Assessing Rape Myth Acceptance: A Contribution to Italian Validation of the Measure for Assessing Subtle Rape Myth (SRMA-IT)

Abstract

The study aimed to validate the Italian version of the Measure for Assessing Subtle Rape Myths developed by McMahon and Farmer. A sample of 3,915 university students (70.8% female) completed the questionnaire. After an exploratory factor analysis, a confirmatory factor analysis tested the resulting four-factor structure of the Italian Subtle Rape Myth Acceptance (SRMA-IT) Scale (“She Asked for It”; “He Didn’t Mean To”; “It Wasn’t Really Rape”; and “She Lied”), consistent with McMahon and Farmer’s initial hypothesis. The Italian validation did not include items related to intoxication. Internal consistency of the subscales was good (α from .78 to .90). Convergent validity between all subscales and System Justification–Gender was detected: A strong relationship was observed (r is from .19 to .33; p < .001). The independent-sample T test then showed that women accepted all four rape myths significantly less than men: Effect size is more than moderate for the myth “She Asked for It” (Cohen’s d = .60) and between small and moderate for the other myths (d is from .35 to .42). Acceptance of rape myths is often associated with higher men’s proclivity to rape and with tendency to raped women’s double victimization (they can be not believed or blamed when they disclose the rape). Having a validated instrument to measure rape myth acceptance can enhance empirical research on this topic and help to develop interventions of prevention both for men in the society and for the first responders to disclosures, also sustaining a culture of respect and of contrast to violence.

Keywords

rape myth acceptance Italian validation SRMA-IT system justification–gender sexual violence

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Arafat

S. M. Y.

Chowdhury

H. R.

Qusar

M. M. A. S.

Hafez

M. A.

(2016). Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric validation of research instruments: A methodological review. Journal of Behavioral Health, 5(3), 129–136. https://doi.org/10.5455/jbh.20160615121755

Bendixen

Kennair

L. E. O.

(2017). Advances in the understanding of same-sex and opposite-sex sexual harassment. Evolution and Human Behavior, 38(5), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2017.01.00

Bentler

P. M.

(1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238–246. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238

Block

(2006). Rape and sexual power in early America. University of North Carolina Press.

Bond

S. B.

Mosher

D. L.

(1986). Guided imagery of rape: Fantasy, reality, and the willing victim myth. The Journal of Sex Research, 22(2), 162–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224498609551298

Browne

M. W.

(1990). MUTMUM PC: User’s guide. Columbus: Ohio State University, Department of Psychology.

Brownmiller

(1975). Against our will: Men, women and rape. Simon & Schuster.

Burt

M. R.

(1980). Cultural myths and supports for rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38(2), 217–230. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.38

Cantor

Fisher

Chibnall

Townsend

Bruce

Thomas

Lee

(2015, September 21). Report on the AAU (Association of American Universities) campus climate survey on sexual assault and sexual misconduct. Westat.

10.

Carabellese

Tamma

La Tegola

Candelli

Catanesi

(2014). Women victims of violent partners: The Italian situation amid culture and psychopathology. Journal of Forensic Science, 59(2), 533–539. https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.12347

11.

Catts

H. W.

Petscher

Schatschneider

Sittner Bridges

Mendoza

(2009). Floor effects associated with universal screening and their impact on early identification of reading disabilities. Journal of Learning Disability, 42(2), 163–176. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219408326219

12.

Chapleau

K. M.

Oswald

D. L.

(2010). Power, sex, and rape myth acceptance: Testing two models of rape proclivity. Journal of Sex Research, 47, 66–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490902954323

13.

Chapleau

K. M.

Oswald

D. L.

(2013). Status, threat, and stereotypes: Understanding the function of rape myth acceptance. Social Justice Research, 26(1), 18–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-013-0177-z

14.

Chapleau

K. M.

Oswald

D. L.

(2014). A system justification view of sexual violence: Legitimizing gender inequality and reduced moral outrage are connected to greater rape myth acceptance. Journal of Trauma & Dissociation, 15(2), 204–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/15299732.2014.867573

15.

Cohen

(1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum.

16.

Correia

Alves

Morais

Ramos

(2015). The legitimation of wife abuse among women: The impact of belief in a just world and gender identification. Personality and Individual Differences, 76, 7–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.11.041

17.

Craig

Mullan

(2011). How mothers and fathers share childcare: A cross-national time-use comparison. American Sociological Review, 76(6), 834–861. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122411427673

18.

Cravens

J. D.

Whiting

J. B.

Aamar

(2015). Why I stayed/left: An analysis of voices of intimate partner violence on social media. Contemporary Family Therapy, 37(4), 372–385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10591-015-9360-8

19.

Di Grande

Perrier

M. P.

Lauro

M. G.

Contu

. (2000). Alcohol use and correlates of binge drinking among university students on the Island of Sardinia, Italy. Substance Use & Misuse, 35(10), 1471–1483.

20.

Edwards

K. M.

Turchik

J. A.

Dardis

C. M.

Reynolds

Gidycz

C. A.

(2011). Rape myths: History, individual and institutional-level presence, and implications for change. Sex Roles, 65, 761–773. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-9943-2

21.

Eurobarometer. (2015). Gender equality (Report. Special Eurobarometer 428 / Wave EB82.4—TNS Opinion & Social) http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/index_en.htm

22.

Eyssel

F. A.

Bohner

(2011). Schema effects of rape myth acceptance on judgments of guilt and blame in rape cases: The role of perceived entitlement to judge. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 26(8), 1579–1605. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260510370593

23.

Filippini

(2005). Relazioni perverse. La violenza psicologica nella coppia [Perverse relationships. Psychological violence in the couple]. Franco Angeli.

24.

FRA–European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights. (2014). Violence against women: An EU-wide survey [Main results]. European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights. http://fra.europa.eu/en/publication/2014/violence-against-women-eu-wide-survey-main-results-report.

25.

Gerger

Kley

Bohner

Siebler

(2007). The Acceptance of Modern Myths About Sexual Aggression (AMMSA) Scale: Development and validation in German and English. Aggressive Behavior, 33, 422–440. https://doi.org/10.13072/midss.440

26.

Global Gender Gap Report. (2018). World Economic Forum. http://reports.weforum.org/global-gender-gap-report-2018/

27.

Grubb

Turner

(2012). Attribution of blame in rape cases: A review of the impact of rape myth acceptance, gender role conformity and substance use on victim blaming. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 17(5), 443–452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2012.06.002

28.

Helmus

Hanson

R. K.

Babchishin

K. M.

Mann

R. E.

(2013). Attitudes supportive of sexual offending predict recidivism: A meta-analysis. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 14, 3453. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838012462244

29.

Hinck

S. S.

Thomas

R. W.

(1999). Rape myth acceptance in college students: How far have we come? Sex Roles, 40, 815–832. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260510370593

30.

Hingson

R. W.

Zha

Weitzman

E. R.

(2009). Magnitude of and trends in alcohol-related mortality and morbidity among U.S. college students ages 18-24, 1998-2005. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 16, 12–20. https://doi.org/10.15288/jsads.2009.s16.12

31.

Neville

(2004). Korean Rape Myth Acceptance Scale: Development and validation of the Korean Rape Myth Acceptance Scale. The Counseling Psychologist, 32(2), 301–331.

32.

Bentler

P. M.

(1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118

33.

Il Sole 24Ore. (2019). La violenza, le denunce e gli stupri. Il femminicidio in Italia [Violence, denunciations and rapes. Femicide in Italy]. https://www.infodata.ilsole24ore.com

34.

ISTAT–Italian National Institute of Statistics. (2015). La violenza contro le donne [Violence against women]. https://www.istat.it/it/archivio/161716

35.

Jones

M. E.

Russell

R. L.

Bryant

F. B.

(1998). The structure of rape attitudes for men and women: A three-factor model. Journal of Research in Personality, 32, 331–350. https://doi.org/10.1006/jrpe.1998.2217

36.

Jost

J. T.

Banaji

M. R.

(1994). The role of stereotyping in system-justification and the production of false consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 11–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.1994.tb01008.x

37.

Jost

J. T.

Kay

A. C.

(2005). Exposure to benevolent sexism and complementary gender stereotypes: Consequences for specific and diffuse forms of system justification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(3), 498–509. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.88.3.498

38.

Kamdar

Z. N.

Kosambiya

J. K.

Chawada

B. L.

Verma

Kadia

(2017). Rape: Is it a lifestyle or behavioral problem? Indian Journal of Psychiatry, 59, 77–82. https://doi.org/10.4103/psychiatry

39.

Laghi

Baiocco

Lonigro

Capacchione

Baumgartner

(2012). Family functioning and binge drinking among Italian adolescents. Journal of Health Psychology, 17(8), 1132–1141. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105311430005

40.

Leanna

J. P.

Mindy

J. E.

(2017). Objectification and system justification impact rape avoidance behaviors. Sex Roles, 76, 110–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-016-0660-8

41.

Lee

(1999). Kangkant ongny om chuk’do- i keep’all-kwa tadangdo ky omj ung [Development and validity of Rape Myth Acceptance Scale]. Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, 2, 131–148. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260509340536

42.

Lerner

(1971). Observer’s evaluation of a victim: Justice, guilt, and veridical perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 20(2), 127–135. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0031702

43.

Lewin

(1946). Action research and minority problems. Journal of Social Issues, 2, 34–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1946.tb02295.x

44.

Lonsway

K. A.

Fitzgerald

L. F.

(1995). Attitudinal antecedents of rape myth acceptance: A theoretical and empirical reexamination. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(4), 704–711. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.68.4.704

45.

Mann

R. E.

Webster

Wakeling

Marshall

(2007). The measurement and influence of child sexual abuse supportive beliefs. Psychology, Crime, & Law, 13, 443–458. https://doi.org/10.1080/10683160601061141

46.

McMahon

Farmer

L. G.

(2011). An updated measure for assessing subtle rape myths. Social Work Research, 35(2), 71–81.

47.

Mouilso

E. R.

Calhoun

K. S.

(2013). The role of rape myth acceptance and psychopathy in sexual assault perpetration. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 22(2), 159–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926771.2013.743937

48.

Navarro

J. C.

Tewksbury

(2017). National comparisons of rape myth acceptance predictors between nonathletes and athletes from multi-institutional settings. Sex Abuse, 1. https://doi.org/1079063217732790

49.

Nunes

K. L.

Pettersen

Hermann

C. A.

Looman

J. M.

Spape

(2016). Does change on the MOLEST and RAPE Scales predict sexual recidivism? Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 28(5), 427–447. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063214540725

50.

Olver

M. E.

Nicholaichuk

T. P.

Kingston

D. A.

Wong

S. C.

(2014). A multisite examination of sexual violence risk and therapeutic change. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 82(2), 312–324. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035340

51.

Payne

D. A.

Lonsway

K. A.

Fitzgerald

L. F.

(1999). Rape myth acceptance: Exploration of its structure and its measurement using the Illinois Rape Myth Acceptance Scale. Journal of Research in Personality, 33(1), 27–68.

52.

Reddy

L. N.

(2018). An experimental study on the impact of informal rape myth education to alter rape myth acceptance scores in a non-student sample (Dissertations and theses. Paper. 4460). https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=5531&context=open_access_etds

53.

Rollero

Tartaglia

(2019). The effect of sexism and rape myths on victim blame. Sexuality & Culture, 23, 209–219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-018-9549-8

54.

Schwendinger

J. R.

Schwendinger

(1974). Rape myths: In legal, theoretical, and everyday practice. Crime and Social Justice, 1, 18–26.

55.

Selvatico

(2018). Colpa, vergogna e pudore nell’identità della vittima di violenza sessuale [Guilt, shame, and modesty in the identity of the sexual assault victim]. Politics. Rivista di Studi Politici, 9(1), 65–84.

56.

Stahl

Eek

Kazemi

(2010). Rape victim blaming as system justification: The role of gender and activation of complementary stereotypes. Social Justice Research, 23, 239–258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-010-0117-0

57.

Steiger

J. H.

(1980). Tests for comparing elements of a correlation matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 87(2), 245–251. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.87.2.245

58.

Stenning

Mitra-Kahn

Gunby

(2013). Sexual violence against female university students in the U.K.: A case study. Rivista di Criminologia, Vittimologia e Sicurezza, 7(2), 110–119.

59.

Stephens

Kamimura

Yamawaki

Bhattacharya

Birkholz

Makomenaw

Olson

L. M.

(2016). Rape myth acceptance among college students in the United States, Japan, and India. SAGE Open. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244016675015

60.

Tartaglia

Fedi

Miglietta

(2017). Family or friends: What counts more for drinking behaviour of young adults? / Familia o amigos: ¿qué pesa más en los hábitos de consumo de alcohol de los jóvenes? Revista de Psicología Social, 32(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/02134748.2016.1248029

61.

Tourangeau

Rips

L. J.

Rasinski

K. A.

(2000). The psychology of survey response. Cambridge University Press.

62.

Tucker

L. R.

Lewis

(1973). A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 38, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02291170

63.

Warren

Swan

Allen

C. T.

(2015). Comprehension of sexual consent as a key factor in the perpetration of sexual aggression among college men. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 24(8), 897–913. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926771.2015.1070232

64.

Whitaker

D. J.

Hanson

K. R.

Baker

C. K.

McMahon

P. M.

Ryan

Klein

Rice

D. D.

(2008). Risk factors for the perpetration of child sexual abuse: A review and meta-analysis. Child Abuse & Neglect, 32(5), 529–548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2007.08.005

65.

World Health Organization. (2009). Changing cultural and social norms that support violence. http://www.who.int/violenceprevention/publications/en/index.html

66.

World Health Organization. (2018). Violence against women. https://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/topics/violence/en/

67.

Xue

Fang

Huang

Cui

Rhodes

K. V.

Gelles

(2016). Rape myths and the cross-cultural adaptation of the Illinois Rape Myth Acceptance Scale in China. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 5. https://doi.org/0886260516651315