This article describes how a collaborative class strategy and an introductory activity were used to develop students’ thinking about business and management communication. The article focuses on teachers who want to integrate critical perspectives about business communication into their classes. A course ethos, learning groups, and an introductory activity were used to develop students’ thinking about business and management communication. These strategies encouraged collaborative peer learning in a large bicultural/multicultural lecture environment and developed learning relationships typically found in a small class context. In addition, the activities produced ongoing lecture learning groups in which business students could question their “trained incapacities,” boundaries, and assumptions gained from their experiences of communicating and managing relationships during these activities.
Ackroyd, S., & Thompson, P. ( 1999). Organisational misbehaviour. London , England: Sage.
2.
Biggs, J. ( 2003). Teaching for quality learning at university: What the student does (2nd ed.). Buckingham , England: Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.
3.
Boje, D. ( 1996). Management education as a panoptic cage. In R. French & C. Grey (Eds.), Rethinking management education (pp.172-195). London , England: Sage.
4.
Brookfield, S.D. ( 2005). The power of critical theory: Liberating adult learning and teaching. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
5.
Burke, L.A., & James, K.E. ( 2008). Powerpoint-based lectures in business education: An empirical investigation of student-perceived novelty and effectiveness. Business Communication Quarterly, 71, 277-296.
6.
Burkill, S., Rodway Dyer, S., & Stone, M. ( 2008). Lecturing in higher education in further education settings . Journal of Further and Higher Education, 32, 321-331.
7.
Cheney, G., Christensen, L.T., Zorn, T.E., & Ganesh, S. ( 2004). Organizational communication in an age of globalization: Issues, reflections, practices. Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press.
8.
Cooper, J.L., & Robinson, P. ( 2000, Spring). The argument for making large classes seem small . New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 81, 5-10.
9.
Cunliff, A., Forray, J.M., & Knights, D. ( 2002). Considering management education: Insights from critical management studies. Journal of Management Education, 26, 489-495.
10.
Du-Babcock, B. ( 2002). Teaching a large class in Hong Kong. Business Communication Quarterly, 54, 80-88.
11.
Flannery, D.D., & Hayes, E. ( 2001). Challenging adult learning: A feminist perspective. In V. Sheared & P. A. Sissel (Eds.), Making space: Merging theory and practice in adult education (pp. 29-41). Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey.
12.
French, R., & Grey, C. (1996). (Eds.). Rethinking management education . London, England: Sage.
13.
Fulop, L., & Rifkin, W.D. ( 2004). Management knowledge and learning. In S. Linstead, L. Fulop , & S. Lilley (Eds.), Management and organization: A critical text (pp. 17-55). Basingstoke , England: Palgrave Macmillan.
14.
Gabriel, Y. ( 1995). The unmanaged organization: Stories, fantasies and subjectivity . Organizational Studies, 16, 477-501.
15.
Garrick, J., & Solomon, N. ( 2001). Technologies of learning at work: Disciplining the self . In V. Sheared & P. A. Sissel (Eds.), Making space: Merging theory and practice in adult education (pp. 301-313). Westport, CT : Bergin & Garvey.
16.
Gulati, S. ( 2004, April). Constructivism and emerging online learning pedagogy: A discussion for formal to acknowledge and promote the informal. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Universities Association for Continuing Education: Regional Futures: Formal and Informal Learning Perspectives, Centre for Lifelong Learning, University of Glamorgan. Retrieved from http://www.leeds.ac.uk/educol/documents/00003562.htm
17.
Jackson, B. ( 2001). Management gurus and management fashions. London, England: Routledge.
18.
Kryder, L.G. ( 2002). Large lecture format: Some lessons learned. Business Communication Quarterly, 65, 88-93.
19.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. ( 1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation . Cambridge, England: University of Cambridge Press.
20.
Lee, J.J. ( 2008). Size matters: An exploratory comparison of small-and-large-class university lecture introductions. English for Specific Purposes , 28, 42-57.
21.
Linstead, S., Fulop, L., & Lilley, S. (Eds.). (2004). Management and organization: A critical text (2nd ed.). Basingstoke, England: Palgrave Macmillan.
22.
Linstead, S., Fulop, L., & Lilley, S. (Eds.). (2009). Management and organization: A critical text (3rd ed.). Basingstoke, England: Palgrave Macmillan.
23.
Lorbiecki, A., & Jack, G. ( 2000). Critical turns in the evolution of diversity management . British Journal of Management, 11(Suppl. s1), S17-S31.
24.
Mezirow, J. ( 2000). Learning to think like an adult: Core concepts of transformation theory. In J. Mezirow (Ed.), Learning as transformation: Critical perspectives on a theory in progress (pp. 3-33). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
25.
Rodaway, P. ( 2007). Changing perspectives on teaching. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 31, 1-6.
26.
Rosa, E.A., & Machlis, G.E. ( 2002). It’s a bad thing to make one thing into two: Disciplinary distinctions as trained incapacities. Society & Natural Resources, 15, 251-261.
27.
Saltmarsh, D., & Saltmarsh, S. ( 2008). Has anyone read the reading? Using assessment to promote academic literacies and learning cultures. Teaching in Higher Education, 13, 621-632.
28.
Sinclair, A. ( 1992). The tyranny of a team ideology. Organization Studies, 13, 611-626.
29.
Westwood, R.I., & Jack, G. ( 2007). Manifesto for post-colonial international business and management studies: A provocation. Critical Perspectives on International Business, 3, 246-265.
