The general fractional operator shows its great predominance in the construction of constitutive model owing to its agility in choosing the embedded parameters. A generalized fractional viscoelastic–plastic constitutive model with the sense of the k-Hilfer–Prabhakar (k-H-P) fractional operator, which has the character recovering the known classical models from the proposed model, is established in this article. In order to describe the damage in the creep process, a time-varying elastic element is used in the proposed model with better representation of accelerated creep stage. According to the theory of the kinematics of deformation and the Laplace transform, the creep constitutive equation and the strain of the modified model are established and obtained. The validity and rationality of the proposed model are identified by fitting with the experimental data. Finally, the influences of the fractional derivative order and parameter k on the creep process are investigated through the sensitivity analyses with two- and three-dimensional plots.
LiuX.The conspectus of rock rheology. Beijing: Geology Press, 1994.
2.
YoshidaHHoriiH.A micromechanics-based model for creep behavior of rock. Appl Mech Rev1992; 45(8): 294–303.
3.
BérestPGharbiHBrouardB, et al. Very slow creep tests on salt samples. Rock Mech Rock Eng2019; 52: 2917–2934.
4.
JunS.Rock rheological mechanics and its advance in engineering applications. Chin J Rock Mech Eng2007; 26(6): 1081–1106.
5.
Reza TaheriSPakAShadS, et al. Investigation of rock salt layer creep and its effects on casing collapse. Int J Mining Sci Technol2020; 30(3): 357–365.
6.
HamzaOStaceR.Creep properties of intact and fractured muddy siltstone. Int J Rock Mech Mining Sci2018; 106: 109–116.
7.
LuoGYYangWDBoCJ, et al. Viscoelastic analysis of the creep characteristics of interlayered rock specimens under uniaxial compression. Mech Time-Depend Mater. Epub ahead of print 31 December 2019. DOI: 10.1007/s11043-019-09441-0
8.
KachanovLM.On the time to failure under creep conditions (in Russian). Izv Akad Nauk SSR1958; 8: 26–31.
9.
RabotnovYN.Damage from creep. Zhurn Prikl Mekh Tekhn Phys1963; 2: 113–123.
10.
BuiTAWongHDeleruyelleF, et al. A thermodynamically consistent model accounting for viscoplastic creep and anisotropic damage in unsaturated rocks. Int J Solids Struct2017; 117: 26–38.
11.
WangJBZhangQSongZP, et al. Creep properties and damage constitutive model of salt rock under uniaxial compression. Int J Damage Mech2020; 29(6): 902–922.
12.
ZhangSGLiuWBLvHM.Creep energy damage model of rock graded loading. Results Phys2019; 12: 1119–1125.
13.
ZhouHWWangCPHanBB, et al. A creep constitutive model for salt rock based on fractional derivatives. Int J Rock Mech Mining Sci2011; 48(1): 116–121.
14.
BasEOzarslanR.Real world applications of fractional models by Atangana–Baleanu fractional derivative. Chaos Solitons Fractals2018; 116: 121–125.
15.
FengYYYangXJLiuJG, et al. A new fractional Nishihara-type model with creep damage considering thermal effect. Eng Fract Mech2021; 242(1): 107451.
16.
ZhuravkovMARomanovaNS.Review of methods and approaches for mechanical problem solutions based on fractional calculus. Math Mech Solids2016; 21(5): 595–620.
17.
YangXJGaoFJuY.General Fractional Derivatives With Applications in Viscoelasticity. New York: Academic Press, 2020.
18.
YangXJ.General Fractional Derivatives: Theory, Methods and Applications. New York: CRC Press, 2019.
19.
YangXJ.New general calculi with respect to another functions applied to describe the Newton-like dashpot models in anomalous viscoelasticity. Therm Sci2019; 23(6B), 3751–3757.
20.
YangXJGaoFJingHW.New mathematical models in anomalous viscoelasticity from the derivative with respect to another function view point. Therm Sci2019; 23(3A): 1555–1561.
21.
YangXJ.New general fractional-order rheological models with kernels of Mittag–Leffler functions. Rom Rep Phys2017; 69(4): 118.
22.
CaputoM.Linear model of dissipation whose q is almost frequency independent - II. Geophys J Int1967; 13(5): 529–539.
23.
LiouvilleJ.Memoire sur le calcul des different idles a indices quelconques. J Ecole Polytech1832; 13(21): 71–162.
24.
RiemannB.Versucheinerallgemeinen auffassung der integration und differentiation. In: Bernhard Riemanns Gesammelte Mathematische Werke, January1847, pp. 353–362.
25.
GiustiAColombaroI.Prabhakar-like fractional viscoelasticity. Commun Nonlin Sci Numer Sim2018; 56: 138–143.
26.
YangXJ.An Introduction to Hypergeometric and Superhyperbolic Functions. New York: Academic Press, 2021.
27.
TomovskiŽSandevT. Fractional wave equation with a frictional memory kernel of Mittag–Leffler type. Appl Math Computat2012; 218(20): 10022–10031.
28.
DorregoGA.The k-Mittag–Leffler function. Int J Contemp Math Sci2012; 7(15): 705–716.
29.
PrabhakarTR.A singular integral equation with a generalized Mittag–Leffler function in the kernel. Yokohama Math J1971; 19(1): 7–15.
30.
DiazRPariguanE.On hypergeometric functions and k-Pochammer symbol. Divulgaciones Matematicas2008; 15(2): 1–12.
31.
PanchalSKKhandagaleADDolePV.k-Hilfer–Prabhakar fractional derivatives and applications. Indian J Math2016; 59(3): 1–18.
32.
DoetchG.Theorie und An. der Laplace-Transformation. Berlin: Springer, 1937.
33.
de OliveiraDSCapelas de OliveiraEDeifS.On a sum with a three-parameter Mittag–Leffler function. Integral Transforms Special Functions2016; 27(8): 639–652.
34.
YangSQ.Study on Rheological Mechanical Properties of Rock and Its Engineering Applications. PhD Thesis, HoHai University, Nanjing, China, March2006.
35.
MainardiF.Fractional Calculus and Waves in Linear Viscoelasticity: An Introduction to Mathematical Models. London: Imperial College Press, 2010.
36.
YangTQ.Theory of Viscoelasticity. Shanghai: East China University of Science and Technology Press, 1990.
37.
WangYYShengDF.Study on the whole process of rock creep considering damage based on Burgers model. Chin Q Mech2019; 40(1): 143–148.
38.
WanL.A Visco-Elastoplastic Damage Constitutive Model of Rock and Rock-Like Materials and Applications. PhD Thesis, Chongqing University, 2004.
