Child sexual exploitation is increasingly recognized nationally and internationally as a pressing child protection, crime prevention, and public health issue. In the United Kingdom, for example, a recent series of high-profile cases has fueled pressure on policy makers and practitioners to improve responses. Yet, prevailing discourse, research, and interventions around child sexual exploitation have focused overwhelmingly on female victims. This study was designed to help redress fundamental knowledge gaps around boys affected by sexual exploitation. This was achieved through rigorous quantitative analysis of individual-level data for 9,042 users of child sexual exploitation services in the United Kingdom. One third of the sample were boys, and gender was associated with statistically significant differences on many variables. The results of this exploratory study highlight the need for further targeted research and more nuanced and inclusive counter-strategies.
AlaggiaR. (2005). Disclosing the trauma of child sexual abuse: A gender analysis. Journal of Loss & Trauma, 10, 453-470. doi:10.1080/15325020500193895
2.
AppletonJ. (2014). Child sexual exploitation, victimisation and vulnerability. Child Abuse Review, 23, 155-158. doi:10.1002/car.2336
3.
Association of Chief Police Officers. (2012). ACPO child sexual exploitation action plan. London, England: ACPO Child Protection and Abuse Investigation Working Group. Retrieved from http://www.ceop.police.uk/Documents/ACPOCSEPlanNPM.pdf
4.
BairdG.SimonoffE.PicklesA.ChandlerS.LoucasT.MedlrumD.CharmanT. (2006). Prevalence of disorders of the autism spectrum in a population cohort of children in South Thames: The Special Needs Autism Project (SNAP). The Lancet, 378, 210-215. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69041-7
5.
Barnardo’s. (2012). Cutting them free: How is the UK progressing in protecting its children from sexual exploitation?London, England: Author.
6.
BarrettD.MelroseM. (2003). Courting controversy—Children sexually abused through prostitution—Are they everybody’s distant relative but nobody’s children?Child and Family Law Quarterly, 15, 371-382.
7.
BeckettH. (2011). Not a world away: The sexual exploitation of children and young people in Northern Ireland. Belfast, Ireland: Barnardo’s.
8.
BrayleyH.CockbainE. (2014). British children can be trafficked too: Towards an inclusive definition of internal child sex trafficking. Child Abuse Review, 23, 171-184. doi:10.1002/car.2307
9.
BrayleyH.CockbainE.GibsonK. (2014). Rapid evidence assessment: The sexual exploitation of boys and young men. London, England: Barnardo’s.
10.
BrayleyH.CockbainE.LaycockG. (2011). The value of crime scripting: Deconstructing internal child sex trafficking. Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice, 5, 132-143. doi:10.1093/police/par024
11.
CashmoreJ.ShackelR. (2014). Gender differences in the context and consequences of child sexual abuse. Current Issues in Criminal Justice, 24, 75-104.
12.
ChaseE.StathamJ. (2005). Commercial and sexual exploitation of children and young people in the UK—A review. Child Abuse Review, 14, 4-25. doi:10.1002/car.881
13.
Child Exploitation and Online Protection Centre. (2011). Out of mind, out of sight: Breaking down the barriers to understanding child sexual exploitation. London, England: Author.
14.
CluttonS.ColesJ. (2007). Sexual exploitation risk assessment framework: A pilot study. Cardiff, UK: Barnardo’s Cymru.
15.
CockbainE. (2013). Grooming and the “Asian sex gang predator”: The construction of a racial crime threat. Race & Class, 54, 22-32. doi:10.1177/0306396813475983
16.
CockbainE.BrayleyH. (2012). Child sexual exploitation and youth offending: A research note. European Journal of Criminology, 9, 689-700. doi:10.1177/1477370812453401
17.
CockbainE.BrayleyH.LaycockG. (2011). Exploring internal child sex trafficking using social network analysis. Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice, 5, 144-157. doi:10.1093/police/par025
18.
CraggJ. G. G.UhlerR. S. (1970). The demand for automobiles. Canadian Journal of Economics, 3, 386-406. doi:10.2307/133656
19.
CramérH. (1946). Mathematical methods of statistics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
20.
Crown Prosecution Service. (2013). Interim guidance on prosecuting cases of child sexual abuse. London, England: Author.
21.
De JongA. R.HervadaA. R.EmmettG. A. (1983). Epidemiological variations in childhood sexual abuse. Child Abuse & Neglect, 7, 155-162. doi:10.1016/0145-2134(83)90067-4
22.
Department for Children, Schools and Families. (2009). Safeguarding children and young people from sexual exploitation (Supplementary Guidance to Working Together to Safeguard Children). London, England: Home Office.
23.
Department for Education. (2011). Tackling child sexual exploitation: Action plan. London, England: Author.
24.
Department for Education. (2014). Children looked after in England (including adoption and care leavers) year ending 31 March 2014. London, England: Office for National Statistics.
25.
DischE.AveryN. (2001). Sex in the consulting room, the examining room, and the sacristy: Survivors of sexual abuse by professionals. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 71, 214-217. doi:10.1037/0002-9432.71.2.204
26.
EdelsonM. (2012). Why have all the boys gone? Gender differences in prosecution acceptance of child sexual abuse cases. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 25, 461-481. doi:10.1177/1079063212465900
27.
EmersonE. (2003). Prevalence of psychiatric disorders in children and adolescents with and without intellectual disability. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 47, 51-58. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2788.2003.00464.x
28.
FeiringC.TaskaL.LewisM. (1999). Age and gender differences in children’s and adolescents’ adaptation to sexual abuse. Child Abuse & Neglect, 23, 115-128. doi:10.1016/S0145-2134(98)00116-1
29.
FinkelhorD. (1986). A source book on child sexual abuse. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
30.
FinkelhorD. (1994). The international epidemiology of child sexual abuse. Child Abuse & Neglect, 18, 409-417. doi:10.1016/0145-2134(94)90026-4
31.
FirminC. (2013). Busting the “gang-rape” myth: Girls’ victimisation and agency in gang-associated sexual violence. In HorvathM.WoodhamsJ. (Eds.), Handbook on the study of multiple perpetrator rape (pp. 97-115). Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
32.
FombonneE. (2005). The changing epidemiology of autism. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 18, 281-294. doi:10.1111/j.1468-3148.2005.00266.x
33.
ForrestS. (2007). Boys, young men and sexual health services: A summary of a review of the academic literature. London, England: Brook.
34.
GohirS. (2013). Unheard voices: The sexual exploitation of Asian girls and young women. Birmingham: Muslim Women’s Network UK.
35.
HarveyJ.HornsbyR.SattarZ. (2015). Disjointed service: An English case study of multi-agency provision in tackling child trafficking. British Journal of Criminology, 55, 494-513. doi:10.1093/bjc/azu115
36.
Home Affairs Select Committee. (2013). Child sexual exploitation and the response to localised grooming: Second report of session 2013-14. London, England: The Stationery Office.
37.
Home Office. (2011). UK action plan on tackling child sexual exploitation. London, England: The Stationery Office.
38.
Home Office. (2015). Tackling child sexual exploitation. London, England: The Stationery Office.
39.
HommaY.WangN.SaewycE.KishorN. (2012). The relationship between sexual abuse and risky sexual behavior among adolescent boys: A meta-analysis. Journal of Adolescent Health, 51, 18-24. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2011.12.032
40.
JagoS.ArochaL.BrodieI.MelroseM.PearceJ.WarringtonC. (2011). What’s going on to safeguard children and young people from sexual exploitation? How local partnerships respond to child sexual exploitation. Luton, UK: University of Bedfordshire.
41.
JagoS.PearceJ. (2008). Gathering evidence of sexual exploitation of children and young people: A scoping exercise. Luton, UK: University of Bedfordshire.
John Jay College of Criminal Justice. (2006). The nature and scope of sexual abuse of minors by Catholic Priests and Deacons in the United States, 1950-2002. Washington, DC: United States Conference of Catholic Bishops.
44.
KvamM. (2000). Is sexual abuse of children with disabilities disclosed? A retrospective analysis of child disability and the likelihood of sexual abuse among those attending Norwegian hospitals. Child Abuse & Neglect, 24, 1073-1084. doi:10.1016/S0145-2134(00)00159-9
45.
LillywhiteR.SkidmoreP. (2006). Boys are not sexually exploited? A challenge to practitioners. Child Abuse Review, 15, 351-361. doi:10.1002/car.952
46.
LoweK.PearceJ. (2006). Young people and sexual exploitation. Child Abuse Review, 15, 289-293. doi:10.1002/car.958
47.
McNaughton-NichollsC.HarveyS.PaskellC. (2014). Sexual exploitation of boys and young men: Interviews with professionals. London, England: Barnardo’s.
48.
Ministry of Justice. (2014). Youth justice annual statistics: 2012 to 2013. London, England: Author.
49.
MoodyC. (1999). Male child sexual abuse. Journal of Pediatric Health Care, 13, 112-119. doi:10.1016/S0891-5245(99)90072-X
50.
National Statistics. (2014). Population estimates for UK, England and Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland, Mid-2013. London, England: Office for National Statistics.
51.
NelsonA.OliverP. (1998). Gender and the construction of consent in child-adult sexual contact beyond gender neutrality and male monopoly. Gender & Society, 12, 554-577. doi:10.1177/089124398012005004
52.
Office of the Children’s Commissioner for England. (2012). “I thought I was the only one. The only one in the world.” The Office of the Children’s Commissioner’s inquiry into child sexual exploitation in gangs and groups, interim report. London, England: Author.
53.
PalmerT. (2001). No son of mine! Children abused through prostitution. London, England: Barnardo’s.
54.
PaolucciE.GenuisM.ViolatoC. (2001). A meta-analysis of the published research on the effects of child sexual abuse. The Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 135, 17-36. doi:10.1080/00223980109603677
55.
ParkinsonP.OatesK.JayakodyA. (2010). Breaking the long silence: Reports of child sexual abuse in the Anglican Church of Australia. Ecclesiology, 6, 183-200. doi:10.1163/174413610X493791
56.
PearceJ.WilliamsM.GalvinC. (2003). It’s someone taking a part of you: A study of young women and sexual exploitation. London, England: National Children’s Bureau.
57.
PriebeG.SvedinC. (2009). Prevalence, characteristics and associations of sexual abuse with sociodemographics and consensual sex in a population-based sample of Swedish adolescents. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 18, 19-39. doi:10.1080/10538710802584635
58.
Public Petitions Committee. (2014). Inquiry into tackling child sexual exploitation in Scotland. Edinburgh, Scotland: Author.
59.
RadfordL.CorralS.BradleyC.FisherH.BassettC.HowatN.CollishawS. (2011). Child abuse and neglect in the UK today. London, England: NSPCC.
60.
RosenthalR. (1991). Meta-analytic procedures for social research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
61.
ScottS.SkidmoreP. (2006). Reducing the risk: Barnardo’s support for sexually exploited young people: A two-year evaluation. London, England: Barnardo’s.
62.
ScrandisD.WattM. (2014). Child sexual abuse in boys: Implications for primary care. The Journal for Nurse Practitioners, 10, 706-713. doi:10.1016/j.nurpra.2014.07.021
63.
SharpN. (2012). Still hidden? Going missing as an indicator of child sexual exploitation. London, England: Missing People.
64.
SmallboneS.MarshallW.WortleyR. (2008). Preventing child sexual abuse: Evidence, policy and practice. Cullompton, UK: Willan.
65.
SmallboneS.WortleyR. (2000). Child sexual abuse in Queensland: Offender characteristics and modus operandi. Brisbane, Australia: Queensland Crime Commission.
66.
SmeatonE. (2013). Running from hate to what you think is love: The relationship between running away and child sexual exploitation. London, England: Barnardo’s.
67.
StoltenborghM.van IjzendoornM.EuserE.Bakermans-KranenburgM. (2011). A global perspective on child sexual abuse: Meta-analysis of prevalence around the world. Child Maltreatment, 16, 79-101. doi:10.1177/1077559511403920
68.
SullivanP.KnutsonJ. (2000). Maltreatment and disabilities: A population-based epidemiological study. Child Abuse & Neglect, 24, 1257-1273. doi:10.1016/S0145-2134(00)00190-3
69.
TukeyJ. (1977). Exploratory data analysis. New York, NY: Pearson.
70.
United Nations. (1989). United Nations convention on the rights of the child (UNCRC). Geneva, Switzerland: United Nations.
71.
WardJ.PatelN. (2006). Broadening the discussion on “sexual exploitation”: Ethnicity, sexual exploitation and young people. Child Abuse Review, 15, 341-350. doi:10.1002/car.953
72.
Welsh Assembly Government. (2010). Safeguarding children and young people from sexual exploitation: Supplementary guidance to safeguarding children: Working Together Under the Children Act 2004. Cardiff, UK: Author.
73.
Youth Justice Board. (2009). Girls and offending: Patterns, perceptions and interventions. London, England: Author.
