International diversification is predominantly assumed to have a mixed (either positive or negative) linear relationship with environmental performance in multinational enterprises (MNEs). Departing from this assumption, we use firm-specific advantages (FSA) and institutional theory to hypothesise that international diversification, due to recombination barriers, has a curvilinear U-shaped relationship with MNEs’ environmental performance. Because of their key roles as boosters of country-specific advantages (CSA), we also examine whether home country competitiveness and environmental levels moderate the proposed curvilinear relationship. Results from panel data of 298 MNEs between 2006 and 2017 from 21 different countries in 11 sectors provide support for the main curvilinear relationship and the moderating influence of home country competitiveness. Our study contributes to the international business literature by casting doubt on the widely held assumption that international diversification always carries either positive or negative effects on environmental records.
Aguilera-CaracuelJ.Aragón-CorreaN. E.Hurtado-TorresN. E. (2011). Extending the literature on the environmental strategy of MNEs. Multinational Business Review, 19(4), 299–310.
2.
Aguilera-CaracuelJ.Hurtado-TorresN. E.Aragón-CorreaJ. A. (2012). Does international experience help firms to be green? A knowledge-based view of how international experience and organisational learning influence proactive environmental strategies. International Business Review, 21(5), 847–861.
3.
Aguilera-CaracuelJ.Hurtado-TorresN. E.Aragón-CorreaJ. A.RugmanA. M. (2013). Differentiated effects of formal and informal institutional distance between countries on the environmental performance of multinational enterprises. Journal of Business Research, 66(12), 2657–2665.
4.
Amankwah-AmoahJ.DebrahY. A. (2017). Toward a construct of liability of origin. Industrial and Corporate Change, 26(2), 211–231.
5.
AndreevaT.MartinezJ. S.GoyaN. A.GaraninaT. (2018). Does country context matter in the relationship between intellectual capital and innovation?Academy of Management Proceedings, 1, Article 16552.
6.
Aragón-CorreaJ. A. (1998). Strategic proactivity and firm approach to the natural environment. Academy of Management Journal, 41(5), 556–567.
7.
Aragón-CorreaJ. A.MarcusA.Hurtado-TorresN. (2016). The natural environmental strategies of international firms: Old controversies and new evidence on performance and disclosure. Academy of Management Perspectives, 30(1), 1–16.
8.
Aragón-CorreaJ. A.MarcusA. A.VogelD. (2020). The effects of mandatory and voluntary regulatory pressures on firms’ environmental strategies: A review and recommendations for future research. Academy of Management Annals, 14(1), 339–365.
9.
ArayY.DikovaD.GaraninaT.VeselovaA. (2021). The hunt for international legitimacy: Examining the relationship between internationalization, state ownership, location and CSR reporting of Russian firms. International Business Review, 30, Article 101858. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2021.101858
10.
AsmussenC. G. (2009). Local, regional, or global? Quantifying MNE geographic scope. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(7), 1192–1205.
11.
AttigN.BoubakriN.El GhoulS.GuedhamiO. (2016). Firm internationalization and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 134(2), 171–197.
12.
BansalP. (2005). Evolving sustainably: A longitudinal study of corporate sustainable development. Strategic Management Journal, 26(3), 197–218.
13.
BansalP.RothK. (2000). Why companies go green: A model of ecological responsiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 717–736.
14.
BascleG. (2008). Controlling for endogeneity with instrumental variables in strategic management research. Strategic Organization, 6(3), 285–327.
15.
BerroneP.FosfuriA.GelabertL.Gomez-MejiaL. R. (2013). Necessity as the mother of “green” inventions: Institutional pressures and environmental innovations. Strategic Management Journal, 34(8), 891–909.
16.
BerroneP.Gómez-MejíaL. R. (2009). Environmental performance and executive compensation: An integrated agency-institutional perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 52(1), 103–126.
17.
BerroneP.Gómez-MejíaL. R.CruzC.Larraza-KintanaM. (2010). Socioemotional wealth and corporate responses to institutional pressures: Do family-controlled firms pollute less?Administrative Science Quarterly, 55(1), 82–113.
18.
BhaumikS. K.DriffieldN.ZhouY. (2016). Country specific advantage, firm specific advantage and multinationality—Sources of competitive advantage in emerging markets: Evidence from the electronics industry in China. International Business Review, 25(1), 165–176.
19.
BlomstromM.KokkoA. (1998). Multinational corporations and spillovers. Journal of Economic Surveys, 12(3), 247–277.
20.
BohnsackR.CiulliF.KolkA. (2020). The role of business models in firm internationalization: An exploration of European electricity firms in the context of the energy transition. Journal of International Business Studies, 52, 824–852.
21.
BranstetterL. (2006). Is foreign direct investment a channel of knowledge spillovers? Evidence from Japan’s FDI in the United States. Journal of International Economics, 68(2), 325–344.
22.
BuchananS.MarquesJ. C. (2018). How home country industry associations influence MNE international CSR practices: Evidence from the Canadian mining industry. Journal of World Business, 53(1), 63–74.
23.
BurrittR. L.ChristK. L.RammalH. G.SchalteggerS. (2020). Multinational enterprise strategies for addressing sustainability: The need for consolidation. Journal of Business Ethics, 164(2), 389–410.
24.
CalzaF.ProfumoG.TutoreI. (2016). Corporate ownership and environmental proactivity. Business Strategy and the Environment, 25(6), 369–389.
25.
CarneyM.DuranP.van EssenM.ShapiroD. (2017). Family firms, internationalization, and national competitiveness: Does family firm prevalence matter?Journal of Family Business Strategy, 8(3), 123–136.
26.
ChangS. C.WangC. F. (2007). The effect of product diversification strategies on the relationship between international diversification and firm performance. Journal of World Business, 42(1), 61–79.
27.
ChenP. H.OngC. F.HsuS. C. (2016). The linkages between internationalization and environmental strategies of multinational construction firms. Journal of Cleaner Production, 116, 207–216.
28.
ChristmannP. (2004). Multinational companies and the natural environment: Determinants of global environmental policy. Academy of Management Journal, 47(5), 747–760.
29.
ChristmannP.TaylorG. (2001). Globalization and the environment: Determinants of firm self-regulation in China. Journal of International Business Studies, 32(3), 439–458.
30.
ChristmannP.TaylorG. (2006). Firm self-regulation through international certifiable standards: Determinants of symbolic versus substantive implementation. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(6), 863–878.
31.
CollinsonS. C.NarulaR. (2014). Asset recombination in international partnerships as a source of improved innovation capabilities in China. The Multinational Business Review, 22, 394–417.
32.
CormierD.MagnanM. (2015). The economic relevance of environmental disclosure and its impact on corporate legitimacy: An empirical investigation. Business Strategy and the Environment, 24(6), 431–450.
33.
CovielloN.KanoL.LieschP. W. (2017). Adapting the Uppsala model to a modern world: Macro-context and microfoundations. Journal of International Business Studies, 48(9), 1151–1164.
34.
D’AngeloA.MajocchiA.BuckT. (2016). External managers, family ownership and the scope of SME internationalization. Journal of World Business, 51(4), 534–547.
35.
DelgadoM.KetelsC.PorterM. E.SternS. (2012). The determinants of national competitiveness (No. w18249). National Bureau of Economic Research.
36.
Delgado-MárquezB. L.Hurtado-TorresN. E.PedaugaL. E.Cordón-PozoE. (2018). A network view of innovation performance for multinational corporation subsidiaries. Regional Studies, 52(1), 47–67.
37.
Delgado-MárquezB. L.PedaugaL. E.Cordón-PozoE. (2015). Industries regulation and firm environmental disclosure: A stakeholders’ perspective on the importance of legitimation and international activities. Organization & Environment, 30(2), 103–121.
38.
DelmasM. A.Montes-SanchoM. J. (2010). Voluntary agreements to improve environmental quality: Symbolic and substantive cooperation. Strategic Management Journal, 31(6), 575–601.
39.
DelmasM. A.ToffelM. W. (2011). Institutional pressures and organizational characteristics: Implications for environmental strategy. In BansalP.HoffmanA. J. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of business and the natural environment (pp. 231–247). Oxford University Press.
40.
DengP.ZhangS. (2018). Institutional quality and internationalization of emerging market firms: Focusing on Chinese SMEs. Journal of Business Research, 92, 279–289.
41.
DiMaggioP. J.PowellW. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147–160.
42.
DohJ. P.GuayT. R. (2006). Corporate social responsibility, public policy, and NGO activism in Europe and the United States: An institutional-stakeholder perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 43, 47–73.
43.
DunningJ. H.LundanS. M. (2008). Multinational enterprises and the global economy. Edward Elgar Publishing.
44.
DurbinJ. (1954). Errors in variables. Review of the International Statistical Institute, 22(1), 23–32.
45.
EllimäkiP.Gómez-BolañosE.Hurtado-TorresN.Aragón-CorreaJ. A. (2019). Do global firms increase their environmental disclosure and performance? Symbolic versus effective operations and the moderating role of liability of origin. Legitimation implications. Industrial Marketing Management, 92, 354–363.
46.
FainshmidtS.SmithA.JudgeW. Q. (2016). National competitiveness and Porter’s diamond model: The role of MNE penetration and governance quality. Global Strategy Journal, 6(2), 81–104.
47.
FerrarisA. (2014). Rethinking the literature on “multiple embeddedness” and subsidiary-specific advantages. Multinational Business Review, 22(1), 15–33.
48.
FifkaM. S. (2013). Corporate responsibility reporting and its determinants in comparative perspective—A review of the empirical literature and a meta-analysis. Business Strategy and the Environment, 22(1), 1–35.
49.
ForslidR.OkuboT.Ulltveit-MoeK. H. (2018). Why are firms that export cleaner? International trade, abatement and environmental emissions. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 91, 166–183.
50.
FreilingJ.LaudienS. M. (2012). Assets or liabilities of foreignness? On the role of TNCs in international business (Zentra Working Papers in Transnational Studies No. 9). University of Bremen.
51.
Gallego-ÁlvarezI.LozanoM. B.Rodríguez-RosasM. (2018). An analysis of the environmental information in international companies according to the new GRI standards. Journal of Cleaner Production, 182, 57–66.
52.
GardbergN. A.SchepersD. H. (2008). Do stakeholders detect corporate social performance signals?Academy of Management Proceedings, 1, 1–6.
53.
GasbarroF.IraldoF.DaddiT. (2017). The drivers of multinational enterprises’ climate change strategies: A quantitative study on climate-related risks and opportunities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 160, 8–26.
54.
GhemawatP. (2001). Distance still matters: The hard reality of global expansion. Harvard Business Review, 79(8), 137–147.
GomesL.RamaswamyK. (1999). An empirical examination of the form of the relationship between multinationality and performance. Journal of International Business Studies, 30(1), 173–187.
57.
Gómez-BolañosE.EllimäkiP.Hurtado-TorresN. E.Delgado-MárquezB. L. (2022). Internationalization and environmental innovation in the energy sector: Exploring the differences between multinational enterprises from emerging and developed countries. Energy Policy, 163, 112867.
58.
Gómez-BolañosE.Hurtado-TorresN. E.Delgado-MárquezB. L. (2020). Disentangling the influence of internationalization on sustainability development: Evidence from the energy sector. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(1), 1–11.
59.
Gomez-MejíaL. R.MakriM.KintanaM. L. (2010). Diversification decisions in family-controlled firms. Journal of Management Studies, 47(2), 223–252.
60.
GreeneW. H. (2002). Econometric modelling guide. Econometric Software.
61.
GrøgaardB.ColmanH. L.StensakerI. G. (2022). Legitimizing, leveraging, and launching: Developing dynamic capabilities in the MNE. Journal of International Business Studies, 53, 636–656.
62.
HairJ. F.AndersonR. E.TathamR. L.BlackW. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis. Prentice-Hall International, Inc.
63.
HallP. A.SoskiceD. (Eds.). (2001). Varieties of capitalism: The institutional foundations of comparative advantage. Oxford University Press.
64.
HartmannJ.VachonS. (2018). Linking environmental management to environmental performance: The interactive role of industry context. Business Strategy and the Environment, 27(3), 359–374.
65.
HausmanJ. (1977). Errors in variables in simultaneous equation models. Journal of Econometrics, 5(3), 389–401.
66.
Hervas-OliverJ.RojasR.MartinsB.Cervelló-RoyoR. (2011). The overlapping of national IC and innovation systems. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 12(1), 111–131.
67.
HittM. A.HoskissonR. E.KimH. (1997). International diversification: Effects on innovation and firm performance in product-diversified firms. Academy of Management Journal, 40(4), 767–798.
68.
HittM. A.IrelandR. D.HoskissonR. E. (2009). Strategic management: Competitiveness and globalization concepts. Nelson Education.
69.
HittM. A.TihanyiL.MillerT.ConnellyB. (2006). International diversification: Antecedents, outcomes, and moderators. Journal of Management, 32(6), 831–867.
70.
HoxJ. (2010). Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications. Routledge.
71.
IMD World Competitiveness Center. (2020). IMD world competitiveness yearbook 2020.
72.
IoannouI.SerafeimG. (2012). What drives corporate social performance? The role of nation-level institutions. Journal of International Business Studies, 43(9), 834–864.
73.
JohnstoneL.HallbergP. (2020). ISO 14001 adoption and environmental performance in small to medium sized enterprises. Journal of Environmental Management, 266, 1–13.
74.
KangM.YangS. (2010). Comparing effects of country reputation and the overall corporate reputations of a country on international consumers’ product attitudes and purchase intentions. Corporate Reputation Review, 13, 52–62.
75.
KennedyP. (2008). A guide to econometrics. John Wiley.
76.
KingA. A.ShaverJ. M. (2001). Are aliens green? Assessing foreign establishments’ environmental conduct in the United States. Strategic Management Journal, 22(11), 1069–1085.
77.
KockC. J.SantaloJ.DiestreL. (2012). Corporate governance and the environment: What type of governance creates greener companies?Journal of Management Studies, 49(3), 492–514.
78.
KolkA.CiulliF. (2021). International business, climate change and the energy transition: A commentary on the importance of business models and digitalization. In MithaniM.NarulaR.SurduI.VerbekeA. (Eds.), Crises and disruptions in international business (pp. 287–303). Palgrave Macmillan.
79.
KolkA.FortanierF. (2013). Internationalization and environmental disclosure: The role of home and host institutions. Multinational Business Review, 21(1), 87–114.
80.
KolkA.PinkseJ. (2008). A perspective on multinational enterprises and climate change: Learning from “an inconvenient truth”?Journal of International Business Studies, 39(8), 1359–1378.
81.
KostovaT.RothK. (2003). Social capital in multinational corporations and a micro-macro model of its formation. Academy of Management Review, 28(2), 297–317.
82.
KumarM. S. (1984). Growth, acquisition, and investment: An analysis of the growth of industrial firms and their overseas activities. Cambridge University Press.
83.
LarteyT. A.Amankwah-AmoahJ.DansoA.AdomakoS.KhanZ.TarbaS. Y. (2021). Environmental sustainability practices and offshoring activities of multinational corporations across emerging and developed markets. International Business Review, 30(5), Article 101789.
84.
LeeJ. M.NarulaR.HillemannJ. (2021). Unraveling asset recombination through the lens of firm-specific advantages: A dynamic capabilities perspective. Journal of World Business, 56(2), 101193.
85.
LenzT.ViolaL. A. (2017). Legitimacy and institutional change in international organisations: A cognitive approach. Review of International Studies, 43, 939–961.
86.
LevyD. L. (1995). The environmental practices and performance of transnational corporations. Transnational Corporations, 4(1), 44–67.
87.
Leyva-de la HizD. I.Hurtado-TorresN.Bermúdez-EdoM. (2019). The heterogeneity of levels of green innovation by firms in international contexts: A study based on the home country institutional profile. Organization & Environment, 32(4), 508–527.
88.
LiaoZ. (2018). Institutional pressure, knowledge acquisition and a firm’s environmental innovation. Business Strategy and the Environment, 27(7), 849–857.
89.
LindJ. T.MehlumH. (2010). With or without U? The appropriate test for a U-shaped relationship. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 72(1), 109–118.
90.
LukeD. A. (2004). Quantitative applications in the social sciences: Multilevel modeling. SAGE.
91.
MaranoV.KostovaT. (2016). Unpacking the institutional complexity in adoption of CSR Practices in multinational enterprises. Journal of Management Studies, 53(1), 28–54.
92.
Martínez-FerreroJ.LozanoM. B.VivasM. (2021). The impact of board cultural diversity on a firm’s commitment toward the sustainability issues of emerging countries: The mediating effect of a CSR committee. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28(2), 675–685.
93.
NarulaR.AsmussenC. G.ChiT.KunduS. K. (2019). Applying and advancing internalization theory: The multinational enterprise in the twenty-first century. Journal of International Business Studies, 50(8), 1231–1252.
94.
NarulaR.VerbekeA. (2015). Making internalization theory good for practice: The essence of Alan Rugman’s contributions to international business. Journal of World Business, 50(4), 612–622.
95.
NoorderhavenN. G.HarzingA. W. (2003). The “Country-of-Origin Effect” in multinational corporations: Sources, mechanisms and moderating conditions. Management International Review, 43(2), 47–66.
96.
OrtasE.Gallego-ÁlvarezI.ÁlvarezI. (2019). National institutions, stakeholder engagement, and firms’ environmental, social, and governance performance. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(3), 598–611.
97.
Ortiz-de-MandojanaN.Aguilera-CaracuelJ.Morales-RayaM. (2016). Corporate governance and environmental sustainability: The moderating role of the national institutional context. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 23(3), 150–164.
98.
ParkS. B. (2018). Multinationals and sustainable development: Does internationalization develop corporate sustainability of emerging market multinationals?Business Strategy and the Environment, 27(8), 1514–1524.
99.
PatchellJ.HayterR. (2021). The cloud’s fearsome five renewable energy strategies: Coupling sustainable development goals with firm-specific advantages. Journal of Cleaner Production, 288, 125501.
100.
PerkinsR.NeumayerE. (2010). Geographic variations in the early diffusion of corporate voluntary standards: Comparing ISO 14001 and the global compact. Environment and Planning A, 42(2), 347–365.
101.
PorterM. E. (1990). The competitive advantage of nations. Harvard Business Review, 68(2), 73–93.
102.
PorterM. E.Van der LindeC. (1995). Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), 97–118.
103.
Pucheta-MartínezM. C.Gallego-ÁlvarezI. (2018). Environmental reporting policy and corporate structures: An international analysis. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 25(1), 788–798.
104.
QianG.KhouryT. A.PengM. W.QuianZ. (2010). The performance implications of intra- and inter-regional geographic diversification. Strategic Management Journal, 39(9), 1018–1030.
105.
RaduC.FrancoeurC. (2017). Does innovation drive environmental disclosure? A new insight into sustainable development. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(7), 893–911.
106.
RathertN. (2016). Strategies of legitimation: MNEs and the adoption of CSR in response to host-country institutions. Journal of International Business Studies, 47(7), 858–879.
107.
RugmanA. M. (1981). Inside the multinationals: The economics of internal markets. Columbia University Press.
108.
RugmanA. M.NguyenQ. T. K. (2014). Modern international business theory and emerging market multinational companies. In Cuervo-CazurraA.RamamurtiR. (Eds.), Understanding multinationals from emerging markets (pp. 53–80). Cambridge University Press.
109.
RugmanA. M.OhC. H.LimD. S. (2012). The regional and global competitiveness of multinational firms. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40(2), 218–235.
110.
RugmanA. M.VerbekeA. (1992). A note on the transnational solution and the transaction cost theory of multinational strategic management. Journal of International Business Studies, 23(4), 761–771.
111.
RugmanA. M.VerbekeA. (1998a). Corporate strategies and environmental regulations: An organizing framework. Strategic Management Journal, 19, 363–375.
112.
RugmanA. M.VerbekeA. (1998b). Corporate strategy and international environmental policy. Journal of International Business Studies, 29, 819–836.
113.
RugmanA. M.VerbekeA. (2005). Towards a theory of regional multinationals: A transaction cost economics approach. MIR: Management International Review, 45(1), 5–17.
114.
RugmanA. M.VerbekeA. (2008). A new perspective on the regional and global strategies of multinational services firms. Management International Review, 48(4), 397–411.
115.
RugmanA. M.VerbekeA.NguyenQ. T. (2011). Fifty years of international business theory and beyond. Management International Review, 51(6), 755–786.
116.
RussoM. V. (2003). The emergence of sustainable industries: Building on natural capital. Strategic Management Journal, 24(4), 317–331.
117.
RutzO. J.WatsonG. F. (2019). Endogeneity and marketing strategy research: An overview. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 47(3), 479–498.
118.
ScottW. R. (2001). Institutions and organizations (2nd ed.) SAGE.
119.
Scott-KennelJ.GiroudA. (2015). MNEs and FSAs: Network knowledge, strategic orientation and performance. Journal of World Business, 50(1), 94–107.
120.
SemadeniM.WithersM. C.Trevis CertoS. (2014). The perils of endogeneity and instrumental variables in strategy research: Understanding through simulations. Strategic Management Journal, 35(7), 1070–1079.
121.
SicheJ. R.AgostinhoF.OrtegaE.RomeiroA. (2008). Sustainability of nations by indices: Comparative study between environmental sustainability index, ecological footprint and the energy performance indices. Ecological Economics, 66(4), 628–637.
122.
SinghN.ParkY. H.TolmieC. R.BartikowskiB. (2014). Green firm-specific advantages for enhancing environmental and economic performance. Global Business and Organizational Excellence, 34(1), 6–17.
123.
SrholecM. (2010). A multilevel approach to geography of innovation. Regional Studies, 44(9), 1207–1220.
124.
StahleP.BounfourA. (2008). Understanding dynamics of intellectual capital of nations. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 9(2), 164–177.
125.
StarikM.MarcusA. A.IlinitchA. Y. (2000). Introduction to the special research forum on the management of organizations in the natural environment: A field emerging from multiple paths, with many challenges ahead. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 539–546.
126.
StavropoulosS.WallR.XuY. (2018). Environmental regulations and industrial competitiveness: Evidence from China. Applied Economics, 50(12), 1378–1394.
127.
StoianC.MohrA. (2016). Outward foreign direct investment from emerging economies: Escaping home country regulative voids. International Business Review, 25(5), 1124–1135.
128.
StrikeV. M.GaoJ.BansalP. (2006). The (ir) responsibility of multinational enterprises. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2006(1), A1–A6.
129.
SymeouP. C.ZyglidopoulosS.WilliamsonP. (2018). Internationalization as a driver of the corporate social performance of extractive industry firms. Journal of World Business, 53(1), 27–38.
130.
TashmanP.MaranoV.KostovaT. (2019). Walking the walk or talking the talk? Corporate social responsibility decoupling in emerging market multinationals. Journal of International Business Studies, 50(2), 153–171.
131.
TatogluE.BayraktarE.SahadevS.DemirbagM.GlaisterK. W. (2014). Determinants of voluntary environmental management practices by MNE subsidiaries. Journal of World Business, 49(4), 536–548.
TihanyiL.GriffithD. A.RussellC. J. (2005). The effect of cultural distance on entry mode choice, international diversification, and MNE performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of International Business Studies, 36(3), 270–283.
134.
VerbekeA. (2009). International business strategy. Cambridge University Press.
135.
VerbekeA.KanoL. (2016). An internalization theory perspective on the global and regional strategies of multinational enterprises. Journal of World Business, 51(1), 83–92.
136.
VerbekeA.LeeI. (2021). International business strategy: Rethinking the foundations of global corporate success (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
137.
VogelD. (2010). The private regulation of global corporate conduct: Achievements and limitations. Business and Society, 49, 68–87.
138.
WallsJ. L.BerroneP.PhanP. H. (2012). Corporate governance and environmental performance: Is there really a link?Strategic Management Journal, 33(8), 885–913.
139.
WallsJ. L.PhanP. H.BerroneP. (2011). Measuring environmental strategy: Construct development, reliability, and validity. Business & Society, 50(1), 71–115.
140.
WanW. P.HoskissonR. E. (2003). Home country environments, corporate diversification strategies, and firm performance. Academy of Management Journal, 46(1), 27–45.
141.
WangR.WijenF.HeugensP. P. (2018). Government’s green grip: Multifaceted state influence on corporate environmental actions in China. Strategic Management Journal, 39(2), 403–428.
142.
WangW.MaH. (2018). Export strategy, export intensity and learning: Integrating the resource perspective and institutional perspective. Journal of World Business, 53(4), 581–592.
143.
WendlingZ. A.EmersonJ. W.EstyD. C.LevyM. A.de SherbininA. (2018). Environmental performance index. Yale Center for Environmental Law & Policy.
144.
WoodG.PereiraV.TemouriY.WilkinsonA. (2021). Exploring and investigating sustainable international business practices by MNEs in emerging markets. International Business Review, 30(5), 101899.
145.
WooldridgeJ. M. (2010). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. MIT Press.
146.
WuD. M. (1973). Alternative tests of independence between stochastic regressors and disturbances. Econometrica, 41(4), 733–750.
147.
WuJ. (2013). Diverse institutional environments and product innovation of emerging market firms. Management International Review, 53(1), 39–59.
148.
XiaoC.WangQ.van der VaartT.van DonkD. P. (2018). When does corporate sustainability performance pay off? The impact of country-level sustainability performance. Ecological Economics, 146, 325–333.
149.
YaprakA.YosunT.CetindamarD. (2018). The influence of firm-specific and country-specific advantages in the internationalization of emerging market firms: Evidence from Turkey. International Business Review, 27(1), 198–207.
150.
ZengK.EastinJ. (2012). Do developing countries invest up? The environmental effects of foreign direct investment from less-developed countries. World Development, 40(11), 2221–2233.
151.
ZottC.AmitR. (2010). Business model design: An activity system perspective. Long Range Planning, 43(2–3), 216–226.
