The authors examine environmentalists’ attribution of responsibility for addressing climate change and their beliefs about solutions to this problem. Their analysis is based on responses to open-ended questions completed by 1,227 members of nine different environmental organizations. For these environmental movement participants, the federal government is seen as most responsible for addressing climate change. Government leadership is necessary because it has the power to set regulations and lead corporations and citizens toward pro-environmental behavior. However, a substantial number of participants also assert that “individuals are the driving force” in dealing with climate change. In this framework, individuals can take responsibility either through making lifestyle changes, or through applying pressure to government and businesses as citizens and consumers. Corporations are interpreted as unwilling to change on their own but must be coerced into becoming more environmentally sustainable by a strong state.
AdkinL. E. (2009). Ecology, citizenship, democracy. In AdkinL. E. (Ed.), Environmental conflict and democracy in Canada (pp. 1-15). Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada: University of British Columbia Press.
2.
BeckU. (2010). Climate for change, or how to create a green modernity?Theory, Culture & Society, 27, 254-266.
3.
BellD. (2010). Justice and the politics of climate change. In Lever-TracyC. (Ed.), Routledge handbook of climate change and society (pp. 423-441). London, England: Routledge.
4.
BetsillM. M.BulkeleyH. (2006). Cities and the multilevel governance of global climate change. Global Governance, 12, 141-159.
5.
BiroA. (2010). Environmental prospects in Canada. Environmental Politics, 19, 303-309.
6.
BlühdornI. (2011). The politics of unsustainability: COP15, Post-ecologism, and the ecological paradox. Organization & Environment, 24, 34-53.
7.
BrechinS. R. (2003). Comparative public opinion and knowledge on global climatic change and the Kyoto Protocol: The U.S. versus the world?International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 23(10), 106-134.
8.
BrunnerS. (2008). Understanding policy change: Multiple streams and emissions trading in Germany. Global Environmental Change, 18, 501-507.
9.
BrynerG. (2008). Failure and opportunity: Environmental groups in US climate change policy. Environmental Politics, 17, 319-336.
10.
BulkeleyH.BetsillM. (2005). Rethinking sustainable cities: Multilevel governance and the “urban” politics of climate change. Environmental Politics, 14, 42-63.
11.
CarvalhoA. (2005). Representing the politics of the greenhouse effect: Discursive strategies in the British media. Critical Discourse Studies, 2, 1-29.
12.
CohenS. J.WaddellM. W. (2009). Climate change in the 21st century. Montreal, Quebec, Canada: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
13.
CompstonH. (2009). Networks, resources, political strategy and climate policy. Environmental Politics, 18, 727-746.
14.
CreswellJ. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
15.
DietzT.DanA.ShwomR. (2007). Support for climate change policy: Social psychological and social structural influences. Rural Sociology, 72, 185-214.
16.
DorseyM. K. (2007). Climate knowledge and power: Tales of skeptic tanks, weather gods, and sagas for climate (in)justice. Capitalism, Nature, Socialism, 18(2), 8-21.
17.
DunlapR. E. (1998). Lay perceptions of global risk: Public views of global warming in cross-national context. International Sociology, 13, 473-498.
18.
DunlapR. E.KentE.Van LiereD.MertigA. G.JonesR. E. (2000). Measuring endorsement of the new ecological paradigm: A revised NEP scale. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 425-442.
19.
EarlJ. (2004). The cultural consequences of social movements. In SnowD. A.SouleS. A.KriesiH. (Eds.), The Blackwell companion to social movements (pp. 508-530). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
20.
FisherD. R. (2004). National governance and the global climate change regime. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
21.
FisherD. R. (2006). Bringing the material back in: Understanding the U.S. position on climate change. Sociological Forum, 21, 467-494.
22.
GiddensA. (2009). The politics of climate change. Cambridge, England: Polity Press.
23.
GiugniM. G. (1998). Was it worth the effort? The outcomes of social movements. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 371-393.
24.
GiugniM. G. (1999). How social movements matter: Past research, present problems, future developments. In GiugniM.McAdamD.TillyC. (Eds.), How social movements matter (pp. 13-33). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
25.
GiugniM. G. (2004). Social protest and policy change: Ecology, antinuclear, and peace movements in comparative perspective. Lanham, MD: Rowan & Littlefield.
26.
GouldK. A.PellowD. N.SchnaibergA. (2004). Interrogating the treadmill of production: Everything you wanted to know about the treadmill but were afraid to ask. Organization & Environment, 17, 296-316.
27.
GouldK. A.PellowD. N.SchnaibergA. (2008). The treadmill of production: Injustice and unsustainability in the global economy. Boulder, CO: Paradigm.
28.
HaleS. (2010). The new politics of climate change: Why we are failing and how we will succeed. Environmental Politics, 19, 255-275.
29.
HarrisP. G. (2008). Climate change and global citizenship. Law & Policy, 30, 481-501.
30.
HenryA. D. (2000). Public perceptions of global warming. Human Ecology Review, 7(1), 25-30.
31.
Hesse-BiberS. N. (2010). Mixed methods research: Merging theory with practice. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
32.
HoldenB. (2002). Democracy and global warming. London, England: Continuum.
33.
JacquesP. J.DunlapR. E.FreemanM. (2008). The organisation of denial: Conservative think tanks and environmental scepticism. Environmental Politics, 17, 349-385.
34.
KlandermansB. (2004). The demand and supply of participation: Social-psychological correlates of participation in social movements. In SnowD. A.SouleS. A.KriesiH. (Eds.), The Blackwell companion to social movements (pp. 360-379). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
35.
KlandermansB.OegemaD. (1987). Potentials, networks, motivations, and barriers: Steps towards participation in social movements. American Sociological Review, 52, 519-531.
36.
KondohK. (2009). The challenge of climate change and energy policies for building a sustainable society in Japan. Organization & Environment, 22, 52-74.
37.
KrippendorffK. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
38.
Lever-TracyC. (2008). Global warming and sociology. Current Sociology, 56, 445-466.
39.
Lever-TracyC. (Ed.). (2010). Routledge handbook of climate change and society. London, England: Routledge.
McCarthyJ. D.ZaldM. N. (1977). Resource mobilization and social movements: A partial theory. American Journal of Sociology, 82, 1212-1241.
42.
McCrightA. M.DunlapR. E. (2003). Defeating Kyoto: The conservative movement’s impact on U.S. climate change policy. Social Problems, 50, 348-373.
43.
McCrightA. M.DunlapR. E. (2011). The politicization of climate change and the polarization in the American public’s views of global warming 2001–2010. Sociological Quarterly, 52, 155-194.
44.
MischeA. (2008). Partisan publics: Communication and contention across Brazilian youth activist networks. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
45.
MohaiP.PellowD.RobertsT. (2009). Environmental justice. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 34, 405-430.
46.
MohrJ. W. (1998). Measuring meaning structures. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 345-370.
47.
MolA. P. J.SpaargarenG. (2000). Ecological modernisation theory in debate: A review. In MolA. P. J.SonnenfeldD. A. (Eds.), Ecological modernization around the world: Perspectives and critical debates (pp. 17-49). London, England: Frank Cass.
48.
MolA. P. J.SpaargarenG. (2002). Ecological modernization and the environmental state. Research in Social Problems and Public Policy, 10, 33-52.
49.
NorgaardK. M. (2006). “We don’t really want to know”: Environmental justice and socially organized denial of global warming in Norway. Organization & Environment, 19, 347-370.
50.
NorgaardK. M. (2011). Living in denial: Climate change, emotions, and everyday life. London, England: MIT Press.
51.
O’ConnorR. E.BordR. J.YarnalB.WiefekN. (2002). Who wants to reduce greenhouse gas emissions?Social Science Quarterly, 83, 1-17.
52.
PaehlkeR. C. (2008). Some like it cold: The politics of climate change in Canada. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Between the Lines.
53.
ParksB. C.RobertsJ. T. (2006). Globalization, vulnerability to climate change, and perceived injustice. Society & Natural Resources, 19, 337-355.
54.
Plano ClarkV. L.CreswellJ. W.O’Neil GreenD.ShopeR. (2008). Mixing quantitative and qualitative approaches. In Hesse-BiberS. N.LeavyP. (Eds.), Handbook of emergent methods (pp. 363-387). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
55.
PulverS. (2007). Making sense of corporate environmentalism: An environmental contestation approach to analyzing the causes and consequences of the climate change policy split in the oil industry. Organization & Environment, 20, 44-83.
56.
ReiterH.AndrettaM.della PortaD.MoscaL. (2007). The global justice movement in Italy. In della PortaD. (Ed.), The global justice movement: Cross-national and transnational perspectives (pp. 52-78). Boulder, CO: Paradigm.
57.
RobertsJ. T. (2011). Multipolarity and the new world (dis)order: US hegemonic decline and the fragmentation of the global climate regime. Global Environmental Change, 21, 776-784.
58.
RobertsJ. T.ParksB. C. (2007). A climate of injustice: Global inequality, North-South politics, and climate policy. Cambridge: MIT Press.
59.
RochonT. R. (1998). Culture moves: Ideas, activism, and changing values. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
60.
SchnaibergA.GouldK. A. (2000). Environment and society: The enduring conflict. Caldwell, NJ: Blackburn Press.
61.
SimpsonJ.JaccardM.RiversN. (2007). Hot air: Meeting Canada’s climate change challenge. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Douglas Gibson Books.
62.
SpaargarenG.MolA. P. J. (2008). Greening global consumption: Redefining politics and authority. Global Environmental Change, 18, 350-359.
63.
StrangD.SouleS. A. (1998). Diffusion in organizations and social movements: From hybrid corn to poison pills. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 265-290.
64.
TeddlieC.TashakkoriA.JohnsonB. (2008). Emergent techniques in the gathering and analysis of mixed methods data. In Hesse-BiberS. N.LeavyP. (Eds.), Handbook of emergent methods (pp. 389-413). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
65.
TindallD. B. (2008). Networks, social influence, and concern about climate change: The effects of personal network ties to environmentalists on the general public in Canada. Paper presented at 2008 Berlin Conference on the Human Dimensions of Global Environmental Change International Conference of the Social-Ecological Research Programme. February 22nd, 2008. Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
66.
TindallD. B.DaviesS.MauboulèsC. (2003). Activism and conservation behavior in an environmental movement: The contradictory effects of gender. Society and Natural Resources, 16, 909-932.
67.
TindallD. B.HarshawH.TaylorJ. M. (2011). The effects of social network ties on the public’s satisfaction with forest management in British Columbia, Canada.” In BodinÖ.PrellC. (Eds.), Social Networks and Natural Resource Management: Uncovering the Social Fabric of Environmental Governance (pp. 147-179). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
68.
TrainorS. F.GodduhnA.DuffyL. K.ChapinF. S. I.NatcherD. C.KofinasG.HuntingtonH. P. (2009). Environmental injustice in the Canadian far north: Persistent organic pollutants and arctic climate impacts. In AgyemanJ.ColeP.Haluza-DeLayR.O’ReileyP. (Eds.), Speaking for ourselves: Environmental justice in Canada (pp. 144-162). Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada: University of British Columbia Press.
UrryJ. (2004). The “system” of automobility. Theory, Culture & Society, 21(4-5), 25-39.
71.
UrryJ. (2008). Climate change, travel and complex futures. British Journal of Sociology, 59, 261-279.
72.
WeartS. R. (2003). The discovery of global warming. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
73.
WeberR. P. (1990). Basic content analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
74.
WolfJ.BrownK.ConwayD. (2009). Ecological citizenship and climate change: Perceptions and practice. Environmental Politics, 18, 503-521.
75.
ZahranS.BrodyS. D.GroverH.VedlitzA. (2006). Climate change vulnerability and policy support. Society & Natural Resources, 19, 771-789.
76.
ZahranS.KimE.ChenX.LubellM. (2007). Ecological development and global climate change: A cross-national study of Kyoto Protocol ratification. Society & Natural Resources, 20, 37-55.
