Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2026-3
A Psychometric Evaluation of the Illinois Rape Myth Acceptance Scale – Subtle Version (IRMA-S-2022) and the Newly Developed Rape Myth Questionnaire – Short Form (RMQ-S) in Serbian Culture
Rape myths are false beliefs about rape that blame the victim and excuse the person who committed rape. This study aimed to assess the psychometric properties of two rape myth acceptance scales in Serbian culture: the Serbian adaptation of the Illinois Rape Myth Acceptance Scale – Subtle Version (IRMA-S-2022) and the newly developed Rape Myth Questionnaire – Short Form (RMQ-S) in Serbian. The sample comprised 601 adults (50.9% men) from the general population of Serbia. The results revealed the five-factor in addition to the bifactor five-factor model as the best solution for the IRMA-S-2022, whereas the RMQ-S showed a one-factor structure. Scores on both instruments were gender invariant, with men obtaining higher scores. Furthermore, the scores showed good reliability based on internal consistency. The high correlation between the two instruments confirmed their convergent validity, as well as positive correlations with hostile sexism and victim culpability. Overall, the results support the reliability and construct validity of both instruments, and indicate that the RMQ-S is a useful nine-item tool, whereas the IRMA-S-2022 offers deeper insights into the acceptance of various subcategories of rape myths.
AbramsD.VikiG. T.MasserB.BohnerG. (2003). Perceptions of stranger and acquaintance rape: The role of benevolent and hostile sexism in victim blame and rape proclivity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(1), 111–125. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.1.111
BareketO.FiskeS. T. (2023). A systematic review of the ambivalent sexism literature: Hostile sexism protects men's power; benevolent sexism guards traditional gender roles. Psychological Bulletin, 149(11–12), 637–698. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000400
4.
BendixenM.KennairL. E. O. (2017). When less is more: Psychometric properties of Norwegian short-forms of the ambivalent sexism scales (ASI and AMI) and the Illinois rape myth acceptance (IRMA) scale. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 58(6), 541–550. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjop.12392
5.
BertschS.MatthewsK. (2023). Lies and imagined intent to lie: Personality, sexism beliefs and false claims of assault. Current Psychology, 42(12), 9810–9818. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-02278-2
6.
BohnerG.ReinhardM. A.RutzS.SturmS.KerschbaumB.EfflerD. (1998). Rape myths as neutralizing cognitions: Evidence for a causal impact of anti-victim attitudes on men’s self-reported likelihood of raping. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28(2), 257–268. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199803/04)28:2<257::AID-EJSP871>3.0.CO;2-1
CantoJ. M.San Martín GarcíaJ.NovasF. P. (2021). Exploring the role of aggressor's social class in rape and its relation to right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(11–12), 5635–5658. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260518805095
9.
ChapleauK. M.OswaldD. L. (2013). Status, threat, and stereotypes: Understanding the function of rape myth acceptance. Social Justice Research, 26(1), 18–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-013-0177-z
10.
ChenF. F. (2008). What happens if we compare chopsticks with forks? The impact of making inappropriate comparisons in cross-cultural research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(5), 1005–1018. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013193
11.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Routledge Academic.
12.
CostaR.FáveroM.MoreiraD.Del CampoA.Sousa-GomesV. (2024). Is the link between the Dark Tetrad and the acceptance of sexual violence mediated by sexual machismo?Aggressive Behavior, 50(1), Article e22116. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.22116
13.
DawtryR. J.CozzolinoP. J.CallanM. J. (2019). I blame therefore it was: Rape myth acceptance, victim blaming, and memory reconstruction. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 45(8), 1269–1282. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167218818475
DiStefanoC.MotlR. W. (2006). Further investigating method effects associated with negatively worded items on self-report surveys. Structural Equation Modeling, 13(3), 440–464. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1303_6
16.
European Institute for Gender EqualityBarbieriD.García CazorlaA.ThilL.MollardB.OchmannJ.PeciukonisV.ReingardėJ.SalanauskaitėL. (2021). Gender equality index 2021: Health. Publications Office of the European Union. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2839/834132
17.
DjikanovicB.JansenH.A.OtasevicS. (2010). Factors associated with intimate partner violence against women in Serbia: A cross-sectional study.Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 64(8), 728–735. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-02278-210.1136/jech.2009.090415
18.
FakunmojuS. B.Abrefa-GyanT.MaphosaN. (2019). Confirmatory factor analysis and gender invariance of the Revised IRMA Scale in Nigeria. Journal of Women and Social Work, 34(1), 83–98. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886109918803645
19.
FerrãoM. C.GonçalvesG. (2015). Rape crimes reviewed: The role of observer variables in female victim blaming. Psychological Thought, 8(1), 47–67. https://doi.org/10.5964/psyct.v8i1.131
20.
FrazierA.GonzalesJ. E. (2022). Dispelling a myth: Reevaluating the predictive validity of rape myth acceptance for likelihood of engaging in sexual violence. Sexual Abuse, 34(4), 398–424. https://doi.org/10.1177/10790632211026287
21.
García-MorenoC.JansenH. A.EllsbergM.HeiseL.WattsC. (2005). WHO multy-country study on women’s health and domestic violence against women: Initial results on prevalence, health outcomes and women’s responses. World Health Organization. https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/43309
22.
GencA.SamacN.KneževićL.PetrovićK.KoncI. (2018). Upitnik za ispitivanje mitova o silovanju – pilot studija [Rape Myth Questionnaire – a Pilot Study]. Psihološka Istraživanja, 21(2), 155–182. https://doi.org/10.5937/psistra21-18966
23.
GergerH.KleyH.BohnerG.SieblerF. (2007). The acceptance of modern myths about sexual aggression scale: Development and validation in German and English. Aggressive Behavior, 33(5), 422–440. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.20195
24.
GlickP.FiskeS. T. (1996). The ambivalent sexism inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(3), 491–512. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.491
25.
GutierrezB. C.LeaperC. (2024). Linking ambivalent sexism to violence-against-women attitudes and behaviors: A three-level meta-analytic review. Sexuality & Culture: An Interdisciplinary Quarterly, 28(2), 851–882. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-023-10127-6
26.
HuL. T.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
27.
KazmiS. M. A.FarooqZ.TariqS. (2023). Adaptation of the updated Illinois rape myth acceptance scale in Urdu. Sexuality & Culture, 28(4), 1496–1511. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-023-10189-6
28.
KhokhlovaO.BohnerG. (2020). A Russian version of the acceptance of modern myths about sexual aggression scale: Validation with a female online sample. Psychology in Russia: State of the Art, 13(2), 121–139. https://doi.org/10.11621/pir.2020.0209
29.
LomazziV. (2023). The cultural roots of violence against women: Individual and institutional gender norms in 12 countries. Social Sciences, 12(3), 117. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci12030117
LyonsM.BrewerG.ChopenN.DavilaN.ElíasD.GómezL. D. R.VelásquezJ.GarcíaG. G. (2023). Barriers to bystander action in sexual violence in Guatemala: The role of rape myth acceptance. Sexuality & Culture, 28(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-023-10106-x
32.
ŁyślA. E.Bargiel-MatusiewiczK.KrasuskiT.StudzińskaA. (2023). Psychometric properties of the polish updated Illinois rape myth acceptance scale. Current Psychology, 42(1), 445–459. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-01249-3
MartensJ. P.AyazS.AyazS.DearnG. (2023). Meaning and blame: Meaning threats increase victim blaming, but profession and art can diminish it. International Journal of Psychology, 58(5), 415–423. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12916
35.
MartiniM.TartagliaS.De PiccoliN. (2022). Assessing rape myth acceptance: A contribution to Italian validation of the measure for assessing subtle rape myth (SRMA-IT). Sexual Abuse, 34(4), 375–397. https://doi.org/10.1177/10790632211028158
McMahonS.FarmerG. L. (2011). An updated measure for assessing subtle rape myths. Social Work Research, 35(2), 71–81. https://doi.org/10.1093/swr/35.2.71
38.
MihićV. (2010). Intensity and correlates of gender prejudices in the residents of Vojvodina. Primenjena Psihologija, 3(4), 307–321. https://doi.org/10.19090/pp.2010.4.307-321
39.
MilesiP.SüssenbachP.BohnerG.MegíasJ. L. (2020). The interplay of modern myths about sexual aggression and moral foundations in the blaming of rape victims. European Journal of Social Psychology, 50(1), 111–123. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2622
MorryM. M.WinklerE. (2001). Student acceptance and expectation of sexual assault. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue canadienne des sciences du comportement, 33(3), 188–192. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0087140
42.
MurrayC.CalderónC.BahamondesJ. (2023). Modern rape myths: Justifying victim and perpetrator blame in sexual violence. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(3), 1663. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20031663
43.
NavasM. P.ManeiroL.CutrínO.Gómez-FraguelaJ. A.SobralJ. (2022). Sexism, moral disengagement, and Dark Triad traits on perpetrators of sexual violence against women and community men. Sexual Abuse, 34(7), 857–884. https://doi.org/10.1177/10790632211051689
44.
NyúlB.KendeA. (2023). Rape myth acceptance as a relevant psychological construct in a gender-unequal context: The Hungarian adaptation of the updated Illinois Rape Myths Acceptance Scale. Current Psychology, 42(1), 3098–3111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-01631-9
45.
Obradovic-TomasevicB.Santric-MilicevicM.VasicV.VukovicD.Sipetic-GrujicicS.Bjegovic-MikanovicV.Terzic-SupicZ.TomasevicR.TodorovicJ.BabicU. (2019). Prevalence and predictors of violence victimization and violent behavior among youths: A population-based study in Serbia. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(17), 3203. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16173203
46.
PakovicL.TodorovicJ.Santric-MilicevicM.BukumiricD.Terzic-SupicZ. (2019). The association between social characteristics, alcoholic beverage preferences, and binge drinking in a Serbian adult population. Nordic Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 36(1), 36–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/1455072518803281
47.
PayneD. L.LonswayK. A.FitzgeraldL. F. (1999). Rape myth acceptance: Exploration of its structure and its measurement using the Illinois rape myth acceptance scale. Journal of Research in Personality, 33(1), 27–68. https://doi.org/10.1006/jrpe.1998.2238
48.
PerssonS.DhingraK. (2021). Blame, control, or responsibility? Validation of sexual assault culpability measures. Preprint. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/c8hjw
49.
PerssonS.DhingraK. (2022a). Attributions of blame in stranger and acquaintance rape: A multilevel meta-analysis and systematic review. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 23(3), 795–809. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838020977146
50.
PerssonS.DhingraK. (2022b). Moderating factors in culpability ratings and rape proclivity in stranger and acquaintance rape: Validation of rape vignettes in a community sample. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37(13–14), 11358–11385. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260521991294
51.
PettyJohnM. E.CaryK. M.McCauleyH. L. (2023). Rape myth acceptance in a community sample of adult women in the post #MeToo era. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 38(13–14), 8211–8234. https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605231153893
52.
PirjuI.S.PanaitescuM.C.SorcaruS.L.MarinescuL.M.PopaD. A.T. (2024). Gender Disparity Index in European former communist states: Assessing the influence of EU membership. Administrative Sciences, 14(4), 73. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci14040073
53.
RangelovB. (2016). Analiza uticaja medijskog izveštavanja na percepciju u javnosti teme Nasilje nad ženama u Srbiji – studija slučaja [Analysis of contribution of media reporting on public perception of the topic violence against women in Serbia – Case study]. Art and Media časopis za studije umetnosti i medije, 11, 101–113. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063221102628710.25038/am.v0i11.151
54.
RolleroC.TartagliaS. (2019). The effect of sexism and rape myths on victim blame. Sexuality & Culture: An Interdisciplinary Quarterly, 23(1), 209–219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-018-9549-8
55.
RolstadS.AdlerJ.RydénA. (2011). Response burden and questionnaire length: Is shorter better? A review and meta-analysis. Value in Health, 14(8), 1101–1108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2011.06.003
56.
Saravia LalindeI. A.LongpréN.de RoosM. (2023). Everyday sadism as a predictor of rape myth acceptance and perception of harassment. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 67(13–14), 1323–1342. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X231165430
57.
SkovM.van MastrigtS.JensenA. V. (2022). Comparing rape myth acceptance among police trainees and medical students: A preliminary Danish validation of the updated Illinois rape myth acceptance scale. Violence Against Women, 28(11), 2649–2676. https://doi.org/10.1177/10778012211038967
SüssenbachP.BohnerG. (2011). Acceptance of sexual aggression myths in a representative sample of German residents. Aggressive Behavior, 37(4), 374–385. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.20390
61.
ThelanA. R.MeadowsE. A. (2022). The Illinois Rape Myth Acceptance Scale-Subtle Version: Using an adapted measure to understand the declining rates of rape myth acceptance. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37(19–20), 17807–17833. https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605211030013
62.
UjiM.ShonoM.ShikaiN.KitamuraT. (2007). Rape Myth Scale: Factor structure and relationship with gender egalitarianism among Japanese professionals. Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 61(4), 392–400. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440–1819.2007.01674.x
63.
WilsonL. C.ScarpaA. (2017). A pilot study of the impact of sexist attitudes on male survivors of rape. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 18(4), 409–413. https://doi.org/10.1037/men0000059
64.
XueJ.FangG.HuangH.CuiN.RhodesK. V.GellesR. (2019). Rape myths and the cross-cultural adaptation of the Illinois rape myth acceptance scale in China. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 34(7), 1428–1460. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260516651315
65.
YappE. J.QuayleE. (2018). A systematic review of the association between rape myth acceptance and male-on-female sexual violence. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 41(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2018.05.002
66.
ZidenbergA. M.WielingaF.SparksB.MargeotesK.HarkinsL. (2021). Lost in translation: A quantitative and qualitative comparison of rape myth acceptance. Psychology, Crime & Law, 28(2), 179–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2021.1905810
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
