CEO activism refers to corporate leaders speaking out on social and environmental policy issues not directly related to their company’s core business, which distinguishes it from nonmarket strategy and traditional corporate social responsibility. In the first study of this phenomenon, we implement two framed field experiments to provide evidence on how CEO activism can influence public opinions about government policies and consumer attitudes about the CEO’s company.
AnsolabehereS.de FigueiredoJ. M.SnyderJ. M.Jr. (2003). Why is there so little money in politics? (NBER Working Paper No. 9409). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
2.
BaronD. P. (1995). Integrated strategy: Market and nonmarket components. California Management Review, 37(2), 47-65.
3.
BaronD. P. (2012). Business and its environment. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
BonardiJ.-P.HolburnG. L. F.Vanden BerghR. G. (2006). Nonmarket strategy performance: Evidence from US electric utilities. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 1209-1228.
8.
BriscoeF.ChinM. K.HambrickD. C. (2014). CEO ideology as an element of the corporate opportunity structure for social activists. Academy of Management Journal, 57, 1786-1809.
9.
BrownL. D.CaiT. T.DasGuptaA. (2001). Interval estimation for a binomial proportion. Statistical Science, 16(2), 101-117.
10.
ChatterjiA. K.FindleyM.JensenN. M.MeierS.NielsonD. (2016). Field experiments in strategy research. Strategic Management Journal, 37, 116-132.
ChatterjiA.ToffelM. (2018). The new CEO activists. Harvard Business Review, 96(1), 78-89.
13.
ChenG.CrosslandC.LuoS. (2014). Making the same mistake all over again: CEO overconfidence and corporate resistance to corrective feedback. Strategic Management Journal, 36, 1513-1535.
14.
ChinM. K.HambrickD. C.TrevinoL. K. (2013). Political ideologies of CEOs: The influence of executives’ values on corporate social responsibility. Administrative Science Quarterly, 58, 197-232.
15.
Cobb-WalgrenC. J.RubleC. A.DonthuN. (1995). Brand equity, brand preference, and purchase intent. Journal of Advertising, 24(3), 25-40.
CornerA.MarkowitzE.PidgeonN. (2014). Public engagement with climate change: the role of human values. WIREs Climate Change, 5, 411-422.
18.
DahanN. M.HadaniM.SchulerD. A. (2013). The governance challenges of corporate political activity. Business & Society, 52, 365-387.
19.
DelmasM. A.Aragon-CorreaJ. A. (2016). Field experiments in corporate sustainability research: Testing strategies for behavior change in markets and organizations. Organization & Environment, 29, 391-400.
20.
DelmasM. A.LyonT. P.MaxwellJ. W. (2019). Understanding the role of the corporation in sustainability transitions. Organization & Environment, 32, 87-97.
21.
Di GiuliA.KostovetskyL. (2014). Are red or blue companies more likely to go green? Politics and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Financial Economics, 111, 158-180.
22.
DoddM. D.SupaD. W. (2014). Conceptualizing and measuring “corporate social advocacy” communication: Examining the impact on corporate financial performance. Public Relations Journal, 8(3), 2-23.
GrewalD.GotliebJ.MarmorsteinH. (1994). The moderating effects of message framing and source credibility on the price-perceived risk relationship. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(1), 145-153.
31.
GrometD. M.KunreutherH.LarrickR. P. (2013). Political ideology affects energy-efficiency attitudes and choices. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 110, 9314-9319.
HadaniM.BonardiJ. P.DahanN. M. (2017). Corporate political activity, public policy uncertainty, and firm outcomes: A meta-analysis. Strategic Organization, 15, 338-366.
34.
HadaniM.DahanN. M.DohJ. P. (2015). The CEO as chief political officer: Managerial discretion and corporate political activity. Journal of Business Research, 68, 2330-2337.
35.
HambrickD. C.MasonP. A. (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9, 193-206.
36.
HarrisonG. W.ListJ. A. (2004). Field experiments. Journal of Economic Literature, 42, 1009-1055.
37.
HessD.WarrenD. E. (2008). The meaning and meaningfulness of corporate social initiatives. Business and Society Review, 113, 163-197.
38.
HillmanA. J.KeimG. D.SchulerD. (2004). Corporate political activity: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 30, 837-857.
39.
InfosinoW. J. (1986). Forecasting new product sales from likelihood of purchase ratings. Marketing Science, 5, 372-384.
40.
JenniK.LoewensteinG. (1997). Explaining the identifiable victim effect. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 14, 235-257.
41.
KahanD. M.PetersE.WittlinM.SlovicP.OuelletteL. L.BramanD.MandelG. (2012). The polarizing impact of science literacy and numeracy on perceived climate change risks. Nature Climate Change, 2, 732-735.
KellyE.DobbinF. (1998). How affirmative action became diversity management: Employer response to antidiscrimination law, 1961 to 1996. American Behavioral Scientist, 41, 960-984.
44.
LakoffG. (2004). Don’t think of an elephant! Know your values and frame the debate: The essential guide for progressives, including post-election updates. White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green.
45.
LantosG. P. (2001). The boundaries of strategic corporate social responsibility. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 18, 595-632.
46.
LyonT. P.DelmasM. A.MaxwellJ. W.BansalP.Chiroleu-AssoulineM.CrifoP.. . . WijenF. (2018). CSR needs CPR: Corporate sustainability and politics. California Management Review, 60(4), 5-24.
47.
LyonT. P.MaxwellJ. W. (2011). Greenwash: Corporate environmental disclosure under threat of audit. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 20(1), 3-41.
48.
MargolisJ. D.WalshJ. P. (2003). Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48, 268-305.
49.
MazutisD. D. (2013). The CEO effect: A longitudinal, multilevel analysis of the relationship between executive orientation and corporate social strategy. Business & Society, 52, 631-648.
50.
McCrightA. M.DunlapR. E. (2011). The politicization of climate change and polarization in the American public’s views of global warming, 2001-2010. Sociological Quarterly, 52, 155-194.
51.
McWilliamsA.SiegelD. S.WrightP. M. (2006). Corporate social responsibility: Strategic implications. Journal of Management Studies, 43(1), 1-18.
52.
MikeskaJ.HarveyE. J. (2015). The political CEO: An event study comparing consumer attributions of CEO behavior. Social Science Quarterly, 96(1), 76-92.
53.
MorwitzV. G.SchmittleinD. (1992). Using segmentation to improve sales forecasts based on purchase intent: Which “intenders” actually buy?Journal of Marketing Research, 29, 391-405.
54.
OreskesN.ConwayE. M. (2010). Merchants of doubt: How a handful of scientists obscured the truth on issues from tobacco smoke to global warming. New York, NY: Bloomsbury.
55.
PierceL.RogersT.SnyderJ. A. (2015). Losing hurts: The happiness impact of partisan electoral loss. Journal of Experimental Political Science, 3, 44-59.
56.
PlambeckN.WeberK. (2009). CEO ambivalence and responses to strategic issues. Organization Science, 20, 993-1010.
57.
PorterM. E.KramerM. R. (2006). Strategy and society: The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 84(12), 78-85.
RudyB. C.JohnsonA. F. (2016). The chief political officer: CEO characteristics and firm investment in corporate political activity. Business & Society, 58, 612-643.
60.
ScheufeleD. A.TewksburyD. (2007). Framing, agenda setting, and priming: The evolution of three media effects models. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 9-20.
61.
SewallM. A. (1978). Market segmentation based on consumer ratings of proposed product designs. Journal of Marketing Research, 15, 557-564.
62.
SilkA. J.UrbanG. L. (1978). Pre-test-market evaluation of new packaged goods: A model and measurement methodology. Journal of Marketing Research, 15, 171-191.
VergneJ. P.WernickeG.BrennerS. (2018). Signal incongruence and its consequences: A study of media disapproval and CEO overcompensation. Organization Science, 29, 755-774.
67.
WaldmanD. A.YammarinoF. J. (1999). CEO charismatic leadership: Levels-of-management and levels-of-analysis effects. Academy of Management Review, 24, 266-285.
68.
WestphalJ. D.DeephouseD. L. (2011). Avoiding bad press: Interpersonal influence in relations between CEOs and journalists and the consequences for press reporting about firms and their leadership. Organization Science, 22, 1061-1086.