AgnewJ. (1993). Application of a notch filter to reduce acoustic feedback. Hear J46 (3): 37–40, 42–43.
7.
ArcosJTCoreMTHarrisonJG. (1995). Hearing Aid Incorporating a Novelty Filter US Patent 5,396,560.
8.
BennettMJSrikandanSBrowneLMH. (1980). A controlled feedback hearing aid. Hear Aid J33 (7): 12–42.
9.
BerkowitzAO. (1987). The dual-receiver concept: benefits and applications. Hear J40 (7): 19–22.
10.
BisgaardN. (1993). Digital feedback suppression - clinical experiences with profoundly hearing. In: BeilinJJensenGR. (eds. Recent Developments in Hearing Instrument Technology. 15th Danavox Symposium, Kolding, Denmark, 371–384.
11.
BisgaardNDyrlundO. (1991a). Acoustic feedback part 1: traditional feedback suppression methods. Hear Instr42 (9): 24–26.
12.
BisgaardNDyrlundO. (1991b). Acoustic feedback part 2: a digital system for suppression of feedback. Hear Instr42 (10): 44–45.
13.
BisgaardNDyrlundO. (1991c). Acoustic feedback part 3: clinical testing of a DFS prototype. Hear Instr42 (12): 17–18.
14.
BonerCPBonerCR. (1965). A procedure for controlling room-ring modes and feedback modes in sound systems with narow-band filters. J Audio Eng Soc13 (4): 297–300.
15.
BordewijkLG. (1991). Anti-Howling Hearing Aid US Patent 5,003,606.
16.
CastletonL. (1983). NAEL: fitting facts: part IV: feedback—not the problem, the solution. Hear Instr34 (12): 24–26.
17.
ChenC. (1978). Automatically Tunable Notch Filter and Method for Suppression of Acoustical Feedback US Patent 4,091,236.
18.
CongerC. (1990). Understanding digital technology in hearing instruments. Hear Instr41 (3): 21–22.
CoxRM. (1982). Combined effects of earmold vents and suboscillatory feedback on hearing aid frequency response. Ear Hear3:12–17.
21.
DillonH. (1985). Earmolds and high frequency response modification. Hear Instr36 (12): 8–12.
22.
DyrlundOHenningsenLBBisgaardNJensenJH. (1994). Digital feedback suppression (DFS): characterization of feedback-margin improvements in a DFS hearing instrument. Scand Audiol23:135–138.
23.
EgolfDP. (1982). Review of the acoustic feedback literature from a control systems point of view. In: StudebakerGABessFH. (eds). The Vanderbilt Hearing Aid Report. Monographs in Contemporary Audiology, Upper Darby, PA, 94–103.
24.
EgolfDPHowellHCWeaverKABarkerDS. (1985). The hearing aid feedback path: mathematical simulations and experimental verification. J Acous Soc Am78:1578–1587.
25.
EngebretsonAM. (1993). Design criteria for new technologies. J Speech-Lang Path Audiol: Monogr Suppl, Jan 1993: 74–86.
26.
EngebretsonAMFrench-St.George M. (1993). Properties of an adaptive feedback equalization algorithm. J Rehab Res Dev30 (1): 8–16.
27.
EngebretsonAMO'ConnellMPZhengB. (1991). Electronic Filters, Hearing Aids and Methods US Patent 5,016,280.
28.
FlackLWhiteRTweedJGregoryDWQureshiMY. (1995). An investigation into sound attenuation by earmould tubing. Br I Audiol29:237–245.
29.
FrenchGeorge MWoodDJEngebretsonAM. (1993). Behavioral assessment of adaptive feedback equalization in a digital hearing aid. J Rehab Res Dev30 (1): 17–25.
30.
GatehouseS. (1989). Limitations on insertion gains with vented earmoulds imposed by oscillatory feedback. Br J Audiol23:133–136.
31.
GoodingsRLASenensiebGAWilsonPHHansenRS. (1993). Hearing Aid Having Compensation for Acoustic Feedback US Patent 5,259,033.
32.
GraupeDGrosspietschJBasseasSP. (1988). Method of and Means for Adaptively Filtering Screeching Noise Caused by Acoustic Feedback US Patent 4,783,818.
33.
GrimesAMMuellerHG. (1991). Using probe-microphone measures to assess telecoils and ALDs. Hear J44 (7): 21–24, 29.
34.
GroverBCMartinMC. (1974). On the practical limit for postaural hearing aids. Br I Audiol8:121–124.
35.
HahnSBThorpeLFitchA. (1993). Digital cordless telephones and hearing aids: compatibility issues. Vibrations Spring: 14–18.
36.
HenningsenLBDyrlundOBisgaardNBrinkB. (1994). Digital feedback suppression (DFS): clinical experiences when fitting a DFS hearing instrument on children. Scand Audiol23:117–122.
37.
IRPI. (1987). Vibration paths in ITE hearing aids Report Number 10707–1.
38.
Industrial Research Products, Inc., Elk Grove Village, IL.
39.
JoynerKHWoodMBurwoodEAllisonDLe StrangeR. (1993). Interference to hearing aids by the new digital mobile telephone system, Global System for Mobile (GSM) communication standardNational Acoustic Laboratories, Sydney, Australia.
40.
KatesJM. (1988). Acoustic effects in in-the-ear hearing aid response: results from a computer simulation. Ear Hear9:119–132.
41.
KillionMC. (1975). Vibration sensitivity measurements on subminiature condenser microphones. J Audio Eng Soc23 (3): 123–127.
42.
KillionMC. (1993). Transducers and acoustic couplings. Acoustical Factors Affecting Hearing Aid PerformanceSecond Edition. Allyn and Bacon, Boston. MA, 31–50.
43.
KillionMC. (1996). Informal Report on Hearing Aid Interference: US-TDMA, GSM, and CDMAVideotape. Etymotic Research Inc., Elk Grove Village, IL.
44.
KillionMCWilberLAGudmundsenGI. (1988). Zwislocki was right. Hear Instr39 (1): 14–18.
45.
Knowles. (1989a). EJ Receiver data sheet. Data Sheet No. S-545–0989. Knowles Electronics Inc., Itasca, IL.
46.
Knowles. (1989b). The Effect of Acoustic Damping Plugs on Receiver Response. Technical Bulletin No. TB14. Knowles Electronics Inc., Itasca, IL.
47.
KrokstadASveanJRamstadTA. (1994). Programmable Hybrid Hearing Aid with Digital Signal Processing US Patent 5,276,739.
48.
KryterKD. (1975). Method of and Apparatus for Aided Hearing and the Like US Patent 3,894,195.
49.
KukFK. (1994). Maximum usable real-ear insertion gain with ten earmold designs. J Am Acad Audiol5:44–51.
50.
Langford SmithF. (1960). Fidelity and Distortion. In: Langford-Smith F (ed). Radiotron Designer's HandbookFourth Edition. Radio Corporation of America, Harrison, NJ, 603–634.
51.
LeenenJRGM. (1995). In the Ear Hearing Aid Having Extraction Tube which Reduces Acoustic Feedback US Patent 5,395,168.
52.
LetowskiTRRichardsWDBurchfieldSB. (1992). Transmission of sound, vibration through earmold materials. Hear Instr43 (12): 11–15.
53.
LevittH. (1993). Digital Hearing Aids. In: StudebakerGAHochbergI. (eds). Acoustical Factors Affecting Hearing Aid PerformanceSecond Edition. Allyn and Bacon, Boston, MA, 317–335.
54.
LevittHDugotRSKopperKW. (1988). Programmable Digital Hearing Aid System US Patent 4,731,850.
55.
LevittHDugotRSKopperKW. (1989). Host Controller for Programmable Digital Hearing Aid System US Patent 4,879,749.
MyndersJM. (1982). Counseling your client on feedback. Hear Aid J35 (8): 14.
67.
NishinomiyaG. (1968). Improvement of acoustic feedback stability of public address system by warbling. Procceedings of the Sixth International Congress of Acoustics, 3:93–96.
68.
NolanM. (1983). Acoustic feedback - causes and cures. J Brit Assoc Teach Deaf17:13–17.
69.
NyquistH. (1932). Regeneration theory. Bell Sys Tech J11:126–147.
70.
OrtonJ. (1980a). Practical aspects of fitting in-the-ear aids part II: dispenser modifications. Hear Instr31 (5): 20–23.
71.
OrtonJ. (1980b). Practical aspects of fitting in-the-ear aids part III: dispenser modifications. Hear Instr31 (7): 20–23.
72.
OrtonJ. (1981). Earmold modifications for in-the-ear hearing aids. Hear Aid J34 (5): 6–7, 30, 32–33.
73.
OrtonJ. (1986). ITCs in the 80s: part 1: new advancements in ITC design. Hear Instr37 (4): 26,28,30.
74.
PatronisET. (1978). Electronic detection of acoustic feedback and automatic sound system gain control. J Audio Eng Soc26 (5): 323–325.
75.
PowersTASaccaD. (1983). Circuit modification for feedback reduction in ITE instruments. Hear Instr34 (4): 40.
76.
PrevesDA. (1985). Evaluation of Phase Compensation for Enhancing the Signal Processing Capabilities of Hearing Aids in SituDoctoral Dissertation. University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
77.
PrevesDANewtonJR. (1989). The headroom problem and hearing aid performance. Hear J42 (10): 19–21, 24–26.
78.
PrevesDASigelmanJALeMayPR. (1986). A feedback stabilizing circuit for hearing aids. Hear Instr37 (4): 34,36–41,51.
79.
RevitLJ. (1992). Two techniques for dealing with the occlusion effect. Hear Instr43 (12): 16–18.
80.
RidenhourMW. (1988a). A method of enhancing clarity in sound processed through a hearing instrument. Hear Instr39 (8): 31–52.
81.
RidenhourMW. (1988b). The effects of shell material on hearing instrument performance. Hear Instr39 (9): 58–60.
SchroederMR. (1962). Improvement of feedback stability of public address systems by frequency shifting. J Audio Eng Soc10 (2): 108–109.
86.
SchroederMR. (1964). Improvement of acoustic-feedback stability by frequency shifting. J Acoust Soc Am36:1718–1724.
87.
ShawEAG. (1980). The acoustics of the external ear. In: Studebaker GA, Hochberg I (eds). Acoustical Factors Affecting Hearing Aid PerformanceUniversity Park Press, Baltimore, MD, 109–125.
88.
SkinnerMW. (1988). Hearing Aid EvaluationPrentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ., 272.
89.
SmrigaDJ. (1991). Exploring the versatility of three-channel programmability. Hear Instr42 (6): 14, 16–17.
90.
SmrigaDJ. (1993). Digital signal processing to reduce feedback: technology and test results. Hear J46 (5): 28–33.
91.
StaabWJ. (1985). Digital hearing aids. Hear Instrum36 (11): 14,16–20, 22–24.
92.
StaabWJ. (1990). Digital/programmable hearing aids—an eye towards the future. Brit J Audiol24:243–256.
93.
TeccaJE. (1991). Real ear vent effects in ITE hearing instrument fittings. Hear Instr42 (12): 10–12.
94.
TederH. (1992). Reduction of high-frequency gain can help solve feedback problems. Hear J45 (3): 28–30.
95.
ValenteMValenteMPottsLGLybargerEH. (1996). Options: Earhooks, Tubing, and Earmolds. In: Valente M (ed). Hearing Aids: Standards, Options, and LimitationsThieme Medical Publishers, Inc, New York, NY, 252–326.
96.
VollLMLyonsP. (1995). Frequency and effectiveness of in-office modifications with CIC fittings. Hear Rev2 (7): 38–40, 50.
97.
WardGL. (1989). Method and Apparatus for Reducing Acoustical Distortion US Patent No. 4,811,402.
98.
WaterhouseRV. (1965). Theory of howlback in reverberant rooms. J Acoust Soc Am37:921–923.
99.
WeinrichS. (1991). Hearing Aid, Especially of the In-the-ear Type US Patent 5,033,090.
100.
WilliamsDEGutnickHN. (1990). Hearing instrument performance using earmolds with/without a shell additive. Hear Instr41 (12): 8,10,44.