The addition of nanoclay or cellulose fibers has been presented in the literature as a suitable alternative for reinforcing starch films. The aim of the present work was to evaluate the effect of the simultaneous incorporation of nanoclay (bentonite) and cellulose fibers on the mechanical and water barrier properties of the resultant composite-films. Films were prepared by casting with 3% in weight of cassava starch, using glycerol as plasticizer (0.30 g per g of starch), cellulose fibers at a concentration of 0.30 g of fibers per g of starch and nanoclay (0.05 g clay per g starch and 0.10 g clay per g starch). The addition of cellulose fibers and nanoclay increased the tensile strength of the films 8.5 times and the Young modulus 24 times but reduced the elongation capacity 14 times. The water barrier properties of the composite-films to which bentonite and cellulose fibers were added were approximately 60% inferior to those of starch films. Diffractograms showed that the nanoclay was intercalated in the polymeric matrix. These results indicate that the simultaneous addition of bentonite and cellulose fibers is a suitable alternative to increase the tensile strength of the films and decrease their water vapor permeabilities.
American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) (2000). Standard test method for tensile properties of thin plastic sheeting. D882-00. Annual Book of ASTM Standards. Philadelphia, PA: American Society for Testing and Materials, 165–173.
2.
AvérousLFringantCMoroL (2001). Plasticized starch-cellulose interactions in polysaccharides composites. Polymer42(15): 6565–6572.
3.
BellLNLabuzaTP. (2000). Moisture Sorption: Practical Aspects of Isotherm Measurement and Use, 2nd edn. St. Paul, MN: American Association of Cereal Chemists (AACC) Press.
4.
ChiouBSYeeEGlennGMOrtsWJ (2005). Rheology of starch–clay nanocomposites. Carbohydrate Polymers59(4): 467–475.
CyrasVPManfrediLBTon-ThatM-TVázquezA (2008). Physical and mechanical properties of thermoplastic starch/montmorillonite nanocomposites films. Carbohydrate Polymer73(1): 55–63.
7.
DiasABMüllerCMOLarotondaFDSLaurindoJB (2010). Mechanical and barrier properties of composite films based on rice flour and cellulose fibers. Food Science and Technology44(2): 535–542.
8.
DufresneAVignonMR (1998). Improvement of starch film performances using cellulose microfibrils. Macromolecules31(8): 2693–2696.
9.
FollainNJolyCDolePRogeBMathlouthiM (2006). Quaternary starch based blends: influence of fourth component addiction to the starch/water/glycerol systems. Carbohydrate Polymers63(3): 400–407.
10.
FunkeUBergthallerWLindhauerMG (1998). Processing and characterization of biodegradable products based on starch. Polymer Degradation and Stability59(1): 293–296.
11.
GarciaMAMartinhoMNZaritzkyNE (2000). Microstructural characterization of plasticized starch-based films. Starch/Stärke52(4): 118–124.
12.
GásparMBenkóZDogossyGRéczeyKCzigányT (2005). Reducing water absorption in compostable starch-based plastics. Polymer Degradation and Stability90(3): 563–569.
13.
GodbillotLDolePJolyCRogéBMathlouthiM (2006). Analysis of water binding in starch plasticized films. Food Chemistry96(3): 380–386.
14.
GontardNGuilbertSCuqJL (1993). Water and glycerol as plasticizers affect mechanical and water vapor barrier properties of an edible wheat gluten films. Journal of Food Science58(1): 206–211.
15.
ImamSHCinelliPGordonSHChielliniE (2005). Characterization of biodegradable composite films prepared from blends of poly (vinyl alcohol), cornstarch, and lignocellulosic fiber. Journal of Polymers and the Environment13(1): 47–55.
16.
KrochtaJMMillerKS (1997). Oxygen and aroma barrier properties of edible films: a review. Trends in Food Science and Technology8(7): 228–237.
17.
KrochtaJMMulder-JohnstonC (1997). Edible and biodegradable polymer films: challenges and opportunities. Food Technology51(2): 61–74.
18.
KunanopparatTMenutPMorelM-HGuilbertS (2008). Reinforcement of plasticized wheat gluten with natural fibers: from mechanical improvement to deplasticizing effect. Composites: Part A39(5): 777–785.
19.
LarotondaFDSMatsuiKNSobralPJALaurindoJB (2005). Hygroscopicity and water vapor permeability of Kraft paper impregnated with starch acetate. Journal of Food Engineering71(4): 394–402.
20.
LourdinDCoignardHBizotHColonnaP (1997). Influence of equilibrium relative humidity and plasticized concentration on the water content and glass transition of starch materials. Polymer38(21): 5401–5406.
21.
MaXYuJKennedyJF (2005). Studies on the properties of natural fibers-reinforced thermoplastics starch composites. Carbohydrates Polymer62(1): 19–24.
22.
MaliSSakanakaLSYamashitaFGrossmannMVE (2005). Water sorption and mechanical properties of cassava starch films and their relation to plasticizing effect. Carbohydrate Polymers60(3): 283–289.
23.
MooreGRPMartelliSMGandolfoCSobralPJALaurindoJB (2006). Influence of the glycerol concentration on some physical properties of feather keratin films. Food Hydrocolloids20(7): 975–982.
24.
MüllerCYamashitaFLaurindoJB (2008). Evaluation of effects of glycerol and sorbitol concentration and water activity on the water barrier properties of cassava starch films through a solubility approach. Carbohydrate Polymer72(1): 82–87.
25.
MüllerCYamashitaFLaurindoJB (2009). Effect of cellulose fibers addition on the mechanical properties and water vapor barrier of starch-based films. Food Hydrocolloids23(5): 1328–1333.
26.
ParkHMLiXJinCZParkCYChoWJHaCS (2002). Preparation and properties of biodegradable thermoplastic starch/clay hybrids. Macromolecular Materials Engineering287(8): 553–558.
27.
ParkHWLeeWKParkCYChoWJHaC-S (2003). Environmentally friendly polymer hybrids Part I mechanical, thermal, and barrier properties of thermoplastic starch/clay nanocomposites. Journal of Material Science38(5): 909–915.
28.
Rindlav-WestlingAStadingMGatenholmP (1998). Crystallinity and morphology in films of starch, amylose and amylopectin blends. Biomacromolecules3(1): 84–91.
29.
Sarantópoulos CIGL, Oliveira LM, Padula M, Coltris L, Alves RMV, Garcia EEC. (2002). Flexible Plastic Packaging – Polymer and Main Evaluation of Properties. 1. Ed Campinas CETEA / Italy, pp. 267.
30.
Van SoestJJGVliegenthartJFG (1997). Crystallinity in storch plastics: consequence for materials proprieties. Trends in Biotechnology15(6): 208–213.
31.
WeissJTakhistovPMcClementsDJ (2006). Functional materials in food nanotechnology. Journal of Food Science71(9): 107–116.
32.
WilhelmHMSierakowskiaMRSouzaGPWypychcF (2003). Starch films reinforced with mineral clay. Carbohydrate Polymer52(2): 101–110.
33.
WollerdorferMBaderH (1998). Influence of natural fibres on mechanical properties of biodegradable polymers. Industrial Crops and Products8(2): 105–112.
34.
YuLDeanKLiL (2006). Polymer blends and composites from renewable resources. Progress Polymer Science31(6): 576–602.
