Microbial biofilms pose a serious threat to food industry, as they are difficult to inactivate or remove owing to their inherent resistance to traditional physical and antimicrobial treatments. Bacteriophages have been suggested as promising biocontrol agents for eliminating biofilms within the food industry. The efficacy of phages (BP 1369 and BP 1370) was evaluated against Salmonella spp. in biofilms. Biofilms were grown on food (lettuce), food contact surfaces (stainless steel and rubber), and MBEC biofilm devices. The efficacy of these phages in reducing biofilms was examined following phage (108 PFU/mL) treatment for 2 h. Bacteriophage treatment reduced biofilm cells by 3.0, 2.0, and 3.0 log CFU/cm2 on stainless steel, rubber, and an MBEC device, respectively. The adhered viable cells on lettuce were reduced by more than 1.0 log CFU/cm2 with phage treatment.
AdamsMH (1959) Bacteriophages, New York: Interscience Publishers.
2.
Al-MolaGAAl-YassariIH (2010) Characterization of E. coli phage isolated from sewage. AL Qadisiya Journal of Veterinary Medical Science9: 45–52.
3.
BirendraRTShukhoKJungminK (2013) A virulent Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis phage SE2 with a strong bacteriolytic activity of planktonic and biofilmed cells. Journal of Bacteriology and Virology43: 186–194.
4.
CDC. (2014) Foodborne Diseases Active Surveillance Network (FoodNet): FoodNet Surveillance Report for 2012 (Final Report), Atlanta: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, CDC.
5.
ChmielewskiRNFrankJF (2003) Biofilm formation and control in food processing facilities. Comprehensive Review in Food Science and Food Safety2: 22–32.
6.
CoganTABloomfieldSFHumphreyTJ (1999) The effectiveness of hygiene procedures for prevention of cross-contamination from chicken carcasses in the domestic kitchen. Letters in Applied Microbiology29: 354–358.
7.
CorcoranMMorrisDLappeDNO'ConnorJLalorPDockeryPet al.(2013) Commonly used disinfectants fail to eradicate Salmonella enterica biofilms from food contact surface materials. Applied and Environmental Microbiology40: 1507–1514.
8.
DonlanRM (2009) Preventing biofilms of clinically relevant organisms using bacteriophage. Trends in Microbiology17: 66–72.
9.
ElseTAPantleCRAmyPS (2003) Boundaries for biofilm formation: humidity and temperature. Applied and Environmental Microbiology69: 5006–5010.
10.
GalletRShaoYWangIN (2009) High adsorption rate is detrimental to bacteriophage fitness in a biofilm-like environment. BMC Evolutionary Biology9: 241.
11.
GuJLiuXLiYHanWLeiLYangYet al.(2012) A method for generation phage cocktail with great therapeutic potential. PLoS ONE7(3): e31698.
12.
HanningIBNuttJDRickeSC (2009) Salmonellosis outbreaks in the United States due to fresh produce: Sources and potential intervention measures. Foodborne Pathogens and Disease6: 635–648.
13.
HoibyNBjarnsholtTGivskovMMolinSCiofuO (2010) Antibiotic resistance of bacterial biofilms. International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents35: 322–332.
14.
HudsonJABillingtonCCarey-SmithGGreeningG (2005) Bacteriophages as biocontrol agents in food. Journal of Food Protection68: 426–437.
15.
JahidIKLeeNAKimAHaSD (2013) Influence of glucose concentrations on biofilm formation, motility, exoprotease production, and quorum sensing in Aeromonas hydrophila. Journal of Food Protection76: 239–47.
16.
KumarCGAnandSK (1998) Significance of microbial biofilms in food industry: A review. International Journal of Food Microbiology42: 9–27.
LapidotARomlingUYaronS (2006) Biofilm formation and the survival of Salmonella Typhimurium on parsley. International Journal of Food Microbiology109: 229–233.
19.
LeeYDParkJH (2015) Characterization and application of phages isolated from sewage for reduction of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in biofilm. LWT – Food Science and Technology60: 571–577.
20.
MahTFCO'TooleGA (2001) Mechanisms of biofilm resistance to antimicrobial agents. Trends in Microbiology9: 34–39.
21.
MajowiczSEMustoJScallanEAnguloFJKirkMO'BrienSJet al.(2010) International collaboration on enteric disease ‘burden of illness’ studies. The global burden of nontyphoidal Salmonella gastroenteritis. Clinical Infectious Diseases50: 882–889.
22.
MengXShiYJiWMengXZhangJWangHet al.(2011) Application of a bacteriophage lysin to disrupt biofilms formed by the animal pathogen Streptococcus suis. Applied and Environmental Microbiology77: 8272–8279.
23.
Moore-NeibelKGerberCPatelJFriedmanMRavishankarS (2011) Antimicrobial activity of lemongrass oil against Salmonella enterica on organic leafy greens. Journal of Applied Microbiology112: 485–492.
24.
PainterJAHoekstraRMAyersTTauxeRVBradenCRAnguloFJet al.(2013) Attribution of foodborne illnesses, hospitalizations, and deaths to food commodities by using outbreak data, United States, 1998–2008. Emerging Infectious Diseases19: 407–415.
25.
PatelJSharmaM (2010) Differences in attachment of Salmonella enterica serovars to cabbage and lettuce leaves. International Journal of Food Microbiology139: 41–47.
26.
Perez-RodriguezFValeroACarrascoEGarcıaRMZureraG (2008) Understanding and modeling bacterial transfer to foods: a review. Trends in Food Science & Technology19: 131–144.
27.
PuiCFWongWCChaiLCLeeHYTangJYHNoorlisAet al.(2011a) Biofilm formation by Salmonella Typhi and Salmonella Typhimurium on plastic cutting board and its transfer to dragon fruit. International Food Research Journal18: 31–38.
28.
PuiCFWongWCChaiLCNillianEMohamad GhazaliFCheahYKet al.(2011b) Simultaneous detection of Salmonella spp., Salmonella Typhi and Salmonella Typhimurium in sliced fruits using multiplex PCR. Food Control22: 337–342.
29.
ReijMWAantrekkerDED (2004) Recontamination as a source of pathogens in processed foods. International Journal of Food Microbiology91: 1–11.
30.
RodriguesDTeixeiraPOliveiraRAzeredoJ (2011) Salmonella enterica Enteritidis biofilm formation and viability on regular and triclosan impregnated bench cover materials. Journal of Food protection74: 32–37.
31.
SamsonJEMagadanAHSabriMMoineauS (2013) Revenge of the phages: Defeating bacterial defences. Nature Review Microbiology11: 675–687.
32.
ShenCLuoYNouXBauchanGZhouBWangQet al.(2012) Enhanced inactivation of Salmonella and Pseudomonas biofilms on stainless steel by use of T-128, a fresh-produce washing aid, in chlorinated wash solutions. Applied and Environmental Microbiology78: 6789–6798.
SrinivasanSHarringtonGWXagorarakiIGoelR (2008) Factors affecting bulk to total bacteria ratio in drinking water distribution systems. Water Research42: 3393–33404.
35.
SteenackersHHermansKVanderleydenJJKeersmaeckerSC (2012) Salmonella biofilms: An overview on occurrence, structure, regulation and eradication. Food Research International45: 502–531.
36.
USDA. (2003). Profiling Food Consumption in America. Chapter 2 in Agriculture Fact Book 2001–2002. https://www.usda.gov/.
37.
WhiteAGibsonDKimWKayWSuretteM (2006) Thin aggregative fimbriae and cellulose enhance long-term survival and persistence of. Salmonella. Journal of Bacteriology188: 3219–3227.
38.
WoolstonJParksARAbuladzeTAndersonBLiMCarterCet al.(2013) Bacteriophages lytic for Salmonella rapidly reduce Salmonella contamination on glass and stainless steel surfaces. Bacteriophage3(3): e25697.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
