This article examines the teaching of résumé writing at one university in Russia and several institutions in the Newly Independent States (NIS). The authors explore challenges including variable cultural norms for written versus oral communication, severe financial and material hardship in the educational sector, cultural discomfort with the norms of U.S. business writing, issues related to the transition from Soviet-style socialism to Western-style capitalism, and other historical factors that shape expectations for business communication in Russia and the NIS. Recommendations to business writing and communication faculty conclude the article.
Barker, T., & Smith, H., Jr. (1996). A perspective of a new taxonomy for international education. International Education, 26, 40-55.
2.
BBC World Service. (1998, September 22). Education: Teachers paid in vodka. Retrieved July 20, 2004, from http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/education/177421.stm
3.
BBC World Service. (1999, January 28). Education: Russian teachers strike over unpaid wages. Retrieved July 20, 2004, from http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/education/263385.stm
4.
The Bologna Declaration of 19 June 1999. Joint declaration of the European ministers of education. Retrieved August 22, 2005, from http://www.bologna-berlin2003.de/pdf/bologna_declaration.pdf
5.
Brodsky, J. (1986). Less than one. In J. Brodsky (Ed.), Less than one: Selected essays (pp. 3-33). New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
6.
Connor, U., Davis, K., De Rycker, T., Phillips, M., & Verckens, J. (1997). An international course in international business writing: Belgium, Finland, and the United States. Business Communication Quarterly, 60(4), 63-74.
7.
Crabtree, R., & Sapp, D. (2004). Your culture, my classroom, whose pedagogy? Negotiating effective teaching and learning in Brazil. Journal of Studies in International Education, 8(1), 105-132.
8.
Crabtree, R., & Sapp, D. (2005). Technical communication, participatory action research, and global civic engagement: A teaching, research, and social action collaboration in Kenya. Reflections: A Journal of Writing, Service-Learning, and Community Literacy, 4(2), 9-33.
9.
Duin, A., Baer, L., & Starke-Meyerring, D. (2001). Partnering in the learning marketplace. Indianapolis, IN: Jossey-Bass.
10.
Duin, A., & Starke-Meyerring, D. (2004, March). Global literacy as a framework for building global partnerships in technical communication. Paper presented at the meeting of the Association of Teachers of Technical Writing, San Antonio, TX.
11.
Eisenstein, E. (2003). The rise of the reading public. In D. Crowley & P. Heyer (Eds.), Communication in history: Technology, culture, society (pp. 97-105). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
12.
Foster, D., & Russell D. (Eds.). (2002). Writing and learning in cross-national perspective: Transitions from secondary to higher education. Urbana, IL: NCTE.
13.
Germain, M. (1998). World teachers: Cultural learning and pedagogy. Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey.
14.
Graff, H. J. (2003). Early modern literacies. In D. Crowley & P. Heyer (Eds.), Communication in history: Technology, culture, society (pp. 106-114). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
15.
Hagen, P. (1998). Teaching American business writing in Russia: Cross cultures/cross-purposes. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 12, 109-126.
16.
Hamel, J. (with Dufour, S., & Fortin, D.). (1993). Case study methods. Qualitative research methods series (Vol. 32). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
17.
Hofstede, G. (1986). Cultural differences in teaching and learning. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 10, 301-320.
18.
Holden, N. J., Cooper, C. L., & Carr, J. (1998). Dealing with the new Russia: Management cultures in collision. Brisbane, Australia: John Wiley.
19.
Ioffe, G. (1993). From Russia with journals: Writing enhances dialogue in seminars. College Teaching, 41(3), 112-116.
20.
Kynell, T. (2000). Writing in a milieu of utility: The move to technical communication in American engineering programs, 1850-1950. Stamford, CT: Ablex.
21.
Leitch, R., & Day, C. (2000). Action research and reflective practice: Towards a holistic view. Educational Action Research, 8, 179-193.
22.
Lieberman, D. (1997). Culture, problem solving, and pedagogical style. In L. A. Samovar & R. E. Porter (Eds.), Intercultural communication: A reader (pp. 191-213). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
23.
Lindlof, T. R. (1995). Qualitative communication research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
24.
MacWilliams, B. (2001, December 14). For Russia’s universities, a decade of more freedom and less money. Chronicle of Higher Education, 48, A42-A46.
25.
Michalova, N., Yusfin, S., & Polyakov, S. (2002). Using action research in current conditions of Russian teacher education. Educational Action Research, 10, 423-447.
26.
Olson, D. (1988). From utterance to text: The bias of language in speech and writing. In E. Kintgen, B. Kroll, & M. Rose (Eds.), Perspectives on literacy (pp. 175-189). Carbondale: Southern Illinois State University Press.
27.
Ong, W. (1979). Orality and literacy. Profession, 79, 1-7.
28.
Read, B. (2002, April 19). Russian students go online to experience American political science. Chronicle of Higher Education, 49, A36.
29.
Reason, P. (1991). Three approaches to participatory inquiry. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 324-339). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
30.
Russell, D., & Foster, D. (2002). Rearticulating articulation. In D. Foster & D. Russell (Eds.), Writing and learning in cross-national perspective: Transitions from secondary to higher education (pp. 1-47). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
31.
Sanger, M., Brincks, E., Phelps, A., Pak, M., & Lyovkin, A. (2001). A comparison of secondary chemistry courses and chemistry teacher preparation programs in Iowa and St. Petersburg, Russia. Journal of Chemical Education, 78, 1275-1280.
32.
Sapp, D. (2004). Global partnerships in business communication: An institutional collaboration between the U.S. and Cuba. Business Communication Quarterly, 67, 267-280.
33.
Scribner, S. (1988). Literacy in three metaphors. In E. Kintgen, B. Kroll, & M. Rose (Eds.), Perspectives on literacy (pp. 71-81). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
34.
Starke-Meyerring, D. (2005). Meeting the challenges of globalization: A framework for global literacies in professional communication programs. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 19, 468-499.
35.
Stevens, B. (2000). Russian teaching contracts: An examination of cultural influence and genre. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 14, 38-57.
36.
Stevens, B. (2001). Cross-cultural service learning: American and Russian students learn applied organizational communication. Business Communication Quarterly, 64(3), 59-69.
37.
Webber, S., & Webber, T. (1994). Issues in teacher education. In A. Jones (Ed.), Education and society in the new Russia (pp. 231-259). Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
38.
Weiss, T. (1992). “Ourselves among others”: A new metaphor for business and technical writing. Technical Communication Quarterly, 1, 23-36.
39.
Yin, R. (1984). Case study research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
40.
Zoreda, M. (1997). Cross-cultural relations and pedagogy. American Behavioral Scientist, 40, 923-935.
