Can bad news also be good news? In this study, I explicate why bad news about firms’ corporate social irresponsibility (CSiR) can be good news for firms. Specifically, I address the role of negative media coverage of CSiR in firms’ corporate social performance (CSP). Drawing on signaling theory, I propose that negative media coverage of CSiR is a form of costly yet effective external feedback to firms’ current social signaling. It, therefore, propels firms to undertake organizational changes to send positive response signals through improved CSP. Furthermore, I argue that this effect is augmented by organizational innovation search, which influences firms’ learning capacity required to improve firms’ CSP. Using a multicountry sample of 1,049 firms between 2007 and 2016, I find that negative media coverage of CSiR induces firms to enhance CSP, and this effect is moderated by organizational innovation search.
Amel-ZadehA.SerafeimG. (2018). Why and how investors use ESG information: Evidence from a global survey. Financial Analysts Journal, 74(3), 87–103.
2.
AngristJ. D.PischkeJ.-S. (2008). Mostly harmless econometrics: An empiricist’s companion. Princeton University Press.
3.
ArellanoM.BondS. (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. The Review of Economic Studies, 58(2), 277–297.
4.
AshfordS. J.CummingsL. L. (1985). Proactive feedback seeking: The instrumental use of the information environment. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 58(1), 67–79.
5.
BansalP. (2005). Evolving sustainably: A longitudinal study of corporate sustainable development. Strategic Management Journal, 26(3), 197–218. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.441
6.
BansalP.DesJardineM. R. (2014). Business sustainability: It is about time. Strategic Organization, 12(1), 70–78.
7.
BarnettM. L. (2012). Why stakeholders ignore firm misconduct: A cognitive view. Journal of Management, 40, 676–702.
8.
BarnettM. L.SalomonR. M. (2012). Does it pay to be really good? Addressing the shape of the relationship between social and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 33(11), 1304–1320.
9.
BaronR. M.KennyD. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182.
10.
BednarM. K.BoivieS.PrinceN. R. (2013). Burr under the saddle: How media coverage influences strategic change. Organization Science, 24(3), 910–925.
11.
BerghD. D.ConnellyB. L.KetchenD. J.Jr.ShannonL. M. (2014). Signalling theory and equilibrium in strategic management research: An assessment and a research agenda. Journal of Management Studies, 51(8), 1334–1360.
12.
BerghD. D.GibbonsP. (2011). The stock market reaction to the hiring of management consultants: A signalling theory approach. Journal of Management Studies, 48(3), 544–567.
13.
BerghD. D.KetchenD. J.Jr.OrlandiI.HeugensP. P.BoydB. K. (2019). Information asymmetry in management research: Past accomplishments and future opportunities. Journal of Management, 45(1), 122–158.
14.
BerroneP.FosfuriA.GelabertL.Gomez-MejiaL. R. (2013). Necessity as the mother of “green” inventions: Institutional pressures and environmental innovations. Strategic Management Journal, 34(8), 891–909.
15.
BorgersA.DerwallJ.KoedijkK.Ter HorstJ. (2013). Stakeholder relations and stock returns: On errors in investors’ expectations and learning. Journal of Empirical Finance, 22, 159–175.
16.
BorghesiS.CainelliG.MazzantiM. (2015). Linking emission trading to environmental innovation: Evidence from the Italian manufacturing industry. Research Policy, 44(3), 669–683.
17.
BreitingerD.BonardiJ.-P. (2019). Firms, breach of norms, and reputation damage. Business & Society, 58(6), 1143–1176.
18.
BusenitzL. W.FietJ. O.MoeselD. D. (2005). Signaling in venture capitalist—New venture team funding decisions: Does it indicate long–term venture outcomes?Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(1), 1–12.
CainelliG.MazzantiM. (2013). Environmental innovations in services: Manufacturing–services integration and policy transmissions. Research Policy, 42(9), 1595–1604.
21.
CampbellJ. L. (2007). Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 946–967.
22.
CampbellJ. T.EdenL.MillerS. R. (2012). Multinationals and corporate social responsibility in host countries: Does distance matter?Journal of International Business Studies, 43(1), 84–106. https://doi.org/10.1057/Jibs.2011.45
23.
CassimanB.VeugelersR. (2006). In search of complementarity in innovation strategy: Internal R&D and external knowledge acquisition. Management Science, 52(1), 68–82.
24.
ChakrabortyP.ChatterjeeC. (2017). Does environmental regulation indirectly induce upstream innovation? New evidence from India. Research Policy, 46(5), 939–955.
25.
ChortareasG. E.GirardoneC.VentouriA. (2013). Financial freedom and bank efficiency: Evidence from the European Union. Journal of Banking and Finance, 37(4), 1223–1231.
26.
CohenW. M.LevinthalD. A. (1989). Innovation and learning: The two faces of R&D. The Economic Journal, 99(397), 569–596.
27.
ConnellyB. L.CertoS. T.IrelandR. D.ReutzelC. R. (2011). Signaling theory: A review and assessment. Journal of Management, 37(1), 39–67.
28.
DarnallN.HenriquesI.SadorskyP. (2010). Adopting proactive environmental strategy: The influence of stakeholders and firm size. Journal of Management Studies, 47(6), 1072–1094.
29.
DaudigeosT.RouletT.ValiorgueB. (2020). How scandals act as catalysts of fringe stakeholders’ contentious actions against multinational corporations. Business & Society, 59(3), 387–418.
30.
DavisP. S.PettT. L. (2002). Measuring organizational efficiency and effectiveness. Journal of Management Research, 2(2), 87–97.
31.
DeephouseD. L. (2000). Media reputation as a strategic resource: An integration of mass communication and resource-based theories. Journal of Management, 26(6), 1091–1112.
32.
DesaiA.WrightP.ChungK. H.CharoenwongC. (2011). Impact of changes in strategic investments on shareholder returns: The role of growth opportunities. Journal of Applied Business Research, 19(1), 41–56.
33.
DesaiV. M. (2014). The impact of media information on issue salience following other organizations’ failures. Journal of Management, 40(3), 893–918.
34.
DesJardineM. R.MartiE.DurandR. (2020). Why activist hedge funds target socially responsible firms: The reaction costs of signaling corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Journal, 64(3), 851–872.
35.
DeversC. E.DewettT.MishinaY.BelsitoC. A. (2009). A general theory of organizational stigma. Organization Science, 20(1), 154–171.
36.
EcclesR. G.KlimenkoS. (2019). The investor revolution. Harvard Business Review, 97, 106–116.
37.
FlammerC. (2015). Does product market competition foster corporate social responsibility? Evidence from trade liberalization. Strategic Management Journal, 36(10), 1469–1485. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2307
38.
FrankortH. T. (2016). When does knowledge acquisition in R&D alliances increase new product development? The moderating roles of technological relatedness and product-market competition. Research Policy, 45(1), 291–302.
39.
FuL.BoeheD.OrlitzkyM. (2020). Are R&D-intensive firms also corporate social responsibility specialists? A multicountry study. Research Policy, 49(8), Article 104082. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2020.104082
40.
FuL.BoeheD.OrlitzkyM.SwansonD. L. (2019). Managing stakeholder pressures: Toward a typology of corporate social performance profiles. Long Range Planning, 52(6), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2018.08.002
41.
FuL.BoeheD. M.OrlitzkyM. (2021). Broad or narrow stakeholder management? A signaling theory perspective. Business & Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/00076503211053018
42.
FuentelsazL.GarridoE.MaicasJ. P. (2015). Incumbents, technological change and institutions: How the value of complementary resources varies across markets. Strategic Management Journal, 36(12), 1778–1801.
43.
GamacheD. L.McNamaraG. (2019). Responding to bad press: How CEO temporal focus influences the sensitivity to negative media coverage of acquisitions. Academy of Management Journal, 62(3), 918–943.
GomulyaD.MishinaY. (2017). Signaler credibility, signal susceptibility, and relative reliance on signals: How stakeholders change their evaluative processes after violation of expectations and rehabilitative efforts. Academy of Management Journal, 60(2), 554–583.
46.
GreveH. R. (2003). A behavioral theory of R&D expenditures and innovations: Evidence from shipbuilding. Academy of Management Journal, 46(6), 685–702.
47.
GulatiR.HigginsM. C. (2003). Which ties matter when? The contingent effects of interorganizational partnerships on IPO success. Strategic Management Journal, 24(2), 127–144.
HamannP. M.SchiemannF.BelloraL.GuentherT. W. (2013). Exploring the dimensions of organizational performance: A construct validity study. Organizational Research Methods, 16(1), 67–87.
50.
HayesA. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (2nd ed.). The Guilford Press.
51.
HofmannD. A. (1997). An overview of the logic and rationale of hierarchical linear models. Journal of Management, 23(6), 723–744.
HoxJ. J. (2010). Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications (2nd ed.). Routledge.
54.
IoannouI.SerafeimG. (2012). What drives corporate social performance? The role of nation-level institutions. Journal of International Business Studies, 43(9), 834–864. https://doi.org/10.1057/Jibs.2012.26
55.
JordanA. H.AudiaP. G. (2012). Self-enhancement and learning from performance feedback. Academy of Management Review, 37(2), 211–231.
56.
JoshiM.McKendallM. (2018). Responses to the discovery of unethical acts: An organizational identity and reputation perspective. Business & Society, 57(4), 706–741.
57.
JulianS. D.Ofori-DankwaJ. C. (2013). Financial resource availability and corporate social responsibility expenditures in a sub-Saharan economy: The institutional difference hypothesis. Strategic Management Journal, 34(11), 1314–1330.
58.
KatilaR.ChenE. L. (2008). Effects of search timing on innovation: The value of not being in sync with rivals. Administrative Science Quarterly, 53(4), 593–625.
59.
KaufmannD.KraayA.MastruzziM. (2016). The worldwide governance indicators. Aggregated indicators of governance 1996–2014. World Bank.
60.
KaulA.LuoJ. (2018). An economic case for CSR: The comparative efficiency of for-profit firms in meeting consumer demand for social goods. Strategic Management Journal, 39(6), 1650–1677.
61.
KepplingerH. M. (2007). Reciprocal effects: Toward a theory of mass media effects on decision makers. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 12(2), 3–23.
62.
KepplingerH. M.GlaabS. (2007). Research note: Reciprocal effects of negative press reports. European Journal of Communication, 22(3), 337–354.
63.
KhanM.SerafeimG.YoonA. (2016). Corporate sustainability: First evidence on materiality. The Accounting Review, 91(6), 1697–1724.
64.
KölbelJ. F.BuschT.JancsoL. M. (2017). How media coverage of corporate social irresponsibility increases financial risk. Strategic Management Journal, 38(11), 2266–2284.
65.
KumaraswamyA.MudambiR.SarangaH.TripathyA. (2012). Catch-up strategies in the Indian auto components industry: Domestic firms’ responses to market liberalization. Journal of International Business Studies, 43(4), 368–395.
66.
LeeC.-Y. (2010). A theory of firm growth: Learning capability, knowledge threshold, and patterns of growth. Research Policy, 39(2), 278–289.
67.
LiQ.MaggittiP. G.SmithK. G.TeslukP. E.KatilaR. (2013). Top management attention to innovation: The role of search selection and intensity in new product introductions. Academy of Management Journal, 56(3), 893–916.
68.
LyonT. P.MaxwellJ. W. (2011). Greenwash: Corporate environmental disclosure under threat of audit. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 20(1), 3–41.
69.
MaranoV.KostovaT. (2016). Unpacking the institutional complexity in adoption of CSR practices in multinational enterprises. Journal of Management Studies, 53(1), 28–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12124
70.
MarquisC.ToffelM. W.ZhouY. (2016). Scrutiny, norms, and selective disclosure: A global study of greenwashing. Organization Science, 27(2), 483–504.
71.
MattenD.MoonJ. (2008). “Implicit” and “explicit” CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 33(2), 404–424.
72.
McWilliamsA.SiegelD. (2000). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: Correlation or misspecification?Strategic Management Journal, 21(5), 603–609.
73.
MenaS.RintamäkiJ.FlemingP.SpicerA. (2016). On the forgetting of corporate irresponsibility. Academy of Management Review, 41(4), 720–738.
74.
MishinaY.BlockE. S.MannorM. J. (2012). The path dependence of organizational reputation: How social judgment influences assessments of capability and character. Strategic Management Journal, 33(5), 459–477.
75.
O’BrienJ. P.DavidP. (2014). Reciprocity and R&D search: Applying the behavioral theory of the firm to a communitarian context. Strategic Management Journal, 35(4), 550–565.
OrlitzkyM. (2013). Corporate social responsibility, noise, and stock market volatility. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(3), 238–254.
78.
OrlitzkyM.SchmidtF. L.RynesS. L. (2003). Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization Studies, 24(3), 403–441.
79.
PadgettR. C.GalanJ. I. (2010). The effect of R&D intensity on corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 93(3), 407–418.
80.
PetersonM. F.ArregleJ.-L.MartinX. (2012). Multilevel models in international business research. Journal of International Business Studies, 43(5), 451–457.
81.
PetkovaA. (2012). From the ground up: Building young firms’ reputations. In PollockT. G.BarnettM. L. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of corporate reputation (pp. 383–401). Oxford University Press.
82.
Pucheta-MartínezM. C.Gallego-ÁlvarezI. (2020). Corporate environmental disclosure practices in different national contexts: The influence of cultural dimensions. Organization & Environment, 33(4), 597–623.
83.
RaudenbushS. W.BrykA. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. SAGE.
84.
SeeG. (2009). Harmonious society and Chinese CSR: Is there really a link?Journal of Business Ethics, 89, 1–22.
85.
ShinkleG. A.McCannB. T. (2014). New product deployment: The moderating influence of economic institutional context. Strategic Management Journal, 35(7), 1090–1101.
86.
SnijdersT.BoskerR. (2012). Multilevel modeling: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling (2nd ed.). SAGE.
87.
SpenceM. (1974). Market signaling: Information transfer in hiring and related screening processes. Harvard University Press.
88.
SpenceM. (2002). Signaling in retrospect and the informational structure of markets. American Economic Review, 92(3), 434–459.
89.
StrikeV. M.GaoJ.BansalP. (2006). Being good while being bad: Social responsibility and the international diversification of US firms. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(6), 850–862.
90.
SurrocaJ.TribóJ. A.WaddockS. (2010). Corporate responsibility and financial performance: The role of intangible resources. Strategic Management Journal, 31(5), 463–490.
91.
TashmanP.MaranoV.KostovaT. (2019). Walking the walk or talking the talk? Corporate social responsibility decoupling in emerging market multinationals. Journal of International Business Studies, 50(2), 153–171.
92.
Tetrault SirslyC.-A.LvinaE. (2019). From doing good to looking even better: The dynamics of CSR and reputation. Business & Society, 58(6), 1234–1266.
TroiloG.De LucaL. M.Atuahene-GimaK. (2014). More innovation with less? A strategic contingency view of slack resources, information search, and radical innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(2), 259–277.
97.
TsaiW. (2001). Knowledge transfer in intraorganizational networks: Effects of network position and absorptive capacity on business unit innovation and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 44(5), 996–1004.
98.
VoglerD.EiseneggerM. (2020). CSR communication, corporate reputation, and the role of the news media as an agenda-setter in the digital age. Business & Society, 60(8), 1957–1986. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650320928969
99.
VoglerD.EiseneggerM. (2021). CSR communication, corporate reputation, and the role of the news media as an agenda-setter in the digital age. Business & Society, 60(8), 1957–1986.
100.
WaddockS. A.GravesS. B. (1997). The corporate social performance. Strategic Management Journal, 8(4), 303–319.
101.
WangS. L.LiD. (2019). Responding to public disclosure of corporate social irresponsibility in host countries: Information control and ownership control. Journal of International Business Studies, 50(8), 1283–1309.
102.
WintokiM. B.LinckJ. S.NetterJ. M. (2012). Endogeneity and the dynamics of internal corporate governance. Journal of Financial Economics, 105(3), 581–606.
103.
WoodD. J. (1991). Corporate social performance revisited. Academy of Management Review, 16(4), 691–718.
104.
WuJ. (2012). Technological collaboration in product innovation: The role of market competition and sectoral technological intensity. Research Policy, 41(2), 489–496.
105.
ZavyalovaA.PfarrerM. D.RegerR. K.HubbardT. D. (2016). Reputation as a benefit and a burden? How stakeholders’ organizational identification affects the role of reputation following a negative event. Academy of Management Journal, 59(1), 253–276.
106.
ZavyalovaA.PfarrerM. D.RegerR. K.ShapiroD. L. (2012). Managing the message: The effects of firm actions and industry spillovers on media coverage following wrongdoing. Academy of Management Journal, 55(5), 1079–1101.
107.
ZerbiniF. (2017). CSR initiatives as market signals: A review and research agenda. Journal of Business Ethics, 146(1), 1–23.
108.
ZhangY.LiH. (2010). Innovation search of new ventures in a technology cluster: The role of ties with service intermediaries. Strategic Management Journal, 31(1), 88–109.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
