Organizational sustainability orientation (OSO) is a concept increasingly gaining prominence among academics and practitioners. The primary goals of this study entail:(a) elucidating about the origins and evolution of OSO, encompassing its conceptual foundations, the scholarly communities instrumental in shaping the field, and its co-evolution with social and environmental orientations; (b) delineating the diverse research streams within the OSO domain and establishing avenues for advancing this line of inquiry; and, (c) proposing a conceptual framework that includes the drivers, consequences, and contextual contingencies associated with OSO. The study employs two bibliometric analyses, namely, co-citation and citation and a qualitative thematic analysis. Drawing on a dataset of 112 scholarly articles, the research provides nuancedinsights into the development and advancement of OSO research, underscores its state of the art, and proposes avenues for future investigations in this evolving field.
AdamsF.GablerC.LandersV. (2021). The hiearchical resource nature of green logistics competency. Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, 36(8), 1474–1485. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBIM-12-2019-0543
2.
AdomakoS.AmoahJ. A.DansoA.KonaduR.AgyeiS. O. (2019). Environmental sustainability orientation and performance of family and nonfamily firms. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28, 1250–1259. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2314
3.
AhmićA. (2022). Strategic sustainability orientation influence on organizational resilience: Moderating effect of firm size. Business Systems Research, 13(1), 169–191. https://doi.org/10.2478/bsrj-2022-0011
4.
Amankwah-AmoahJ.DansoA.AdomakoS. (2018). Entrepreneurial orientation, environmental sustainability and new venture performance: Does stakeholder integration matter?Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(1), 79–87. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2191
5.
Amankwah-AmoahJ.SylliasJ. (2020). Can adopting ambitious environmental sustainability initiatives lead to business failures? An analytical framework. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(1), 240–249. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2361
6.
AndersénJ. (2022). An attention-based view on environmental management: The influence of entrepreneurial orientation, environmental sustainability orientation, and competitive intensity on green product innovation in Swedish small manufacturing firms. Organization and Environment, 35(4), 627–652. https://doi.org/10.1177/10860266221101345
7.
ArditoL.RabyS.AlbinoV.BertoldiB. (2021). The duality of digital and environmental orientations in the context of SMEs: Implications for innovation performance. Journal of Business Research, 123, 44–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.09.022
8.
BakerW. E.MukherjeeD.PerinM. G. (2022). Learning orientation and competitive advantage: A critical synthesis and future directions. Journal of Business Research, 144, 863–873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.02.003
BanerjeeS. B. (2001). Managerial perceptions of corporate environmentalism: Interpretations from industry and strategic implications for organizations. Journal of Management Studies, 38(4), 489–513. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00246
BanerjeeS. B.IyerE. S.KashyapR. K. (2003). Corporate environmentalism: Antecedents and influence of industry type. Journal of Marketing, 67(2), 106–122. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.67.2.106.18604
BouraM.TsouknidisD. A.LioukasS. (2020). The role of pro-social orientation and national context in corporate environmental disclosure. European Management Review, 17(4), 1027–1040. https://doi.org/10.1111/emre.12416
15.
BreuerH.FichterK.Lüdeke-FreundF.TiemannI. (2018). Sustainability-oriented business model development: Principles, criteria and tools. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Venturing, 10(2), 256–286. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEV.2018.092715
16.
BriegerS. A.TerjesenS. A.HechavarríaD. M.WelzelC. (2019). Prosociality in business: A human empowerment framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 159(2), 361–380. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-4045-5
17.
ButticèV.ColomboM. G.FumagalliE.OrsenigoC. (2019). Green oriented crowdfunding campaigns: Their characteristics and diffusion in different institutional settings. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 141, 85–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.07.047
18.
CalicG.MosakowskiE. (2016). Kicking off social entrepreneurship: How a sustainability orientation influences crowdfunding success. Journal of Management Studies, 53(5), 738–767. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12201
19.
CarrollA. B. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34(4), 39–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/0007-6813(91)90005-G
20.
ChanH. F.MoyN.SchaffnerM.TorglerB. (2021). The effects of money saliency and sustainability orientation on reward based crowdfunding success. Journal of Business Research, 125, 443–455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.037
21.
ChanR. Y. K. (2010). Corporate environmentalism pursuit by foreign firms competing in China. Journal of World Business, 45(1), 80–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2009.04.010
22.
ChanR. Y. K.HeH.ChanH. K.WangW. Y. C. (2012). Environmental orientation and corporate performance: The mediation mechanism of green supply chain management and moderating effect of competitive intensity. Industrial Marketing Management, 41(4), 621–630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2012.04.009
23.
ChanR. Y. K.MaK. H. Y. (2016). Environmental orientation of exporting SMEs from an emerging economy: Its antecedents and consequences. Management International Review, 56(5), 597–632. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-016-0280-0
24.
ChavezR.MalikM.GhaderiH.YuW. (2021). Environmental orientation, external environmental information exchange and environmental performance: Examining mediation and moderation effects. International Journal of Production Economics, 240, 108222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2021.108222
25.
ChengC. C. J. (2020). Sustainability orientation, green supplier involvement, and green innovation performance: Evidence from diversifying green entrants. Journal of Business Ethics, 161(2), 393–414. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3946-7
26.
ClaudyM. C.PetersonM.PagellM. (2016). The roles of sustainability orientation and market knowledge competence in new product development success. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 33, 72–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12343
27.
Corral-VerdugoV.BonnesM.Tapia-FonllemC.Fraijo-SingB.Frías-ArmentaM.CarrusG. (2009). Correlates of pro-sustainability orientation: The affinity towards diversity. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29(1), 34–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.09.001
28.
CoşkunA.VocinoA.PolonskyM. (2017). Mediating effect of environmental orientation on pro-environmental purchase intentions in a low-involvement product situation. Australasian Marketing Journal, 25(2), 115–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ausmj.2017.04.008
29.
CovinJ. G.LumpkinG. T. (2011). Entrepreneurial orientation theory and research: Reflections on a needed construct. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 35(5), 855–872.
30.
CroomS.VidalN.SpeticW.MarshallD.McCarthyL. (2018). Impact of social sustainability orientation and supply chain practices on operational performance. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 38(12), 2344–2366. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-03-2017-0180
31.
CunliffeA. L. (2011). Crafting qualitative research: Morgan and smircich 30 years on. Organizational Research Methods, 14(4), 647–673. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428110373658
32.
DangelicoR. M. (2016). Green product innovation: Where we are and where we are going. Business Strategy and the Environment, 25(8), 560–576. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1886
33.
DansoA.AdomakoS.Amankwah-AmoahJ.Owusu-AgyeiS.KonaduR. (2019). Environmental sustainability orientation, competitive strategy and financial performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(5), 885–895. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2291
34.
DansoA.AdomakoS.AmoahJ. A.OwusuS.RenataA. (2019). Environmental sustainability orientation, competitive strategy and financial performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(5), 885–895. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2291
35.
DansoA.AdomakoS.LarteyT.Amankwah-AmoahJ.Owusu-YirenkyiD. (2020). Stakeholder integration, environmental sustainability orientation and financial performance. Journal of Business Research, 119, 652–662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.02.038
36.
de MenezesL. M.Escrig-TenaA. B.Bou-LlusarJ. C. (2021). Sustainability and quality management: Has EFQM fostered a sustainability orientation that delivers to stakeholders?International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 42(13), 155–184. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-10-2021-0634
37.
DiMaggioP. J.PowellW. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101
38.
DmytriyevS. D.FreemanR. E.HörischJ. (2021). The relationship between stakeholder theory and corporate social responsibility: Differences, similarities, and implications for social issues in management. Journal of Management Studies, 58(6), 1441–1470. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12684
39.
DuS.YalcinkayaG.BstielerL. (2016). Sustainability, social media driven open innovation, and new product development performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 33, 55–71. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12334
40.
ElkingtonJ. (2018, June25). 25 years ago I coined the phrase “Triple Bottom Line.” Here’s why it’s time to rethink it. Harvard Business Review.
41.
EmamisalehK.TaimouriA. (2021). Sustainable supply chain management drivers and outcomes: An emphasis on strategic sustainability orientation in the food industries. Independent Journal of Management & Production, 12(1), 282–309. https://doi.org/10.14807/ijmp.v12i1.1238
42.
FirstI.KhetriwalD. S. (2010). Exploring the relationship between environmental orientation and brand value: Is there fire or only smoke?Business Strategy and the Environment, 19(2), 90–103. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.619
43.
Fraj-AndrésE.Martínez-SalinasE.Matute-VallejoJ. (2009). Factors affecting corporate environmental strategy in Spanish industrial firms. Business Strategy and the Environment, 18(8), 500–514. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.611
44.
FreemanR. E. (1984). A stakeholder approach. Pitman.
GablerC. B.RicheyR. G.RappA. (2015). Developing an eco-capability through environmental orientation and organizational innovativeness. Industrial Marketing Management, 45(1), 151–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2015.02.014
47.
GablerC.LandersV.RappA. (2020). How perceptions of firm environmental and social values influence frontline employee outcomes. Journal of Services Marketing, 34(7), 999–1011. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSM-10-2019-0376
48.
GerdtS.WagnerE.ScheweG. (2019). The relationship between sustainability and customer satisfaction in hospitality: An explorative investigation using eWOM as a data source. Tourism Management, 74, 155–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2019.02.010
49.
GhassimB.BogersM. (2019). Linking stakeholder engagement to profitability through sustainability-oriented innovation: A quantitative study of the minerals industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 224, 905–919. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.226
50.
GiantariI. G. A. K.SukaatmadjaI. P. G. (2021). Effects of environmental orientation, green marketing mix and social capital on the competitive advantage of real estate developers in Bali. Property Management, 39(2), 193–209. https://doi.org/10.1108/PM-01-2020-0005
51.
GioiaD. A.CorleyK. G.HamiltonA. L. (2013). Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the Gioia methodology. Organizational Research Methods, 16(1), 15–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428112452151
52.
Ha-BrookshireJ. E.NorumP. S. (2011). Willingness to pay for socially responsible products: Case of cotton apparel. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 28(5), 344–353. https://doi.org/10.1108/07363761111149992
53.
HallgrenK. A. (2012). Computing inter-rater reliability for observational data: An overview and tutorial. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 8(1), 23–34.
54.
HandritoR. P.SlabbinckH.VanderstraetenJ. (2021). Being pro-environmentally oriented SMEs: Understanding the entrepreneur’s explicit and implicit power motives. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(5), 2241–2254. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2741
55.
HartS. L. (1995). A natural-resource-based view of the firm. The Academy of Management, 20(4), 986–1014.
56.
HieblM. R. W. (2021). Sample selection in systematic literature reviews of management research. Organizational Research Methods, 26(2), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428120986851
57.
HongP.JaganiS.KimJ.YounS. H. (2019). Managing sustainability orientation: An empirical investigation of manufacturing firms. International Journal of Production Economics, 211(January), 71–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.01.035
58.
HultG. T. M. (2011). Market-focused sustainability: Market orientation plus!Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-010-0223-4
JainT. (2017). Decoupling corporate social orientations: A cross-national analysis. Business and Society, 56(7), 1033–1067. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650315610609
61.
JohnsonC. D.BauerB. C.CarlsonB. D. (2022). Constituency building: Determining consumers’ willingness to participate in corporate political activities. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 39(1), 42–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2021.06.004
62.
KangJ.SlatenT.ChoiW. J. (2021). Felt betrayed or resisted? The impact of pre-crisis corporate social responsibility reputation on post-crisis consumer reactions and retaliatory behavioral intentions. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28(1), 511–524. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2067
63.
KernF.RoggeK. S.HowlettM. (2019). Policy mixes for sustainability transitions: New approaches and insights through bridging innovation and policy studies. Research Policy, 48(10), 103832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.103832
64.
KhizarH. M. U.IqbalM. J.KhalidJ.AdomakoS. (2022). Addressing the conceptualization and measurement challenges of sustainability orientation: A systematic review and research agenda. Journal of Business Research, 142, 718–743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.01.029
65.
KirchoffJ. F.TateL. W.MollenkopfD. A. (2016). The impact of strategic organizational orientations on green supply chain management and firm performance. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 46(3), 269–292.
66.
KooC.ChungN.RyooS. Y. (2014). How does ecological responsibility affect manufacturing firms’ environmental and economic performance?Total Quality Management and Business Excellence, 25(9), 1171–1189. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2013.835615
67.
KohliA. K.JaworskiB. J. (1990). Market orientation: The construct, research propositions, and managerial implications. Journal of Marketing, 54(2), 7–44. https://doi.org/10.2307/1251866
68.
KuckertzA.WagnerM. (2010). The influence of sustainability orientation on entrepreneurial intentions—Investigating the role of business experience. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(5), 524–539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2009.09.001
69.
LahtinenS.ElinaN. (2020). Co-creating sustainable corporate brands: A consumer framing approach. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 25(3), 447–461. https://doi.org/10.1108/CCIJ-11-2019-0121
70.
LiP. C.ChenY. C. (2012). How does social orientation influence R&D-marketing collaboration?Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 29(1), 151–168. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-010-9195-7
71.
LiS.JayaramanV.PaulrajA.ShangK. C. (2016). Proactive environmental strategies and performance: Role of green supply chain processes and green product design in the Chinese high-tech industry. International Journal of Production Research, 54(7), 2136–2151. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2015.1111532
72.
MadyK.Abdul HalimM. A. S.OmarK. (2022). Drivers of multiple eco-innovation and the impact on sustainable competitive advantage: Evidence from manufacturing SMEs in Egypt. International Journal of Innovation Science, 14(1), 40–61. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJIS-01-2021-0016
73.
ManningS.BejaranoT. A. (2017). Convincing the crowd: Entrepreneurial storytelling in crowdfunding campaigns. Strategic Organization, 15(2), 194–219. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127016648500
74.
MattenD.MoonJ. (2008). “Implicit” and “explicit” CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 33(2), 404–424. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2008.31193458
75.
MengucB.OzanneL. K. (2005). Challenges of the “green imperative”: A natural resource-based approach to the environmental orientation-business performance relationship. Journal of Business Research, 58(4), 430–438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2003.09.002
NathV.AgrawalR. (2020). Agility and lean practices as antecedents of supply chain social sustainability. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 40(10), 1589–1611. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-09-2019-0642
78.
ObeidatS. M.Al BakriA. A.ElbannaS. (2020). Leveraging “Green” human resource practices to enable environmental and organizational performance: Evidence from the Qatari oil and gas industry. Journal of Business Ethics, 164(2), 371–388. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-4075-z
79.
O’KaneP.SmithA.LermanM. P. (2021). Building transparency and trustworthiness in inductive research through computer-aided qualitative data analysis software. Organizational Research Methods, 24(1), 104–139. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428119865016
80.
PanumK.HansenM. W.DavyE. (2018). The illusive nature of social enterprise at the base of the pyramid: Case studies of six Kenyan social enterprises. Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies, 10(2), 249–276. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEEE-11-2016-0051
81.
Peiró-SignesÁ.Segarra-OñaM. (2018). How past decisions affect future behavior on eco-innovation: An empirical study. Business Strategy and the Environment, 27(8), 1233–1244. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2071
82.
PellegriniC.RizziF.FreyM. (2018). The role of sustainable human resource practices in influencing employee behavior for corporate sustainability. Business Strategy and the Environment, 27(8), 1221–1232. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2064
83.
PrasadJ. T. S. (2015). Cross cultural management: An International Journal Article information. Cross Cultural Management: An International Journal, 15(1), 5–19.
84.
RamirezE. (2013). Consumer-defined sustainably-oriented firms and factors influencing adoption. Journal of Business Research, 66(11), 2202–2209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.01.012
85.
RehmanS. U.BrescianiS.YahiaouiD.GiacosaE. (2022). Environmental sustainability orientation and corporate social responsibility influence on environmental performance of small and medium enterprises: The mediating effect of green capability. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 29(6), 1954–1967. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2293
86.
RenningsK. (2000). Redefining innovation—Eco-innovation research and the contribution from ecological economics. Ecological Economics, 32(2), 319–332.
87.
RodriguezR.SvenssonG.Otero-NeiraC. (2019). Framing sustainable development through descriptive determinants in private hospitals—Orientation and organization. Evaluation and Program Planning, 75, 78–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2019.05.006
RoxasB.AshillN.ChadeeD. (2017). Effects of entrepreneurial and environmental sustainability orientations on firm performance: A study of small businesses in the Philippines. Journal of Small Business Management, 55, 163–178. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12259
90.
RoxasB.CoetzerA. (2012). Institutional environment, managerial attitudes and environmental sustainability orientation of small firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 111(4), 461–476. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1211-z
ShahidiN. (2020). The moderating effects of sustainability orientation in the entrepreneurial intention model. Journal of Enterprising Culture, 28(1), 59–79. https://doi.org/10.1142/S021849582050003X
93.
ShubhamS.CharanP.MurtyL. S. (2018). Institutional pressure and the implementation of corporate environment practices: Examining the mediating role of absorptive capacity. Journal of Knowledge Management, 22(7), 1591–1613. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-12-2016-0531
94.
SlaterS. F.OlsonE. M.FinneganC. (2011). Business strategy, marketing organization culture, and performance. Marketing Letters, 22(3), 227–242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-010-9122-1
95.
St-JeanE.LabelleF. (2018). Wanting to change the world, is it too much of a good thing? How sustainable orientation shapes entrepreneurial behaviour. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research, 24(6), 1075–1086. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-03-2018-0130
van EckN. J.WaltmanL. (2017). Citation-based clustering of publications using CitNetExplorer and VOSviewer. Scientometrics, 111(2), 1053–1070. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2300-7
98.
VedulaS.DoblingerC.PachecoD.YorkJ. G.BacqS.RussoM. V.DeanT. J. (2022). Entrepreneurship for the public good: A review, critique, and path forward for social and environmental entrepreneurship research. Academy of Management Annals, 16(1), 391–425. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2019.0143
von GeiblerJ.PiwowarJ.GrevenA. (2019). The SDG-check: Guiding open innovation towards sustainable development goals. Technology Innovation Management Review, 9(3), 20–37. https://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1222
101.
WagnerM. (2012). Ventures for the public good and entrepreneurial intentions: An empirical analysis of sustainability orientation as a determining factor. Journal of Small Business and Entrepreneurship, 25(4), 519–531. https://doi.org/10.1080/08276331.2012.10593587
102.
WernerfeltB. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171–180.
103.
YangM. G.RohJ. J.KangM. (2020). The role of strategic environmental orientation in environmental design practices. Management Decision, 59(2), 341–357. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-07-2019-086
104.
ZameerH.WangY.YasmeenH.MubarakS. (2022). Green innovation as a mediator in the impact of business analytics and environmental orientation on green competitive advantage. Management Decision, 60(2), 488–507. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-01-2020-0065
105.
ZupicI.ČaterT. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429–472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
