The role of sustainability accounting in promoting organizational change toward more sustainable practices is a relevant area of research for both accounting and organization studies. Despite the interdisciplinary nature of this topic, while accounting research was imagining and exploring the transformative potential of social and environmental accounting practices since the inception of this activity, scholars in organization studies have recently developed a more general interest in this matter. This article aims to review how the association between sustainability accounting and reporting and sustainable organizational change has been examined in both disciplines to elaborate on some potential bridges to foster the creation of an interdisciplinary research field around this association, where a fertile conversation could develop. The mapping of this literature prompts us to propose five bridges around: how accounting and reporting are conceived; the direction of causality between sustainability accounting and organizational change; the assemblage of explanatory factors; theoretical foundations; and research methods.
AdamsC.LarrinagaC. (2019). Progress: Engaging with organisations in pursuit of improved sustainability accounting and performance. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 32(8), 2367–2394.
2.
AdamsC.McNicholasP. (2007). Making a difference: Sustainability reporting, accountability and organizational change. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 20(3), 382–402.
3.
AguinisH.RamaniR. S.AlabduljaderN. (2020). Best-practice recommendations for producers, evaluators, and users of methodological literature reviews. Organizational Research Methods, Advance online publication. https://doi.org/1094428120943281.
4.
Albelda-PérezE.Correa RuizC.Carrasco FenechF. (2007). Environmental management systems as an embedding mechanism: A research note. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 20(3), 403–422.
5.
ArasG.CrowtherD. (2009). Making sustainable development sustainable. Management Decision, 47(6), 975–988.
6.
ArchambaultÉ.CampbellD.GingrasY.LarivièreV. (2009). Comparing bibliometric statistics obtained from the Web of Science and Scopus. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(7), 1320–1326.
7.
ArgentoD.CulassoF.TruantE. (2019). From sustainability to integrated reporting: The legitimizing role of the CSR manager. Organization & Environment, 32(4), 484–507.
8.
ArjalièsD. L.MundyJ. (2013). The use of management control systems to manage CSR strategy: A levers of control perspective. Management Accounting Research, 24(4), 284–300.
9.
ArroyoP. (2012). Management accounting change and sustainability: An institutional approach. Journal of Accounting and Organizational Change, 8(3), 249–256.
10.
BebbingtonJ.FraserM. (2014). Organizational change and sustainability accounting. In O’DwyerB.UnermanJ.BebbingtonJ. (Eds.), Sustainability accounting and accountability (2nd ed., pp. 57–69). Routledge.
11.
BebbingtonJ.LarrinagaC. (2014). Accounting and sustainable development: An exploration. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 39(6), 395–413.
12.
BebbingtonJ.LarrinagaC.O’DwyerB.ThomsonI. (2021). Routledge handbook of environmental accounting. Routledge.
13.
BebbingtonJ.ÖsterblomH.CronaB.JouffrayJ.-B.LarrinagaC.RussellS.ScholtensB. (2020). Accounting and accountability in the Anthropocene. Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal, 33(1), 152–177.
14.
BehnamM.MacLeanT. L. (2011). Where is the accountability in international accountability standards? A decoupling perspective. Business Ethics Quarterly, 21(1), 45–72.
15.
BlancoC.CaroF.CorbettC. J. (2017). An inside perspective on carbon disclosure. Business Horizons, 60(5), 635–646.
16.
BoutenL.ChoC.MichelonG.RobertsR. (2018, May30–June1). CSR performance proxies in large-sample studies: “Umbrella advocates,,” construct clarity and the “validity police” [Conference session]. 41st European Accounting Association Annual Conference, Milan, Italy. http://eaa2018.eaacongress.org/r/home
17.
BoutenL.HoozéeS. (2013). On the interplay between environmental reporting and management accounting change. Management Accounting Research, 24(4), 333–348.
18.
BowdenB.Stevenson-ClarkeP. (2021). Accounting, Foucault and debates about management and organizations. Journal of Management History, 27(1), 99–120.
19.
BreslinD.GatrellC. (2020). Theorizing through literature reviews: The miner-prospector continuum. Organizational Research Methods, Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428120943288
20.
BrownJ.DillardJ. (2013). Agonizing over engagement: SEA and the “death of environmentalism” debates. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 24(1), 1–18.
21.
BrownJ.DillardJ. (2014). Integrated reporting: On the need for broadening out and opening up. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 27(7), 1120–1156.
22.
BrownJ.TregidgaH. (2017). Re-politicizing social and environmental accounting through Rancière: On the value of dissensus. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 61, 1–21.
23.
BuscoC.ScapensR. W. (2011). Management accounting systems and organisational culture: Interpreting their linkages and processes of change. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, 8(4), 320–357.
24.
CasillasJ. C.MorenoA. M.AcedoF. J.GallegoM. A.RamosE. (2009). An integrative model of the role of knowledge in the internationalization process. Journal of World Business, 44(3), 311–322.
25.
CerboneD.MarounW. (2020). Materiality in an integrated reporting setting: Insights using an institutional logics framework. The British Accounting Review, 52(3), Article 100876.
26.
Chartered Association of Business Schools. (2018). Academic Journal Guide, 2018.
27.
ChatterjiA. K.DurandR.LevineD. I.TouboulS. (2016). Do ratings of firms converge? Implications for managers, investors and strategy researchers. Strategic Management Journal, 37(8), 1597–1614.
28.
ChelliM.DurocherS.RichardJ. (2014). France’s new economic regulations: Insights from institutional legitimacy theory. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 27(2), 283–316.
29.
ContrafattoM. (2014). The institutionalization of social and environmental reporting: An Italian narrative. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 39(6), 414–432.
30.
ContrafattoM.BurnsJ. (2013). Social and environmental accounting, organisational change and management accounting: A processual view. Management Accounting Research, 24(4), 349–365.
31.
CorreaC.LarrinagaC. (2015). Engagement research in social and environmental accounting. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 6(1), 5–28.
32.
CroninM. A.GeorgeE. (2020). The why and how of the integrative review. Organizational Research Methods, Advance online publication. https://doi.org/1094428120935507.
33.
DelmasM. A.LyonT. P.MaxwellJ. W. (2019). Understanding the role of the corporation in sustainability transitions. Organization & Environment, 32(2), 87–97.
34.
DeyC. (2007). Social accounting at Traidcraft plc: A struggle for the meaning of fair trade. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 20(3), 423–445.
35.
DillardJ. F.RigsbyJ. T.GoodmanC. (2004). The making and remaking of organization context: Duality and the institutionalization process. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 17(4), 506–542.
36.
DooreyD. J. (2011). The transparent supply chain: From resistance to implementation at Nike and Levi-Strauss. Journal of Business Ethics, 103(4), 587–603.
37.
DuncanO.ThomsonI. (1998). Waste accounting and cleaner technology: A complex evaluation [Conference session]. 2nd Asian-Pacific Interdisciplinary Research in Accounting Conference, Osaka, Japan.
38.
EganM.TweedieD. (2018). A “green” accountant is difficult to find: Can accountants contribute to sustainability management initiatives?Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 31(6), 1749–1773.
39.
ErgeneS.BanerjeeS. B.HoffmanA. J. (2020). (Un)sustainability and organization studies: Towards a radical engagement. Organization Studies, 42(8), 1319–1335.
40.
European Commission. (2018). Communication from the commission. Action Plan: Financing Sustainable Growth. COM(2018) 97 final.
41.
European Commission. (2019). The European Green Deal. COM(2019) 640 final.
42.
FerdousI. M.AdamsC. A.BoyceG. (2019). Institutional drivers of environmental management accounting adoption in public sector water organisations. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 32(4), 984–1012.
43.
FergusonJ.SalesdeAguiarT. R.FearfullA. (2015). Corporate response to climate change: Language, power and symbolic construction. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 29(2), 278–304.
44.
FinauG. (2020). Imagining the future of social and environmental accounting research for Pacific Small Island developing states. Social and Environmental Accountability Journal, 40(1), 42–52.
45.
FolkeC.ÖsterblomH.JouffrayJ.-B.LambinE.F.AdgerW.N.SchefferM.CronaB.I.NyströmM.LevinS.A.CarpenterS.R.AnderiesJ.M.ChapinS.IIICrépinA.-S.DauriachA.GalazV.GordonL.J.KautskyN.WalkerB.H.WatsonJ.R.de ZeeuwA. (2020). Transnational corporations and the challenge of biosphere stewardship. Nature Ecology and Evolution, 3(10), 1396–1403.
46.
FraserM. (2012). “Fleshing out” an engagement with a social accounting technology. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 25(3), 508–534.
47.
GeorgakopoulosG.ThomsonI. (2008). Social reporting, engagements, controversies and conflict in an arena context. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 21(8), 1116–1143.
48.
GibbonsM.LimogesC.NowotonyH.SchwartzmanS.ScottP.TrowM. (1994). The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. SAGE.
49.
GrayR. (1992). Accounting and environmentalism: An exploration of the challenge of gently accounting for accountability, transparency and sustainability. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 17(5), 399–425.
50.
GrayR. (2002). The social accounting project and Accounting Organizations and Society Privileging engagement, imaginings, new accountings and pragmatism over critique?Accounting, Organizations and Society, 27(7), 687–708.
51.
GrayR.MilneM. J. (2002). Sustainability reporting: Who’s kidding whom?Chartered Accountants Journal of New Zealand, 81(6), 66–70.
52.
GrayR.OwenD.AdamsC. (1996). Accounting and accountability: Changes and challenges in corporate social and environmental reporting. Prentice Hall.
53.
GrayR.WaltersD.BebbingtonJ.ThompsonI. (1995). The greening of enterprise: An exploration of the (non) role of environmental accounting and environmental accountants in organizational change. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 6(3), 211–239.
54.
GreenwoodR.HiningsC. R. (1988). Organizational design types, tracks and the dynamics of strategic change. Organization Studies, 9(3), 293–316.
55.
GunarathneN.LeeK.-H. (2015). Environmental Management Accounting (EMA) for environmental management and organizational change: An eco-control approach. Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, 11(3), 362–383.
56.
HahnR.ReimsbachD.WickertC.EcclesR. (2020). Special issue of organization & environment on “nonfinancial disclosure and real sustainable change within and beyond organizations: Mechanisms.”Organization & Environment, 33(2), 311–314.
57.
HigginsC.StubbsW.TweedieD.McCallumG. (2019). Journey or toolbox? Integrated reporting and processes of organisational change. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 32(6), 1662–1689.
58.
HopwoodA. G. (2009). Accounting and the environment. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34(3–4), 433–439.
59.
JohannsdottirL.OlafssonS.DavidsdottirB. (2015). Leadership role and employee acceptance of change: Implementing environmental sustainability strategies within Nordic insurance companies. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 28(1), 72–96.
60.
KPMG. (2020). KPMG International survey of corporate responsibility reporting.
61.
LaineM. (2009). Ensuring legitimacy through rhetorical changes? A longitudinal interpretation of the environmental disclosures of a leading Finnish chemical company. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 22(7), 1029–1054.
62.
LarrinagaC.BebbingtonJ. (2001). Accounting change or institutional appropriation?—A case study of the implementation of environmental accounting. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 12(3), 269–292.
63.
LarrinagaC.BebbingtonJ. (2021). The pre-history of sustainability reporting: A constructivist reading. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 34(9), 131–150.
64.
LarrinagaC.SennJ. (2021). Norm development in environmental reporting. In BebbingtonJ.LarrinagaC.O’DwyerB.ThomsonI. (Eds.), Routledge handbook of environmental accounting (pp. 137–150). Routledge.
65.
LaughlinR. C. (1991). Environmental disturbances and organizational transitions and transformations: Some alternative models. Organization Studies, 12(2), 209–232.
66.
LawrenceR. J. (2004). Housing and health: From interdisciplinary principles to transdisciplinary research and practice. Futures, 36(4), 487–502.
67.
Le BretonM.AggeriF. (2019). The emergence of carbon accounting: How instruments and dispositifs interact in new practice creation. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 11(3), 505–522.
68.
LeongS.HazeltonJ. (2019). Under what conditions is mandatory disclosure most likely to cause organisational change?Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 32(3), 811–835.
69.
Le RouxC.PretoriusM. (2019). Exploring the nexus between integrated reporting and sustainability embeddedness. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 10(5), 822–843.
70.
LiT.BelalA. (2018). Authoritarian state, global expansion and corporate social responsibility reporting: The narrative of a Chinese state-owned enterprise. Accounting Forum, 42(2), 199–217.
71.
MarounW. (2018). Evaluating the temporal dimension of legitimisation strategies: Evidence from non-financial reporting in response to a social crisis. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, 15(3), 282–312.
72.
McNallyM. A.MarounW. (2018). It is not always bad news: Illustrating the potential of integrated reporting using a case study in the eco-tourism industry. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 31(5), 1319–1348.
73.
MillerP.O’LearyT. (2007). Mediating instruments and making markets: Capital budgeting, science and the economy. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 32(7–8), 701–734.
74.
MitchellM.CurtisA.DavidsonP. (2012). Can triple bottom line reporting become a cycle for “double loop” learning and radical change?Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 25(6), 1048–1068.
75.
NarayananV.AdamsC. A. (2017). Transformative change towards sustainability: The interaction between organisational discourses and organisational practices. Accounting and Business Research, 47(3), 344–368.
76.
NarayananV.BoyceG. (2019). Exploring the transformative potential of management control systems in organisational change towards sustainability. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 32(5), 1210–1239.
77.
O’DwyerB. (2005). The construction of a social account: A case study in an overseas aid agency. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 30(3), 279–296.
78.
O’DwyerB. (2021). Theorising environmental accounting and reporting. In BebbingtonJ.LarrinagaC.O’DwyerB.ThomsonI. (Eds.), Routledge handbook of environmental accounting (pp. 29–45). Routledge.
ReasonP.BradburyH. (2012). The SAGE handbook of action research. Participative inquiry and practice. SAGE.
81.
Rodríguez-GutiérrezP.CorreaC.LarrinagaC. (2019). Is integrated reporting transformative? An exploratory study of non-financial reporting archetypes. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 10(3), 617–644.
82.
RousseauD. M.ManningJ.DenyerD. (2008). Evidence in management and organizational science: Assembling the field’s full weight of scientific knowledge through syntheses. Academy of Management Annals, 2(1), 475–515.
83.
SethiS. P.SchepersD. H. (2014). United Nations Global Compact: The promise-performance gap. Journal of Business Ethics, 122(2), 193–208.
84.
ShepherdD. A.SutcliffeK. M. (2011). Inductive top-down theorizing: A source of new theories of organization. Academy of Management Review, 36(2), 361–380.
85.
ShimeldS.WilliamsB.ShimeldJ. (2017). Diversity ASX corporate governance recommendations: A step towards change?Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 8(3), 335–357.
86.
SoobaroyenT.MahadeoJ. D. (2016). Community disclosures in a developing country: Insights from a neo-pluralist perspective. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 29(3), 452–482.
87.
SpenceC. (2009). Social accounting’s emancipatory potential: A Gramscian critique. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 20(2), 205–227.
88.
StoughtonA. M.LudemaJ. (2012). The driving forces of sustainability. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 25(4), 501–517.
89.
StubbsW.HigginsC. (2014). Integrated reporting and internal mechanisms of change. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 27(7), 1068–1089.
90.
TiltC. A. (2006). Linking environmental activity and environmental disclosure in an organisational change framework. Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, 2(1), 4–24.
VigneauL.HumphreysM.MoonJ. (2015). How do firms comply with international sustainability standards? Processes and consequences of adopting the global reporting initiative. Journal of Business Ethics, 131(2), 469–486.
93.
VinnariE.LaineM. (2013). Just a passing fad? The diffusion and decline of environmental reporting in the Finnish water sector. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 26(7), 1107–1134.
94.
von WehrdenH.GuimarãesM. H.BinaO.VarandaM.LangD. J.JohnB.LawrenceR. J. (2019). Interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary research: Finding the common ground of multi-faceted concepts. Sustainability Science, 14(3), 875–888.
95.
WolfP.HansmannR.TroxlerP. (2011). Unconferencing as method to initiate organisational change: A case study on reducing CO2 emissions of a university. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 24(1), 112–142.
96.
WoodsideA. G. (2016). The good practices manifesto: Overcoming bad practices pervasive in current research in business. Journal of Business Research, 69(2), 365–381.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
