An important part of the comparative approach to assess the safety of new crop plant varieties is an extensive compositional analysis, including the measurement of all key nutrients and antinutrients in a specific crop. The study described here investigates the applicability of `omics' technologies, transcriptomics and proteomics, as additional tools in this comparative safety assessment. The aim of the work was to assess the extent of the natural variation in ripening tomato fruits as a model crop and to determine whether it is possible to develop simple `ripening stage' criteria for the sampling of fruits for `omics' analyses. It is shown that the set-up of an `omics' study is of crucial importance. Samples under scrutiny should be well-matched with relation to environmental conditions during growth and harvest, including the stage of ripening, as is stipulated in international guidance documents for the nutritional and toxicological assessment of genetically modified plants.
Alba R., Payton P., Fei Z., McQuinn R., Debbie P., Martin G.B., Tanksley S.D. and Giovannoni J.J. (2005). Transcriptome and selected metabolite analyses reveal multiple points of ethylene control during tomato fruit development . Plant Cell17: 2954-2965.
2.
BramLey P.M. (2002). Regulation of carotenoid formation during tomato fruit ripening and development. Journal of Experimental Botany53(377): 2107-2113.
3.
European Food Safety Authority. (2004). Guidance document of the scientific panel on genetically modified organisms for the risk assessment of genetically modified plants and derived food and feed, EFSA Journal99: 1-94. Available at http://www.efsa.eu.int/science/gmo/gmo_guidance/660/guidance_docfinal1.pdf
4.
European Union. (2003). Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2003 on genetically modified food and feed. Official Journal of the European UnionL268/1: 1-23.
5.
FAO/WHO Food and Agriculture Organisation/World Health Organisation. (2000). Safety aspects of genetically modified foods of plant origin. Report of a Joint FAO/WHO Expert Consultation on Foods derived from Biotechnology. Organization, Geneva, Switzerland: FAO/WHO.
6.
Food Standards Agency. (2005). Safety assessment of genetically modified foods research programme. Available at http://www.food.gov.uk/science/research/researchinfo/foodcomponentsresearch/novelfoodsresearch/g02programme. Accessed 11 October 2008.
7.
Franssen-Van Hal N.L.W., Vorst O., Kramer E.H.M., Hall R.D. and Keijer J. (2002). Factors influencing cDNA microarray hybridisation on silylated glass slides. Analytical Biochemistry308(1): 5-17.
Giovannoni J. (2001). Molecular biology of fruit maturation and ripening . Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology52: 725-749.
10.
Gmocare (2004). New methodologies for assessing the potential of unintended effects in genetically modified food crops. Available at http://www.entransfood.nl . Accesed
11.
Kaufman R.J. (2004). Regulation of mRNA translation by protein folding in the endoplasmic reticulum. Trends in Biochemical Sciences29(3): 152-158.
12.
Koistinen K.M., Hassinen V.H., Gynther P.A.M., Lehesranta S.J., Keinanen S.I., Kokko H.I., Oksanen E.J., Tervahauta A.I., Auriola S., Karenlampi S.O. and Birch P.R. (2002). 10c is induced by factors causing oxidative stress but appears not to confer tolerance to these agents. New Phytologist155(3): 381-391.
13.
Kok E.J. and Kuiper H.A. (2003). Comparative safety assessment for biotech crops . Trends in Biotechnology21(10): 439-444.
14.
Kok E.J., Franssen-van Hal N.L.W., Winnubst L.N.W., Kramer E.H.M., Dijksma W.T.P., Kuiper H.A. and Keijer J. (2007). Assessment of representational difference analysis (RDA) to construct informative cDNA microarrays for gene expression analysis of species with limited transcriptome information, using red and green tomatoes as a model. Journal of Plant Physiology164: 337-349.
15.
Kuiper H.A., Kleter G.A., Noteborn H.P.J.M. and Kok E.J. (2001). Assessment of the food safety issues related to genetically modified foods. Plant Journal27(6): 503-528.
16.
Lee S.W., Robb J. and Nazar R.N. (1992). Truncated phenylalanine ammonia-lyase expression in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum). Journal of Biological Chemistry267(17): 11824-11830.
17.
Lehesranta S.J., Davies H.V., Shepherd L.V.T., Nunan N., McNicol J.W., Auriola S., Koistinen K.M., Suomalainen S., Kokko H.I., and Karenlampi S.O. (2005). Comparison of tuber proteomes of potato (Solanum sp.) varieties, landraces and genetically modified lines. Plant Physiology138: 1690-1699.
18.
Lisitsyn N., Lisitsyn N. and Wigler M. (1993). Cloning the differences between two complex genomes . Science259 (5097): 946-951.
19.
Marin-Rodriguez M.C., Orchard J. and Seymour G.B. (2002). Pectate lyases, cell wall degradation and fruit softening. Journal of Experimental Botany Fruit Development and Ripening (Special Issue)53(377): 2115-2119.
20.
Metzdorff S.B., Kok E.J., Knuthsen P. and Pedersen J. (2006). Evaluation of a non-targeted `omic' approach in the safety assessment of genetically modified plants. Plant Biology8: 662-672.
21.
Moore S., Vrebalov J., Payton P. and Giovannoni J. (2002). Use of genomic tools to isolate key ripening genes and analyse fruit maturation in tomato. Journal of Experimental Botany, Fruit Development and Ripening Special Issue53(377): 2023-2030.
22.
Ramamoorthy V., Raguchander T. and Samiyappan R. (2002). Induction of defense-related proteins in tomato roots treated with Pseudomonas fluorescens Pf1 and Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. Lycopersici. Plant Soil239: 55-68.
23.
Rastogi R., Dulson J. and Rothstein S.J. (1993). Cloning of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) arginine decarboxylase gene and its expression during fruit ripening. Plant Physiology103: 829-834.
24.
Sargent S. (2000). Ripening Tomatoes with Ethylene. Gainesville, FL: Department of Horticultural Sciences VC-29 Florida Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida.
25.
Schena M., Shalon D., Heller R., Chai A., Brown P.O. and Davis R.W. (1996). Parallel human genome analysis: Microarray-based expression monitoring of 1000 genes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA93: 10614-10619.
