This article proposes a pedagogical framework to help students analyze their group and team interactions. Intersecting five fundamental group attributes (group size, group goal, group member interdependence, group structure, and group identity) with three overarching group processes (leadership, decision making, and conflict management) creates an analytical tool for the examination of team interaction. Furthermore, each group attribute/group process intersection encourages analytical questions targeting assumptions, values, and ethical positions embedded within the group. One advantage of this heuristic device is that it weds team member behaviors with the values members espouse and enact during team interactions. Pedagogical considerations are also discussed.
Alavi, S.B., & McCormick, J. (2007). Measurement of vertical and horizontal idiocentrism and allocentrism in small groups. Small Group Research, 38, 556-564.
2.
Anderson, L.E., & Balzer, W.K. (1991). The effects of timing of leaders' opinions on problem-solving groups: A field experiment. Group & Organization Studies, 16, 86-101.
3.
Barge, J.K., & Hirokawa, R.Y. (1989). Towards a communication competency model of leadership. Small Group Behavior, 20, 167-189.
4.
Barnes, M.C., & Keleher, M. (2006). Ethics in conflict: Making the case for a critical pedagogy. Business Communication Quarterly, 69, 144-157.
5.
Beckman, C.M. (2006). The influence of founding team company affiliations on firm behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 741-758.
6.
Beersma, B., Hollenbeck, J.R., Humphrey, S.E., Moon, H., Conlon, D., & Ilgen, D.R. (2003). Cooperation, competition, and team performance: Toward a contingency approach. Academy of Management Journal , 46, 572-590.
7.
Bettenhausen, K.L. (1991). Five years of group research: What have we learned and what needs to be addressed. Journal of Management, 17, 345-381.
8.
Boone, C., Olffen, W.V., & van Witteloostuijn, A. (2005). Team locus-of-control composition, leadership structure, information acquisition, and financial performance: A business simulation study. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 889-909.
9.
Brewer, M.B., (1995). Managing diversity: The role of social identities . In S. E. Jackson & M. Ruderman (Eds.), Diversity in work teams: Research paradigms for a changing workplace (pp. 47-68). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
10.
Brodbeck, F.C., Kerschreiter, R., Mojzisch, A., & Schulz-Hardt, S. (2007). Group decision making under conditions of distributed knowledge: The information asymmetries model . Academy of Management Review, 32, 459-479.
11.
Cheney, C., Christensen, L.T., Zorn, T.E., Jr., & Ganesh, S. (2004). Organizational communication in an age of globalization: Issues, reflections, practices. Long Grove, IL: Waveland.
12.
Conaway, R.N., & Fernandez, T.L. (2000). Ethical preferences among business leaders: Implications for business schools. Business Communication Quarterly, 63(1), 23-31.
13.
Crown, D.F. (2007). The use of group and groupcentric individual goals for culturally heterogeneous and homogeneous task groups: An assessment ofEuropean work teams. Small Group Research, 38, 489-508.
14.
Dainty, P., & Kakabadse, A. (1992). Brittle, blocked, blended, and blind: Top team characteristics that lead to business success or failure. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 7, 4-17.
15.
Druskat, V.U., & Wheeler, J.V. (2003). Managing from the boundary: The effective leadership of self-managing work teams. Academy of Management Journal , 46, 435-457.
Freeman, K.A. (1996). Attitudes toward work in project groups as predictors of academic performance. Small Group Research, 27, 265-282.
18.
Gouran, D.S., & Hirokawa, R.Y. (1983). The role of communication in decision making groups: A functional perspective. In M. S. Mander (Ed.), Communications in transition (pp. 168-185). New York: Praeger .
19.
Grey, C. (2004). Reinventing business schools: The contribution of critical management education. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 2, 178-186.
20.
Grosse, C.U. (2002). Managing communication within intercultural virtual teams. Business Communication Quarterly, 65(4), 22-38.
21.
Hare, L.R., & O'Neill, K. (2000). Effectiveness and efficiency in small academic peer groups: A case study. Small Group Research, 31, 24-53.
22.
Harshman, E.F., & Harshman, C.L. (1999). Communicating with employees: Building an ethical foundation. Journal of Business Ethics , 19, 3-19.
23.
Henry, K.B., Arrow, H., & Carini, B. (1999). A tripartite model of group identification: Theory and measurement. Small Group Research, 30, 558-581.
24.
Hollenbeck, J.R., Ilgen, D.R., Sego, D.J., Hedlund, J., Major, D.A., & Phillips, J. (1995). Multilevel theory of team decision making: Decision performance in teams incorporating distributed expertise. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 292-316.
25.
Hollingshead, A.B., Jacobsohn, G.C., & Beck, S.J. (2007). Motives and goals in context: A strategic analysis of information-sharing groups. In K. Fiedler (Ed.), Social communication (pp. 257-280). New York: Psychology Press.
26.
Holmes, P., Cockburn-Wootten, C., Motion, J., Zorn, T.E., & Roper, J. (2005). Critical reflexive practice in teaching management communication. Business Communication Quarterly, 68, 247-256.
27.
Jehn, K.A. (1994). Enhancing effectiveness: An investigation of advantages and disadvantages of value-based intragroup conflict. International Journal of Conflict Management, 5, 223-238.
28.
Jennings, J.E., & McDougald, M.S. (2007). Work-family interface experiences and coping strategies: Implications for entrepreneurship research and practice . Academy of Management Review, 32, 747-760.
29.
Johns, G. (2006). The essential impact of context on organizational behavior. Academy of Management Review, 31, 386-408.
30.
Kabanoff, B., & Daly, J. (2002). Espoused values of organizations. Australian Journal of Management, 27, 89-104.
31.
Keyton, J. (2006). Communicating in groups: Building relationships for group effectiveness (3rd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
32.
Kilmann, R.H., & Thomas, K.W. (1975). Interpersonal conflict-handling behavior as reflections of Jungian personality dimensions. Psychological Reports, 37, 971-980.
33.
Klenke, K. (2003). Gender influences in decision-making processes in top management teams. Management Decision, 4, 1024-1034.
34.
Kotlyar, I., & Karakowsky, L. (2007). Falling over ourselves to follow the leader: Conceptualizing connections between transformational leader behaviors and dysfunctional team conflict. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 14, 38-49.
35.
Lankau, M.J., Ward, A., Amason, A., Ng, T., Sonnenfeld, J.A., & Agle, B.R. (2007). Examining the impact of organizational value dissimilarity in top management teams. Journal of Managerial Issues, 19, 11-34.
36.
Larson, C., & LaFasto, F. (1989). TeamWork: What must go right/what can go wrong . London: Sage
37.
Levine, J.M., & Moreland, R.L. (1990). Progress in small group research. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 585-634.
38.
Li, J.T., & Hambrick, D.C. (2005). Factional groups: A new vantage on demographic fault-lines, conflict and disintegration in work teams . Academy of Management Journal, 48, 794-813.
39.
Meyers, R.A., Berdahl, J.L., Brashers, D., Considine, J.R., Kelly, J.R., Moore, C., et al. (2005). Understanding groups from a feminist perspective . In M. S. Poole & A. B. Hollingshead (Eds.), Theories of small groups: Interdisciplinary perspectives (pp. 241-276). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
40.
Oetzel, J.G. (1995). Intercultural small groups: An effective decision-making theory. In R. L. Wiseman (Ed.), Intercultural communication theories (pp. 247-270). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
41.
Pavitt, C., High, A.C., Tressler, K.E., & Winslow, J.K. (2007). Leadership communication during group resource dilemmas. Small Group Research, 38, 509-531.
42.
Perretti, F., & Negro, G. (2006). Filling empty seats: How status and organizational hierarchies affect exploration versus exploitation in team design. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 759-777.
43.
Polzer, J.T., Crisp, C.B., Jarvenpaa, S.L., & Kim, J.W. (2006). Extending the faultline model to geographically dispersed teams: How collocated subgroups can impair group functioning. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 679-692.
44.
Postmes, T., Spear, R., & Lea, M. (2000). The formation of group norms in computer-mediated communication. Human Communication Research, 26, 341-371.
45.
Raver, J.L., & Gelfand, M.J. (2005). Beyond the individual victim: Linking sexual harassment, team processes, and team performance. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 387-400.
46.
Roberson, Q.M., & Colquitt, J.A. (2005). Shared and configural justice: A social network model of justice in teams. Academy of Management Review, 30, 595-607.
47.
Rodriguez, R.A. (1998). Challenging demographic reductionism: A pilot study investigating diversity in group composition. Small Group Research, 29, 744-759.
48.
Roebuck, D.B., Brock, S.J., & Moodie, D.R. (2004). Using a simulation to explore the challenges of communicating in a virtual team. Business Communication Quarterly , 67, 359-367.
49.
Rokeach, M. (1969). Beliefs, attitudes, and values: A theory of organization and change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass .
50.
Rooney, P.S. (2000). Constructive controversy: A new approach to designing team projects. Business Communication Quarterly, 63(1), 53-58.
51.
Scheerhorn, D., Geist, P., & Teboul, J.C. (1994). Beyond decision making in decision-making groups: Implications of the study of group communication. In L. R. Frey (Ed.), Group communication in context: Studies of natural groups (pp. 247-262). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
52.
Schutz, W.C. (1966). The interpersonal underworld. Palo Alto, CA: Science and Behavior Books.
53.
Schwartz, S.H., & Bilsky, W. (1990). Toward a theory of the universal content and structure of values: Extensions and cross-cultural replications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 878-891.
54.
Schweiger, D.M., & Sandberg, W.R. (1989). The utilization of individual capabilities in group approaches to strategic decision-making. Strategic Management Journal, 10, 31-43.
55.
Scott, E.D. (2002). Organizational moral values. Business Ethics Quarterly, 12, 33-55.
56.
Spitzberg, B.H., & Cupach, W.R. (1989). Handbook of interpersonal competence research . New York: Springer-Verlag.
57.
Stasser, G., Taylor, L.A., & Hanna, C. (1989). Information sampling in structured and unstructured discussions of three- and six-person groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 67-78.
58.
Von Glinow, M.A., Shapiro, D.L., & Brett, J.M. (2004). Can we talk, and should we? Managing emotional conflict in multicultural teams. Academy of Management Review , 29, 578-592.
59.
Wageman, R. (1995). Interdependence and group effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 145-180.
60.
Wall, V.D., & Nolan, L.L. (1987). A look at equity, satisfaction, and styles of conflict management. Small Group Research, 18, 188-211.
61.
White, D.W., & Lean, E. (in press). The impact of perceived leader integrity on subordinates in a work team environment. Journal of Business Ethics.
62.
Wilson, J.M., Goodman, P.S., & Cronin, M.A. (2007). Group learning. Academy of Management Review, 32, 1041-1059.
