A Quantile Regression Approach to Understanding the Relations Among Morphological Awareness,Vocabulary,and Reading Comprehension in Adult Basic Education Students

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the joint and unique contributions of morphological awareness and vocabulary knowledge at five reading comprehension levels in adult basic education (ABE) students. We introduce the statistical technique of multiple quantile regression, which enabled us to assess the predictive utility of morphological awareness and vocabulary knowledge at multiple points (quantiles) along the continuous distribution of reading comprehension. To demonstrate the efficacy of our multiple quantile regression analysis, we compared and contrasted our results with a traditional multiple regression analytic approach. Our results indicated that morphological awareness and vocabulary knowledge accounted for a large portion of the variance (82%–95%) in reading comprehension skills across all quantiles. Morphological awareness exhibited the greatest unique predictive ability at lower levels of reading comprehension whereas vocabulary knowledge exhibited the greatest unique predictive ability at higher levels of reading comprehension. These results indicate the utility of using multiple quantile regression to assess trajectories of component skills across multiple levels of reading comprehension. The implications of our findings for ABE programs are discussed.

Keywords

adult basic education morphological awareness quantile regression reading comprehension vocabulary knowledge

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Berko

(1958). The child’s learning of English morphology. Word, 14, 150–177.

Binder

K. S.

Lee

(2012). Reader profiles for adults with low literacy skills: A quest to find resilient readers. Journal of Research and Practice for Adult Literacy, Secondary, and Basic Education, 1(2), 19–30.

Carlisle

J. F.

(1988). Knowledge of derivational morphology and spelling ability in fourth, sixth, and eighth graders. Applied Psycholinguistics, 9, 247–266.

Carlisle

J. F.

(2000). Awareness of the structure and meaning of morphologically complex words: Impact on reading. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12, 169–190.

Carlisle

J. F.

(2003). Morphology matters in learning to read: A commentary. Reading Psychology, 24, 291–322.

Catts

H. W.

Petscher

Schatschneider

Bridges

M. S.

Mendoza

(2009). Floor effects associated with universal screening and their impact on the early identification of reading disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42, 163–176.

CTB/McGraw-Hill. (2008). Test of Adult Basic Education (TABE). Monterey, CA: Author.

Cutting

L. E.

Scarborough

H. S.

(2006). Prediction of reading comprehension: Relative contributions of word recognition, language proficiency, and other cognitive skills can depend on how comprehension is measured. Scientific Studies of Reading, 10, 277–299.

Derwing

(1976). Morpheme recognition and the learning of rules for derivational morphology. Canadian Journal of Linguistics, 21, 38–66.

10.

Derwing

B. L.

Baker

W. J.

(1979). Recent research on the acquisition of English morphology. In Fletcher

Garman

(Eds.), Language acquisition: Studies in first language development (pp. 209–223). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

11.

Dunn

L. M.

Dunn

D. M.

(2007). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test–Fourth Edition (PPVT-4). Circle Pines, MN: Pearson Assessments.

12.

Greenberg

(2007). Tales from the field: The struggles and challenges of conducting ethical and quality research in the field of adult literacy. In Belzer

(Ed.), Toward defining and improving quality in adult basic education (pp. 53–67). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

13.

Hall

Greenberg

Laures-Gore

Pae

H. K.

(2014). The relationship between expressive vocabulary knowledge and reading skills for adult struggling readers. Journal of Research in Reading, 37, 87–100.

14.

Herman

Gilbert-Cote

Reilly

Binder

K. S.

(2013). Literacy skill differences between adult native English and native Spanish speakers. Journal of Research and Practice for Adult Literacy, Secondary, and Basic Education, 2, 142–155.

15.

Kieffer

M. J.

Lesaux

N. K.

(2008). The role of derivational morphology in the reading comprehension of Spanish-speaking English language learners. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 21, 783–804.

16.

Koenker

(2005). Quantile regression. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

17.

Koenker

Bassett

(1978). Regression quantiles. Econometrica, 46, 33–50.

18.

Koenker

Bassett

(1982). Robust tests for heteroscedasticity based on regression quantiles. Econometrica, 50, 43–61.

19.

Koenker

Hallock

K. F.

(2001). Quantile regression. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15, 143–156.

20.

Y.-M.

Anderson

R. C.

(2003). Development of morphological awareness in Chinese and English. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 16, 399–422.

21.

Leong

C. K.

(2000). Rapid processing of base and derived forms of words and grades 4, 5, and 6 children’s spelling. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12, 277–302.

22.

Lesgold

A. M.

Welch-Ross

(Eds.). (2012). Improving adult literacy instruction: Options for practice and research. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

23.

Logan

J. A. R.

Petrill

S. A.

Hart

S. A.

Schatschneider

Thompson

L. A.

Deater-Deckard

. . . Bartlett

(2012). Heritability across the distribution: An application of quantile regression. Behavior Genetics, 42, 256–267.

24.

Maag

(2007) Measuring morphological awareness in adult readers: Implications for vocabulary development (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Florida, Gainesville.

25.

MacArthur

C. A.

Konold

T. R.

Glutting

J. J.

Alamprese

J. A.

(2010). Reading component skills of learners in adult basic education. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 43, 108–121.

26.

MacArthur

C. A.

Konold

T. R.

Glutting

J. J.

Alamprese

J. A.

(2012). Subgroups of adult basic education learners with different profiles of reading skills. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 25, 587–609.

27.

Mahony

D. L.

(1994). Using sensitivity to word structure to explain variance in high school and college level reading ability. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 6, 19–44.

28.

Martin

N. A.

Brownell

(2011). Expressive One-Word Picture Vocabulary Test–Fourth Edition (EOWPT-4). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.

29.

Mellard

D. F.

Fall

(2012). Component model of reading comprehension for adult education participants. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 35, 10–23.

30.

Mellard

D. F.

Fall

Mark

(2009). Reading profiles for adults with low-literacy: Cluster analysis with power and speeded measures. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 22, 975–992.

31.

Mellard

Fall

Woods

(2010). A path analysis of reading comprehension for adults with low literacy. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 43, 154–165.

32.

Meng

X.-L.

Rosenthal

Rubin

D. B.

(1992). Comparing correlated correlation coefficients. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 172–175.

33.

Muse

A. E.

(2005). The nature of morphological knowledge (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Florida State University, Tallahassee.

34.

Muthén

L. K.

Muthén

B. O.

(1998–2012). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.

35.

Nagy

Berninger

V. W.

Abbott

R. D.

(2006). Contribution of morphology beyond phonology to literacy outcomes of upper elementary and middle-school students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 134–147.

36.

Nagy

W. E.

Berninger

Abbott

Vaughan

Vermeulen

(2003). Relationship of morphology and other language skills to literacy skills in at-risk second-grade readers and at-risk fourth-grade writers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 730–742.

37.

Nunes

Bryant

Bindman

(1997). Morphological spelling strategies: Developmental stages and processes. Developmental Psychology, 33, 637–649.

38.

Nunes

Bryant

Bindman

(2006). The effects of learning to spell on children’s awareness of morphology. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 19, 767–787.

39.

Petscher

Kim

Y.-S.

(2011). The utility and accuracy of oral reading fluency score types in predicting reading comprehension. Journal of School Psychology, 49, 107–129.

40.

Petscher

Logan

J. A. R.

(2014). Quantile regression in the study of developmental sciences. Child Development, 85, 861–881.

41.

Petscher

Logan

J. A. R.

Zhou

(2013). Extending conditional means modeling: An introduction to quantile regression. In Petscher

Schatschneider

Compton

D. L.

(Eds.), Applied quantitative analysis in the social sciences (pp. 3–33). New York, NY: Routledge.

42.

R Development Core Team. (2011). R: A language and environment for statistical computing [Computer software]. Vienna, Austria: R Foundational for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from http://www.R-project.org

43.

Reeves

E. B.

Lowe

(2009). Quantile regression: An education policy research tool. Southern Rural Sociology, 24, 175–199.

44.

Sabatini

J. P.

Sawaki

Shore

Scarborough

(2010). Relationships among reading skills of adults with low literacy. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 43, 122–138.

45.

SAS Institute Inc. (2012). Base SAS 9.2 utilities: Reference. Cary, NC: Author.

46.

Singson

Mahony

Mann

(2000). The relation between reading ability and morphological skills: Evidence from derivation suffixes. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12, 219–252.

47.

Strucker

Yamamoto

Kirsch

(2007). The relationship of component skills of reading to IALS performance: Tipping points and five classes of adult literacy learners. Cambridge, MA: National Center for the Study of Adult Learning and Literacy. Retrieved from http://www.ncsall.net/fileadmin/resources/research/report_29_ials.pdf

48.

Taylor

N. A.

Greenberg

Laures-Gore

Wise

J. C.

(2012). Exploring the syntactic skills of struggling adult readers. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 25, 1385–1402.

49.

Tighe

E. L.

(2012). An investigation of the dimensionality of morphological and vocabulary knowledge in adult basic education students (Unpublished master’s thesis). Florida State University, Tallahassee.

50.

Tighe

E. L.

Binder

K. S.

(2014). An investigation of morphological awareness and processing in adults with low literacy. Applied Psycholinguistics. Advance online publication. doi:10.1017/S0142716413000222

51.

Tighe

E. L.

Schatschneider

(2014). Exploring the dimensionality of morphological awareness and its relations with vocabulary knowledge in adult basic education students. Manuscript submitted for publication.

52.

N. L.

Tighe

E. L.

Binder

K. S.

(in press). Investigating morphological awareness and the processing of transparent and opaque words in adults with low literacy skills and in skilled readers. Journal of Research in Reading.

53.

Tong

Deacon

S. H.

Kirby

J. R.

Cain

Parrila

(2011). Morphological awareness: A key to understanding poor reading comprehension in English. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103, 523–534.

54.

Wagner

R. K.

Torgesen

J. K.

Rashotte

C. A.

Pearson

N. A.

(2010). The Test of Silent Reading Efficiency and Comprehension (TOSREC). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.