Incarcerated for a Sex Offense: In-Prison Experiences and Concerns about Reentry

Abstract

Using a sample of 3,041 incarcerated men and women, this study examines the impact of being incarcerated for a sex offense and individuals’ in-prison experiences on their concerns about reentry into society. Bivariate analyses suggest that being incarcerated for a sex offense is related to greater concerns about housing and fewer concerns about recidivism compared with individuals incarcerated for nonsex offenses. A sex offense conviction is also associated with weaker social bonds, greater relational difficulties, and greater fear of victimization while incarcerated. Multiple regression models indicate that, after controlling for in-prison experiences, being incarcerated for a sex offense increases reentry concerns related to employment and housing, though may reduce them for recidivism. In-prison experiences mediate the relationship between being incarcerated for a sex offense and reentry concerns. Policy implications of these findings are discussed.

Keywords

reentry sex offense prison experiences

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alper

Durose

M. R.

(2019). Recidivism of sex offenders released from state prisons: A 9-year follow-up (2005-2014). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics.

Balko

(2017). The big lie about sex offenders. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-watch/wp/2017/03/09/the-big-lie-about-sex-offenders/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.e8797190a823

Baron

R. M.

Kenny

D. A.

(1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.

Breen

Karlson

K. B.

Holm

(2013). Total, direct, and indirect effects in logit and probit models. Sociological Methods & Research, 42, 164-191.

Bronson

Carson

E. A.

(2019). Prisoners in 2017. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.

Brown

Spencer

Deakin

(2007). The reintegration of sex offenders: Barriers and opportunities for employment. The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 46, 32-42.

Casey-Acevedo

Bakken

(2002). Visiting women in prison: Who visits and who cares? Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 34(3), 67-83.

Center for Sex Offender Management. (2007). Managing the challenges of sex offender reentry. Retrieved from https://www.csom.org/pubs/reentry_brief.pdf

Cochran

J. C.

Mears

D. P.

Bales

W. D.

(2017). Who gets visited in prison? Individual- and community-level disparities in inmate visitation experiences. Crime & Delinquency, 63, 545-568. doi:10.1177/0011128714542503

10.

Connor

D. P.

Tewksbury

(2015). Prison inmates and their visitors: An examination of inmate characteristics and visitor types. The Prison Journal, 95, 159-177.

11.

Duwe

(2013). Can Circles of Support and Accountability (COSA) work in the United States? Preliminary results from a randomized experiment in Minnesota. Sexual Abuse, 25(2), 143-165.

12.

Farkas

M. A.

Miller

(2007). Reentry and reintegration: Challenges faced by the families of convicted sex offenders. Federal Sentencing Reporter, 20, 88-92.

13.

Freeman-Longo

Wall

(1986, March). Changing a lifetime of sexual crime. Psychology Today, 20, 58-64.

14.

Göbbels

Ward

Willis

G. M.

(2012). An integrative theory of desistance from sex offending. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 17, 453-462.

15.

Göbbels

Willis

G. M.

Ward

(2014). Current re-entry practices in sex offender treatment programmes: Desistance facilitating or hindering? Journal of Sexual Aggression, 20, 354-366.

16.

Hanson

R. K.

Harris

A. J.

Helmus

Thornton

(2014). High-risk sex offenders may not be high risk forever. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 29, 2792-2813.

17.

Hanson

R. K.

Morton-Bourgon

(2004). Predictors of sexual recidivism: An updated meta-analysis. Ottawa, Ontario: Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness Canada.

18.

Harris

A. J.

Socia

K. M.

(2016). What’s in a name? Evaluating the effects of the “sex offender” label on public opinions and beliefs. Sexual Abuse, 28, 660-678.

19.

Hayes

A. F.

(2009). Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium. Communication Monographs, 76, 408-420.

20.

Karlson

K. B.

Holm

Breen

(2012). Comparing regression coefficients between same-sample nested models using logit and probit: A new method. Sociological Methodology, 42, 286-313.

21.

King

L. L.

(2019). Perceptions about sexual offenses: Misconceptions, punitiveness, and public sentiment. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 30, 254-273.

22.

Kruttschnitt

Uggen

Shelton

(2000). Predictors of desistance among sex offenders: The interaction of formal and informal social controls. Justice Quarterly, 17, 61-87.

23.

Lageson

Uggen

(2013). How work affects crime and crime affects work over the life course. In Gibson

C. L.

Krohn

M. D.

(Eds.), Handbook of life-course criminology: Emerging trends and directions for future research (pp. 201-212). New York, NY: Springer.

24.

Levenson

J. S.

Brannon

Y. N.

Fortney

Baker

(2007). Public perceptions about sex offenders and community protection policies. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 7, 137-161.

25.

Levenson

J. S.

Hern

A. L.

(2007). Sex offender residence restrictions: Unintended consequences and community reentry. Justice Research and Policy, 9, 59-73.

26.

Levenson

J. S.

Tewksbury

(2009). Collateral damage: Family members of registered sex offenders. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 34, 54-68.

27.

Lindsey

A. M.

Mears

D. P.

Cochran

J. C.

Bales

W. D.

Stults

B. J.

(2017). In prison and far from home: Spatial distance effects on inmate misconduct. Crime & Delinquency, 63, 1043-1065.

28.

Liu

Pickett

J. T.

Baker

(2016). Inside the black box: Prison visitation, the costs of offending, and inmate social capital. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 27, 766-790.

29.

Mancini

Baker

Sainju

K. D.

Golden

Bedard

L. E.

Gertz

(2016). Examining external support received in prison and concerns about reentry among incarcerated women. Feminist Criminology, 11, 163-190.

30.

Martinson

(1974, Spring). What works?—Questions and answers about prison reform. The Public Interest, pp. 22-54.

31.

Maruna

(2001). Making good: How ex-convicts reform and rebuild their lives. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

32.

Maruna

Immarigeon

LeBel

(2004). After crime and punishment: pathways to ex-offender reintegration. Cullompton: Willan Publishing.

33.

Mbuba

J. M.

(2012). Lethal rejection: Recounting offenders’ experience in prison and societal reaction post release. The Prison Journal, 92, 231-252.

34.

Mears

D. P.

Cochran

J. C.

(2015). Prisoner reentry in the era of mass incarceration. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

35.

Mears

D. P.

Cochran

J. C.

Siennick

S. E.

Bales

W. D.

(2012). Prison visitation and recidivism. Justice Quarterly, 29, 888-918.

36.

Meyers

T. J.

Wright

K. A.

Young

J. T.

Tasca

(2017). Social support from outside the walls: Examining the role of relationship dynamics among inmates and visitors. Journal of Criminal Justice, 52, 57-67.

37.

Mustaine

E. E.

Tewksbury

(2011). Residential relegation of registered sex offenders. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 36, 44-57.

38.

Pager

(2003). The mark of a criminal record. American Journal of Sociology, 108, 937-975.

39.

Sample

L. L.

Bray

T. M.

(2003). Are sex offenders dangerous? Criminology & Public Policy, 3, 59-82.

40.

Sample

L. L.

Bray

T. M.

(2006). Are sex offenders different? An examination of rearrest patterns. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 17, 83-102.

41.

Sampson

R. J.

Laub

J. H.

(1993). Crime the making: pathways and turning points through life. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

42.

Schwaebe

(2005). Learning to pass: Sex offenders’ strategies for establishing a viable identity in the prison general population. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 49, 614-625.

43.

Scroggins

J. R.

Malley

(2010). Reentry and the (unmet) needs of women. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 49, 146-163.

44.

Simpson

P. L.

Reekie

Butler

T. G.

Richters

Yap

Grant

. . . Donovan

(2016). Factors associated with sexual coercion in a representative sample of men in Australian prisons. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 45, 1195-1205.

45.

Skarbek

(2014). The social order of the underworld: How prison gangs govern the American penal system. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

46.

Spjeldnes

Goodkind

(2009). Gender differences and offender reentry: A review of the literature. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 48, 314-335.

47.

Spjeldnes

Jung

Yamatani

(2014). Gender differences in jail populations: Factors to consider in reentry strategies. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 53, 75-94.

48.

Sykes

(1958). The society of captives: A study of a maximum security prison. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

49.

Tewksbury

Copes

(2013). Incarcerated sex offenders’ expectations for reentry. The Prison Journal, 93, 102-122.

50.

Trammell

Chenault

(2009). “We have to take these guys out”: Motivations for assaulting incarcerated child molesters. Symbolic Interaction, 32, 334-350.

51.

Uggen

Wakefield

Western

(2005). Work and family perspectives on reentry. In Travis

Visher

(Eds.), Prisoner reentry and crime in America (pp. 209-242). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

52.

van den Berg

Beijersbergen

Nieuwbeerta

Dirkzwager

. (2018). Sex offenders in prison: Are they socially isolated? Sexual Abuse, 30, 828-845.

53.

Ward

(2002). Good lives and the rehabilitation of offenders: Promises and problems. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 7, 513-528.

54.

Ward

Maruna

(2007). Rehabilitation. London, England: Routledge.

55.

Willis

G. C.

Grace

R. C.

(2009). Assessment of community reintegration planning for sex offenders. Poor planning predicts recidivism. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36, 494-512.

56.

Zandbergen

P. A.

Hart

T. C.

(2006). Reducing housing options for convicted sex offenders: Investigating the impact of residence restriction laws using GIS. Justice Research and Policy, 8(2), 1-24. doi:10.3818/JRP.8.2.2006.1

57.

Zgoba

K. M.

(2017). Memorialization laws in the United Kingdom: A response to a moral panic or an increased occurrence? American Journal of Criminal Justice, 42, 628-643.

58.

Zgoba

K. M.

Jennings

Salerno

(2018). Megan’s law 20 years later: An empirical analysis and policy review. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 45, 1028-1046. doi:10.1177/0093854818771409

59.

Zgoba

K. M.

Levenson

McKee

(2009). Examining the impact of sex offender residence restrictions on housing availability. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 20, 91-110.

60.

Zgoba

K. M.

Miner

Letourneau

Levenson

Knight

Thornton

(2016). A multi-state recidivism study using Static-99 and Static-2002 risk scores and tier guidelines from the Adam Walsh Act. Sexual Abuse, 28, 722-740.