Sexual violence prevention on college campuses has received significant recent attention. A prevalent intervention paradigm has centered around re-educating young people around consent and reduce endorsement of “rape myths,” based on the correlation between rape myths and sexual violence incidents. Yet many of these programs have not measurably reduced sexual assaults. We evaluated the predictive value of a rape myth measure, as compared with other predictors (criminal history, childhood victimization, aggressive tendencies, substance use, and empathy), in predicting self-reported acts of forcible and incapacitated sexual assault in college-age men (N = 304) from 45 U.S. states. Across three logistic regression model pairs, rape myths were weakly associated with violence when considered as sole predictors. However, this predictive power dissipated when other predictors were included. Comprehensive models accounted significantly better for variability in outcomes; with criminal history demonstrating consistent predictive effects. Based on these findings, we recommend further research into prevention programming based on other predictors of violence.
AbbeyA.Jacques-TiuraA. J.LeBretonJ. M. (2011). Risk factors for sexual aggression in young men: An expansion of the confluence model. Aggressive Behavior, 37(5), 450–464. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.20399
2.
AbbeyA.WegnerR.PierceJ.Jacques-TiuraA. J. (2012). Patterns of sexual aggression in a community sample of young men: Risk factors associated with persistence, desistance, and initiation over a 1-year interval. Psychology of Violence, 2(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026346
AjzenI. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211.
5.
AjzenI.FishbeinM. (1969). The prediction of behavioral intentions in a choice situation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 5(4), 400–416. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(69)90033-X
AndersonL. A.WhistonS. C. (2005). Sexual assault education programs: A meta-analytic examination of their effectiveness. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 29(4), 374–388. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2005.00237.x
8.
AndersonR. E.WandreyR. L.KlossnerS. C.CahillS. P.DelahantyD. L. (2017). Sexual minority status and interpersonal victimization in college men. Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity, 4(1), 130–136. https://doi.org/10.1037/sgd0000204
9.
ArielyD.LoewensteinG. (2006). The heat of the moment: The effect of sexual arousal on sexual decision making. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 19(2), 87–98. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.501
10.
Baldwin-WhiteA.MosesK. (2019). A multisession evaluation of sexual assault prevention education: The unique effects of program participation. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(13–14), NP7692–NP7716. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260519829767
11.
BarnettM. D.SligarK. B.WangC. D. (2018). Religious affiliation, religiosity, gender, and rape myth acceptance: Feminist theory and rape culture. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 33(8), 1219–1235. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260516665110
12.
BarrattE. S.FelthousA. R. (2003). Impulsive versus premeditated aggression: Implications for mens rea decisions. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 21(5), 619–630. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.555
13.
BeretvasS. N.MeyersJ. L.LeiteW. L. (2002). A reliability generalization study of the Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 62(4), 570–589. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164402062004003
14.
BohnerG.PinaA.Tendayi VikiG.SieblerF. (2010). Using social norms to reduce men’s rape proclivity: Perceived rape myth acceptance of out-groups may be more influential than that of in-groups. Psychology, Crime & Law, 16(8), 671–693. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2010.492349
15.
BonanomiA.Nai RusconeM.OsmettiS. A. (2012). Reliability measurement for polytomous ordinal items: The empirical polychoric ordinal Alpha. Quaderni di Statistica, 14, 53–56.
16.
BorgesA. M.BanyardV. L.MoynihanM. M. (2008). Clarifying consent: Primary prevention of sexual assault on a college campus. Journal of Prevention & Intervention in the Community, 36(1–2), 75–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/10852350802022324
17.
BossonJ. K.ParrottD. J.SwanS. C.KuchynkaS. L.SchrammA. T. (2015). A dangerous boomerang: Injunctive norms, hostile sexist attitudes, and male-to-female sexual aggression. Aggressive Behavior, 41(6), 580–593. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21597
18.
BouffardJ. (2011). “In the heat of the moment”: Mediating versus moderating relationships between sexual arousal and perceived sanctions. Journal of Crime and Justice, 34(1), 24–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/0735648X.2011.554745
19.
BuddK. M.RocqueM.BierieD. M. (2019). Deconstructing incidents of campus sexual assault: Comparing male and female victimizations. Sexual Abuse, 31(3), 296–317. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063217706708
20.
BumbyK. M. (1996). Assessing the cognitive distortions of child molesters and rapists: Development and validation of the MOLEST and RAPE Scales. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 8(1), 37–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/107906329600800105
21.
Burgess-ProctorA.PickettS. M.ParkhillM. R.HamillT. S.KirwanM.KozakA. T. (2016). College women’s perceptions of and inclination to use campus sexual assault resources: Comparing the views of students with and without sexual victimization histories. Criminal Justice Review, 41(2), 204–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734016816634786
CarrN. K. (2020). How Can We End# CancelCulture—Tort liability or Thumper’s rule?Catholic University Journal of Law and Technology, 28(2), 133–146.
24.
CarrollJ. S.Padilla-WalkerL. M.NelsonL. J.OlsonC. D.McNamara BarryC.MadsenS. D. (2008). Generation XXX: Pornography acceptance and use among emerging adults. Journal of Adolescent Research, 231(1), 6–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/0743558407306348
25.
ChenH.CohenP.ChenS. (2010). How big is a big odds ratio? Interpreting the magnitudes of odds ratios in epidemiological studies. Communications in Statistics—Simulation and Computation, 39(4), 860–864. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610911003650383
26.
ConstantinidisC.LunaB. (2019). Neural substrates of inhibitory control maturation in adolescence. Trends in Neurosciences, 42(9), 604–616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2019.07.004
27.
CortinaJ. M. (1993). What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(1), 98–104. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.78.1.98
28.
CossinsA.PlummerM. (2018). Masculinity and sexual abuse: Explaining the transition from victim to offender. Men and Masculinities, 21(2), 163–188. https://doi.org/10.1177/1097184X16652655
29.
CrooksC. V.JaffeP.DunlopC.KerryA.Exner-CortensD. (2019). Preventing gender-based violence among adolescents and young adults: Lessons from 25 years of program development and evaluation. Violence Against Women, 25(1), 29–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801218815778
30.
CrowneD. P.MarloweD. (1960). A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 24(4), 349–354. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0047358
31.
D’AbreuL. C. F.KrahéB. (2014). Predicting sexual aggression in male college students in Brazil. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 15(2), 152–162. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032789
32.
da SilvaT.WoodhamsJ.HarkinsL. (2018). “An adventure that went wrong”: Reasons given by convicted perpetrators of multiple perpetrator sexual offending for their involvement in the offense. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 47(2), 443–456. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-017-1011-8
33.
DavisK. C. (2010). The influence of alcohol expectancies and intoxication on men’s aggressive unprotected sexual intentions. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 18(5), 418–428. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020510
DeVellisR. F. (2016). Scale development: Theory and applications (Vol. 26). SAGE.
36.
EdwardsK. M.TurchikJ. A.DardisC. M.ReynoldsN.GidyczC. A. (2011). Rape myths: History, individual and institutional-level presence, and implications for change. Sex Roles, 65(11–12), 761–773. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-9943-2
37.
FedinaL.HolmesJ. L.BackesB. L. (2018). Campus sexual assault: A systematic review of prevalence research from 2000 to 2015. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 19(1), 76–93.
38.
FelittiV. J.AndaR. F.NordenbergD.WilliamsonD. F.SpitzA. M.EdwardsV.MarksJ. S. (1998). Relationship of childhood abuse and household dysfunction to many of the leading causes of death in adults: The Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACE) Study. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 14(4), 245–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2019.04.001
39.
FergusonC. J. (2009). An effect size primer: A guide for clinicians and researchers. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 40(5), 532–538. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015808
40.
FloresS. A.HartlaubM. G. (1998). Reducing rape-myth acceptance in male college students: A meta-analysis of intervention studies. Journal of College Student Development, 39(5), 438–448.
41.
FordD. C.MerrickM. T.ParksS. E.BreidingM. J.GilbertL. K.EdwardsV. J.ThompsonW. W. (2014). Examination of the factorial structure of adverse childhood experiences and recommendations for three subscale scores. Psychology of Violence, 4(4), 432–444. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037723
42.
FoubertJ. D.BrosiM. W.BannonR. S. (2011). Pornography viewing among fraternity men: Effects on bystander intervention, rape myth acceptance and behavioral intent to commit sexual assault. Sexual Addiction & Compulsivity, 18(4), 212–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/10720162.2011.625552
43.
FoubertJ. D.NewberryJ. T. (2006). Effects of two versions of an empathy-based rape prevention program on fraternity men’s survivor empathy, attitudes, and behavioral intent to commit rape or sexual assault. Journal of College Student Development, 47(2), 133–148. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2006.0016
44.
FoubertJ. D.PerryB. C. (2007). Creating lasting attitude and behavior change in fraternity members and male student athletes: The qualitative impact of an empathy-based rape prevention program. Violence Against Women, 13(1), 70–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801206295125
45.
GeorgiouG.KimonisE. R.FantiK. A. (2019). What do others feel? Cognitive empathy deficits explain the association between callous-unemotional traits and conduct problems among preschool children. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 16(6), 633–653. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2018.1478810
46.
GergerH.KleyH.BohnberG.SieblerF. (2013). Acceptance of Modern Myths About Sexual Aggression (AMMSA) Scale. Measurement Instrument Database for the Social Science.
47.
GidyczC. A.WarkentinJ. B.OrchowskiL. M. (2007). Predictors of perpetration of verbal, physical, and sexual violence: A prospective analysis of college men. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 8(2), 79–94. https://doi.org/10.1037/1524-9220.8.2.79
48.
GrahamN.KimonisE. R.WassermanA. L.KlineS. M. (2012). Associations among childhood abuse and psychopathy facets in male sexual offenders. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 3(1), 66–75. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025605
49.
GrannM.WedinI. (2002). Risk factors for recidivism among spousal assault and spousal homicide offenders. Psychology, Crime and Law, 8(1), 5–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/10683160208401806
50.
GrubbA.TurnerE. (2012). Attribution of blame in rape cases: A review of the impact of rape myth acceptance, gender role conformity and substance use on victim blaming. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 17(5), 443–452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2012.06.002
51.
HarperC. A.HogueT. E.BartelsR. M. (2017). Attitudes towards sexual offenders: What do we know, and why are they important?Aggression and Violent Behavior, 34, 201–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2017.01.011
52.
HermanD. (1988). The rape culture. Culture, 1(10), 45–53.
53.
HildebrandM. M.NajdowskiC. J. (2014). The potential impact of rape culture on juror decision making: Implications for wrongful acquittals in sexual assault trials. Albany Law Review, 78(3), 1059–1086.
54.
HoltzmanM.MenningC. L. (2015). Primary prevention and risk reduction programming for college-level sexual assault prevention: Illustrating the benefits of a combined approach. eJournal of Public Affairs, 4, 12–38. https://doi.org/10.21768/ejopa.v4i2.74
55.
HongK. (2018). A new mens rea for rape: More convictions and less punishment. American Criminal Law Review, 55, 259–332.
56.
HudsonS. M.WalesD. S.BakkerL.WardT. (2002). Dynamic risk factors: The Kia Marama evaluation. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research & Treatment, 14(2), 103–119. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014616113997
57.
JohnsonS. B.BlumR. W.GieddJ. N. (2009). Adolescent maturity and the brain: The promise and pitfalls of neuroscience research in adolescent health policy. Journal of Adolescent Health, 45(3), 216–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2009.05.016
58.
JozkowskiK. N. (2015). “Yes means yes?” Sexual consent policy and college students. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 47(2), 16–23.
59.
KahlorL.EastinM. S. (2011). Television’s role in the culture of violence toward women: A study of television viewing and the cultivation of rape myth acceptance in the United States. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 55(2), 215–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2011.566085
60.
KettreyH. H.MarxR. A. (2019). The effects of bystander programs on the prevention of sexual assault across the college years: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 48(2), 212–227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-018-0927-1
61.
KinportsK. (2001). Rape and force: The forgotten mens rea. Buffalo Criminal Law Review, 4(2), 755–799.
62.
KorchmarosJ. D.PowellC.StevensS. (2013). Chasing sexual orientation: A comparison of commonly used single-indicator measures of sexual orientation. Journal of Homosexuality, 60(4), 596–614. https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2013.760324
63.
KossM. P.OrosC. J. (1982). Sexual Experiences Survey: A research instrument investigating sexual aggression and victimization. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 50(3), 455–457. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.50.3.455
64.
LockeB. D.MahalikJ. R. (2005). Examining masculinity norms, problem drinking, and athletic involvement as predictors of sexual aggression in college men. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52(3), 279–283. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.52.3.279
65.
LohC.GidyczC. A.LoboT. R.LuthraR. (2005). A prospective analysis of sexual assault perpetration: Risk factors related to perpetrator characteristics. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 20(10), 1325–1348. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260505278528
66.
LonswayK. A.FitzgeraldL. F. (1995). Attitudinal antecedents of rape myth acceptance: A theoretical and empirical reexamination. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(4), 704–711. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.68.4.704
67.
LoomanJ.AbracenJ. (2011). Substance abuse among high-risk sexual offenders: Do measures of lifetime history of substance abuse add to the prediction of recidivism over actuarial risk assessment instruments?Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 26(4), 683–700. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260510365871
68.
LussierP.ProulxJ.LeBlancM. (2005). Criminal propensity, deviant sexual interests and criminal activity of sexual aggressors against women: A comparison of explanatory models. Criminology, 43(1), 249–282. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0011-1348.2005.00008.x
69.
MalamuthN. M.HuppinM.LinzD. (2018). Sexual assault interventions may be doing more harm than good with high-risk males. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 41, 20–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2018.05.010
70.
MaldonadoR. C.DiLilloD.HoffmanL. (2015). Can college students use emotion regulation strategies to alter intimate partner aggression-risk behaviors? An examination using I³ theory. Psychology of Violence, 5(1), 46–55. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035454
71.
MarshallW. L.MarshallL. E. (2019). Empathy and sexual offending: Theory, research and practice. In O’DonohueW.ScheweP. A. (Eds.), Handbook of sexual assault and sexual assault prevention (pp. 229–239). Springer.
72.
McMahonS.FarmerG. L. (2011). An updated measure for assessing subtle rape myths. Social Work Research, 35(2), 71–81. https://doi.org/10.1093/swr/35.2.71
73.
MénardK. S.PincusA. L. (2012). Predicting overt and cyber stalking perpetration by male and female college students. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 27(11), 2183–2207. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260511432144
74.
MouilsoE. R.CalhounK. S. (2013). The role of rape myth acceptance and psychopathy in sexual assault perpetration. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 22(2), 159–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926771.2013.743937
NewinsA. R.WilsonL. C.WhiteS. W. (2018). Rape myth acceptance and rape acknowledgment: The mediating role of sexual refusal assertiveness. Psychiatry Research, 263, 15–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2018.02.029
77.
NewlandsR.O’DonohueW. (2016). A critical review of sexual violence prevention on college campuses. Acta Psychopathologica, 2(2), 14–27. https://doi.org/10.4172/2469-6676.100040
78.
O’ConnorJ.CusanoJ.McMahonS.DraperJ. (2018). Students’ articulation of subtle rape myths surrounding campus sexual assault. Journal of College Student Development, 59(4), 439–455.
79.
O’LearyP.EastonS. D.GouldN. (2017). The effect of child sexual abuse on men: Toward a male sensitive measure. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 32(3), 423–445. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260515586362
80.
OlverM. E.NicholaichukT. P.WongS. C. (2014). The predictive and convergent validity of a psychometric battery used to assess sexual offenders in a treatment programme: An 18-year follow-up. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 20(2), 216–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552600.2013.816791
81.
PalmerJ. E.McMahonS.FisselE. (2020). Correlates of incoming male college students’ proclivity to perpetrate sexual assault. Violence Against Women, 27, 507–528. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801220905663
82.
PaolacciG.ChandlerJ.IpeirotisP. G. (2010). Running experiments on Amazon Mechanical Turk. Judgment and Decision Making, 5(5), 411–419.
83.
PatrickC. J.KramerM. D.KruegerR. F.MarkonK. E. (2013). Optimizing efficiency of psychopathology assessment through quantitative modeling: Development of a brief form of the Externalizing Spectrum Inventory. Psychological Assessment, 25(4), 1332–1348. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034864
84.
PaulhusD. L. (1991). Measurement and control of response bias. In RobinsonJ. P.ShaverP. R.WrightsmanL. S. (Eds.), Measures of social psychological attitudes: Vol. 1. Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes (pp. 17–59). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-590241-0.50006-X
85.
PayneD. L.LonswayK. A.FitzgeraldL. F. (1999). Rape myth acceptance: Exploration of its structure and its measurement using the Illinois Rape Myth Acceptance Scale. Journal of Research in Personality, 33(1), 27–68. https://doi.org/10.1006/jrpe.1998.2238
86.
People of the State of California v. Brock A. Turner, No. H043709 (Cal. Ct. App. Aug. 8, 2018).
87.
PriceJ. T. (2004). Reconciling morality and moral responsibility in the law: A due process challenge to the inconsistent mental responsibility standards at play in criminal insanity defenses and sexually violent predator civil commitment hearings. Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly, 32(4), 987–1014.
RerickP. O.LivingstonT. N.DavisD. (2019). Does the horny man think women want him too? Effects of male sexual arousal on perceptions of female sexual willingness. The Journal of Social Psychology, 160, 520–533. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2019.1692330
90.
RussellT. D.KingA. R. (2016). Anxious, hostile, and sadistic: Maternal attachment and everyday sadism predict hostile masculine beliefs and male sexual violence. Personality and Individual Differences, 99, 340–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.05.029
91.
SalazarL. F.SwartoutK. M.SwahnM. H.BellisA. L.CarneyJ.VagiK. J.LokeyC. (2018). Precollege sexual violence perpetration and associated risk and protective factors among male college freshmen in Georgia. Journal of Adolescent Health, 62(3), S51–S57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2017.09.028
92.
SayreF. B. (1932). Mens rea. Harvard Law Review, 45(6), 974–1026.
93.
SchulzeC.Koon-MagninS. (2017). Gender, sexual orientation, and rape myth acceptance: Preliminary findings from a sample of primarily LGBQ-identified survey respondents. Violence and Victims, 32(1), 159–180. https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.vv-d-15-00017
94.
SchwendingerJ. R.SchwendingerH. (1974). Rape myths: In legal, theoretical, and everyday practice. Crime and Social Justice, 1, 18–26.
95.
SennC. Y.EliasziwM.BarataP. C.ThurstonW. E.Newby-ClarkI. R.RadtkeH. L.HobdenK. L. (2015). Efficacy of a sexual assault resistance program for university women. New England Journal of Medicine, 372(24), 2326–2335. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmc1509345
96.
SheehanK. B. (2018). Crowdsourcing research: Data collection with Amazon’s Mechanical Turk. Communication Monographs, 85(1), 140–156.
97.
SheeranP.WebbT. L. (2016). The intention–behavior gap. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 10(9), 503–518. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12265
98.
ShoreyR. C.BrasfieldH.FebresJ.StuartG. L. (2011). An examination of the association between difficulties with emotion regulation and dating violence perpetration. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 20(8), 870–885. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926771.2011.629342
99.
StalansL. J.HackerR.TalbotM. E. (2010). Comparing nonviolent, other-violent, and domestic batterer sex offenders: Predictive accuracy of risk assessments on sexual recidivism. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 37(5), 613–628. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854810363794
100.
SteinmetzS. E.GrayM. J.RaymondE. M. (2019). Reducing rape-related attitudes utilizing a cognitive dissonance paradigm. Violence Against Women, 25(14), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801218824999
101.
StephensK. A.GeorgeW. H. (2009). Rape prevention with college men: Evaluating risk status. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 24(6), 996–1013. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260508319366
102.
TaylorR. (1990). Interpretation of the correlation coefficient: A basic review. Journal of Diagnostic Medical Sonography, 6(1), 35–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/875647939000600106
103.
Teding van BerkhoutE.MalouffJ. M. (2016). The efficacy of empathy training: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 63(1), 32–41. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000093
104.
ThornberryT. P.FarnworthM. (1982). Social correlates of criminal involvement: Further evidence on the relationship between social status and criminal behavior. American Sociological Review, 47(4), 505–518. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095195
105.
TuliaoA. P.McChargueD. (2014). Problematic alcohol use and sexual assault among male college students: The moderating and mediating roles of alcohol outcome expectancies. The American Journal on Addictions, 23(4), 321–328. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1521-0391.2014.12119.x
106.
TuranovicJ. J. (2019). Heterogeneous effects of adolescent violent victimization on problematic outcomes in early adulthood. Criminology, 57(1), 105–135. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12198
Van de MortelT. F. (2008). Faking it: Social desirability response bias in self-report research. Australian Journal of Advanced Nursing, 25(4), 40–48.
109.
VenablesN. C.PatrickC. J. (2012). Validity of the Externalizing Spectrum Inventory in a criminal offender sample: Relations with disinhibitory psychopathology, personality, and psychopathic features. Psychological Assessment, 24(1), 88–100. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024703
110.
VriezeS. I. (2012). Model selection and psychological theory: A discussion of the differences between the Akaike information criterion (AIC) and the Bayesian information criterion (BIC). Psychological Methods, 17(2), 228–243. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027127
111.
WebbT. L.SheeranP. (2006). Does changing behavioral intentions engender behavior change? A meta-analysis of the experimental evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 132(2), 249–268. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.2.249
112.
WegnerR.AbbeyA.PierceJ.PegramS. E.WoernerJ. (2015). Sexual assault perpetrators’ justifications for their actions: Relationships to rape supportive attitudes, incident characteristics, and future perpetration. Violence Against Women, 21(8), 1018–1037. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801215589380
113.
WheelerJ. G.GeorgeW. H.DahlB. J. (2002). Sexually aggressive college males: Empathy as a moderator in the “Confluence Model” of sexual aggression. Personality and Individual Differences, 33(5), 759–775. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(01)00190-8
114.
WhiteJ. W.SmithP. H. (2004). Sexual assault perpetration and reperpetration: From adolescence to young adulthood. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 31(2), 182–202. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854803261342
115.
WillisG. M.GermannN. S. (2016). Effective or not? Measuring outcomes of sexual violence primary prevention programs. In JeglicE. L.CalkinsC. (Eds.), Sexual violence (pp. 181–225). Springer.
116.
WilsonL.MouilsoE.GentileB.CalhounK.ZeichnerA. (2015). How is sexual aggression related to nonsexual aggression? A meta-analytic review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 24, 199–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2015.04.010
117.
WithersM. (2019). Preventing sexual assault on college campuses in the United States. In WithersM.McCoolJ. (Eds.), Global health leadership (pp. 107–117). Springer.
118.
WoodsK.FroggeG. (2017). Preferences and experiences of traditional and nontraditional university students. The Journal of Continuing Higher Education, 65(2), 94–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/07377363.2017.1318567
119.
YangY.GreenS. B. (2011). Coefficient alpha: A reliability coefficient for the 21st century?Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 29(4), 377–392. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282911406668
120.
YappE. J.QuayleE. (2018). A systematic review of the association between rape myth acceptance and male-on-female sexual violence. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 41, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2018.05.002
121.
ZumboB. D.GadermannA. M.ZeisserC. (2007). Ordinal versions of coefficients alpha and theta for Likert rating scales. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods, 6(1), 4–29. https://doi.org/10.22237/jmasm/1177992180
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
