The international contributions of Stuart Gatehouse are reviewed in three areas: as a scientist, as an advisor to health policy makers, and as a participant in international conferences. He was able, as no other auditory scientist of his time, to bridge the gap between scientific and clinical research. His ability to apply sound scientific principles to issues of clinical importance was most apparent in his work in three main areas of his research: acclimatization to amplified speech, auditory disability and hearing aid benefit, and candidature for linear and nonlinear signal processing.
Arlinger, S., Gatehouse, S., & Bentler, R.A. (1996). Report of the 1st Eriksholm Consensus Conference on auditory deprivation and acclimatization. Ear & Hearing, 17(Suppl.), 87S-90S.
2.
Browning, G.G., & Gatehouse, S. (1992). The prevalence of middle ear disease in the adultBritish population. Clinical Otolaryngology, 17, 317-321.
3.
Cox, R.M., & Alexander, G.C. (2002). The International Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA): Psychometric properties of the English version . International Journal of Audiology, 41, 30-35.
4.
Cox, R.M., Alexander, G.C., & Beyer, C.M. (2003). Norms for the International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology , 14, 407-417.
5.
Cox, R.M., Hyde, M., Gatehouse, S., Noble, W., Dillon, H., Bentler, R., et al. (2000). Optimal outcome measures, research priorities and international cooperation. Ear & Hearing, 21, 106S-115S.
6.
Cox, R.M., Stephens, D., & Krame, S.E. (2002). Translations of the International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA). International Journal of Audiology , 41, 3-26.
7.
Day, G.A., Browning, G.G., & Gatehouse, S.S. (1988). Benefits from binaural amplification in the severely hearing impaired. British Journal of Audiology, 22, 273-277.
8.
Gatehouse, S. (1989a). Apparent auditory deprivation effects of late onset: the role of presentation level. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 86, 2103-2106.
9.
Gatehouse S. (1989b). A pseudo free-field measure of auditory disability . British Journal of Audiology, 23, 317-322.
10.
Gatehouse, S. (1990a). Acclimatization and auditory deprivation as explanations for changes in speech identification abilities in hearing aid users. Proceedings of the Institute of Acoustics, 12, 44-48.
11.
Gatehouse, S. (1990b). Determinants of self-reported auditory disability in older subjects. Ear & Hearing, 11, 57-65.
12.
Gatehouse, S. (1991a). Modelling of disability in unilateral hearing loss. Audiology, 29, 204-211.
13.
Gatehouse, S. (1991b). The role of non-auditory factors in measured and self-reported disability. Acta Otolaryngologica (Stockholm) , 476, 249-256.
14.
Gatehouse, S. (1991c). The contribution of central auditory factors to auditory disability. Acta Otolaryngologica (Stockholm) , 476, 182-188.
15.
Gatehouse, S. (1991d). Factors that influence the benefit from amplification in the elderly. Acta Otolaryngologica (Stockholm), 476, 262-269.
16.
Gatehouse, S. (1992). The time-course and magnitude of perceptual acclimatization to frequency responses: Evidence from monaural fitting of hearing aids. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 92, 1258-1268.
17.
Gatehouse, S. (1993). Role of perceptual acclimatization in the selection of frequency responses for hearing aids. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 4, 296-306.
18.
Gatehouse, S. (1994). Components and determinants of hearing aid benefit . Ear & Hearing, 15, 30-49.
19.
Gatehouse S. (1998). Speech tests as measures of outcome. Scandinavian Audiology, 27(Suppl. 49), 54-60.
20.
Gatehouse, S. (1999a). The Glasgow Hearing Aid Benefit Profile: derivation and validation of a client-centered outcome measure for hearing aid services . Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 10, 80-103.
21.
Gatehouse, S. (1999b). A self-report outcome measure for the evaluation of hearing-aid fittings and services. Health Bulletin, 57, 424-436.
22.
Gatehouse, S. (2000). The impact of measurement goals on the design specification of outcome measures. Ear & Hearing, 21, 100S-105S.
23.
Gatehouse, S. (2001). Self-report outcome measures for adult hearing aid services: some uses, users and options. Trends in Amplification , 5, 91-110.
24.
Gatehouse, S. (2003). Rehabilitation: Identification of needs, priorities and expectations, and the evaluation of benefit. International Journal of Audiology, 42(Suppl. 2), 77-83.
25.
Gatehouse, S., & Gordon, J. (1990). Response times to speech stimuli as measures of benefit from amplification. British Journal of Audiology, 24, 63-68.
26.
Gatehouse, S., Naylor, G., & Elberling, C. (2003). Benefits from hearing aids in relation to the interaction between the user and the environment. International Journal of Audiology, 42(Suppl. 1), 77-85.
27.
Gatehouse, S., Naylor, G., & Eberling, C. (2006a). Linear and non-linear hearing aid fittings. 1. Patterns of benefit. International Journal of Audiology, 45, 130-152.
28.
Gatehouse, S., Naylor, G., & Eberling, C. (2006b). Linear and non-linear hearing aid fittings. 2. Patterns of candidature. International Journal of Audiology , 45, 153-171. Gatehouse , S., & Robinson, K. (1995). Acclimatization to monaural hearing aid fitting-effects on loudness functions and preliminary evidence for parallel electrophysiological and behavioural effects. In B. Kollmeier (Ed.), Psychoacoustics, speech and hearing aids (pp. 319-330). Singapore: World Scientific.
29.
Gatehouse, S., & Swan, I.R.C. (1986). A scale for hearing aid benefit measures and auditory disability. British Journal of Audiology, 20, 147-151.
30.
Haggard, M.P., Gatehouse, S., & Davis, A.C. (1981). The high prevalence of hearing loss and its implications for services in the UK. British Journal of Audiology, 15, 241-252.
31.
Kubba, H., Swan, I.R.C., & Gatehouse, S. (2004). The Glasgow Children's Benefit Inventory: A new instrument for assessing health-related benefit after an intervention. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology, 113, 980-986.
32.
Robinson, K., & Gatehouse, S. (1995). Changes in intensity discrimination resulting from monaural long-term use of a hearing aid. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97, 1183-1190.
33.
Robinson, K., & Gatehouse, S. (1996). The time course of effects on intensity discrimination following monaural fitting of hearing aids. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 99, 1255-1258.
34.
Schow, R.L. & Gatehouse, S. (1990). Fundamental issues in self-assessment of hearing . Ear & Hearing, 11, 6-16.
35.
Swan, I.R.C., Browning, G.G., & Gatehouse, S. (1987). Optimum side for fitting a monaural hearing aid. 1. Patient's preference. British Journal of Audiology, 21, 59-65.
36.
Swan, I.R.C., & Gatehouse, S. (1987a). Optimum side for fitting a monaural hearing aid. 1. Measured benefit. British Journal of Audiology, 21, 67-71.
37.
Swan, I.R.C., & Gatehouse, S. (1987b). Optimum side for fitting a monaural hearing aid. 3. A paradox resolved. British Journal of Audiology, 21, 205-208.
38.
Swan, I.R.C., & Gatehouse, S. (1995). Benefit from hearing-aid fitting using in-the-ear measurements of hearing aid gain. British Journal of Audiology , 29, 271-277.
