BentlerRANiehburD.Verification: Issues and Implementation. Trends Amplif4:90–102.
6.
BergerKWHagbergENRaneRL. (1989). Prescription of Hearing Instruments: Rationale, Procedures, and Results. Kent, OH: Herald Press.
7.
BlairJ. (1977). Effects of amplification, speech reading, and classroom environments on reception of speech. Volta Rev Dec: 443–449.
8.
BlairJMyrupCViehwegS. (1989). Comparison of the listening effectiveness of hard-of-hearing children using three types of amplification. Ed Aud Mono1: 48–55.
9.
BoneySJBessFH. (1984). Noise and reverberation in minimal bilateral sensorineural hearing loss. Presented at the ASHA convention, San Francisco, CA, November.
10.
BoothroydA. (1984). Auditory perception of speech contrasts by subjects with sensorineural hearing loss. J Speech Hear Res2:134–144.
11.
BoothroydA. (1992). The FM wireless link: An invisible microphone cable. In: RossM. (ed.) FM Auditory Training Systems: Characteristics, Selection, and Use. Timonium, MD: York Press, pp 1–19.
BrackettD. (1992). Effects of early FM use on speech perception. In: RossM. (ed.) FM Auditory Training Systems: Characteristics, Selection & Use. Timonium, MD: York Press, pp 175–188.
14.
ByrneDDillonH. (1986). The National Acoustics Laboratories (NAL) procedure for selecting the gain and frequency response of a hearing instruments. Ear Hear7:257–265.
15.
ChristensenLAThomasTE. (1997). The use of multiple-memory hearing instruments technology in children. Presented at the 2nd Biennial Hearing Instruments Research and Development Conference, Bethesda, MD.
16.
CornelisseLEGagneJ-PSeewaldRC. (1991). Ear level recordings of the long-term average spectrum of speech. Ear Hear12(1):47–54.
17.
CornelisseLESeewaldRCJamiesonDG. (1994). Wide dynamic range compression hearing instruments: The DSL[i/o] approach. Hear J47(10):23–29.
18.
CornelisseLESeewaldRCJamiesonDG. (1995). The input/output formula: A theoretical approach to the fitting of personal amplification devices. J Acoust Soc Amer97:1854–1864.
19.
CoxRM. (1981). Using LDLs to establish hearing instruments limiting levels. Hear Instrum32(5):16–20.
20.
CoxRMMooreJN. (1988). Composite speech spectrum for hearing instruments gain prescriptions. J Speech Hear Res31:102–107.
21.
CrandellC. (1993). Speech recognition in noise by children with minimal hearing loss. Ear Hear14(3):210–216.
22.
DempsterJHMackenzieK. (1990). The resonance frequency of the external auditory canal in children. Ear Hear11:296–298.
23.
DillonH. (1996). Compression? Yes, but for low or high frequencies, for low or high intensities, and with what response times?Ear Hearing17:287–307.
24.
Ellekjaer-JensenCMayA. (1998). Fitting children with OLC vs. PC hearing instruments. Hear Rev5(2):37–38, 40.
25.
ElliotLL. (1979). Performance of children aged 9 to 17 years on a test of speech intelligibility in noise using sentence material with controlled word predictability. J Acoust Soc Amer66(3):651–653.
26.
ErberNPWittLH. (1977). Effects of stimulus intensity on speech perception by deaf children. J Speech Hear Res42:271–278.
27.
FeiginJAKopunJKStelmachowiczPGGorgaMP. (1989). Probe-microphone measures of ear-canal sound pressure levels in infants and children. Ear Hear10:254–258.
28.
Finitzo-HeiberTTillmanT. (1978). Room acoustics effects on monosyllabic word discrimination ability for normal and hearing-impaired children. J Speech Hear Res21:440–458.
29.
GitlesTCNiquettePT. (1995). FIG6 in ten. Hear Rev48:28, 30.
30.
GravelJFauselNLiskowCChobotJ. (1999). Children's speech recognition in noise using omni-directional and dual microphone hearing aid technology. Ear Hear20(1):1–11.
31.
HawkinsDB. (1984). Comparisons of speech recognition in noise by mildly-to-moderately hearing-impaired children using hearing instruments and FM systems. J Speech Hear Dis49:409–418.
32.
HawkinsD. (1987). Assessment of FM systems with an ear canal probe tube microphone system. Ear Hear8:301–303.
33.
HawkinsDMuellerHG. (1992). Test protocols for probe-tube microphone measurements. In: MuellerHGHawkinsDBNorthernJL. Probe Microphone Measurements: Hearing Instruments Selection and Assessment. San Diego, CA: Singular Publishing, Inc., pp 269–278.
34.
HawkinsDSchumD. (1985). Some effects of FM-system coupling on hearing instruments characteristics. J Speech Hear Dis50:132–141.
35.
HawkinsDBWaldenBEMontgomeryAProsekRA. (1987). Description and validation of an LDL procedure designed to select SSPL90. Ear Hear8:162–169.
36.
HawkinsDVan TasellD. (1982). Electroacoustic characteristics of personal FM systems. J Speech Hear Dis47:355–362.
37.
HawkinsDBYaculloWS. (1984). Signal-to-noise advantage of binaural hearing instruments and directional microphones under different levels of reverberation. J Speech Hear Dis49:278–286.
38.
Hedley-WilliamsATharpeAMBessFH. (1996). Fitting hearing instruments in the pediatric population: A survey of practice procedures. In: BessFHGravelJSTharpeAM (eds.) Amplification for Children with Auditory Deficits. Nashville, TN: Bill Wilkerson Center Press, pp 107–122.
39.
HicksonL. (1994). Compression amplification in hearing instruments. Amer J Audiol3:51–65.
40.
JonesJBergFViehwegS. (1989). Close, distant and sound field overhead listening in kindergarten classrooms. Educ Audiol Mono1:56–65.
41.
KammCDirksDMickeyMR. (1977). Effects of sensorineural hearing loss on loudness discomfort level and most comfortable loudness judgments. J Speech Hear Res21:668–681.
42.
KawellMEKopunJGStelmachowiczPG. (1988). Loudness discomfort levels in children. Ear Hear9:133–137.
43.
KeidserG. (1995). The relationship between listening conditions and alternative amplification schemes for multiple memory hearing instruments. Ear Hear16(6):575–586.
44.
KillionMC. (1995). Talking hair cells: What they have to say about hearing instruments. In: BerlinCI (ed.) Hair Cells and Hearing Instruments. San Diego: Singular Press, pp 3–20.
45.
KillionMCFikret-PasaS. (1993). The three types of sensorineural hearing loss: Loudness and intelligibility considerations. Hear J46:11, 31–36.
46.
KrugerB. (1987). An update on the external ear resonance in infants and young children. Ear Hear8:333–336.
47.
KrugerBRubenRJ. (1987). The acoustic properties of the infant ear: A preliminary report. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh)103:578–5785.
48.
KukDK. (1992). Evaluation of the efficacy of a multi-memory hearing instruments. J Amer Acad Audiol7(6):406–418.
49.
KukDK. (1996). Theoretical and practical considerations in compression hearing aids. Trends Amp1(1):5–39.
50.
LeavittRFlexerC. (1991). Speech degradation as measured by the rapid speech transmission index (RASTI). Ear Hear12:115–118.
51.
LeeuwARDreschlerWA. (1991). Advantages of directional hearing instruments microphones related to room acoustics. Audiol30(6):330–344.
52.
LewisD. (1991). FM systems and assistive devices: Selection and evaluation. In: FeiginJAStelmachowiczPG. (eds.) Pediatric Amplification: Proceedings of the 1991 National Conference, Omaha, NE: BTNRH, 115–138.
53.
LewisD. (1994). Assistive devices for classroom listening: FM systems. Amer J Audiol3:70–83.
54.
LewisD. (1997). Selection and assessment of classroom amplification. In: McCrackenWLaoide-KempS, (eds.) Audiology in Education. Manchester: University of Manchester, pp 323–347.
55.
LewisD. (1998). Classroom amplification. In: BessFH (ed.) Children with Hearing Impairment: Contemporary Trends. Nashville, TN: Bill Wilkerson Center Press, pp 277–295.
56.
LewisDFeiginJKarasekAStelmachowiczP. (1991). Evaluation and assessment of FM systems. Ear Hear12:268–280.
57.
LibbyER. (1986). The 1/3–2/3 insertion gain hearing instruments selection guide. Hear Instrum37:27–28.
58.
MacPhersonBJElfenbeinJLSchumRLBentlerRA. (1991). Thresholds of discomfort in children. Ear Hear12:184–190.
59.
MatkinND. (1987). Hearing instruments for children: Premises for selecting and fitting. Hear Instrum38:14–16.
60.
McCandlessGALyregaardPE. (1983). Prescription of gain and output (POGO) for hearing instruments. Hear Instrum3:16–21.
61.
MoellerMPDonaghyKFBeauchaineKLLewisDEStelmachowiczPG. (1996). Longitudinal study of FM system use in nonacademic settings: Effects on language development. Ear Hear17(1):28–41.
62.
MoodieKSSeewaldRCSinclairST. (1994). Procedure for predicting real-ear hearing instruments performance in young children. Amer J Audiol3(1):23–31.
63.
NabelekADonahueA. (1986). Comparison of amplification systems in an auditorium. J Acoust Soc Amer79:2078–2082.
64.
NabelekAKRobinsonPK. (1982). Monaural and binaural speech perception in reverberation for listeners of various ages. J Acoust Soc Amer71(5):1242–1248.
65.
BarlowNelson NLAuslanderMCRinesDStelmachowiczPC. (1988). Probe-tube microphone measures in hearing impaired children and adults. Ear Hear9(5):243–247.
66.
NittrouerSBoothroydA. (1990). Context effects in phoneme and word recognition by young children and older adults. J Acoust Soc Amer80:50–57.
67.
NozzaRJ. (1987). Infant speech-sound discrimination testing: Effects of stimulus intensity and procedural model on measures of performance. J Acoust Soc Amer81:1928–1939.
NozzaRJRossmanRNFBondLC. (1991). Infant-adult differences in unmasked threshold for the discrimination of consonant-vowel syllable pairs. Audiol30:102–112.
70.
PascoeDP. (1988). Clinical measurements of the auditory dynamic range and their relationship to formulas for hearing instruments gain. In: JensenJH (ed.) Hearing Instruments Fitting - Theoretical and Practical Views (Proceedings of the 13th Danavox Symposium). Copenhagen: Stougard Jensen, pp 129–152.
71.
RintlemannWFBessFH. (1988). High-level amplification and potential hearing loss in children. In: BessFH (ed.) Hearing Impairment in Children. Parkton, MD: York Press, pp 278–309.
72.
RossMSeewaldRC. (1988). Hearing instruments selection and evaluation with young children. In: BessFH. (ed.) Hearing Impairment in Children. Parkton, MD: York Press, pp 190–213.
73.
RubenRJ. (1997). A time frame of critical/sensitive periods of language development. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh), 117:202–205.
74.
SeewaldRC. (1988). The desired sensation level approach for children: Selection and verification. Hear Instrum39:18–22.
75.
SeewaldRC. (1991). Hearing instruments output limiting considerations for children. In: FeiginJAStelmachowiczPG. (eds.) Pediatric Amplification: Proceedings of the 1991 National Conference. Omaha, NE: BTNRH, pp 19–35.
76.
SeewaldRC. (1994). Fitting children with the DSL method. Hear J47(9):10, 48–51.
77.
SeewaldRCornelisseLJenstadLMoodieSShantzJPumfordJ, (submitted). Rationale for WDRC applications in pediatric fittings.
78.
SeewaldRCCornelisseLERamjiKVSinclairSTMoodieKSJamiesonDG. (1997). DSL v 4.1 for Windows: A software implementation of the Desired Sensation Level (DSL[i/o]) Method for fitting linear gain and wide-dynamic-range compression hearing instruments. Hearing Health Care Research Unit. University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.
79.
SeewaldRCHudsonSPGagneJ-PZeliskoDL. (1992). Comparison of 2 procedures for estimating the sensation level of amplified speech. Ear Hear13(3):142–149.
80.
SeewaldRCGagneJ-P. (1995). Approaches to hearing instruments fitting in infants and young children. Volta Rev, 97(summer):161–173.
81.
SeewaldRCRossM. (1988). Amplification for young hearing impaired children. In: PollackMC. (ed.) Amplification for the Hearing Impaired, 3rd Ed.Orlando: Grune and Stratton, pp 213–217.
82.
SeewaldRCSinclairSTMoodieKS. (1994). Predictive accuracy of a procedure for electroacoustic fitting in young children. Presented at the AAA convention, Richmond, VA.
83.
SeewaldRCRamjiKVSinclairSTMoodieKSJamiesonDG. (1993). DSL 3.1 User's Manual. London, Ontario: University of Western Ontario.
84.
SeewaldRCRossMSpiroMK. (1985). Selecting amplification characteristics for young hearing-impaired children. Ear Hear6:48–53.
85.
SeewaldRCRossMStelmachowiczPG. (1987). Selecting and verifying hearing instruments performance characteristics for young children. J Acad Rehab Audiol20:25–37.
86.
SeewaldRCZeliskoDCGagneJ. (1990, May). Evaluation of a procedure for measuring loudness discomfort levels in children. Presented at Issues in advanced hearing instruments research, Lake Arrowhead, California.
87.
SkinnerMW. (1988). Hearing Aid Evaluation. Englewood, NJ: Prentice Hall, Inc.
88.
SkinnerMWPascoeDPMillerJDPopelkaGR. (1982). Measurements to determine the optimal placement of speech energy within the listener's auditory area: A basis for selecting amplification characteristics. In: StudebakerGABessFH. (eds.) The Vanderbilt Hearing-Instruments Report: State of the Art Research Needs. Upper Darby, Pennsylvania: Monographs in Contemporary Audiology, pp 161–169.
89.
SmithLZBoothroydA. (1989). Performance intensity function and speech perception in hearing impaired children. Presented at the ASHA convention, St. Louis, MO.
90.
StelmachowiczPGDalzellSPetersonDKopunJLewisDHooverB. (1998). A comparison of threshold-based fitting strategies for non-linear hearing instruments. Ear Hear19(2):131–138.
91.
StelmachowiczPGKalbererALewisDE. (1996). Situational hearing aid response profile (SHARP). In: BessFHGravelJSTharpeAM (eds.) Amplification for Children with Auditory Deficits. Nashville, TN: Bill Wilkerson Center Press, pp 193–214.
92.
StelmachowiczPGLewisDECarneyE. (1994). Preferred hearing instruments frequency responses in simulated listening environments. J Speech Hear Res37:712–719.
93.
StelmachowiczPGLewisDEHooverBMKeefeDH. (1999). Subjective effects of peak clipping vs. compression limiting in normal and hearing-impaired children and adults. J Acoust Soc Amer. 105(1):412–422.
94.
StelmachowiczPGMaceALKopunJGCarneyE. (1993). Long-term and short-term characteristics of speech: Implications for hearing instruments selection for young children. J Speech Hear Res36(3):609–620.
95.
StuartADurieux-SmithAStenstromR. (1991). Probe tube microphone measures of loudness discomfort levels in children. Ear Hear12(2):140–143.
96.
The Pediatric Working Group of the Conference on Amplification for Children with Auditory Deficits. (1996). Amplification for infants and children with hearing loss. Amer J Audiol5(1):53–68.
97.
ThibodeauL. (1990). Electroacoustic performance of direct-input hearing instruments with FM amplification systems. Language, Speech, Hear Services in Schools21:49–56.
98.
ThibodeauLBalashJ. (1993). Equivalent input noise in personal FM systems. Educ Audiol Mono3:1–4.
99.
ThibodeauLSaucedoK. (1991). Consistency of electroacoustic characteristics across components of FM systems. J Speech Hear Res34:628–635.
100.
ThibodeauLMcCaffreyHAbrahamsonJ. (1988). Effects of coupling hearing instruments to FM systems via neckloops. J Acad Rehab Audiol21:49–56.
101.
ValenteMFabryDAPottsLG. (1995). Recognition of speech in noise with hearing instruments using dual microphones. J Amer Acad Audiol6:440–449.
102.
Van TasellDLandinD. (1980). Frequency response characteristics of FM mini-loop auditory trainers. J Speech Hear Dis45:247–258.
103.
Van TasellDMallingerCCrumpE. (1986). Functional gain and speech recognition with two types of FM amplification. Lang, Speech Hear Serv Schools17:28–37.
104.
WalkerGDillonHByrneDChristenL. (1984). The use of loudness discomfort levels for selecting maximum power output of hearing instruments. Austral J Audiol6:23–32.
105.
WestwoodGFSBamfordJM. (1995). Probe-tube microphone measures with very young infants: Real ear to coupler differences and longitudinal changes in real ear unaided response. Ear Hear16(3):263–273.
106.
Yoshinaga-ItanoCSedeyACoulterDMehlA. (1998). Language of early- and later identified children with hearing loss. Pediatrics102(5):1161–1171.