (1998). WordNet: An electronic lexical database. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
38.
GardnerD. (2004). Vocabulary input through extensive reading: A comparison of words found in children’s narrative and expository reading materials. Applied Linguistics, 25(1), 1–37.
39.
GoodwinA. P.AhnS. (2013). A meta-analysis of morphological interventions in English: Effects on literacy outcomes for school-age children. Scientific Studies of Reading, 17(4), 257–285. doi:10.1080/10888438.2012.689791
40.
HairrellA.RupleyW.SimmonsD. (2011). The state of vocabulary research. Literacy Research and Instruction, 50(4), 253–271. doi:10.1080/19388071.2010.514036
41.
HarmonJ. M.HedrickW. B.WoodK. D. (2005). Research on vocabulary instruction in the content areas: Implications for struggling readers. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 21(3), 261–280.
42.
HellerR.GreenleafC. L. (2007). Literacy instruction in the content areas: Getting to the core of middle and high school improvement. Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education.
43.
HiebertE. H.CervettiG. N. (2012). What differences in narrative and informational texts mean for the learning and instruction of vocabulary. In Kame’enuiE. J.BaumannJ. F. (Eds.), Vocabulary instruction: Research to practice (2nd ed., pp. 322–344). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
44.
JenkinsJ. R.PanyD.SchreckJ. (1978). Vocabulary and reading comprehension: Instructional effects (Tech. Rep. No. 100). Urbana, IL: University of Illinois, Center for the Study of Reading.
45.
Kame’enuiE. J.CarnineD. W.FreschiR. (1982). Effects of text construction and instructional procedures for teaching word meanings on comprehension and recall. Reading Research Quarterly, 17(3), 367–388.
46.
LawrenceJ. F.CrossonA. C.Paré-BlagoevE. J.SnowC. (2015). Word generation randomized trial: Discussion mediates the impact of program treatment on academic word learning. American Educational Research Journal, 52(4), 750–786.
47.
LesauxN. K.KiefferM. J.FallerE.KelleyJ. (2010). The effectiveness and ease of implementation of an academic vocabulary intervention for linguistically diverse students in urban middle schools. Reading Research Quarterly, 45(2), 198–230.
48.
LesauxN. K.KiefferM. J.KelleyJ. G.HarrisJ. R. (2014). Effects of academic vocabulary instruction for linguistically diverse adolescents: Evidence from a randomized field trial. American Educational Research Journal, 51(6), 1159–1194. doi:10.3102/0002831214532165
49.
LublinerS.HiebertE. (2011). An analysis of English-Spanish cognates as a source of general academic language. Bilingual Research Journal, 34(1), 76–93.
50.
MacGinitieW. H.MacGinitieR. K.MariaK.DreyerL. G.HughesK. E. (2007). GMRT-MacGinitie Reading Tests, Level 7/9 (4th ed.). Rolling Meadows, IL: Riverside Publishing.
51.
MargoseinC. M.PascarellaE. T.PflaumS. W. (1982, April). The effects of instruction using semantic mapping on vocabulary and comprehension. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York, NY.
52.
MarulisL. M.NeumanS. B. (2013). How vocabulary interventions affect young at-risk children’s word learning: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 6(3), 224–263.
53.
MatsumuraL. C.GarnierH. E.SpybrookJ. (2013). Literacy coaching to improve student reading achievement: A multi-level mediation model. Learning and Instruction, 25, 35–48.
54.
MatsumuraL. C.SlaterS.CrossonA. C. (2008). Classroom climate, rigorous instruction and curriculum, and students’ interactions in urban middle schools. Elementary School Journal, 108(4), 293–312.
55.
McKeownM. G.BeckI. L.BlakeR. G. K. (2009). Rethinking comprehension instruction: Comparing strategies and content instructional approaches. Reading Research Quarterly, 44(3), 218–253.
56.
McKeownM. G.BeckI. L.OmansonR. C.PerfettiC. A. (1983). The effects of long-term vocabulary instruction on reading comprehension: A replication. Journal of Reading Behavior, 15(1), 3–18.
57.
McKeownM. G.BeckI. L.OmansonR. C.PopleM. T. (1985). How specific aspects of vocabulary instruction contribute to the knowledge and use of words. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, Chicago, IL.
58.
McKeownM. G.CrossonA. C.BeckI. L.ArtzN. J.SandoraC.MooreD. (2014, April). Word knowledge and comprehension outcomes for the second year of implementation of an academic word vocabulary intervention. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, Philadelphia, PA.
59.
McKeownM. G.DeaneP. D.ScottJ. A.KrovetzR.LawlessR. R. (2017). Vocabulary assessment to support instruction: Building rich word-learning experiences. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
MezynskiK. (1983). Issues concerning the acquisition of knowledge: Effects of vocabulary training on reading comprehension. Review of Educational Research, 53(2), 253–279.
62.
MyersL. M. (1966). The roots of modern English. New York, NY: Little, Brown and Company.
63.
NagyW. E.BerningerV.AbbottR.VaughanK.VermeulenK. (2003). Relationship of morphology and other language skills to literacy skills in at-risk second grade readers and at-risk fourth grade writers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(4), 730–742.
64.
NagyW. E.ScottJ. A. (2000). Vocabulary processes. In KamilM. L.MosenthalP. B.David PearsonP.BarrR. (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. III, pp. 69–284). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
65.
NationI. S. P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction (NIH Pub. No. 00-4754). Washington, DC: National Institutes of Health.
68.
NelsonJ. R.StageS. A. (2007). Fostering the development of vocabulary knowledge and reading comprehension though contextually-based multiple meaning vocabulary instruction. Education & Treatment of Children, 30(1), 1–22.
69.
NystrandM. (1997). Opening dialogue: Understanding the dynamics of language and learning in the English classroom. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
70.
PachecoM. B.GoodwinA. P. (2013). Putting two and two together: Middle school students’ morphological problem-solving strategies for unknown words. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 56(7), 541–553. doi:10.1002/jaal.181
71.
PalincsarA. S.BrownA. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1(2), 117–175.
72.
PearsonP. D.HiebertE. H.KamilM. L. (2007). Vocabulary assessment: What we know and what we need to learn. Reading Research Quarterly, 42(2), 282–296.
73.
PerfettiC. A. (2007). Reading ability: Lexical quality to comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11(4), 357–383.
74.
PerfettiC. A.AdlofS. M. (2012). Reading comprehension: A conceptual framework from word meaning to text meaning. In SabatiniJ. P.AlbroE. R.O’ReillyT. (Eds.), Measuring up: Advances in how to assess reading ability (pp. 3–20). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Education.
75.
PerfettiC. A.HartL. (2002). The lexical quality hypothesis. In VerhoevenL.ElbroC.ReitsmaP. (Eds.), Precursors of functional literacy (pp. 189–214). Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
76.
PerfettiC.StafuraJ. (2014). Word knowledge in a theory of reading comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 18(1), 22–37.
77.
PoehnerM. E.LantolfJ. P. (2010). Vygotsky’s teaching-assessment dialectic and L2 education: The case for dynamic assessment. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 17, 312–330. doi:10.1080/10749030903338509
78.
ReichleE. D.PerfettiC. A. (2003). Morphology in word identification: A word-experience model that accounts for morpheme frequency effects. Scientific Studies of Reading, 7(1), 219–238.
79.
RichterT.IsbernerM.NaumannJ.NeebY. (2013). Lexical quality and reading comprehension in primary school children. Scientific Studies of Reading, 17(6), 415–434.
80.
ScottJ.NagyW. E. (1997). Understanding the definitions of unfamiliar verbs. Reading Research Quarterly, 32(2), 184–200.
SingerH. (1965). A developmental model of speed of reading in Grade 3 through 6. Reading Research Quarterly, 1(1), 29–49.
83.
SnowC.LawrenceJ.WhiteC. (2009). Generating knowledge of academic language among urban middle school students. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 2(4), 325–344. doi:10.1080/19345740903167042
84.
SpearrittD. (1972). Identification of subskills of reading comprehension by maximum likelihood factor analysis. Reading Research Quarterly, 8, 92–111.
85.
StahlS. A.FairbanksM. M. (1986). The effects of vocabulary instruction: A model-based meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 56(1), 72–110.
86.
TannenbaumK. R.TorgesenJ. K.WagnerR. K. (2006). Relationships between word knowledge and reading comprehension in third-grade children. Scientific Studies of Reading, 10(4), 381–398.
VaughnS.MartinezL. R.Linan-ThompsonS.ReutebuchC. K.CarlsonC. D.FrancisD. J. (2009). Enhancing social studies vocabulary and comprehension for seventh-grade English language learners. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 2(4), 297–324.
89.
WrightT. S.CervettiG. N. (2017). A systematic review of the research on vocabulary instruction that impacts text comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 52(2), 203–226. doi:10.1002/rrq.163
90.
YangC-L.PerfettiC. A.SchmalhoferF. (2005). Less skilled comprehenders’ ERPs show sluggish word-to-text integration processes. Written Language & Literacy, 8(2), 233–257.
91.
YangC-L.PerfettiC. A.SchmalhoferF. (2007). Event-related potential indicators of text integration across sentence boundaries. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33(1), 55–89.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
