To help students better understand and be better prepared for professional workplaces, the author suggests that business communication teachers examine and learn from workplace assessment methods. Throughout the article, the author discusses the rationale behind this proposal, reviews relevant literature, reports interview findings on workplace assessment, and compares classroom and workplace practices to suggest areas where we can meaningfully bridge the two.
Allen, J. ( 2004). The impact of student learning outcomes assessment on technical and professional communication programs. Technical Communication Quarterly, 13, 93-108.
2.
Andrews, D. ( 2001). It depends on when you ask. Business Communication Quarterly, 64(4), 7-8.
3.
Andrews, D. ( 2007). How do we know we’ve won?Business Communication Quarterly, 70, 9-15.
4.
Bazerman, C. ( 2003). What is not institutionally visible does not count: The problem of making activity assessable, accountable, and plannable. In C. Bazerman & D. Russell (Eds.), Writing selves/writing societies: Research from activity perspectives (pp. 428-482). Fort Collins, CO: WAC Clearinghouse.
5.
Bazerman, C., Little, J., Bethel, L., Chavkin, T., Fouquette, D., & Garufis, J. ( 2005). Reference guide to writing across the curriculum. West Lafayette, IN: Parlor Press and WAC Clearinghouse .
6.
Bergland, B. ( 1997). Incorporating performance reviews into the business writing classroom. Business Communication Quarterly, 60(4), 52-62.
7.
Billikopf, G. ( 2003). Labor management in agriculture: Cultivating personnel productivity. Oakland, CA: Regents of the University of California.
8.
Blakeslee, A.M. ( 2001). Bridging the workplace and the academy: Teaching professional genres through classroom-workplace collaborations. Technical Communication Quarterly, 10, 169-192.
9.
Church, A. ( 2000). Do higher performing managers actually receive better ratings? A validation of multirater assessment methodology. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 52(2), 99-116.
10.
Clark, I. ( 1993). Portfolio evaluation, collaboration, and writing centers . College Composition and Communication, 44, 515-524.
11.
Coppola, N.W. ( 1999). Setting the discourse community: Tasks and assessment for the new technical communication service course. Technical Communication Quarterly, 8, 249-267.
12.
Dias, P., Freedman, A., Medway, P., & Paré, A. (1999). Worlds apart: Acting and writing in academic and workplace contexts. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
13.
Dias, P., & Paré, A. (Eds.). (2000). Transitions: Writing in academic and workplace settings. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
14.
Dillon, T. ( 1997). Corporate advisory boards, portfolio assessment, and business and technical writing program development. Business Communication Quarterly, 60(1), 41-58.
15.
Dragga, S. ( 1991). Responding to technical writing. The Technical Writing Teacher, 28, 201-221.
16.
Dyrud, M. ( 2001). Group projects and peer review. Business Communication Quarterly, 64(4), 106-112.
17.
Elbow, P. ( 1997). High stakes and low stakes in assigning and responding to writing. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 69, 5-13.
18.
Freedman, A., & Adam, C. ( 1996). Learning to write professionally: "Situated learning" and the transition from university to professional discourse. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 10, 395-427.
19.
Freedman, A., Adam, C., & Smart, G. ( 1994). Wearing suits to class: Simulating genres and simulations as genre. Written Communication, 11(2), 193-226.
20.
Garay, M.S. ( 1995). Meeting workplace needs in an introductory business writing course: A tale of a classroom corporation and a "boss" instructor. Business Communication Quarterly, 58(1), 35-41.
21.
Halverson, S., Tonidandel, S., Barlow, C., & Dipboye, R. ( 2002). Self-other agreement on a 360-degree leadership evaluation . Paper presented at the 17th annual conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Retrieved from http://rcoes.rice.edu/docs/Halverson&others2002.pdf
22.
Hamp-Lyons, L., & Condon, W. ( 1993). Questioning assumptions about portfolio-based assessment . College Composition and Communication, 44, 176-199.
23.
Huot, B. ( 1996). Toward a new theory of writing assessment. College Composition and Communication, 47, 549-566.
24.
London, M., & Beatty, R.W. ( 1993). 360-degree feedback as a competitive advantage. Human Resource Management (1986-1998), 32, 353-372.
25.
Merriam, S.B. ( 1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education . San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Nilsen, D., & Campbell, D.P. (1993). Self-observer rating discrepancies: Once an overrater, always an overrater? Human Resource Management (1986-1998), 32, 265-281.
29.
Odell, L., & Goswami, D. (Eds.). (1986). Writing in nonacademic settings . New York: Guilford Press.
30.
Patton, M.Q. ( 2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
31.
Peiperl, M.A. ( 2005). Getting 360-degree feedback right. In Harvard Business Review (Ed.), Harvard business review on appraising employee performance (pp. 69-83). Boston: Harvard Business School Publishing.
32.
Pfau, B., & Kay, I. ( 2002, June 1). Does 360-degree feedback negatively affect company performance?HR Magazine, pp. 55-59.
33.
Pittenger, K., Miller, M., & Mott, J. ( 2004). Using real-world standards to enhance students’ presentation skills. Business Communication Quarterly, 67, 327-336.
34.
Posthuma, R.A., & Campion, M.A. ( 2008). Twenty best practices for just employee performance reviews . Compensation Benefits Review, 40(1), 47-55.
35.
Rynes, S.L., Gerhart, B., & Parks, L. ( 2005). Personnel psychology: Performance evaluation and pay for performance. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 571-600.
36.
Scanlon, P., & Ford, M. ( 1998). Grading student performance in real-world settings. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 74, 97-105.
37.
Schullery, N. ( 2003). A holistic approach to grading. Business Communication Quarterly, 66(1), 86-90.
38.
Scott, J.B., Longo, B., & Wills, K.V. ( 2006). Why cultural studies? Expanding technical communication’s critical toolbox. In J. B. Scott, B. Longo, & K. V. Wills (Eds.), Critical power tools: Technical communication and cultural studies (pp. 1-19). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
39.
Seshadri, S., & Theye, L. ( 2000). Professionals and professors: Substance or style? Business Communication Quarterly, 63(3), 9-23.
40.
Spilka, R. (Ed.). (1998). Writing in the workplace: New research perspectives. Carbondale : Southern Illinois University Press.
41.
United States Office of Personnel Management. ( 1997). 360-degree assessment: An overview. Retrieved from http://www.opm.gov/perform/wppdf/360asess.pdf
