This article explores two largely untested assumptions that dominate popular and scholarly examinations of the “late-night comedy audience.” The first assumption is that young people are tuning in to late-night comedy programs instead of the news. The second assumption is that there is one monolithic “late-night audience.” Using data from both the 2004 Pew Research Center Political Communications Study and the 2004 National Annenberg Election Survey, this article provides evidence that challenges these two assumptions, illustrating that young people are tuning in to late-night comedy in addition to—rather than in the place of—news and that the audiences of various late-night comedy programs have distinct sociodemographic and political profiles
Baum, Matthew. A.2003. “Soft News and Political Knowledge: Evidence of Absence or Absence of Evidence?”Political Communication20(2):173-190.
2.
Baum,Matthew.A.2005.Soft News Goes to War: Public Opinion and American Foreign Policy in the New Media Age. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
3.
Baym,Geoffrey.2005.“The Daily Show: Discursive Integration and the Reinvention of Political Journalism.”Political Communication22(3): 259-276.
4.
Bergson, Henri. 1956. “Laughter.” In Comedy, ed. George Meredith. New York: Doubleday Anchor Books.
5.
Bloom, Edward A., and Lilian D. Bloom. 1979. Satire’s Persuasive Voice. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
6.
Delli Carpini, Michael X., and Scott Keeter. 1996. What Americans Know about Politics and Why It Matters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
7.
Delli Carpini, Michael X., and Bruce Williams. 2004. “And the Walls Came Tumbling Down: Media Regimes and the Blurring of News and Entertainment.” Unpublished manuscript.
8.
Downie, Leonard, and Robert G. Kaiser. 2002. The News about the News: American Journalism in Peril. New York: Knopf.
Koestler, Arthur. 1964. The Act of Creation. London: Hutchinson and Co.
11.
McLeod, Jack M., Zhongshi Guo, Katie Daily, Catherine A. Steele, Huiping Huang, Edward Horowitz, and Huailin Chen. 1996. “The Impact of Traditional and Nontraditional Media Forms in the 1992 Presidential Election.”Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly73(2):401-416.
12.
Moy, Patricia, and Michael Pfau. 2000. With Malice toward All? The Media and Public Confidence in Democratic Institutions. Westport, CT: Praeger.
13.
Moy, Patricia, Michael A. Xenos, and Verena K. Hess. 2005. “Communication and Citizenship: Mapping the Political Effects of Infotainment.”Mass Communication and Society8(2):111-131.
14.
Moy, Patricia, Michael A. Xenos, and Verena K. Hess. Forthcoming. “Priming Effects of Late-Night Comedy.”International Journal of Public Opinion Research.
15.
National Annenberg Election Survey. 2004. “Daily Show Viewers Knowledgeable about Presidential Campaign.” September 21. <http://www.annenbergpublicpolicycenter.org/naes/2004_03_late-night-knowledge-2_9-21_pr.pdf>.
16.
Niven, Daniel, S.Robert Lichter, and Dan Amundson. 2003. “The Political Content of Late Night Comedy.”Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics8(3):118-133.
17.
Pew Research Center for the People and the Press.2000.“Audiences Fragmented and Skeptical: The Tough Job of Communicating with Voters.” February 5. <http://www.peoplepress.org/jan00rpt2.htm>.
18.
Pew Research Center for the People and the Press. 2004. “Cable and Internet Loom Large in Fragmented Political News Universe.” January 11.<http://people-press.org/reports/display.php3?ReportID=200>.
19.
Pfau, Michael, Jaeho Cho, and Kirsten Chong. 2001. “Communication Forms in U.S. Presidential Campaigns: Influences on Candidate Perceptions and the Democratic Process. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics6(4):88-105.
20.
Prior, Marcus. 2003. “Any Good News in Soft News? The Impact of Soft News Preference on Political Knowledge.”Political Communication20(2):149-171.
21.
Suls,Jerry.1972.“A Two-Stage Model for the Appreciation of Jokes and Cartoons: An Information-Processing Analysis.” In The Psychology of Humor,ed. Jeffrey H. Goldstein and Paul E. McGhee. New York: Academic Press.
22.
Young, Dannagal G.2004. “Late-Night Comedy in Election 2000: Its Influence on Candidate Trait Ratings and the Moderating Effects of Political Knowledge.”Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media48(1):1-22.
23.
Young, Dannagal Goldthwaite, Russell M. Tisinger, Kate Kenski, and Dan Romer. Forthcoming. “The Power of Numbers: Examining Subpopulations with the NAES.” In Capturing Campaign Dynamics. The National Annenberg Election Survey: Design, Method, and Data, 2nd ed., ed. Dan Romer, Kate Kenski, Christopher Adasiewicz, and Kathleen Hall Jamieson. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
