The co-treatment system of photosynthetic microalgae Chlorella vulgaris and adsorption was investigated as a possible combination of symbiotic mixed culture for the simultaneous removal of nutrients (ammonium and phosphate) and organic contaminants. In this study, response surface methodology for experimental design and optimization was used. For experiment operation, two factorial designs containing five chemical oxygen demand influent (CODin) concentrations (100, 200, 400, 600 and 700 mg l−1) and hydraulic retention times (0.63, 1, 1.75, 2.5 and 2.88 d) were applied. The co-treatment system performed successfully in removing both nutrients (nitrogen and phosphate) and COD, showing around 88%, 75% and 48% removal for the maximum level, respectively. The adsorption-photobioreactor (APBR) displayed superior performance of the microalgae growth rate compared to the photobioreactor. Also, the adsorption capacity (the uptake of COD) has been analysed with the first-order equation. The results showed that the experimental data of the APBR fit well with the model.
AbdulsadaZKadhimZ (2014) Evaluation of microalgae for secondary and tertiary wastewater treatment. Thesis, Carleton University Ottawa.
2.
AghamohammadiN. (2007) Powdered activated carbon augmented activated sludge process for treatment of semi-aerobic landfill leachate using response surface methodology. Bioresource Technology98: 3570–3578.
3.
AhmadiM. (2016) Application of the central composite design for the treatment of soft drink factory wastewater in two-stage aerobic sequencing batch reactors combined with ozonation. Desalination and Water Treatment57: 19077–19086.
4.
Almeida BezerraM. (2008) Response surface methodology (RSM) as a tool for optimization in analytical chemistry. Talanta76: 965–977.
5.
AzizSQ. (2011) Landfill leachate treatment using powdered activated carbon augmented sequencing batch reactor (SBR) process: Optimization by response surface methodology. Journal of Hazardous Materials189: 404–413.
6.
BashirMJK (2010) Stabilized sanitary landfill leachate treatment using anionic resin: treatment optimization by response surface methodology. Journal of Hazardous Materials: 128: 115–122.
7.
ChenZ-B. (2011) Improving the simultaneous removal efficiency of COD and color in a combined HABMR– CFASR system based MPDW. Part 1: Optimization of operational parameters for HABMR by using response surface methodology, Bioresource Technology, 102: 8839–8847.
8.
de AlvaMS. (2013) Green microalga Scenedesmus acutus grown on municipal wastewater to couple nutrient removal with lipid accumulation for biodiesel production. Bioresource Technology146: 744–748.
9.
El-GoharyFAKamelG (2016) Characterization and biological treatment of pre-treated landfill leachate. Ecological Engineering94: 268–274.
10.
El-SheekhM. (2013) Biodegradation of crude oil by Scenedesmus obliquus and Chlorella vulgaris growing under heterotrophic conditions. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation82: 67–72.
11.
EsraT. (2002) Effectiveness of algae in the treatment of a wood-based pulp and paper industry wastewaterBioresource Technology84: 1–5.
12.
Federation WE (2005) “Association APH.”Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. Washington, DC: American Public Health Association (APHA).
13.
FooKHameedB (2009) An overview of landfill leachate treatment via activated carbon adsorption process. Journal of Hazardous Materials171: 54–60.
14.
GaoF. (2014) Concentrated microalgae cultivation in treated sewage by membrane photobioreactor operated in batch flow mode. Bioresource Technology167: 441–446.
15.
GaoF. (2015a) A novel algal biofilm membrane photobioreactor for attached microalgae growth and nutrients removal from secondary effluent. Bioresource Technology179: 8–12.
16.
GaoF. (2016) Continuous microalgae cultivation in aquaculture wastewater by a membrane photobioreactor for biomass production and nutrients removal. Ecological Engineering92: 55–61.
17.
GaoJ. (2015b) Integration of autotrophic nitrogen removal, ozonation and activated carbon filtration for treatment of landfill leachate. Chemical Engineering Journal275: 281–287.
18.
GhafariS (2009) Application of response surface methodology (RSM) to optimize coagulation-flocculation treatment of leachate using poly-aluminum chloride (PAC) and alum. Journal of Hazardous Materials163: 650–656.
19.
GuoZ. (2013) Microalgae cultivation using an aquaculture wastewater as growth medium for biomass and biofuel production. Journal of Environmental Sciences25: S85-S88.
20.
HalimAA. (2010) Comparison study of ammonia and COD adsorption on zeolite, activated carbon and composite materials in landfill leachate treatment. Desalination262: 31–35.
21.
JiM-K. (2013) Cultivation of microalgae species in tertiary municipal wastewater supplemented with CO2 for nutrient removal and biomass production. Ecological Engineering58: 142–148.
22.
JinqiLHoutianL (1992) Degradation of azo dyes by algae. Environmental Pollution75: 273–278.
23.
KumariM. (2016) Landfill leachate treatment using bacto-algal co-culture: An integrated approach using chemical analyses and toxicological assessment. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety128: 44–51.
24.
LiY. (2008) Effects of nitrogen sources on cell growth and lipid accumulation of green alga Neochloris oleoabundans. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology81: 629–636.
25.
LiY. (2011) Characterization of a microalga Chlorella sp. well adapted to highly concentrated municipal wastewater for nutrient removal and biodiesel production. Bioresource Technology102: 5138–5144.
26.
LiangW. (2010) Cultivation of green algae chlorella sp. in different wastewaters from municipal wastewater treatment plant. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology162: 1174–1186.
27.
MarbeliaL. (2014) Membrane photobioreactors for integrated microalgae cultivation and nutrient remediation of membrane bioreactors effluent. Bioresource Technology163: 228–235.
28.
MichelsMH. (2014) Growth of Tetraselmis suecica in a tubular photobioreactor on wastewater from a fish farm. Water Research65: 290–296.
29.
MookW. (2012) Removal of total ammonia nitrogen (TAN), nitrate and total organic carbon (TOC) from aquaculture wastewater using electrochemical technology: A review. Desalination285: 1–13.
30.
NeilsonALewinR (1974) Uptake and utilization of organic carbon by algae. Phycology13: 229–257.
31.
OngSA (2003) Effects of adsorbents and copper (II) on activated sludge microorganisms and sequencing batch reactor treatment process. Journal of Hazardous Materials103: 263–277.
32.
PeyraviM. (2016) Old landfill leachate treatment through multistage process: membrane adsorption bioreactor and nanofitration. Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering39(12): 1803–1816.
33.
PraveenPLohK-C (2015) Photosynthetic aeration in biological wastewater treatment using immobilized microalgae-bacteria symbiosis. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology99: 10345–10354.
34.
Qing-YuanH. (2015) Influence of powdered activated carbon addition on water quality, sludge properties, and microbial characteristics in the biological treatment of commingled industrial waste water.Journal of Hazardous Materials295: 1–8.
35.
RenouS. (2008) Landfill leachate treatment: review and opportunity. Journal of Hazardous Materials150: 468–493.
36.
Ruiz-MarinA.. (2010) Growth and nutrient removal in free and immobilized green algae in batch and semi-continuous cultures treating real wastewater. Bioresource Technology101: 58–64.
37.
SathianS. (2014) Performance of SBR for the treatment of textile dye wastewater: Optimization and kinetic studies. Alexandria Engineering Journal53: 417–426.
38.
ShiJ. (2014) Application of a prototype-scale Twin-Layer photobioreactor for effective N and P removal from different process stages of municipal wastewater by immobilized microalgae. Bioresource Technology154: 260–266.
39.
SirmerovaM. (2013) Adhesion of Chlorella vulgaris to solid surfaces, as mediated by physicochemical interactions. Journal of Applied Phycology25: 1687–1695.
40.
SukačováK. (2015) Phosphorus removal using a microalgal biofilm in a new biofilm photobioreactor for tertiary wastewater treatment. Water Research71: 55–63.
41.
TangH. (2012) Continuous microalgae cultivation in a photobioreactor. Biotechnology and Bioengineering109: 2468–2474.
42.
TraviesoL. (1996) Experiments on immobilization of microalgae for nutrient removal in wastewater treatmentsBioresource Technology, 55: 181–186.
43.
Van Den HendeS. (2014) Up-scaling aquaculture wastewater treatment by microalgal bacterial flocs: from lab reactors to an outdoor raceway pond. Bioresource Technology159: 342–354.
44.
Van RijnJ (1996) The potential for integrated biological treatment systems in recirculating fish culture—A review. Aquaculture139: 181–201.
45.
WangY. (2015) Cultivation of Chlorella vulgaris JSC-6 with swine wastewater for simultaneous nutrient/COD removal and carbohydrate production. Bioresource Technology198: 619–625.
46.
WeissmanJC. (1988) Photobioreactor design: mixing, carbon utilization, and oxygen accumulation. Biotechnology and Bioengineering31: 336–344.
ZhangX. (2014) New insight into the biological treatment by activated sludge: the role of adsorption process. Bioresource Technology153: 160–164.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
