For many purposes in continuum mechanics it has been found useful to decompose the deformation gradient into two factors, which result from some elastic process through which destressing is achieved at a material point. There is an essential rotational non-uniqueness in these factors; however, some subfactors are uniquely defined. In particular, a certain unique right stretch tensor is identified, which serves as a convenient independent variable for describing the anisotropic elastic response of a solid from its evolving stress-free intermediate configurations.
GreenAENaghdiPM. Some remarks on elastic-plastic deformation at finite strain. Int J Eng Sci1971; 9: 1219–1229.
3.
SidoroffF. The geometrical concept of intermediate configuration and elastic-plastic finite strain. Arch Mech1971; 25: 299–308.
4.
NaghdiPMTrappJA. On finite elastic-plastic deformation of metals. J Appl Mech1974; 41: 254–260.
5.
CaseyJNaghdiPM. A remark on the use of the decomposition F = FeFp in plasticity. J Appl Mech1980; 47: 672–675.
6.
LeeEH. Some comments on elastic-plastic analysis. Int J Solids Structures1981; 17: 859–872.
7.
BammannDJJohnsonGC. On the kinematics of finite deformation plasticity. Acta Mech1987; 70: 1–13.
8.
DafaliasYF. Issues on the constitutive formulation at large elastoplastic deformations, part 1: Kinematics. Acta Mech1987; 69: 119–138.
9.
NaghdiPM. A critical review of the state of finite plasticity. Z Angew Math Phys1990; 41: 315–394.
10.
LublinerJ. Plasticity theory. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company, 1990.
11.
Nemat-NasserS. Certain basic issues in finite-deformation continuum plasticity. Meccanica1990; 25: 223–229.
12.
KhanASHuangS. Continuum theory of plasticity. New York: Wiley, 1995.
13.
RajagopalKRSrinivasaAR. Mechanics of the inelastic behavior of materials – Part 1, theoretical underpinnings. Int J Plasticity1998; 14: 945–967.
14.
LubardaVA. Constitutive theories based on the multiplicative decomposition of deformation gradient: Thermoelasticity, elastoplasticity, biomechanics. Appl Mech Rev2004; 57: 95–108.
15.
BertramA. Elasticity and plasticity of large deformations – An introduction. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2005.
16.
GuptaASteigmannDJStölkenJS. On the evolution of plasticity and incompatibility. Math Mech Solids2007; 12: 583–610.
17.
GuptaASteigmannDJStölkenJS. Aspects of the phenomenological theory of elastic-plastic deformation. J Elasticity2011; 104: 249–266.
18.
SteigmannDJGuptaA. Mechanically equivalent elastic-plastic deformations and the problem of plastic spin. Theor Appl Mech2011; 38: 397–417.
BruhnsOT. The multiplicative decomposition of the deformation gradient in plasticity-origins and limitations. In AltenbackH (eds.) From creep damage mechanics to homogenization methods (Advanced Structured Materials, vol. 64). Switzerland: Springer International Publishing, 2015, 37–66.
21.
StojanovićRDjurićSVujoševićL. On finite thermal deformations. Arch Mech Stosow1964; 16: 103–108.
22.
ImamAJohnsonGC. Decomposition of the deformation gradient in thermoelasticity. J Appl Mech1998; 65: 362–366.
23.
VujoševićLLubardaVA. Finite strain thermoelasticity based on multiplicative decomposition of deformation gradient. Theor Appl Mech2002; 28–29: 379–399.
LubardaVAHogerA. On the mechanics of solids with a growing mass. Int J Solids Structures2002; 39: 4627–4664.
26.
RajagopalKR. Conspectus of concepts of elasticity. Math Mech Solids2011; 16: 536–562.
27.
CaseyJNaghdiPM. A prescription for the identification of finite plastic strain. Int J Eng Sci1992; 30: 1257–1278.
28.
CaseyJ. Discussion. J Appl Mech1987; 54: 247–248.
29.
CaseyJNaghdiPM. On the identification of plastic strain at finite deformations. In BrockLM (ed.) Defects and anelasticity in the characterization of crystalline solids (Applied Mechanics Division, vol. 148). New York: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 1992, 11–33.
