Caregiving to elderly parents, in India, is primarily provided by adult children. This study aims at understanding the issues and concerns relating to elderly parental caregiving in the contemporary Indian sociocultural context. Qualitative methods have been used in this study to collect the data based on phenomenological principles. Data for this study was collected through in-depth interviews with 15 couples who were recruited through purposive and snowball method. Finding of the study highlighted five main themes: (a) The emotional bonding; (b) Implications on caregiver; (c) Impact on finance; (d) Who takes the responsibility and (e) Being a daughter. This study has tried to highlight that in India, being a collectivist nation, there are various aspects relating to elderly parental caregiving which affect the caregiver in different ways in the sociocultural context.
MitchellGJ. The lived experience of taking life day-by-day in later life: Research guided by Parse’s emergent method. Nurs Sci Q1990;3:29-36.
2.
GrahamH. A labor of love. In FinchJGrovesD, eds. A Labour of Love: Women, Work and Caring. London, UK: Routledge & Kegan Paul; 1983:13-30.
3.
FutrellMWondolowskiCMitchellGJ. Aging in the oldest old living in Scotland: a phenomenological study. Nurs Sci Q. 1993;6:189-194.
4.
PelusoPRPelusoJPBucknerJPKernRMCurletteW. Measuring lifestyle and attachment: an empirical investigation linking individual psychology and attachment theory. J Couns Dev. 2009;87:394-403.
5.
KaldjianLCCurtisAEShinkunasLACannonKT. Goals of care toward the end of life: a structured literature review. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2009;25:501-511.
6.
GrandónPJenaroCLemosS. Primary caregivers of schizophrenia outpatients: burden and predictor variables. Psychiatry Res. 2008;158:335-343.
7.
KimJ.-HKKnightBG. Effects of caregiver status, coping styles, and social support on the physical health of Korean American caregivers. Gerontologist. 2008;48:287-299.
8.
GaffneyM. A research study of young caregivers: the development of a recording tool for agencies to identify young caregivers (Final Report). Wellington: Ministry of Health (in association with Caregivers New Zealand); 2006.
9.
VenkateshA. Ethno-consumerism: A new paradigm to study cultural and cross-cultural consumer behaviour. In: CostaJBarmossyG, eds. Marketing and Multicultural World-Ethnicity, Nationalism and Cultural Identity. London, UK: SAGE;1995:68-104.
10.
ChhokarJS. India: Diversity and complexity in action. In: ChhokarJSBrodbeckFCHouseRJ, eds. Culture and Leadership Across the World: The GLOBE Book of In-Depth Studies of 25 Societies. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 2007:971-1020.
11.
AlleyKD. The American Anthropology of India, India Review. 2006;5:122-143.
12.
TriandisHCBontempoRVillarealMJAsaiMLuccaN. Individualism and collectivism: cross-cultural perspectives on self-ingroup relationships. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1988;54:323-338.
13.
Stopes-RoeMCochraneR. The child-rearing values of Asian and British parents and young people: an inter-ethnic and intergenerational comparison in the evaluation of Kohn’s 13 qualities, Br J Soc Psychol. 1990;29:149-160.
14.
BhopalK. Gender, Race and Patriarchy: A Study of South Asian Women. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate; 1997.
15.
DosanjhJSGhumanPAS. Punjabi child-rearing in Britain: development of identity, religion and bilingualism. Childhood: A Global Journal of Child Research. 1997;4:285-303.
16.
SternRW. Changing India. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2003.
17.
WebsterC. Purchase decision making in India: a critical ethnographic study of the antecedents of marital power. Consumption, Markets and Culture. 2000;4:145-177.
18.
MadanTN. The Hindu family and development. In: UberoiP, ed. Family, Kinship and Marriage in India. New Delhi, India: Oxford University Press;1993:416-434.
19.
ChaudharyN. Listening to Culture: Constructing Reality from Everyday Talk. New Delhi: SAGE; 2004.
20.
UsunierJ.-C. Marketing Across Cultures. London, UK: Pearson; 2000.
21.
FrawleyD. Yoga and Ayurveda: Self-Healing and Self-Realization. Delhi, India: Motilal Banarsi; 2000.
GriffinAP. A philosophical analysis of caring in nursing. J Adv Nurs. 1983;8:289-295.
24.
NoddingsN. Caring: A Feminist Approach to Ethics and Moral Education. Berkley: University of California Press; 1984.
25.
ConnellPJ. A Phenomenological Study of the Lived Experiences of Adult Caregiving Daughters and Their Elderly Mothers [doctoral dissertation]. Gainesville: University of Florida; 2003.
26.
GubriumJF. The Mosaic of Care, Frail Elderly and Their Families in the Real World. New York, NY: Springer; 1991.
27.
LevesqueLCossetteSLaurinL. A multidimensional examination of the psychological and social well-being of caregivers of a demented relative. Res Aging. 1995;17:332-361.
28.
McKinlayJBCrawfordSLTennstedtSL. The everyday impacts of providing informal care to dependent elders and their consequences for the care recipients. J Aging Health. 1995;7:497-528.
29.
MontgomeryRJV. Investigating caregiver burden. In: MarkidesKSCooperCL, eds. Aging Stress and Health. New York, NY: Wiley; 1989:201-218.
30.
SchulzRNewsomnJTMittlemarkMBurtoLCHirschCHJacksonS. Health effects of caregiving: the caregiver health effects study. Ann Behav Med. 1997;19:106-116.
31.
SchulzRO’BrienATBookwalaJFleissnerK. Psychiatric and physical morbidity effects of dementia caregiving: prevalence, correlates and causes. Gerontologist. 1995;35:771-791.
32.
SleathBThorpeJLandermanLRDoyleMClippE. African-American and White caregivers of older adults with dementia: differences in depressive symptomatology and psychotropic drug use. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005;53:397-404.
33.
BeachSRSchulzRYeeJLJacksonS. Negative and positive health effects of caring for a disabled spouse: longitudinal findings from the caregiver health effects study. Psychol Aging. 2000;15:259-271.
34.
SkaffMMPearlinLI. Caregiving: role engulfment and the loss of self. Gerontologist. 1992;32:656-664.
35.
BraithwaiteV. Contextual or general stress outcomes: making choices through caregiving appraisals. Gerontologist. 2000;40:706-717.
36.
NoonanAETennstedtSLRebelskyFG. 1996; Making the best of it: Themes of meaning among informal caregivers to elderly. J Aging Stud. 2000;10:313-327.
37.
KramerBJ. Gain in caregiving experience: where are we? What next?Gerontologist. 1997;37:218-232.
38.
AlbertSMMossMLawtonMP. The significance of the self-perceived start of caregiving. Unpublished manuscript. Philadelphia, PA: Philadelphia Geriatric Center; 1993.
39.
GeorgeLK. Caregiver Stress studies—there really is more to learn. Gerontologist. 1990;30:580-581.
40.
PearlinLIMullanJTSempleSJSkaffMM. Caregiving and the stress process: an overview of concepts and their measures. Gerontologist. 1990;30:583-594.
41.
KnightBGLutzkySMMacofsky-UrbanF. A meta-analytic review of interventions for caregiver distress: recommendations for future research. Gerontologist. 1993;33:240-248.
42.
PattonMQ. Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods (2nd ed.) Newbury Park, CA: SAGE; 1990.
43.
Merleau-PontyM. The Phenomenology of Perception. London, UK: Routledge & Kegan Paul; 1962.
44.
HusserlE. Ideas: General Introduction to Pure Phenomenology. New York, NY: Collier Books; 1962.
45.
PowersBAKnappTR. A Dictionary of Nursing Theory and Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE; 1995.
46.
BergumV. Being a Phenomenological Researcher. In: MorseJ, ed. Qualitative Nursing Research: Contemporary Dialogue. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE; 1991:55-71.
47.
van ManenM. Care-as-worry, or “don’t worry be happy.”Qual Health Res. 2002;12:264-280.
48.
BennerP. A phenomenological perspective on explanation, prediction and understanding in nursing science. Advances in Nursing Science. 1985;8:1-14.
49.
ColaizziPF. Psychological research as the phenomenologist views it. In: ValleRSKingM, eds. Existential-Phenomenological Alternatives for Psychology. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1978:49-71.
50.
CreswellJW. Research Design: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE; 1998:49-71.
51.
MerriamSB. (Ed.). Qualitative Research in Practice: Examples for Discussion and Analysis. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass; 2002.
52.
SchalockRL. Guest editorial and introduction [Special issue on quality of life]. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2005;49:695-698.
53.
TurnbullATurnbullR. Families, Professionals and Exceptionalities: A Special Partnership. Columbus, OH: Merrill; 1990.
54.
SummersJPostonDTurnbullA. Conceptualizing and measuring family quality life. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2005;49:777-783.
55.
HeckerLLMimsGABoughnerSR. General systems theory, cybernetics, and family therapy. In: HeckerLLWetchlerJL, eds. An Introduction to Marriage and Family Therapy. New York, NY: Haworth Clinical Practice Press; 2003:39-62.
56.
NicholsMPSchwartzRC. Family Therapy: Concepts and Methods (6th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon; 2004.
57.
MilesMBHubermanAM. Qualitative Data Analysis: A Sourcebook of New Methods. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE; 1984.
58.
PolitDFBeckCT. Nursing Research. Principles and Methods. (7th ed., pp. 422-437) Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins;2004.
59.
SpezialeHCarpenterD. Qualitative Research in Nursing: Advancing the Humanistic Imperative. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott; 2003.
60.
DenzinNKLincolnYS. (Eds.) Handbook of Qualitative Research. London, UK: SAGE; 1994.
61.
HallettC. Understanding the phenomenological approach to research. Nurse Researcher. 1995;3:55-65.
62.
PolitDFBeckCTHunglerBP. Essentials of Nursing Research: Methods, Appraisal and Utilization. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott; 2001.
63.
ShieldsM. Stress, Health and the Benefit of Social Support. Health Reports (Catalogue Number 82-003-XPE, Vol. 15). Ottawa, Ontario: Statistics Canada; 2003.
64.
BourgeoisSJohnsonA. Caring for someone dying at home. Nurs N Z. 2006;12:12-15.
65.
CarnevaleFAlexanderEDavisMRennickJTroiniR. Daily living with distress and enrichment: the moral experience of families with ventilator-assisted children at home. Pediatrics. 2006;117:48-60.
66.
FallonP. Elder Abuse and/or Neglect: Literature Review (Centre for Social Research and Evaluation: Te Pakapū Rangahau Arotaki Hapori). Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Social Development; 2006.
67.
van den BergBSpauwenP. Measurement of informal care: an empirical study into the valid measurement of time spent on informal caregiving. Health Econ. 2006;14:447-460.
68.
HepworthD. Asian caregivers’ perceptions of care assessment and support in the community. Br J Soc Work. 2005; 35:337-353.
69.
RajnovichBKeefeJFastJ. Supporting caregivers to dependent adults in the 21st century. Background paper for Canadian Policy Research Networks policy workshop on family caregiving; 2005:i-54.
70.
MacDonaldMPhippsSLethbridgeL. Taking its toll: the influence of paid and unpaid work on women’s well-being. Feminist Economics. 2005;11:63-94.
MorrisM. What research reveals about gender home care and caregiving: Overview and policy implications. In: GrantKAmaratungaCArmstrongPBoscoeMPedersonAWillsonK, eds. Caring For/Caring About. Aurora, Ontario, Canada: Garamond Press; 2004:91-114.
73.
DunnNJStrainLA. Caregivers at risk: Changes in leisure participation. In: BialeschkiDStewartW, eds. Abstracts From the 1998 Symposium in Leisure Research. Miami Beach, FL: National Recreation and Parks Association; September 1998:84.
74.
White-MeansSIChangC. Informal caregivers’ leisure time and stress. J Fam Econ Issues. 1994;15:117-136.
75.
KellerMJTuSF. The relationship between leisure and perceived burden of spouse caregivers of persons with Alzheimer’s disease. Paper presented at the National Recreation and Park Assoication Leisure Research Symposium; October, 1994; Minneapolis, MN.
76.
MillerBMontgomeryA. Family caregivers and limitations in social activities. Res Aging. 1990;12:72-93.
77.
StobertSCranswickMK. “Looking after seniors: Who does what for whom?” Canadian Social Trends (Catalogue no. 11-008-XIE). Ottawa, Ontario: Statistics Canada; 2004:2-6.
78.
KeatingNFastJEFrederickJCranswickKPerrierC. Eldercare in Canada: Context, Content, and Consequences. Ottawa, Ontario: Statistics Canada; 1999.
79.
PerkinsHWDeMeisD. Gender and Family effects on the “second-shift” domestic activity of college-educated young adults, Gender and Society. 1996;10:78-93.
80.
ChappellNBlandfordA. Informal and formal care: exploring the complementarityAgeing Soc. 1991;11:299-317.
81.
GibsonMJHouserAN. Valuing the Invaluable: A New Look at the Economic Value of Family Caregiving. Washington, DC: AARP Public Policy Institute; 2007.
82.
SroufeLA. The role of infant–caregiver attachment in development. In: BelskyJNezworskiT, eds. Clinical Implications of Attachment. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1988:18-38.
83.
BenoitDParkerKCH. Stability and transmission of attachment across three generations. Child Dev. 1994;65: 1444-1456.
84.
PelusoPRPelusoJPWhiteJAnnaFKernRM. A Comparison of Attachment Theory and Individual Psychology: a Review of the Literature. Journal of counselling & development. 2004;82:139-145.
85.
BelskyJIsabellaR. Maternal, infant, and social contextual determinants of attachment security. In: BelskyJNezworskiT, eds. Clinical Implications of Attachment. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1988:41-94.
86.
HughesDA. Facilitating Developmental Attachment. Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson; 1997.
87.
DonigerWSmithKB. The Laws of Manu. London, UK Penguin Classics. [ISBN 0-14-044540-4]; 1991.
88.
ScharlachA. Caregiving and employment: competing or complementary roles?Gerontologist. 1994;34:378-385.
89.
MurphyBSchofieldHNankervisJBlockSHerrmanHSinghB. Women with multiple roles: the emotional impact of caring for ageing parents. Ageing Soc. 1997;17:277-291.
90.
GeorgeLKGwytherLP. Caregiver well-being: a multidimensional examination of family caregivers of demented adults. Gerontologist. 1986;26:253-259.
91.
StrawbridgeWJWallhagenMShemaSKaplanG. New burdens or more of tbe same? Comparing grandparent, spouse, and adult-child caregivers. Gerontologist. 1997;37:505-510.
92.
GottlieibBKellowayKFraboniM. Aspects of eldercare that place an employee at risk. Gerontologist. 1994;34:815-821.
93.
VanderwerkerLCLaffREKadan-LottickNSMcCollSPrigersonH.G. Psychiatric disorders and mental health service use among caregivers of advanced cancer patients. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:6899-6907.
94.
LevineC. Introduction: The many worlds of family caregivers. In: LevineC, ed. Always on Call: When Illness Turns Families Into Caregivers. New York, NY: United Hospital Fund; 2004.
95.
ColemanEABerensonRA. Lost in translation: challenges and opportunities for improving the quality of transitional care. Ann Intern Med. 2004;141: 533-536.
96.
BaumgartenMLebelPLapriseHLeclercCQuinnC. Adult day care for the frail elderly: outcomes, satisfaction, and cost. J Aging Health. 2002;14:237.
97.
SmergliaVDeimlingG. Care-related decision making satisfaction and caregiver well-being in families caring for older members. Gerontologist. 1997;37:658.
98.
BrinkS. Elder Care; the Nexus for Family, Work and Health Policy. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: Caledon Institute of Social Policy; 2004.
99.
CranswickK. Canada’s Caregivers. Canadian Social Trends (Catalogue No. 11-008-XPE). Ottawa, Ontario: Statistics Canada; 1997.
100.
DuxburyLHigginsCSchroederB. Balancing Paid Work and Caregiving Responsibilities: A Closer Look at Family Caregivers in Canada. Ottawa, Ontario: Canadian Policy Research Networks; 2009.
101.
AneshenselCSPearlinLIMullanJTZaritSHWhitlatchCJ. Profiles in Caregiving: The Unexpected Career. San Diego, CA: Academic Press; 1995.
102.
KellyB. Preserving moral integrity: a follow-up study with new graduate nurses. J Adv Nurs. 1998;28:1134-1145.
103.
TriandisHCBhawukDPSCulture theory and the meaning of relatedness. In: ErleyCPErezM, eds. New Perspective on Industrial/organisational psychology. San Francisco, CA: New Lexington Press; 1997:13-52.
104.
FingermanKL. Aging Mothers and Adult Daughters. A Study in Mixed Emotions. New York, NY: Springer; 2001.
105.
BeardP. Good Daughters. Loving Our Mothers as They Age. New York, NY: Warner Books; 1999.
106.
DwyerJWCowardRT. A multivariate comparison of the involvement of adult sons versus daughters in the care of impaired parents. J Gerontol. 1991;46:S259-S269.
107.
WalkerAJAllenKR. Relationships between caregiving daughters and their elderly mothers. Gerontologist. 1991; 31:389-396.
108.
CumminsRA. Moving from the quality of life concept to a theory. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2005;49:699-706.
109.
WhiteJKleinD. Family Theories (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE; 2002.
110.
TurnbullABrownITurnbullR. (Eds.). Families and People With Mental Retardation and Quality of Life: International Perspectives. Washington, DC: AAMR; 2004.
111.
GallimoreRWeisnerTSKaufmanSZBernbeimerLP. The social construction of ecocul594 tural niches: Family accommodation of developmentally delayed children. Am J Ment Retard. 1989;94:216-230.
112.
DukesS. Phenomenological methodology in the human sciences. J Relig Health. 1984;23:197-203.
113.
GiorgiA. Sketch of a psychological phenomenological method. In: GiorgiA, ed. Phenomenology and Psychological Research. Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press; 1985:8-22.
114.
PolkinghorneDE. Phenomenological Research Methods. In: ValleRSHallingS, eds. Existential-phenomenological Perspectives in Psychology. New York, NY: Plenum; 1989:41-60.
115.
PattonMQ. Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: SAGE. 1990.
116.
BrantlingerEJimenezRKlingnerJPugachMRichardsonV. Qualitative studies in special education. Exceptional children. 2005;71:195-207.
117.
BarkerVEAbramsJRTiyaamornwongVSeiboldDRDugganAParkHSSebastianM. New contexts for relational communication in groups. Small Group Research. 2000;31:470-503.
118.
GiddensA. The Constitution of Society. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press; 1984.
119.
RolandA. Psychoanalysis in civilizational perspective: The self in India, Japan and America. Psychoanalytic Review. 1984;71:569-590.
120.
RolandA. The familial self, the individualized self, and the transcendent self Psychoanalytic reflections on India and America. Psychoanal Rev. 1987;74:237-250.
121.
RolandA. In Search of Self in India and Japan: Toward a Cross-Cultural Psychology. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 1988.
