In this paper we numerically simulate the phenomenon of bone growth in bone defects as driven by external mechanical excitation. Bone growth is accounted for through a continuum model that allows simulation of the filling of a defect. The influence of the model boundary conditions is also discussed. Two and three dimensional simulations are presented, explicitly showing the bone regeneration process inside the cavity on a weekly basis. Numerical results are qualitatively compared with literature experimental data from a rat calvarial defect exposed to low-intensity pulsed ultrasound. The obtained results show trend correlations with the targeted phenomenological observations and allow us to perform a first evaluation of the proposed model parameters to be optimized for clinically relevant situations, even if a systematic experimental campaign is still needed to precisely identify the bio-mechanical parameters involved.
WolffJ.Das Gesetz der Transformation der Knochen. Berlin: Verlag vonAugust Hirschwald, 1892.
2.
FrostHM.Skeletal structural adaptations to mechanical usage (SATMU): 1. Redefining Wolff’s law: The bone modeling problem. Anat Rec1990; 226: 403–413.
3.
FrostHM.Wolff’s law and bone’s structural adaptations to mechanical usage: An overview for clinicians. Angle Orthod1994; 64(3): 175–188.
4.
CarterDRFyhrieDPWhalenRT.Trabecular bone density and loading history: Regulation of connective tissue biology by mechanical energy. J Biomech1987; 20(8): 785–794.
5.
CarterDROrrTEFyhrieDP.Relationship between loading history and femoral cancellous bone architecture. J Biomech1989; 22(3): 231–244.
6.
CarterDRVan der MeulenMCHBeaupréGS.Mechanical factors in bone growth and development. Bone1996; 18(1) 5S–10S.
7.
MadeoAGeorgeDLekszyckiT. A second gradient continuum model accounting for some effects of micro-structure on reconstructed bone remodelling. CR Mecanique2012; 339(10): 625–640.
8.
MadeoALekszyckiTdell’IsolaF.A continuum model for the bio-mechanical interactions between living tissue and bio-resorbable graft after bone reconstructive surgery. CR Mecanique2011; 339(10): 625–640.
9.
MalizosKNHantesMEProtopappasV. Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound for bone healing: An overview. Injury2006; 37S: S56–S62.
10.
AzumaYItoMHaradaY. Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound accelerates rat femoral fracture healing by acting on the various cellular reactions in the fracture callus. J Bone Miner Res2001; 16(4): 671–680.
11.
SchortinghuisJRubenJLRaghoebarGM. Ultrasound to stimulate mandibular bone defect healing: A placebo-controlled single-blind study in rats. J Oral Maxil Surg2004; 62(2): 194–201.
12.
YangKHParkSJ.Stimulation of fracture healing in a canine ulna full-defect model by low intensity pulsed ultrasound. Yonsei Med J2001; 42(5): 503–508.
13.
YoshidaASasakiHFuruyaY. Effect of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound on bone-healing process in murine low-turnover osteoporosis model. J Hard Tissue Biol2013; 22(3): 301–310.
14.
DuarteLR.The stimulation of bone growth by ultrasound. Arch Orthop Traum Su1983; 101: 153–159.
15.
LavandierBGleizalABéraJC.Experimental assessment of calvarial bone defect re-ossification stimulation using low-intensity pulsed ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol2009; 35(4): 585–594.
16.
BeaupréGSOrrTECarterDR.An approach for time-dependent bone modeling and remodeling - Application: A preliminary remodeling simulation. J Orthop Res1990; 8: 662–670.
17.
BeaupréGSStevensSSCarterDR.Mechanobiology in the development, maintenance, and degeneration of articular cartilage. J Rehabil Res Dev2000; 37(2): 142–152.
18.
CarterDRWongM.Mechanical stresses in joint morphogenesis and maintenance. In: Biomechanics of diarthrodial joints. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1990, pp.157–174.
19.
HasuikeASatoSUdagawaA. In vivo bone regenerative effect of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound in rat calvarial defects. Oral Surg Oral Med O2011; 111: e12–e20.
20.
AndreausUGiorgioIMadeoA.Modeling of the interaction between bone tissue and resorbable biomaterial as linear elastic materials with voids. Z Angew Math Phys2014; 66(1): 209–237.
21.
AndreausUGiorgioILekszyckiT.A 2-D continuum model of a mixture bone tissue and bioresorbable material for simulating mass density redistribution under load slowly variable in time. ZAMM-Z Angew Math Me2014; 94(12): 978–1000
22.
GiorgioIAndreausULekszyckiT. The influence of different geometries of matrix/scaffold on the remodeling process of a bone and bioresorbable material mixture with voids. Math Mech Solids2015. DOI: 10.1177/1081286515616052.
23.
GiorgioIAndreausUScerratoD. A visco-poroelastic model of functional adaptation in bones reconstructed with bio-resorbable materials. Biomech Model Mechan2016. DOI: 10.1007/s10237-016-0765-6.
24.
LekszyckiT.Functional adaptation of bone as an optimal control problem. J Theor Appl Mech2005; 43(3): 555–574.
25.
LekszyckiTdell’IsolaF.A mixture model with evolving mass densities for describing synthesis and resorption phenomena in bones reconstructed with bio-resorbable materials. ZAMM-Z Angew Math Me2012; 92(6): 426–444.
26.
LuYLekszyckiT.Modeling of an initial stage of bone fracture healing. Continuum Mech Therm2015; 27: 851–859.
27.
CarterDRBeaupréGS.Skeletal function and form: Mechanobiology of skeletal development, aging and regeneration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
28.
MullenderMGHuiskesR.Proposal for the regulatory mechanism of Wolff’s Law. J Orthop Res1995; 13: 503–512.
29.
WolffJ.The law of bone remodelling. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1986.
30.
Gomez-BenitoMJGonzales-TorresLAReina-RomoE. Influence of high-frequency cyclical stimulation on the bone fracture-healing process: Mathematical and experimental models. Philos T R Soc A2011; 369(1954): 4278–4294.
31.
Gonzales-TorresLAGomez-BenitoMJDoblaréM. Influence of the frequency of the external mechanical stimulus on bone healing: A computational study. Med Eng Phys2010; 32(4): 363–371.
32.
FındıkYBaykulT.Effect of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound on autogenous bone graft healing. Oral Surg Oral Med O2014; 117(3): e225–e260.
33.
HasuikeASatoSMakinoN. The potency of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound in a rat calvarial guided bone-regeneration model. J Hard Tissue Biol2011; 20(3): 217–224.
PetiteHViateauVBensaïdW. Tissue-engineered bone regeneration. Nat Biotechnol2000; 18(9): 959–963.
36.
AuffrayNdell’IsolaFEremeyevVA. Analytical continuum mechanics á la Hamilton-Piola least action principle for second gradient continua and capillary fluids. Math Mech Solids2013; 20(4): 375–417.
37.
AuffrayNDirrenbergerJRosiG.A complete description of bi-dimensional anisotropic strain-gradient elasticity. Int J Solids Struct2015; 69: 195–206.
38.
dell’IsolaFMadeoAPlacidiL.Linear plane wave propagation and normal transmission and reflection at discontinuity surfaces in second gradient 3D continua. ZAMM-Z Angew Math Me2011; 92(1): 52–71.
39.
PlacidiLRosiGGiorgioI. Reflection and transmission of plane waves at surfaces carrying material properties and embedded in second-gradient materials. Math Mech Solids2013; 19(5): 555–578.
40.
NeffPGhibaIDMadeoA. A unifying perspective: The relaxed linear micromorphic continuum. Continuum Mech Therm2014; 26(5): 639–681.
41.
BiotM. Theory of propagation of elastic waves in a fluid-saturated porous solid. I. Low-frequency range. J Acoust Soc Am1956; 28(2): 168–178.
42.
dell’IsolaFMadeoASeppecherP.Boundary conditions at fluid-permeable interfaces in porous media: A variational approach. Int J Solids Struct2009; 46(17): 3150–3164.
43.
RosiGNguyenV-HNailiS.Numerical investigations of ultrasound wave propagating in long bones using a poroelastic model. Math Mech Solids2015; 21(1): 119–133.
44.
RosiGMadeoAGuyaderJ.Switch between fast and slow Biot compression waves induced by ‘second gradient microstructure’ at material discontinuity surfaces in porous media. Int J Solids Struct2013; 50(10): 1721–1746.
45.
SciarraGdell’IsolaFCoussyO.Second gradient poromechanics. Int J Solids Struct2007; 44(20): 6607–6629.
