It is widely understood that stable housing is a key element in the transition from prison to the community. However, many persons under correctional supervision face substantial barriers in securing and maintaining housing, a fact that is heightened among individuals with a sexual offense conviction. Although frequent movement is commonplace among people on parole, it is unclear how housing changes affect recidivism outcomes and whether such mobility uniquely impacts individuals with a sexual offense conviction. In the present study, we use a quasi-experimental propensity score weighting design to compare a sample of individuals paroled from prison in Michigan for sexual and non-sexual crimes (N = 3930) to consider the role of housing mobility on the likelihood of rearrests and technical revocation, with attention to disaggregating sexual crimes against adults and children. Results suggest that increased movement was distinctly associated with a higher hazard of rearrest for individuals with a sexual offense conviction, and a strong predictor of technical return hazard for both individuals with sexual and non-sexual convictions.
AllisonP. D. (2014). Event history and survival analysis: Regression for longitudinal event data (Vol. 46). SAGE publications.
2.
BarnesJ. C.DukesT.TewksburyR.De TroyeT. M. (2009). Analyzing the impact of a statewide residence restriction law on South Carolina sex offenders. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 20(1), 21–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887403408320842
3.
BergM. T.HuebnerB. M. (2011). Reentry and the ties that bind: An examination of social ties, employment, and recidivism. Justice Quarterly, 28(2), 382–410. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2010.498383
4.
BlombergT.LuckenK. (1994). Stacking the deck by piling up sanctions: Is intermediate punishment destined to fail?The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 33(1), 62–80. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2311.1994.tb00794.x
5.
BowmanE. I.ElyK. (2020). Voices of returning citizens: A qualitative study of a supportive housing program for ex-offenders in a rural community. The Prison Journal, 100(4), 423–446. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032885520939273
6.
ByrneT.CashyJ.MetrauxS.BlosnichJ. R.CusackM.CulhaneD. P.McInnesD. K.CulhaneE.MontgomeryA. E. (2022). Association between registered sex offender status and risk of housing instability and homelessness among Veterans. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37(7–8), NP5818–NP5829. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260520959646
7.
CannD.Isom ScottD. A. (2020). Sex offender residence restrictions and homelessness: A critical look at South Carolina. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 31(8), 1119–1135. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887403419862334
8.
ClarkV. A. (2016). Predicting two types of recidivism among newly released prisoners: First addresses as “Launch Pads” for recidivism or reentry success. Crime & Delinquency, 62(10), 1364–1400. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128714555760
9.
ClearT. R. (2007). Imprisoning communities: How mass incarceration makes disadvantaged neighborhoods worse. Oxford University Press.
10.
CochranJ. C.TomanE. L.ShieldsR. T.MearsD. P. (2021). A uniquely punitive turn? Sex offenders and the persistence of punitive sanctioning. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 58(1), 74–118. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427820941172
11.
Colorado Department of Public Safety. (2004). Report on safety issues raised by living arrangements for and location of sex offenders in the community. Colorado Department of Public Safety.
DesmondM. (2018). Heavy is the house: Rent burden among the American urban poor. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 42(1), 160–170. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12529
DohertyF. (2016). Obey all laws and be good: Probation and the meaning of recidivism. Georgetown Law Journal, 104(2), 291–354.
17.
DuweG. (2012). Evaluating the Minnesota comprehensive offender reentry plan (MCORP): Results from a randomized experiment. Justice Quarterly, 29(3), 347–383. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2011.555414
18.
EdwardsW.HensleyC. (2001). Contextualizing sex offender management legislation and policy: Evaluating the problem of latent consequences in community notification laws. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology. 45(1), 83–101. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624x01451006
19.
EvansD. N. (2016). The effect of criminal convictions on real estate agent decisions in New York City. Journal of Crime and Justice, 39(3), 363–379. https://doi.org/10.1080/0735648X.2016.1166068
20.
EvansD. N.Blount-HillK.-L.CubellisM. A. (2019). Examining housing discrimination across race, gender, and felony history. Housing Studies, 34(5), 761–778. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2018.1478069
21.
EvansD. N.PorterJ. R. (2015). Criminal history and landlord rental decisions: A New York quasi-experimental study. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 11(1), 21–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-014-9217-4
22.
FongC.HazlettC.ImaiK. (2018). Covariate balancing propensity score for a continuous treatment: Application to the efficacy of political advertisements. The Annals of Applied Statistics, 12(1), 156–177. https://doi.org/10.1214/17-AOAS1101
GiuffreA.HuebnerB. M. (2022). Monetary sanctions assessed for sexual offense convictions: Avenues for policy reform. Federal Sentencing Reporter, 34(2–3), 147–154. https://doi.org/10.1525/fsr.2022.34.2-3.147
26.
GlazeL. E.BonczarA. (2008). Correctional populations in the United States, 2007. Bureau of Justice Statistics.
27.
GrambschP. M.TherneauT. M. (1994). Proportional hazards tests and diagnostics based on weighted residuals. Biometrika, 81(3), 515–526. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/81.3.515
28.
GrattetR.LinJ. (2016). Supervision intensity and parole outcomes: A competing risks approach to criminal and technical parole violations. Justice Quarterly, 33(4), 565–583. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2014.932001
29.
GrattetL. M. (2017). Sexual offenders, violent offenders, and community reentry: Challenges and treatment considerations. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 34, 59–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2017.04.005
HansonR. K.HarrisA. J. R.HelmusL.ThorntonD. (2014). High-risk sex offenders may not be high risk forever. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 29(15), 2792–2813. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260514526062
32.
HansonR. K.Morton-BourgonK. (2004). Predictors of sexual recidivism: An updated meta-analysis. Researchgate.
33.
HansonR. K.Morton-BourgonK. E. (2005). The characteristics of persistent sexual offenders: A meta-analysis of recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73(6), 1154–1163. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.73.6.1154
34.
HansonR. K.Morton-BourgonK. E. (2009). The accuracy of recidivism risk assessments for sexual offenders: A meta-analysis of 118 prediction studies. Psychological Assessment, 21(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014421
35.
HansonR. K.ScottH.SteffyR. A. (1995). A comparison of child molesters and non-sexual criminals: Risk predictors and long-term recidivism. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 32, 325–337. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427895032003004
36.
HardingD. J.MorenoffJ. D.HerbertC. W. (2013). Home is hard to find: Neighborhoods, institutions, and the residential trajectories of returning prisoners. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 647(1), 214–236. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716213477070
37.
HenryT. K. S. (2021). Revolving doors: Examining the effect of race and ethnicity on discretionary decision-making in parole revocations. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 46(2), 279–297. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-020-09560-2
38.
HerbertC. W.MorenoffJ. D.HardingD. J. (2015). Homelessness and housing insecurity among former prisoners. RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences, 1(2), 44–79. https://doi.org/10.7758/rsf.2015.1.2.04
39.
HippJ. R.TurnerS.JannettaJ. (2010). Are sex offenders moving into social disorganization? Analyzing the residential mobility of California parolees. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 47(4), 558–590. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427810381093
40.
HuebnerB. M.GiuffreA.PleggenkuhleB.KrasK. R. (2022). The price of a sex offense conviction: A comparative analysis of the costs of community supervision. Criminology, 60, 159–186. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12294
41.
HuebnerB. M.KrasK. R.PleggenkuhleB. (2019). Structural discrimination and social stigma among individuals incarcerated for sexual offenses: Reentry across the rural–urban continuum. Criminology, 57(2), 715–738. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12226
42.
HuebnerB. M.KrasK. R.RydbergJ.BynumT. S.GrommonE.PleggenkuhleB. (2014). The effect and implications of sex offender residence restrictions. Criminology & Public Policy, 13(1), 139–168. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12066
43.
HuebnerB. M.PleggenkuhleB. (2015). Residential location, household composition, and recidivism: An analysis by gender. Justice Quarterly, 32(5), 818–844. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2013.827231
44.
HuebnerB. M.PleggenkuhleB.KrasK. R. (2021). Access to health care and treatment among individuals convicted of sexual offenses paroled to urban and rural communities. Criminal Justice And Behavior, 48(7), 964–980. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854820972747
45.
HughesL. A.BurchfieldK. B. (2008). Sex offender residence restrictions in Chicago: An environmental injustice?Justice Quarterly, 25(4), 647–673. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418820802119976
46.
JacobsL. A.GottliebA. (2020). The effect of housing circumstances on recidivism: Evidence from a sample of people on probation in San Francisco. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 47(9), 1097–1115. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854820942285
47.
KirkD. S. (2012). Residential change as a turning point of the lifecourse of crime: Desistance or temporary cessation?Criminology, 50(2), 329–358. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2011.00262.x
48.
KishL. (1965). Survey Sampling. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
49.
KrasK. R.McGuirkM.PleggenkuhleB.HuebnerB. M. (2018). Compounded stigmatization: Collateral consequences of a sex offense conviction. In HuebnerB. M.FrostN. A. (Eds.), Handbook on the consequences of sentencing and punishment decisions. Routledge.
50.
KrasK. R.PleggenkuhleB.HuebnerB. M. (2016). A new way of doing time on the outside: Sex offenders’ pathways in and out of a transitional housing facility. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 60(5), 512–534. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624x14554194
51.
LaVigneN. G.ParthasarathyB. (2005). Prisoner reentry and residential mobility. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
52.
LeBelT. P. (2017). Housing as the tip of the iceberg in successfully navigating prisoner reentry. Criminology & Public Policy, 16(3), 891–908. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12313
LevensonJ.AckermanA. R.SociaK. M.HarrisA. J. (2015). Where for art thou? Transient sex offenders and residence restrictions. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 26(4), 319–344. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887403413512326
55.
LevensonJ. S. (2008). Collateral consequences of sex offender residence restrictions. Criminal Justice Studies, 21(2), 153–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/14786010802159822
56.
LevensonJ. S.CotterL. P. (2005). The impact of sex offender residence restrictions: 1,000 feet from danger or one step from absurd?International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 49(2), 168–178. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624x04271304
57.
LeverentzA.WilliamsM. (2017). Contextualizing community crime control: Race, geography, and configurations of control in four communities. Criminology, 55(1), 112–136. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12127
58.
LinJ.GrattetR.PetersiliaJ. (2010). Back-end sentencing” and reimprisonment: Individual, organizational, and community predictors of parole sanctioning decisions. Criminology, 48(3), 759–795. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2010.00201.x
59.
LinkE.LöselF. (2021). “Mixed” sexual offending against both children and adults: An empirical comparison with individuals who exclusively offend against child or adult victims. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 48(11), 1616–1633. https://doi.org/10.1177/00938548211002882
60.
LinkN. W.HyattJ.RuhlandE. (2020). Monetary sanctions, legal and collateral consequences, and probation and parole: Where do we go from here?UCLA Criminal Justice Law Review, 4(1), 199–212https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4w8022j5
61.
LoughranT.WilsonT.NaginD.PiqueroA. (2015). Evolutionary regression? Assessing the problem of hidden biases in criminal justice applications using propensity scores. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 11(4), 631–652. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-015-9242-y
62.
LovinsB. K.Brusman LovinsL. A.LatessaE. J. (2022). Reimagining probation reform: Applying a coaching model to probation departments. In JeglicE.CalkinsC. (Eds.), Handbook of issues in criminal justice reform in the United States (pp. 291–305). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77565-0_16
63.
LutzeF. E.RoskyJ. W.HamiltonZ. K. (2014). Homelessness and reentry: A multisite outcome evaluation of Washington State’s reentry housing program for high risk offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 41(4), 471–491. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854813510164
64.
MakariosM.SteinerB.TravisL. F. (2010). Examining the predictors of recidivism among men and women released from prison in Ohio. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 37(12), 1377–1391. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854810382876
65.
MannR. E.HansonR. K.ThorntonD. (2010). Assessing risk for sexual recidivism: Some proposals on the nature of psychologically meaningful risk factors. Sexual Abuse, 22(2), 191–217. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063210366039
66.
McNeeleyS. (2018). Do ecological effects on recidivism vary by gender, race, or housing type?Crime & Delinquency, 64(6), 782–806. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128717714425
67.
MeredithT.SpeirJ. C.JohnsonS. (2007). Developing and implementing automated risk assessments in parole. Justice Research and Policy, 9(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.3818/jrp.9.1.2007.1
68.
Michigan Sex offenders registration act. (2005).
69.
MiddlemassK. (2017). Convicted and condemned: The politics and policies of prisoner reentry. NYU Press.
70.
MillerR. J. (2021). Halfway home: Race, punishment, and the afterlife of mass incarceration. Little, Brown, and Company.
OmoriM. K.TurnerS. F. (2015). Assessing the cost of electronically monitoring high-risk sex offenders. Crime & Delinquency, 61(6), 873–894. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128712466373
73.
PadgettD. K.GulcurL.TsemberisS. (2006). Housing first services for people who are homeless with co-occurring serious mental illness and substance abuse. Research on Social Work Practice, 16(1), 74–83. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731505282593
74.
PaternosterR.BrameR.MazerolleP.PiqueroA. (1998). Using the correct statistical test for the equality of regression coefficients. Criminology, 36(4), 859–866. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1998.tb01268.x
75.
PayneB. K.DeMicheleM. (2008). Warning: Sex offenders need to be supervised in the community. Federal Probation, 72(1), 37–42.
76.
PetersD. J.HochstetlerA.DeLisiM.KuoH.-J. (2015). Parolee recidivism and successful treatment completion: Comparing hazard models across propensity methods. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 31(1), 149–181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-014-9229-2
77.
PetersiliaJ.TurnerS. (1993). Intensive probation and parole. Crime and Justice, 17, 281–335. https://doi.org/10.1086/449215
78.
PickettJ. T.GrahamA.CullenF. T. (2022). The American racial divide in fear of the police. Criminology, 60(2), 291–390. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12298
79.
PickettJ. T.ManciniC.MearsD. P. (2013). Vulnerable victims, monstrous offenders, and unmanageable risk: Explaining public opinion on the social control of sex crime. Criminology, 51(3), 729–759. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12018
80.
PleggenkuhleB.HuebnerB. M.KrasK. R. (2016). Solid Start: supportive housing, social support, and reentry transitions. Journal of Crime and Justice, 39(3), 380–397. https://doi.org/10.1080/0735648x.2015.1047465
RolfeS. M.TewksburyR.SchroederR. D. (2017). Homeless shelters’ policies on sex offenders: Is this another collateral consequence?International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 61(16), 1833–1849. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624x16638463
83.
RosenbaumP. R.RubinD. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41–55. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/70.1.41
RuhlandE.HolmesB.PetkusA. (2020). The role of fines and fees on probation outcomes. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 47(10), 1244–1263. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854820918877
RydbergJ.GrommonE. (2016). A multimethod examination of the dynamics of recidivism during reentry. Corrections: Policy, Practice, and Research, 1(1), 40–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/23774657.2016.1105660
88.
RydbergJ.GrommonE.HuebnerB. M.BynumT. (2014). The effect of statewide residency restrictions on sex offender post-release housing mobility. Justice Quarterly, 31(2), 421–444. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2012.667141
89.
RydbergJ.GrommonE.HuebnerB. M.PleggenkuhleB. (2017). Examining the correlates of sex offender residence restriction violation rates. Journal of quantitative criminology. Justice Quarterly, 33(2), 347–369. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-016-9303-z
SchiraldiV.ArzuJ. L. (2018). Less is more in New York: An examination of the impact of state parole violations on prison and jail populations. Justicelab.
92.
ScoonesC. D.WillisG. M.GraceR. C. (2012). Beyond static and dynamic risk factors: The incremental validity of release planning for predicting sex offender recidivism. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 27(2), 222–238. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260511416472
93.
ShelbyR. M.HatchA. R. (2014). Obscuring sexual crime: Examining media representations of sexual violence in Megan’s law. Criminal Justice Studies, 27(4), 402–418. https://doi.org/10.1080/1478601X.2014.928459
94.
SmithJ.ToddP. (2005). Does matching overcome LaLonde's critique of nonexperimental estimators?Journal of Econometrics, 125(1–2), 305–353. https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:econom
95.
SociaK. M. (2011). The policy implications of residence restrictions on sex offender housing in Upstate NY. Criminology and Public Policy, 10(2), 351–389. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9133.2011.00713.x
96.
SociaK. M.DumC. P.RydbergJ. (2019). Turning a blind eye: Public support of emergency housing policies for sex offenders. Sexual Abuse, 31(1), 25–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063217720925
97.
SociaK. M.LevensonJ. S.AckermanA. R.HarrisA. J. (2015). Brothers under the bridge”: Factors influencing the transience of registered sex offenders in Florida. Sexual Abuse, 27(6), 559–586. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063214521472
98.
SteinerB.MakariosM. D.TravisL. F. (2015). Examining the effects of residential situations and residential mobility on offender recidivism. Crime & Delinquency, 61(3), 375–401. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128711399409
99.
SuiterE.AndersenT. S. (2022). Residency restrictions, race, and homelessness among registered sex offenders. Criminal Justice Studies, 35(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/1478601X.2022.2026352
100.
TewksburyR.MustaineE. E. (2007). Collateral consequences and community re-entry for registered sex offenders with child victims: Are the challenges even greater?Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 46(1–2), 113–131. https://doi.org/10.1080/10509670802071550
101.
The Pew Charitable Trusts (2018). Probation and parole systems marked by high stakes, missed opportunities: 1 in 55 adults is under community supervision. The Pew Charitable Trusts.
ThompsonK. J.HuebnerB. M. (2021). Predicting failure on the sex offense registry: An examination of static and dynamic factors. Justice Evaluation Journal, 5(7), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/24751979.2021.1963636
WesternB. (2018). Homeward: Life in the year after prison. Russel Sage Foundation.
106.
WesternB.BragaA. A.DavisJ.SiroisC. (2015). Stress and hardship after prison. American Journal of Sociology, 120(5), 1512–1547. https://doi.org/10.1086/681301
107.
WillisG. M.GraceR. C. (2008). The quality of community reintegration planning for child molesters: Effects on sexual recidivism. Sexual Abuse, 20(2), 218–240. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063208318005
108.
WillisG. M.GraceR. C. (2009). Assessment of community reintegration planning for sex offenders: Poor planning predicts recidivism. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36(5), 494–512. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854809332874
109.
ZandbergenP. A.HartT. C. (2006). Reducing housing options for convicted sex offenders: Investigating the impact of residency restriction laws using GIS. Justice Research and Policy, 8(2), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.3818/jrp.8.2.2006.1
110.
ZhuY.CoffmanD. L.GhoshD. (2015). A boosting algorithm for estimating generalized propensity scores with continuous treatments. Journal of Causal Inference, 3(1), 25–40. https://doi.org/10.1515/jci-2014-0022
