Scantling rules established by international bodies like International Organization for Standardization (ISO) and classification societies play a crucial role in the structural design of marine structures in terms of safety, reliability, and efficiency. Although these guidelines provide straightforward calculations to determine design loads or minimum requirements, such as thickness or section of the modulus, achieving an optimum structural design is still a formidable challenge. Specifically, the structural design of composite hulls comprises a counterintuitive design space, considering material (matrix and reinforcement) and geometric properties (stacking sequence, layer thickness, etc.). This study presents a practical and systematic framework that collates automated finite element simulations and an optimization approach based on response surface methodology (RSM) to determine the optimal structural design for composite hulls. To illustrate the applicability of the proposed methodology, the stiffened bottom plate of a generic motor boat is investigated in detail. The general framework is developed by integrating ANSYS® DesignXplorerTM with automated finite element simulations performed using the ANSYS® Parametric Design Language (APDL). Different optimization strategies are explored and discussed, elucidating the effects of geometric design parameters such as stacking sequence, layer thickness, and spacing between stiffeners.
HsissouRSeghiriRBenzekriZ, et al. Polymer composite materials: a comprehensive review. Compos Struct2021; 262: 113640.
5.
El HawaryOBoccarussoLAnsellMP, et al. An overview of natural fiber composites for marine applications. J Mar Sci Eng2023; 11(5): 1076.
6.
RubinoFNisticòATucciF, et al. Marine application of fiber reinforced composites: a review. J Mar Sci Eng2020; 8(1): 26.
7.
ChaudharyVAhmadF. A review on plant fiber reinforced thermoset polymers for structural and frictional composites. Polym Test2020; 91: 106792.
8.
NirmalUHashimJLowK. Adhesive wear and frictional performance of bamboo fibres reinforced epoxy composite. Tribol Int2012; 47: 122–133.
9.
BaştürkB. Effect of fiber orientation on the mechanical properties of glass fiber reinforced polymer (GFRP)/PVC sandwich composites. Karaelmas Fen ve Muhendislik Dergisi2023; 13(1): 52–61.
10.
KangishwarSRadhikaNSheikAA, et al. A comprehensive review on polymer matrix composites: material selection, fabrication, and application. Polym Bull2023; 80(1): 47–87.
11.
YangHGanzoschGGiorgioI, et al. Material characterization and computations of a polymeric metamaterial with a pantographic substructure. Z Angew Math Phys2018; 69(4): 105.
12.
BarchiesiEEugsterSRdell’IsolaF, et al. Large in-plane elastic deformations of bi-pantographic fabrics: asymptotic homogenization and experimental validation. Math Mech Solids2020; 25(3): 739–767.
13.
AbaliBEBarchiesiE. Additive manufacturing introduced substructure and computational determination of metamaterials parameters by means of the asymptotic homogenization. Continuum Mech Thermodyn2021; 33(4): 993–1009.
14.
GiorgioIVaranoVdell’IsolaF, et al. Two layers pantographs: a 2D continuum model accounting for the beams’ offset and relative rotations as averages in SO(3) Lie groups. Int J Solids Struct2021; 216: 43–58.
15.
ÖzenAAbaliBEVöllmeckeC, et al. Exploring the role of manufacturing parameters on microstructure and mechanical properties in fused deposition modeling (FDM) using PETG. Appl Compos Mater2021; 28(6): 1799–1828.
16.
BarchiesiEMavrikosSGiorgioI, et al. Complex mechanical properties of 3D micro-metric pantographic metamaterials fabricated by two-photon polymerization. Continuum Mech Thermodyn2024; 36(6): 1755–1766.
17.
McAvoyRBarchiesiE. Towards the Galerkin approximation of tetraskelion metamaterials. Continuum Mech Thermodyn2025; 37(1): 6.
18.
Álvarez BlancoMAbaliBEVöllmeckeC. An experimental methodology to determine damage mechanics parameters for phase-field approach simulations using material extrusion-based additively manufactured tensile specimens. Virtual Phys Prototyp2025; 20(1): e2443099.
19.
dell’IsolaFSeppecherPSpagnuoloM, et al. Advances in pantographic structures: design, manufacturing, models, experiments and image analyses. Continuum Mech Thermodyn2019; 31: 1231–1282.
20.
AugerPLavigneTSmaniottoB, et al. Poynting effects in pantographic metamaterial captured via multiscale DVC. J Strain Anal Eng Des2021; 56(7): 462–477.
21.
TurcoEBarchiesiEdell’IsolaF. A numerical investigation on impulse-induced nonlinear longitudinal waves in pantographic beams. Math Mech Solids2022; 27(1): 22–48.
22.
CiallellaAGiorgioIEugsterSR, et al. Generalized beam model for the analysis of wave propagation with a symmetric pattern of deformation in planar pantographic sheets. Wave Motion2022; 113: 102986.
23.
dell’IsolaFLekszyckiTPawlikowskiM, et al. Designing a light fabric metamaterial being highly macroscopically tough under directional extension: first experimental evidence. Z Angew Math Phys2015; 66(6): 3473–3498.
24.
GiorgioIdell’IsolaFMisraA. Chirality in 2D Cosserat media related to stretch-micro-rotation coupling with links to granular micromechanics. Int J Solids Struct2020; 202: 28–38.
25.
GiorgioI. Lattice shells composed of two families of curved Kirchhoff rods: an archetypal example, topology optimization of a cycloidal metamaterial. Continuum Mech Thermodyn2021; 33(4): 1063–1082.
26.
StilzMdell’IsolaFGiorgioI, et al. Continuum models for pantographic blocks with second gradient energies which are incomplete. Mech Res Commun2022; 125: 103988.
27.
CiallellaALa ValleGVintacheA, et al. Deformation mode in 3-point flexure on pantographic block. Int J Solids Struct2023; 265: 112129.
28.
CiallellaAD’AnnibaleFDel VescovoD, et al. Deformation patterns in a second-gradient lattice annular plate composed of “spira mirabilis” fibers. Continuum Mech Thermodyn2023; 35(4): 1561–1580.
29.
CiallellaAGiorgioIBarchiesiE, et al. A 3D pantographic metamaterial behaving as a mechanical shield: experimental and numerical evidence. Mater Des2024; 237: 112554.
30.
GiorgioIdell’IsolaFSteigmannDJ. Second-grade elasticity of three-dimensional pantographic lattices: theory and numerical experiments. Continuum Mech Thermodyn2024; 36(5): 1181–1193.
31.
dell’IsolaFEugsterSRFedeleR, et al. Second-gradient continua: from Lagrangian to Eulerian and back. Math Mech Solids2022; 27(12): 2715–2750.
32.
FedeleR. Third-gradient continua: nonstandard equilibrium equations and selection of work conjugate variables. Math Mech Solids2022; 27(10): 2046–2072.
33.
dell’IsolaFFedeleR. Irreducible representation of surface distributions and Piola transformation of external loads sustainable by third gradient continua. C R Mec2023; 351(S3): 1–30.
34.
La ValleGAbaliBEFalsoneG, et al. Sensitivity of a homogeneous and isotropic second-gradient continuum model for particle-based materials with respect to uncertainties. Z Angew Math Mech2023; 103(10): e202300068.
35.
dell’IsolaFMoschiniSTurcoE. Towards the synthesis of planar beams whose deformation energy depends on the third gradient of displacement. Math Mech Complex Syst2024; 12(4): 573–597.
36.
FedeleRPlacidiLFabbrocinoF. A review of inverse problems for generalized elastic media: formulations, experiments, synthesis. Continuum Mech Thermodyn2024; 36(6): 1413–1453.
37.
TerranovaLMTurcoEMisraA, et al. Computational identification of double-bending stiffness: from Zigzagged Articulated Parallelograms with Articulated Braces (ZAPAB) structures to pure-curvature gradient planar inextensible 1D continua. C R Mec2025; 353(G1): 647–672.
38.
AlibertJJSeppecherPdell’IsolaF. Truss modular beams with deformation energy depending on higher displacement gradients. Math Mech Solids2003; 8(1): 51–73.
39.
TurcoEGiorgioIMisraA, et al. King post truss as a motif for internal structure of (meta) material with controlled elastic properties. R Soc Open Sci2017; 4(10): 171153.
40.
GiorgioIHildFGeramiE, et al. Experimental verification of 2D cosserat chirality with stretch-micro-rotation coupling in orthotropic metamaterials with granular motif. Mech Res Commun2022; 126: 104020.
41.
TurcoEdell’IsolaFCazzaniA, et al. Hencky-type discrete model for pantographic structures: numerical comparison with second gradient continuum models. Z Angew Math Phys2016; 67(4): 85.
42.
TurcoE. Discrete is it enough? The revival of Piola–Hencky keynotes to analyze three-dimensional Elastica. Continuum Mech Thermodyn2018; 30(5): 1039–1057.
43.
TurcoEMisraAPawlikowskiM, et al. Enhanced Piola–Hencky discrete models for pantographic sheets with pivots without deformation energy: numerics and experiments. Int J Solids Struct2018; 147: 94–109.
44.
TurcoEBarchiesiEGiorgioI, et al. A Lagrangian Hencky-type non-linear model suitable for metamaterials design of shearable and extensible slender deformable bodies alternative to Timoshenko theory. Int J Non Linear Mech2020; 123: 103481.
45.
GiorgioI. A discrete formulation of Kirchhoff rods in large-motion dynamics. Math Mech Solids2020; 25(5): 1081–1100.
46.
TurcoEBarchiesiE. Kinematically triggered nonlinear vibrations of Hencky-type pantographic sheets. Math Mech Complex Syst2022; 9(3): 311–335.
47.
TurcoEBarchiesiEdell’IsolaF. Nonlinear dynamics of origami metamaterials: energetic discrete approach accounting for bending and in-plane deformation of facets. Z Angew Math Phys2023; 74(1): 26.
48.
dell’IsolaFGavrilyukS. Variational models and methods in solid and fluid mechanics, vol. 535. Cham: Springer, 2012.
49.
PlacidiL. A variational approach for a nonlinear one-dimensional damage-elasto-plastic second-gradient continuum model. Continuum Mech Thermodyn2016; 28(1): 119–137.
50.
GiorgioI. A variational formulation for one-dimensional linear thermoviscoelasticity. Math Mech Complex Syst2022; 9(4): 397–412.
51.
GrilloADi StefanoS. Comparison between different viewpoints on bulk growth mechanics. Math Mech Complex Syst2023; 11(2): 287–311.
52.
GrilloADi StefanoS. An a posteriori approach to the mechanics of volumetric growth. Math Mech Complex Syst2023; 11(1): 57–86.
53.
RezaeiNYildizdagMETurcoE, et al. Strain-gradient finite elasticity solutions to rigid bar pull-out test. Continuum Mech Thermodyn2024; 36(3): 607–617.
54.
GiorgioIPlacidiL. A variational formulation for three-dimensional linear thermoelasticity with “thermal inertia”. Meccanica2024; 59(10): 1745–1756.
55.
PlacidiLBarchiesiEMisraA, et al. Micromechanics-based elasto-plastic–damage energy formulation for strain gradient solids with granular microstructure. Continuum Mech Thermodyn2021; 33(5): 2213–2241.
56.
YilmazNYildizdagMEFabbrocinoF, et al. Emergence of critical state in granular materials using a variationally-based damage-elasto-plastic micromechanical continuum model. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech2024; 48: 3369–3391.
57.
PlacidiLBarchiesiEMisraA. A strain gradient variational approach to damage: a comparison with damage gradient models and numerical results. Math Mech Complex Syst2018; 6(2): 77–100.
58.
TimofeevDBarchiesiEMisraA, et al. Hemivariational continuum approach for granular solids with damage-induced anisotropy evolution. Math Mech Solids2021; 26(5): 738–770.
59.
PlacidiLBarchiesiEdell’IsolaF, et al. On a hemi-variational formulation for a 2D elasto-plastic-damage strain gradient solid with granular microstructure. Math Eng2022; 5: 1–24.
60.
AddessiDD’AnnibaleFPlacidiL, et al. A bone remodeling approach encoding the effect of damage and a diffusive bio-mechanical stimulus. Continuum Mech Thermodyn2024; 36(4): 993–1012.
61.
PlacidiLdell’IsolaFIaniroN, et al. Variational formulation of pre-stressed solid–fluid mixture theory, with an application to wave phenomena. Eur J Mech A Solids2008; 27(4): 582–606.
62.
BarchiesiELaudatoMDi CosmoF. Wave dispersion in non-linear pantographic beams. Mech Res Commun2018; 94: 128–132.
63.
EugsterSR. Numerical analysis of nonlinear wave propagation in a pantographic sheet. Math Mech Complex Syst2022; 9(3): 293–310.
64.
TurcoEBarchiesiECiallellaA, et al. Nonlinear waves in pantographic beams induced by transverse impulses. Wave Motion2022; 115: 103064.
65.
YildizdagMECiallellaAD’OvidioG. Investigating wave transmission and reflection phenomena in pantographic lattices using a second-gradient continuum model. Math Mech Solids2023; 28(8): 1776–1789.
GiorgioIAndreausUScerratoD, et al. A visco-poroelastic model of functional adaptation in bones reconstructed with bio-resorbable materials. Biomech Model Mechanobiol2016; 15(5): 1325–1343.
68.
TerzeZPandzaVAndricM, et al. Lie group dynamics of reduced multibody-fluid systems. Math Mech Complex Syst2021; 9(2): 167–177.
69.
YildizdagMEArdicITErginA. An isogeometric FE-BE method to investigate fluid–structure interaction effects for an elastic cylindrical shell vibrating near a free surface. Ocean Eng2022; 251: 111065.
70.
ScrofaniABarchiesiEChiaiaB, et al. Fluid diffusion related aging effect in a concrete dam modeled as a Timoshenko beam. Math Mech Complex Syst2023; 11(2): 313–334.
71.
SoizeC. An overview on uncertainty quantification and probabilistic learning on manifolds in multiscale mechanics of materials. Math Mech Complex Syst2023; 11(1): 87–174.
72.
ArdicITYildizdagMEErginA. Hybrid isogeometric-based analysis and experimental investigation on the dynamic response characteristics of a clamped circular plate partially in contact with fluid. Thin-Walled Struct2024; 203: 112171.
73.
CuomoMContrafattoLGrecoL. A variational model based on isogeometric interpolation for the analysis of cracked bodies. Int J Eng Sci2014; 80: 173–188.
74.
MaurinFGrecoFDesmetW. Isogeometric analysis for nonlinear planar pantographic lattice: discrete and continuum models. Continuum Mech Thermodyn2019; 31(4): 1051–1064.
75.
TurcoE. Numerically driven tuning of equilibrium paths for pantographic beams. Continuum Mech Thermodyn2019; 31(6): 1941–1960.
76.
TranLVNiiranenJ. A geometrically nonlinear Euler–Bernoulli beam model within strain gradient elasticity with isogeometric analysis and lattice structure applications. Math Mech Complex Syst2020; 8(4): 345–371.
77.
ShahabadPKAlanSYildizdagME, et al. A novel spectral element method with a higher-order coarse quad meshing approach to design laminated composite panels with arbitrarily shaped cutouts. Thin-Walled Struct2024; 197: 111636.
78.
GrecoLCastelloDCammarataA, et al. Spherical b-spline interpolation with application to a mixed isogeometric cosserat rod formulation. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng2025; 446: 118239.
79.
DesmoratBSpagnuoloMTurcoE. Stiffness optimization in nonlinear pantographic structures. Math Mech Solids2020; 25(12): 2252–2262.
80.
KoKYSolyaevY. Explicit benchmark solution for topology optimization of variable-thickness plates. Math Mech Complex Syst2023; 11(3): 381–392.
81.
AzziPDesmoratRKolevB, et al. Distance to a constitutive tensor isotropy stratum by the Lasserre polynomial optimization method. Math Mech Complex Syst2023; 11(3): 393–428.
82.
LevinVAVershininAVZingermanKM, et al. A method for setting the objective function in the problem of the topological optimization of three-dimensional structures using a density gradient. Math Mech Complex Syst2023; 11(4): 451–480.
83.
GugatMSchusterMSokolowskiJ. The location problem for compressor stations in pipeline networks. Math Mech Complex Syst2024; 12(4): 507–546.
84.
MouringSE. Buckling and postbuckling of composite ship panels stiffened with preform frames. Ocean Eng1999; 26(8): 793–803.
85.
MantariJSoaresCG. Finite element formulation of a generalized higher order shear deformation theory for advanced composite plates. Compos Struct2013; 96: 545–553.
86.
Raju PrustyBGKellyDW. Delamination failure of composite top-hat stiffeners using finite element analysis. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part M J Eng Marit Environ2013; 227(1): 61–80.
87.
ColomboCVerganiL. Influence of delamination on fatigue properties of a fibreglass composite. Compos Struct2014; 107: 325–333.
88.
SudhirSastryYBudarapuPRMadhaviN, et al. Buckling analysis of thin wall stiffened composite panels. Comput Mater Sci2015; 96: 459–471.
89.
MaLLiuD. Delamination and fiber-bridging damage analysis of angle-ply laminates subjected to transverse loading. J Compos Mater2016; 50(22): 3063–3075.
90.
MoYGeDHeB. Experiment and optimization of the hat-stringer-stiffened composite panels under axial compression. Compos Part B Eng2016; 84: 285–293.
91.
KhosravaniMWeinbergK. Experimental investigations of the environmental effects on stability and integrity of composite sandwich T-joints. Mater Werkst2017; 48(8): 753–759.
92.
KhosravaniMRWeinbergK. Characterization of sandwich composite T-joints under different ageing conditions. Compos Struct2018; 197: 80–88.
93.
LiHYaoYGuoL, et al. The effects of delamination deficiencies on compressive mechanical properties of reinforced composite skin structures. Compos Part B Eng2018; 155: 138–147.
94.
KolanuNRRajuGRamjiM. Experimental and numerical studies on the buckling and post-buckling behavior of single blade-stiffened CFRP panels. Compos Struct2018; 196: 135–154.
95.
ImranMShiDTongL, et al. Design optimization of composite submerged cylindrical pressure hull using genetic algorithm and finite element analysis. Ocean Eng2019; 190: 106443.
96.
KharghaniNAlizadehFSoaresCG, et al. Experimental and numerical study of a composite-to-steel joint under bending and torsion loads. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part M J Eng Marit Environ2019; 233(3): 722–734.
97.
ZhaoWXieZWangX, et al. Buckling behavior of stiffened composite panels with variable thickness skin under compression. Mech Adv Mater Struct2019; 26(3): 215–223.
98.
KaiQRenjunYWeiS, et al. Research on the tension damage behavior of sandwich composite L-joints: experiment and simulation. Compos Struct2020; 232: 111566.
99.
LiXZhuZLiY, et al. Optimization design of a composite hull stiffened panel considering structural stability. Ocean Eng2020; 65: 62–70.
100.
MorshedsoloukFKarimiradM. Postbuckling of marine stiffened composite plates with initial geometric imperfections using progressive failure analysis. J Mar Sci Appl2021; 20: 694–705.
101.
LiBGongYGaoY, et al. Failure analysis of hat-stringer-stiffened aircraft composite panels under four-point bending loading. Materials2022; 15(7): 2430.
102.
SchillingJCMittelstedtC. Local postbuckling of omega-stringer-stiffened composite panels. Thin Walled Struct2022; 181: 110027.
103.
ZhangXDaiWCaiB, et al. Numerical and experimental investigation of bearing capacity for compressed stiffened composite panel with different stringer section geometries. Appl Compos Mater2022; 29(4): 1507–1535.
104.
MohamedOAMasoodSHBhowmikJL. Mathematical modeling and FDM process parameters optimization using response surface methodology based on q-optimal design. Appl Math Model2016; 40(23–24): 10052–10073.
105.
ISO 12215-5:2019(E). ISO 12215-5:2019: Small craft hull construction and scantlings Part 5: design pressures for monohulls, design stresses, scantlings determination, 2019.
106.
ChenNZSoaresCG. Longitudinal strength analysis of ship hulls of composite materials under sagging moments. Compos Struct2007; 77(1): 36–44.
107.
ChenNZSoaresCG. Ultimate longitudinal strength of ship hulls of composite materials. J Ship Res2008; 52(03): 184–193.
