This study examined the relationship between denial, motivation, static risk (Risk Matrix 2000), and sexual recidivism. Denial was measured in three ways: A Denial Index (resulting from the combination of several measures of different aspects of denial), Absolute Denial, and Denial of Risk. Motivation for treatment was also examined. Logistic regression analyses in a sample of 180 sex offenders using a fixed 10-year follow-up found that risk moderated the relationships between the Denial Index, Absolute Denial, and sexual recidivism. In particular, among high-risk offenders, denial predicted decreased sexual recidivism. An opposite pattern was observed for the low-risk offenders who were in denial, although these differences were not significant. In terms of Denial of Risk, those who were denying they presented a future risk for offending (i.e., higher on Denial of Risk) were less likely to reoffend than those who reported seeing themselves as presenting a high risk. Motivation for treatment was positively correlated with recidivism, but the effect disappeared once static risk was controlled.
Allam, J. ( 2000). Community-based treatment for child sex offenders: An evaluation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Birmingham, U.K.
2.
Barbaree, H.E. ( 1991). Denial and minimization among sexual offenders: Assessment and treatment outcome. Forum on Correction Research, 3, 303-333.
3.
Baron, R.M., & Kenny, D.A. ( 1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
4.
Beckett, R., Beech, A., Fisher, D., & Fordham, A.S. ( 1994). Community-based treatment for sex offenders: An evaluation of seven treatment programmes. London: Home Office Publications Unit.
5.
Beech, A., & Fisher, D. ( 2002). The rehabilitation of child sex offenders. Australian Psychologist, 37, 206-215.
6.
Beech, A., Fisher, D., & Beckett, R. ( 1999). STEP 3: An evaluation of the Prison Sex Offender Treatment Programme (Home Office Occasional Report). London: Home Office Publications Unit. Retrieved December 12, 2009 , from www.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/pdfs/occ-step3.pdf
7.
Beech, A., Oliver, C., Fisher, D., & Beckett, R.C. ( 2005). STEP 4: The Sex Offender Treatment Programme in prison: Addressing the needs of rapists and sexual murderers. Retrieved December 12, 2009, from http://www.hmprisonservice.gov.uk/assets/documents/100013DBStep_4_SOTP_report_2005.pdf
8.
Cooper, S. ( 2005). Understanding, treating, and managing sex offenders who deny their offense. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 11, 85-94.
9.
Draycott, S. ( 2007). Hunting the snark: The concept of motivation. Issues in Forensic Psychology, 7, 26-33.
10.
Garland, R.J., & Dougher, M.J. ( 1991). Motivation intervention in the treatment of sex offenders . In W. Miller & S. Rollnick (Eds.), Motivational interviewing: Preparing people to change addictive behavior (pp. 303-313). New York: Guilford.
11.
Gosling, P., Denizeau, M., & Oberlé, D. (2006). Denial of responsibility: A new mode of dissonance reduction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 722-733.
12.
Hanson, R.K., & Bussière, M.T. (1998). Predicting relapse: A meta-analysis of sexual offender recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 348-362.
13.
Hanson, R.K., & Harris, A.J.R. (2000). Where should we intervene? Dynamic predictors of sexual offense recidivism. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 27, 6-35.
14.
Hanson, R.K., & Morton-Bourgon, K. (2005). The characteristics of persistent sexual offenders: A meta-analysis of recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73, 1154-1163.
15.
Hood, R., Shute, S., Feilzer, M., & Wilcox, A. ( 2002). Sex offenders emerging from long-term imprisonment. British Journal of Criminology, 42, 371-394.
16.
Kalichman, S.C., Henderson, M.C., Shealy, L.S., & Dwyer, M. ( 1992). Psychometric properties of the Multiphasic Sex Inventory in assessing sex offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior , 19, 384-396.
17.
Kear-Colwell, J., & Pollock, P. ( 1997). Motivation or confrontation: Which approach to the child sex offender? Criminal Justice and Behavior, 24, 20-33.
18.
Kennedy, H., & Grubin, D. ( 1992). Patterns of denial in sex offenders. Psychological Medicine, 22, 191-196.
19.
Langton, C.M., Barbaree, H.E., Harkins, L., Arenovich, T., McNamee, J., Peacock, E.J., et al. (2008). Denial and minimization among sex offenders: Post-treatment presentation and association with sexual recidivism. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 35, 69-98.
20.
Lord, A., & Willmot, P. ( 2004). The process of overcoming denial in sexual offenders . Journal of Sexual Aggression, 10, 51-61.
21.
Lund, C.A. ( 2000). Predictors of sexual recidivism: Did meta-analysis clarify the role and relevance of denial? Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 12, 275-287.
22.
Mann, R.E. ( 1999). The sex offender treatment programme HM Prison Service England & Wales. In S. Hofling, D. Drewes & I. Epple-Waigel (Eds.), Auftrag pravention: Offensive gegen sexuellen kindesmibbrauch (pp. 346-352). Munich, Germany: Atwerb-Verlag KG.
23.
Marshall, W.L. ( 1994). Treatment effects on denial and minimization in incarcerated sex offenders. Behavior Research and Therapy, 32, 559-564.
24.
Maruna, S., & Mann, R.E. ( 2006). A fundamental attribution error? Rethinking cognitive distortions. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 11, 155-177.
25.
Miller, W.R., & Rollnick, S. ( 2002). Motivational interviewing: Preparing people for change (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford.
26.
Nichols, H.R., & Molinder, I. ( 1984). The Multiphasic Sex Inventory Manual. Retrieved December 10, 2009, from http://www.nicholsandmolinder.com/
27.
Nunes, K.L., Hanson, R.K., Firestone, P., Moulden, H.M., Greenberg, D.M., & Bradford, J.M. (2007). Denial predicts recidivism for some sexual offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 19, 91-105.
28.
Prochaska, J.O., & DiClemente, C.C. (1982). Transtheoretical therapy: Toward a more integrative model of change. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, and Practice, 19, 276-288.
29.
Proctor, E. ( 1994). The Sex Offense Attitudes Questionnaire. London: Oxford Probation Service.
30.
Roberts, R.B., & Baim, C. ( 1999). A community-based programme for sex offenders who deny their offending behavior. Probation Journal, 46, 225-233.
31.
Salter, A.C. ( 1988). Treating child sex offenders and victims: A practical guide. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
32.
Schneider, S.L., & Wright, R.C. ( 2001). The FoSOD: A measurement tool for reconceptualising the role of denial in child molesters. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 16, 545-564.
33.
Schneider, S.L., & Wright, R.C. ( 2004). Understanding denial in sexual offender: A review of the cognitive and motivational processes to avoid responsibility. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 5, 3-20.
34.
Simkins, L., Ward, W., Bowman, S., & Rinck, C.M. ( 1989). The Multiphasic Sex Inventory as a predictor of treatment response in child sexual abusers. Annals of Sex Research, 2, 205-226.
35.
Tierney D.W., & McCabe, M.P. (2002). Motivation for behavior change among sex offenders: A review of the literature. Clinical Psychology Review, 22, 113-129.
36.
Thornton, D., Mann, R., Webster, S., Blud, L., Travers, R., Friendship, C., et al. (2003). Distinguishing between and combining risks for sexual and violent recidivism. Annals of the New York Academy of Science, 989, 223-235.
37.
Thornton, D., & Knight, R. ( 2007, November). Is denial always bad?Paper presented at the 26th annual conference of the Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers, San Diego, CA.
