The Death of Environmentalism or the Advent of Public Ecology?

Abstract

In this response to a widely circulated essay by environmental activists Michael Shellenberger and Ted Nordhaus, the author provides a critique of some of their key points, including their assertion that “third wave environmentalism” must emphasize investments in public-private partnerships. Contrary to the positions advocated by Shellenberger and Nordhaus, an argument is made that the environment is a public space and collective good and that it is best understood through the lens of a truly public ecology. This approach offers the best chance to reconstruct environmentalism as a vital space for addressing global warming and other major problems. It provides a framework for gathering together new progressive movements aimed at achieving equity from the economy and ecology of the Earth. Further discussion is invited.

Keywords

public ecology public sphere environmental public good private ecology public-private partnerships global warming

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Arendt, H. (1998). The human condition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Beck, U. (2000). What is globalization? Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.

Clark, B. , & Foster, J. B. (2003). Land, the color line and the quest for the golden fleece: An introduction to W. E. B. Du Bois’s The souls of black folk and the The quest of the silver fleece (selections). Organization & Environment, 14, 459-469.

Dodds, F. (with Middleton, T. ).(2000). Earth summit 2002: A new deal. London: Earthscan.

Fischer, F. (1990). Technocracy and the politics of expertise. London: Sage.

Habermas, J. (1991). The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Hoffman, A. J. (2003). Linking social systems to the industrial ecology framework. Organization & Environment, 16, 66-86.

King, A. (1995). Avoiding ecological surprise: Lessons from long-standing communities. Academy of Management Review, 20, 961-985.

Law, J. (Ed.). (1991). A sociology of monsters: Essays on power, technology, and domination. London: Routledge.

10.

Lefebvre, H. (2003). The urban revolution. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

11.

Light, A. , & Shippen, B. S., Jr . (2003). Should environmental policy be a publicly provided good? Organization & Environment, 16, 232-242.

12.

Luke, T. W. (1997). Ecocritique: Contesting the politics of nature, economy, and culture. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

13.

Luke, T. W. (1999). Capitalism, democracy, and ecology: Departing from Marx. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

14.

Luke, T. W. (2003). Global cities or “global cities.” Studies in Political Economy, 71, 11-22.

15.

Luke, T. W. (2005). Collective action and the ecosubpolitical: Revisiting Bill McKibben and “The end of nature.” Organization & Environment, 18, 202-206.

16.

Shellenberger, M. , & Nordhaus, T. (2004). The death of environmentalism: Global warming politics in a post-environmental world. Retrieved from www.thebreakthrough.org/images/Death_of_Environmentalism.pdf